Team:Marburg:Project:Notebook:October
From 2014.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</fieldset> | </fieldset> | ||
- | <fieldset class=" | + | <fieldset class="exp25"> |
- | <legend><a name=" | + | <legend><a name="exp25.4c">25.4 Fluorometer assay with A549</a></legend> |
<div class="aim"> | <div class="aim"> | ||
<p>Aim: Checking interaction of StrepDARPidin with EpCAM on A549 Lung carcinoma cells</p> | <p>Aim: Checking interaction of StrepDARPidin with EpCAM on A549 Lung carcinoma cells</p> | ||
Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">A549</th> |
<td>1</td> | <td>1</td> | ||
<td>H</td> | <td>H</td> | ||
Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">A549</th> |
<td>2</td> | <td>2</td> | ||
<td>H</td> | <td>H</td> | ||
Line 86: | Line 86: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">A549</th> |
<td>3</td> | <td>3</td> | ||
<td>H</td> | <td>H</td> | ||
Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">A549</th> |
<td>4</td> | <td>4</td> | ||
<td>H</td> | <td>H</td> | ||
Line 102: | Line 102: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">A549</th> |
<td>5</td> | <td>5</td> | ||
<td>H</td> | <td>H</td> | ||
Line 110: | Line 110: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">A549</th> |
<td>6</td> | <td>6</td> | ||
<td>H</td> | <td>H</td> | ||
Line 118: | Line 118: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">A549</th> |
<td>7</td> | <td>7</td> | ||
<td>H</td> | <td>H</td> | ||
Line 126: | Line 126: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">A549</th> |
<td>8</td> | <td>8</td> | ||
<td>H</td> | <td>H</td> | ||
Line 134: | Line 134: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">A549</th> |
<td>9</td> | <td>9</td> | ||
<td>H</td> | <td>H</td> | ||
Line 142: | Line 142: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">A549</th> |
<td>10</td> | <td>10</td> | ||
<td>H</td> | <td>H</td> | ||
Line 150: | Line 150: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">A549</th> |
<td>11</td> | <td>11</td> | ||
<td>H</td> | <td>H</td> | ||
Line 158: | Line 158: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">A549</th> |
<td>12</td> | <td>12</td> | ||
<td>H</td> | <td>H</td> | ||
Line 612: | Line 612: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="exp-content"> | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
- | <p>The purified Hag-D2-Strep which was left from crystallization and Florian Altegoer’s purified Hag-Strep were used to make a pulldown with Streptavidin beads | + | <p>The purified Hag-D2-Strep which was left from crystallization and Florian Altegoer’s purified Hag-Strep were used to make a pulldown with Streptavidin beads. We wanted to see if the Strep-Tag in the flagellin monomers can interact with the Streptavidin beads.</p> |
<table width="100%" border="1"> | <table width="100%" border="1"> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
Line 649: | Line 649: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<th scope="row">GST-bead</th> | <th scope="row">GST-bead</th> | ||
- | |||
<td>x</td> | <td>x</td> | ||
<td> </td> | <td> </td> | ||
<td> </td> | <td> </td> | ||
- | <td> | + | <td>x</td> |
+ | <td>x</td> | ||
<td>20 µL slurry</td> | <td>20 µL slurry</td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<th scope="row">Strep-bead</th> | <th scope="row">Strep-bead</th> | ||
- | |||
<td> </td> | <td> </td> | ||
<td>x</td> | <td>x</td> | ||
<td>x</td> | <td>x</td> | ||
- | <td> | + | <td> </td> |
+ | <td> </td> | ||
<td>30 µL slurry</td> | <td>30 µL slurry</td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
Line 671: | Line 671: | ||
<td>x</td> | <td>x</td> | ||
<td> </td> | <td> </td> | ||
- | <td> | + | <td>x</td> |
<td>4 nmol → 4,5 µL</td> | <td>4 nmol → 4,5 µL</td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
Line 1,096: | Line 1,096: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</fieldset> | </fieldset> | ||
- | <fieldset class=" | + | <fieldset class="exp25"> |
- | <legend><a name=" | + | <legend><a name="exp25.5">25.5 new Fluorometer assay with A549</a></legend> |
<div class="aim"> | <div class="aim"> | ||
<p>Aim: Checking interaction of StrepDARPidin with EpCAM on A549 Lung carcinoma cells using a new serial dilution</p> | <p>Aim: Checking interaction of StrepDARPidin with EpCAM on A549 Lung carcinoma cells using a new serial dilution</p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="exp-content"> | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
