Team:XMU-China/Project Background
From 2014.igem.org
Fengshao18 (Talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 471: | Line 471: | ||
| | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
- | <p style=" | + | <p> |
- | + | <span style="font-size: 16px;"><span style="font-family:Arial, sans-serif">Bacterial chemotaxis, which is universal in </span><em><span style="font-family:times new roman">E. coli</span></em><span style="font-family:Arial, sans-serif">, is defined as migration of bacteria in response to a chemical stimulus. The natural </span><em><span style="font-family:times new roman">E. coli</span> </em><span style="font-family:Arial, sans-serif">chemotaxis has limited receptor proteins which can respond to only six kinds of amino acid. Nevertheless, the reprogrammed chemotaxis named pseudotaxis makes the engineered </span><em><span style="font-family:times new roman">E. coli</span></em><span style="font-family:Arial, sans-serif"> able to respond to molecules, whose receptor proteins do not exist in classical </span><em><span style="font-family:times new roman">E. coli</span></em><span style="font-family:Arial, sans-serif">, such as IPTG and L-arabinose, etc. </span></span> | |
</p> | </p> | ||
<p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 1em;"> | <p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 1em;"> | ||
| | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
- | <p style=" | + | <p> |
- | + | <em><span style="font-size:16px;font-family:'Arial','sans-serif'">E. coli</span></em><span style="font-size:16px;font-family:'Arial','sans-serif'"> have several flagella per cell (4–10 typically), which can rotate in two ways <sup>[1]</sup>: counterclockwise (CCW) and clockwise (CW)<sup> [2]</sup>. The former aligns the flagella into a single rotating bundle, causing the bacterium to swim in line, while the later breaks the flagella bundle apart such that each flagellum points in a different direction, causing the bacterium to tumble. The motility is determined by the phosphorylation state of CheY protein which is governed by CheZ protein. In the presence of CheZ protein, CheY-P is dephosphorylated and produce CheY, thus CheY leads to the flagellar motor rotating CCW resulting in swimming. In the absence of CheZ, CheY is phosphorylated into CheY-P which can bind to the flagellar switch protein FliM resulting in tumbling (<strong>Figure 1</strong>)<sup> [2]</sup><strong>.</strong> </span> | |
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
<p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 1em;"> | <p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 1em;"> | ||
Line 494: | Line 497: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td style="border-width: medium 1px 1px; border-color: currentColor rgb(0, 0, 0) rgb(0, 0, 0); padding: 0px 7px; width: 434px; vertical-align: top;"> | <td style="border-width: medium 1px 1px; border-color: currentColor rgb(0, 0, 0) rgb(0, 0, 0); padding: 0px 7px; width: 434px; vertical-align: top;"> | ||
- | <p style=" | + | <p> |
- | + | <span style="font-family:times new roman"><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Figure </span></strong><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">1</span></strong><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">. </span></strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Chemotaxis mechanism of<em> E. coli. </em>The direction of rotation of the flagellar motor is controlled by the protein CheY. If the CheY is phosphorylated (CheY-P), it can bind to the flagellar motor protein FliM, causing the cell to tumble. When CheY is not phosphorylated, the flagellar motor rotates counterclockwise (CCW) <sup>[1]</sup>.</span></span> | |
- | + | </p> | |
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
Line 507: | Line 510: | ||
| | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
- | <p style=" | + | <p> |
- | + | <span style="font-size: 16px;font-family:arial, helvetica, sans-serif">Therefore, if no CheZ is expressed (such as <em>E. coli CL-1</em> with <em>CheZ</em> gene knocked out of genome), CheY-P couldn’t be dephosphorylated so that flagella keep CW, thus <em>E. coli</em> keep tumbling and perform non-motile ability on semi-solid culture medium (<strong>Figure 2 left</strong>). With enough CheZ expressed, <em>E. coli</em> regain chemotaxis ability on semi-solid culture medium (<strong>Figure 2 right</strong>). If one kind of molecule (such as IPTG) could stimulate circuit to express <em>CheZ</em>, reprogrammed <em>E. coli</em> will have the tendency to migrate to it. We named the reprogrammed chemotaxis pseudotaxis. Therefore, we are able to reprogram bacterial chemotaxis by knocking <em>CheZ</em> gene out of the wild-type genome to control the expression of <em>CheZ</em> by logic gene circuits.</span> | |
</p> | </p> | ||
<p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 1em;"> | <p style="text-align: justify; font-size: 1em;"> | ||
Line 544: | Line 547: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td style="border-width: medium 1px 1px; border-color: currentColor rgb(0, 0, 0) rgb(0, 0, 0); padding: 0px 7px; width: 586px; vertical-align: top;" colspan="2"> | <td style="border-width: medium 1px 1px; border-color: currentColor rgb(0, 0, 0) rgb(0, 0, 0); padding: 0px 7px; width: 586px; vertical-align: top;" colspan="2"> | ||
