Team:DTU-Denmark/Achievements/Experimental Results

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 78: Line 78:
<ul>
<ul>
<li>Spinach2: 7.7</li>
<li>Spinach2: 7.7</li>
-
<il>Spinach2.1: 8.3</li>
+
<li>Spinach2.1: 8.3</li>
</ul>
</ul>

Revision as of 21:23, 15 October 2014

Comparison of Spinach2 and Spinach2.1

Since we introduced a mutation in the Spinach2 sequence to overcome a SpeI restriction site, our first task was to confirm that this modified Spinach2.1 was performing compatible to Spinach2. We met some complications when generating the spinach RNA by in vitro transcription. This can be due to different parameters ie. the instability of RNA and presence of RNAses. We therefore chose to use all the generated RNA to have the best foundation for measuring fluorescence. This is why Spinach2 and Spinach2.1 is not used in identical concentrations.

The RNA concentrations were measured:
  • Spinach2: 40 ng/µl
  • Spinach2.1: 14 ng/µl
Excess of DFHBI-1T was added and fluorescence was measured in plate reader: Average of measurements
  • Spinach2: 306.9
  • Spinach2.1: 116.2
When these are normalised with the RNA concentration we conclude that our generated mutant Spinach2.1 is compatible with the existing Spinach2. Spinach2.1 is registered as a BioBrick (link). We actually even observe a higher fluorescence signal from Spinach2.1
  • Spinach2: 7.7
  • Spinach2.1: 8.3
Since that is the fact we continued working with the mutant, and all experiments from now on is conducted with this.

Construct of strains

bla
bla

Standard series for DFHBI-1T

bla
bla

Degradation of Spinach2.1

bla
bla

Fluorescence measurement

bla
bla
bla
bla

Calculating promoter activity