- | <p>In order to check the interaction of StrepDARPidin with the EpCAM on | + | <p>In order to check the interaction of StrepDARPidin with the EpCAM on A549 Lung Carcinoma cells we planned an ELISA-Like assay again. Yesterday row F 1-12 of a black Fluotrac600 96-well plate was coated with 100000 cells A549/ well (counted with Neubauer-Chamber) overnight at 37°C. 100000 cells of 3T3 fibroblasts were used as negative control and as well used to coat well G6.</p> |
<p>We intended to incubate them with different concentrations of StrepDARPidin and then target the N-terminal His-Tag with and Anti-His antibody Alexa488 conjugated (1:50 endvolumen). </p> | <p>We intended to incubate them with different concentrations of StrepDARPidin and then target the N-terminal His-Tag with and Anti-His antibody Alexa488 conjugated (1:50 endvolumen). </p> | ||
<p>In wells H1-6 gel filtration purified StrepDARPidin with 87 µM was tested, in well H 7-12 Ni-NTA purified StrepDARPidin with 280 µM.</p> | <p>In wells H1-6 gel filtration purified StrepDARPidin with 87 µM was tested, in well H 7-12 Ni-NTA purified StrepDARPidin with 280 µM.</p> | ||
Line 1,117: | Line 1,117: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">A549</th> |
<td>1</td> | <td>1</td> | ||
<td>F</td> | <td>F</td> | ||
Line 1,125: | Line 1,125: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">A549</th> |
<td>2</td> | <td>2</td> | ||
<td>F</td> | <td>F</td> | ||
Line 1,133: | Line 1,133: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">A549</th> |
<td>3</td> | <td>3</td> | ||
<td>F</td> | <td>F</td> | ||
Line 1,141: | Line 1,141: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">A549</th> |
<td>4</td> | <td>4</td> | ||
<td>F</td> | <td>F</td> | ||
Line 1,149: | Line 1,149: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">A549</th> |
<td>5</td> | <td>5</td> | ||
<td>F</td> | <td>F</td> | ||
Line 1,157: | Line 1,157: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">A549</th> |
<td>6</td> | <td>6</td> | ||
<td>F</td> | <td>F</td> | ||
Line 1,165: | Line 1,165: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">A549</th> |
<td>7</td> | <td>7</td> | ||
<td>F</td> | <td>F</td> | ||
Line 1,173: | Line 1,173: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">A549</th> |
<td>8</td> | <td>8</td> | ||
<td>F</td> | <td>F</td> | ||
Line 1,181: | Line 1,181: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">A549</th> |
<td>9</td> | <td>9</td> | ||
<td>F</td> | <td>F</td> | ||
Line 1,189: | Line 1,189: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">A549</th> |
<td>10</td> | <td>10</td> | ||
<td>F</td> | <td>F</td> | ||
Line 1,197: | Line 1,197: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">A549</th> |
<td>11</td> | <td>11</td> | ||
<td>F</td> | <td>F</td> | ||
Line 1,205: | Line 1,205: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">A549</th> |
<td>12</td> | <td>12</td> | ||
<td>F</td> | <td>F</td> | ||
Line 1,213: | Line 1,213: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">Empty well</th> |
<td>5</td> | <td>5</td> | ||
<td>G</td> | <td>G</td> | ||
Line 1,221: | Line 1,221: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">negative control 3T3 fibroblasts</th> |
<td>6</td> | <td>6</td> | ||
<td>G</td> | <td>G</td> | ||
Line 1,229: | Line 1,229: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">Blank</th> |
<td>7</td> | <td>7</td> | ||
<td>G</td> | <td>G</td> | ||
Line 1,237: | Line 1,237: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">positive control AB</th> |
<td>8</td> | <td>8</td> | ||
<td>G</td> | <td>G</td> | ||
Line 1,252: | Line 1,252: | ||
<p>We are able to see that the fluorescence signal decreases with increasing dilution. Unfortunately the negative control was very high as well. The t-cells were incubated in Eppis because of their non-adherent features. They were incubated with StrepDARPidin and Antibody before. The supernatant was discarded after centrifugation at 1500x g but the cells did not stay at the pellet’s position so that it was not possible to remove the whole preincubated material which might be left when measuring the control.</p> | <p>We are able to see that the fluorescence signal decreases with increasing dilution. Unfortunately the negative control was very high as well. The t-cells were incubated in Eppis because of their non-adherent features. They were incubated with StrepDARPidin and Antibody before. The supernatant was discarded after centrifugation at 1500x g but the cells did not stay at the pellet’s position so that it was not possible to remove the whole preincubated material which might be left when measuring the control.</p> | ||