- | <p style=" | + | <p> |
- | + | <span style="font-family:times new roman"><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Figure 2. </span></strong><em><span style="font-size: 16px;">CL-1</span></em><span style="font-size: 16px;"> could express CheZ with </span><span style="font-size: 14px;"><a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1412000"><span style="font-size:16px;color:windowtext;text-underline: none">BBa_K1412000</span></a></span><span style="font-size: 16px;"> to regain chemotaxis ability (the <strong>right</strong> colony). While with </span><span style="font-size: 14px;"><a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_J04450"><span style="font-size:16px;color:windowtext;text-underline:none">BBa_J04450</span></a></span><span style="font-size: 16px;"> (the <strong>left</strong> colony) for comparison, no chemotaxis ability could be observed. </span></span> | |
- | + | </p> | |
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
Line 558: | Line 561: | ||
| | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
- | <p style=" | + | <p> |
- | + | <span style="font-size: 16px;font-family:arial, helvetica, sans-serif">Besides, as aptamers have the potential to respond to almost all kinds of molecules and have already been used to regulate gene expressions such as <em>CheZ</em> to reprogram chemotaxis (<strong>Figure 3</strong>). We are also developing a new mechanism which combines aptamers with RNA-lock system to regulate the target genes.</span> | |
</p> | </p> | ||
<p style="font-size: 18px;"> | <p style="font-size: 18px;"> | ||
Line 575: | Line 578: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td style="border-width: medium 1px 1px; border-color: currentColor rgb(0, 0, 0) rgb(0, 0, 0); padding: 0px 7px; width: 589px; vertical-align: top;"> | <td style="border-width: medium 1px 1px; border-color: currentColor rgb(0, 0, 0) rgb(0, 0, 0); padding: 0px 7px; width: 589px; vertical-align: top;"> | ||
- | <p style=" | + | <p> |
- | + | <span style="font-family:times new roman"><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Figure 3. </span></strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Mechanism of how aptamers control the translation of CheZ protein. In the absence of target molecules (theophylline as an example), the paired mRNA’s ribosome binding site inhibits the translation of CheZ protein. In the absence of CheZ, CheY-P will remain phosphorylated and the cells tumble in place. While in the presence of theophylline, the mRNA’s ribosome binding site will expose and the CheZ can be expressed, allowing the cells to run and tumble<sup> [1]</sup>. </span></span> | |
- | + | </p> | |
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
Line 598: | Line 601: | ||
| | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
- | <p style=" | + | <p> |
- | + | <span style="font-size: 16px;font-family:arial, helvetica, sans-serif">Characterizing the circuits we constructed, we combined mathematical modeling with experiments, using modeling to guide experiments and to explain experimental phenomena. We have got reasonable results for a broader range of applications. As we have proved that the chemotaxis of <em>E. coli</em> could be well reprogrammed, we tried to apply reprogrammed chemotaxis into practice. For example, we have already demonstrated that motile ability is positively associated with the expression strength of <em>CheZ</em>, thus we can characterize the efficiency of RBS or promoter by migration distance. At the same time, we also developed a biosafety system which relies on reprogrammed chemotaxis.</span> | |
</p> | </p> | ||
<p style="font-size: 18px;"> | <p style="font-size: 18px;"> | ||
| | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
- | <p style=" | + | <p> |
- | + | <span style="font-size: 16px;font-family:arial, helvetica, sans-serif">Last but not the least, we applied mathematical principles in our project. Mathematics is the simplest and clearest language, and its value to the development of human civilization is now widely recognized because of its extensive application in science, society and even our daily life. However, the mathematical laws in life sciences are still unclear and even in chaos. Luckily, synthetic biology can overcome these shortcomings on a certain level. Based on this, we design a gene circuit, expecting that mathematical regularities can realize the regulation and control of life activities. We hope our work can inspire people's interests in combining mathematics with synthetic biology.</span> | |
</p> | </p> | ||
<p style="font-size: 18px;"> | <p style="font-size: 18px;"> |
Revision as of 15:40, 16 October 2014
Bacterial chemotaxis, which is universal in E. coli, is defined as migration of bacteria in response to a chemical stimulus. The natural E. coli chemotaxis has limited receptor proteins which can respond to only six kinds of amino acid. Nevertheless, the reprogrammed chemotaxis named pseudotaxis makes the engineered E. coli able to respond to molecules, whose receptor proteins do not exist in classical E. coli, such as IPTG and L-arabinose, etc.