<p>Additionally it is noticeable that there is the same trend for both purification methods. The lower signal from NTA-purified StrepDARPidin can be explained by the fact that the concentration was higher but the purity also lower so that even less StrepDARPidin was found in the protein aliquods. As negative Bacillus Subtilis WT culture was used which was already lysed causing the huge signal. A different EpCAM-negative cell line has to be used. </p> | <p>Additionally it is noticeable that there is the same trend for both purification methods. The lower signal from NTA-purified StrepDARPidin can be explained by the fact that the concentration was higher but the purity also lower so that even less StrepDARPidin was found in the protein aliquods. As negative Bacillus Subtilis WT culture was used which was already lysed causing the huge signal. A different EpCAM-negative cell line has to be used. </p> | ||
+ | <p>For the next measurement row C of the plate was coated with 100000 A549 cells & Caco-2 cells per well overnight and the same amount of 3T3 fibroblasts as negative control.</p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</fieldset> | </fieldset> | ||
Line 1,268: | Line 1,269: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="exp-content"> | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
- | <p>The purified Hag-D2-Strep which was left from crystallization and Florian | + | <p>The purified Hag-D2-Strep which was left from crystallization and Florian Altegoer's purified Hag-Strep were used to make a pulldown with purified StrepDARPidin. We wanted to see if the Strep-Tag in the flagellin monomers can interact with the StrepDARPidin, especially with the Streptavidin part.</p> |
<table width="100%" border="1"> | <table width="100%" border="1"> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
Line 1,341: | Line 1,342: | ||
<li>Pellet resuspended in 10 µL LB</li> | <li>Pellet resuspended in 10 µL LB</li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/b/bd/SDS_gel_competitive_Strep_beat_pulldown.jpg" width="30%" /> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
<table width="100%" border="1"> | <table width="100%" border="1"> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
Line 1,348: | Line 1,351: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td><strong>1</strong></td> | <td><strong>1</strong></td> | ||
- | <td> | + | <td>Hag-Strep</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td><strong>2</strong></td> | <td><strong>2</strong></td> | ||
- | <td> | + | <td>Hag D2-Strep</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td><strong>3</strong></td> | <td><strong>3</strong></td> | ||
- | <td>Strep | + | <td>Hag Strep + StrepDARPidin</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td><strong>4</strong></td> | <td><strong>4</strong></td> | ||
- | <td> | + | <td>Hag-D2-Strep + StrepDARPidin</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td><strong>5</strong></td> | <td><strong>5</strong></td> | ||
- | <td> | + | <td>StrepDARPidin</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td><strong>6</strong></td> | <td><strong>6</strong></td> | ||
- | <td> | + | <td>Hag-Strep + StrepDARPidin [1:5]</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td><strong>7</strong></td> | <td><strong>7</strong></td> | ||
- | <td> | + | <td>Hag-D2-Strep + StrepDARPidin [1:5]</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td><strong>8</strong></td> | <td><strong>8</strong></td> | ||
- | <td> | + | <td>Hag-Strep + StrepDARPidin [1:1]</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td><strong>9</strong></td> | <td><strong>9</strong></td> | ||
- | <td> | + | <td>Hag-D2-Strep + StrepDARPidin [1:1]</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
- | <p>The Strep- | + | <p>The competitive pulldown shows that just a small amount of protein remains in the supernatant. Hag-D2-Strep seems to be more stable than Hag-Strep. The highest amount of protein precipitates. We have assumed that the Strep-Tag/ Streptavidin-binding is very strong and causes maybe misfolding of the flagellin after binding which causes the precipitation. We plan to isolate the flagella in order to see if the same reaction takes place.</p> |
</div> | </div> | ||
+ | </fieldset> | ||
+ | <fieldset class="exp21"> | ||
+ | <legend><a name="exp21.8">21.8 Western blot with anti-Strep-Tag-AB</a></legend> | ||
+ | <div class="aim"> | ||
+ | <p>Aim: Checking interactions between Hag-D2-Strep & Anti-Strep-Tag-AB</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
+ | <p>To 2ml of culture of Bacillus subtilis (OD=1.01) 120µl H20 and 80 µl were added for lysation. 10 µl of the lysate supplied with Roti-Load (Roth, K 929.1) were loaded on a 12% polyacrylamide gel. The electrophoresis ran at max. 130 V. After finishing, the gel was blotted onto PVDF membrane (6 cm * 9 cm) at 4°C at 250mA for about 1.5 hours. Then, the membrane was washed in BSA solution (3% BSA in TBS/Tween-20, Roth, 9127.1) over night at 4°C, before it was treated with the strep-antibody (Precision Protein StrepTactin-HRP Conjugate (Bio Rad, #161-0381): 1:5000) for 1 hr at RT. The membrane was washed 3 times for 10 minutes in TBS/Tween-20. The membrane was rinsed for 1 minute with ECL solution with a chemiluminescent substrate, which was detected by a Fusion Fx Vilber Lourmat imaging system.</p> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/3/36/Western_Blot_AntiStrep.png" width="30%" /> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <p>It could be seen that in comparison to the wildtype the Hag-D2-Strep strain gave a positive signal for the StrepTag, which was incorporated into the flagellin.</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
</fieldset> | </fieldset> | ||
<fieldset class="exp23"> | <fieldset class="exp23"> | ||
Line 1,766: | Line 1,782: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="exp-content"> | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
- | <p>The parts were ready for the assembly. The same FusionPCR/Gibson assembly mixture was used like the last time to build KSI (22.10). The primers were added to the reaction after a first step of incubation at | + | <p>The parts were ready for the assembly. The same FusionPCR/Gibson assembly mixture was used like the last time to build KSI (22.10). The primers were added to the reaction after a first step of incubation at 50°C for 0.5 hours. Then the PCR was carried out as usual.</p> |
<table width="100%" border="1"> | <table width="100%" border="1"> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
Line 1,862: | Line 1,878: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</fieldset> | </fieldset> | ||
- | <fieldset class=" | + | <fieldset class="exp24"> |
- | <legend><a name=" | + | <legend><a name="exp24.4">24.4 Restriction of StrepCup and Ligation with pET16b</a></legend> |
<div class="aim"> | <div class="aim"> | ||
<p>Aim: insert the StrepCup construct in the overproduction plasmid pET16b</p> | <p>Aim: insert the StrepCup construct in the overproduction plasmid pET16b</p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="exp-content"> | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
- | <p>The purified StrepCup fragment was digested with the enzymes | + | <p>The purified StrepCup fragment was digested with the enzymes <i>Nco</i>I and <i>Xho</i>I, since the Gibson assembly of Strep and Cup with the vector yielded in only one transformand, which was considered as a spontaneous mutation in relation to the control plate, which carried one colony more.</p> |
<table width="100%" border="1"> | <table width="100%" border="1"> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
Line 1,907: | Line 1,923: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row">StrepCup | + | <th scope="row">StrepCup <i>Nco</i>I/<i>Xho</i>I (170.8 ng/µl)</th> |
<td>0,5</td> | <td>0,5</td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row">pET16b | + | <th scope="row">pET16b <i>Nco</i>I/<i>Xho</i>I (18.1 ng/µl)</th> |
<td>16</td> | <td>16</td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
Line 2,084: | Line 2,100: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</fieldset> | </fieldset> | ||
- | <fieldset class=" | + | <fieldset class="exp25"> |
- | <legend><a name=" | + | <legend><a name="exp25.6a">25.6a Immunofluorescence microscopy at AG Grosse lab</a></legend> |
<div class="aim"> | <div class="aim"> | ||
<p>Aim: Checking the interaction of StrepDARPidin with EpCAM-positive cell lines A549 & Caco-2 via immunofluorescence Antibody staining</p> | <p>Aim: Checking the interaction of StrepDARPidin with EpCAM-positive cell lines A549 & Caco-2 via immunofluorescence Antibody staining</p> | ||
Line 2,106: | Line 2,122: | ||
<a name="05.10.2014">05.10.2014</a> | <a name="05.10.2014">05.10.2014</a> | ||
</h2> | </h2> | ||
- | <fieldset class=" | + | <fieldset class="exp25"> |
- | <legend><a name=" | + | <legend><a name="exp25.6b">25.6b Immunofluorescence microscopy at AG Grosse lab</a></legend> |