E. coli have several flagella per cell (4–10 typically), which can rotate in two ways [1]: counterclockwise (CCW) and clockwise (CW) [2]. The former aligns the flagella into a single rotating bundle, causing the bacterium to swim in line, while the later breaks the flagella bundle apart such that each flagellum points in a different direction, causing the bacterium to tumble. The motility is determined by the phosphorylation state of CheY protein which is governed by CheZ protein. In the presence of CheZ protein, CheY-P is dephosphorylated and produce CheY, thus CheY leads to the flagellar motor rotating CCW resulting in swimming. In the absence of CheZ, CheY is phosphorylated into CheY-P which can bind to the flagellar switch protein FliM resulting in tumbling (Figure 1) [2].
|
Figure 1. Chemotaxis mechanism of E. coli. The direction of rotation of the flagellar motor is controlled by the protein CheY. If the CheY is phosphorylated (CheY-P), it can bind to the flagellar motor protein FliM, causing the cell to tumble. When CheY is not phosphorylated, the flagellar motor rotates counterclockwise (CCW) [1]. |
Therefore, if no CheZ is expressed (such as E. coli CL-1 with CheZ gene knocked out of genome), CheY-P couldn’t be dephosphorylated so that flagella keep CW, thus E. coli keep tumbling and perform non-motile ability on semi-solid culture medium (Figure 2 left). With enough CheZ expressed, E. coli regain chemotaxis ability on semi-solid culture medium (Figure 2 right). If one kind of molecule (such as IPTG) could stimulate circuit to express CheZ, reprogrammed E. coli will have the tendency to migrate to it. We named the reprogrammed chemotaxis pseudotaxis. Therefore, we are able to reprogram bacterial chemotaxis by knocking CheZ gene out of the wild-type genome to control the expression of CheZ by logic gene circuits.
|
BBa_K1412000
BBa_J04450
|
Figure 2. CL-1 could express CheZ with BBa_K1412000 to regain chemotaxis ability (the right colony). While with BBa_J04450 (the left colony) for comparison, no chemotaxis ability could be observed. |
|
Besides, as aptamers have the potential to respond to almost all kinds of molecules and have already been used to regulate gene expressions such as CheZ to reprogram chemotaxis (Figure 3). We are also developing a new mechanism which combines aptamers with RNA-lock system to regulate the target genes.
|
Figure 3. Mechanism of how aptamers control the translation of CheZ protein. In the absence of target molecules (theophylline as an example), the paired mRNA’s ribosome binding site inhibits the translation of CheZ protein. In the absence of CheZ, CheY-P will remain phosphorylated and the cells tumble in place. While in the presence of theophylline, the mRNA’s ribosome binding site will expose and the CheZ can be expressed, allowing the cells to run and tumble [1]. |
Characterizing the circuits we constructed, we combined mathematical modeling with experiments, using modeling to guide experiments and to explain experimental phenomena. We have got reasonable results for a broader range of applications. As we have proved that the chemotaxis of E. coli could be well reprogrammed, we tried to apply reprogrammed chemotaxis into practice. For example, we have already demonstrated that motile ability is positively associated with the expression strength of CheZ, thus we can characterize the efficiency of RBS or promoter by migration distance. At the same time, we also developed a biosafety system which relies on reprogrammed chemotaxis.
Last but not the least, we applied mathematical principles in our project. Mathematics is the simplest and clearest language, and its value to the development of human civilization is now widely recognized because of its extensive application in science, society and even our daily life. However, the mathematical laws in life sciences are still unclear and even in chaos. Luckily, synthetic biology can overcome these shortcomings on a certain level. Based on this, we design a gene circuit, expecting that mathematical regularities can realize the regulation and control of life activities. We hope our work can inspire people's interests in combining mathematics with synthetic biology.
References
1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemotaxis
2. Topp S, Gallivan J P. Guiding bacteria with small molecules and RNA[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2007, 129(21): 6807-6811.
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ja0692480