<div class="aim"> | <div class="aim"> | ||
<p>Aim: Checking the interaction of StrepDARPidin with EpCAM-positive cell lines A549 & Caco-2 via immunofluorescence Antibody staining</p> | <p>Aim: Checking the interaction of StrepDARPidin with EpCAM-positive cell lines A549 & Caco-2 via immunofluorescence Antibody staining</p> | ||
Line 2,113: | Line 2,129: | ||
<div class="exp-content"> | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
<p>The dried samples were analysed under a Laser scanning microscope Zeiss LSM Series.</p> | <p>The dried samples were analysed under a Laser scanning microscope Zeiss LSM Series.</p> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/3/39/MR_fuorescence_microscopy_anti-His_Caco2_2014_10_05.jpg" width="50%" /> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/8/89/MR_fuorescence_microscopy_anti-His_A549_2014_10_05.jpg" width="50%" /> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/8/8e/MR_fuorescence_microscopy_anti-His_NIH3T3_2014_10_05.jpg" width="50%" /> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</fieldset> | </fieldset> | ||
Line 2,708: | Line 2,730: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<p>Applied onto a gel nothing could be seen.</p> | <p>Applied onto a gel nothing could be seen.</p> | ||
+ | </fieldset> | ||
+ | <fieldset class="exp25" | ||
+ | <legend><a name="exp25.7">25.7 new Fluorometer assay with A549 and Caco-2</a></legend> | ||
+ | <div class="aim"> | ||
+ | <p>Aim: Checking interaction of StrepDARPidin with EpCAM on A549 Lung carcinoma cells & Caco-2 cells using a new serial dilution</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
+ | <p>This time Caco-2 (C1-6) and A549 (C7-12) were used to coat row C of a black 96-well plate (100000 cells/ well). 100000 cells of 3T3 fibroblasts were used as negative control and as well used to coat 2 wells (G10 & G11) which was done overnight.</p> | ||
+ | <p>The same protocol like in 22.5 was used or GeFi-purified StrepDARPidin.</p> | ||
+ | <p>Following concentrations of StrepDARPidin dissolved in PBS (pH 7,4) +2,5 % glycerin were used:</p> | ||
+ | <table width="100%" border="1"> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">Content</th> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">Well Col</th> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">Well Row</th> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">raw data (485, 520)</th> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">Purification</th> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">StrepDARPidin concentration [M]</th> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">Caco-2</th> | ||
+ | <td>1;1</td> | ||
+ | <td>C</td> | ||
+ | <td>344</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>25 µM</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">Caco-2</th> | ||
+ | <td>2;2</td> | ||
+ | <td>C</td> | ||
+ | <td>538</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>2.5 µM</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">Caco-2</th> | ||
+ | <td>3;3</td> | ||
+ | <td>C</td> | ||
+ | <td>386</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>250 nM</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">Caco-2</th> | ||
+ | <td>4;4</td> | ||
+ | <td>C</td> | ||
+ | <td>319</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>25 nM</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">Caco-2</th> | ||
+ | <td>5;5</td> | ||
+ | <td>C</td> | ||
+ | <td>281</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>2.5 nM</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">Caco-2</th> | ||
+ | <td>6;6</td> | ||
+ | <td>C</td> | ||
+ | <td>259</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>250 pM</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">A549</th> | ||
+ | <td>7;7</td> | ||
+ | <td>C</td> | ||
+ | <td>422</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>25 µM</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">A549</th> | ||
+ | <td>8;8</td> | ||
+ | <td>C</td> | ||
+ | <td>396</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>2,5 µM</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">A549</th> | ||
+ | <td>9;9</td> | ||
+ | <td>C</td> | ||
+ | <td>273</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>250 nM</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">A549</th> | ||
+ | <td>10;10</td> | ||
+ | <td>C</td> | ||
+ | <td>247</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>25 nM</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">A549</th> | ||
+ | <td>11;11</td> | ||
+ | <td>C</td> | ||
+ | <td>288</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>2,5 nM</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">A549</th> | ||
+ | <td>12;12</td> | ||
+ | <td>C</td> | ||
+ | <td>272</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>250 pM</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">Blank</th> | ||
+ | <td>5;9</td> | ||
+ | <td>G</td> | ||
+ | <td>197</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">negative control 3T3 fibroblast</th> | ||
+ | <td>6;10</td> | ||
+ | <td>G</td> | ||
+ | <td>355</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>25 µM</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">negative control 3T3 fibroblast</th> | ||
+ | <td>7;11</td> | ||
+ | <td>G</td> | ||
+ | <td>305</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>25 µ</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">positive AB-control</th> | ||
+ | <td>8,12</td> | ||
+ | <td>G</td> | ||
+ | <td>3950</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <p>The serial dilution shows that the signal is decreasing for both cell lines. The Caco-2 Cells have a higher signal. The experiment should be repeated.</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
</fieldset> | </fieldset> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 3,095: | Line 3,271: | ||
<div class="aim"> | <div class="aim"> | ||
<p>Aim: check nose - lac/const plasmids for correct insert | <p>Aim: check nose - lac/const plasmids for correct insert | ||
- | + | </div> | |
<div class="exp-content"> | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
<p>Since there could have been a confusion after isolating the plasmids, which could have been the reason for the last negative control PCR on the lac plasmids, every reverse primer for the nose plasmids with the ssrA-tags and without the degradation tag were tested. The following table went for every of the nose plasmids with the lac-promoter, not only for the shown piGEM002 + lac In addition to that, a control PCR was performed with the the three existing nose plasmids with constitutive promoter piGEM002/007 and 008, another control PCR was done for piGEM008 + Cu sensitive promoter, which was the last one missing of the nose-plasmids with the metallosensitive promoters.</p> | <p>Since there could have been a confusion after isolating the plasmids, which could have been the reason for the last negative control PCR on the lac plasmids, every reverse primer for the nose plasmids with the ssrA-tags and without the degradation tag were tested. The following table went for every of the nose plasmids with the lac-promoter, not only for the shown piGEM002 + lac In addition to that, a control PCR was performed with the the three existing nose plasmids with constitutive promoter piGEM002/007 and 008, another control PCR was done for piGEM008 + Cu sensitive promoter, which was the last one missing of the nose-plasmids with the metallosensitive promoters.</p> | ||
Line 3,132: | Line 3,308: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row">piGEM002/007/008 + const. | + | <th scope="row">piGEM002/007/008 + const. %#040;ca 40 ng/µl)</th> |
<td>-</td> | <td>-</td> | ||
<td>-</td> | <td>-</td> | ||
Line 3,315: | Line 3,491: | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
- | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/4/42/CPCR_lac_plasmids_09.10.2014.png" width=" | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/4/42/CPCR_lac_plasmids_09.10.2014.png" width="30%" /> |
<br /> | <br /> | ||
<p>For the colony PCR several positive clones could be seen that exposed a band in the height of ca 1000 bp, clone 9 was chosen to work with in the further steps. The control PCR on the nose - lac plasmids was negative for all plasmids. Some showed two very thin bands of ca 750 bp and 1000 bp size. The expected fragment should have a size of ca 818 bp. These findings were striking, since the colony PCR for the clones from which the plasmids were isolated were positive.</p> | <p>For the colony PCR several positive clones could be seen that exposed a band in the height of ca 1000 bp, clone 9 was chosen to work with in the further steps. The control PCR on the nose - lac plasmids was negative for all plasmids. Some showed two very thin bands of ca 750 bp and 1000 bp size. The expected fragment should have a size of ca 818 bp. These findings were striking, since the colony PCR for the clones from which the plasmids were isolated were positive.</p> | ||
Line 3,542: | Line 3,718: | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
- | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/9/95/Kontroll_verdau_und_Colony_PCR_lac_plasmide_09.10.2014.png" width=" | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/9/95/Kontroll_verdau_und_Colony_PCR_lac_plasmide_09.10.2014.png" width="40%" /> |
<br /> | <br /> | ||
- | <p>The control restriction of the nose plasmids was negative, the plasmid just seemed to be linearized and not cut into two fragments. That means that the | + | <p>The control restriction of the nose plasmids was negative, the plasmid just seemed to be linearized and not cut into two fragments. That means that the HindIII could not cut since the IPTG inducible promoter was not contained in the plasmids. However, also the control piGEM030 did not show the expected bands. It could be possible that <i>Hind</i>III did not work correctly, since it was no HF enzyme and used in the CutSmart buffer of NEB, but according to the NEB Double Digest Finder <i>Hind</i>III was able to cut in CutSmart only with the half of its optimal activity. That was the reason, why the double amount of <I>Hind</i>III was chosen.</p> |
<p>Some samples of the new colony PCR showed bands slightly higher than 750 bp, which would resemble the size of the expected fragment of ca 800 bp, but since the controls with the nose plasmids containing the Ag sensitive promoter (all confirmed positive by control PCR on isolated plasmids) were not all positive, it was uncertain, that the visible fragments really were the ones that indicate a positive clone. For the further cloning, the plasmids were isolated and digested directly.</p> | <p>Some samples of the new colony PCR showed bands slightly higher than 750 bp, which would resemble the size of the expected fragment of ca 800 bp, but since the controls with the nose plasmids containing the Ag sensitive promoter (all confirmed positive by control PCR on isolated plasmids) were not all positive, it was uncertain, that the visible fragments really were the ones that indicate a positive clone. For the further cloning, the plasmids were isolated and digested directly.</p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</fieldset> | </fieldset> | ||
- | <fieldset class=" | + | <fieldset class="exp25"> |
- | <legend><a name=" | + | <legend><a name="exp25.9">25.9 new Fluorometer assay with A549 and Caco-2</a></legend> |
<div class="aim"> | <div class="aim"> | ||
<p>Aim: Checking interaction of StrepDARPidin with EpCAM on A549 Lung carcinoma cells & Caco-2 cells using a new serial dilution</p> | <p>Aim: Checking interaction of StrepDARPidin with EpCAM on A549 Lung carcinoma cells & Caco-2 cells using a new serial dilution</p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="exp-content"> | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
- | <p>This time Caco-2 | + | <p>This time Caco-2 (A1-6) and A549 (B1-6) were used to coat row C of a black 96-well plate (100000 cells/ well). 100000 cells of 3T3 WT fibroblasts were used as negative control and as well used to coat C5.</p> |
<p>The same protocol like in 22.5 was used or GeFi-purified StrepDARPidin.</p> | <p>The same protocol like in 22.5 was used or GeFi-purified StrepDARPidin.</p> | ||
<p>Following concentrations of StrepDARPidin dissolved in PBS pH 7,4 +2,5 % glycerin were used:</p> | <p>Following concentrations of StrepDARPidin dissolved in PBS pH 7,4 +2,5 % glycerin were used:</p> | ||
Line 3,562: | Line 3,738: | ||
<th scope="col">Well Col</th> | <th scope="col">Well Col</th> | ||
<th scope="col">Well Row</th> | <th scope="col">Well Row</th> | ||
- | <th scope="col">Blank corrected raw data ( | + | <th scope="col">Blank corrected raw data (85, 520)</th> |
<th scope="col">StrepDARPidin concentration (M)</th> | <th scope="col">StrepDARPidin concentration (M)</th> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
Line 3,772: | Line 3,948: | ||
<p>The serial dilution shows that the signal is decreasing for both cell lines. The Caco-2 Cells have a higher signal compared to A549.</p> | <p>The serial dilution shows that the signal is decreasing for both cell lines. The Caco-2 Cells have a higher signal compared to A549.</p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </fieldset> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <!-- 10.10.14 --> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="notebooky-entry"> | ||
+ | <h2 class="title"> | ||
+ | <a name="10.10.2014">10.10.2014</a> | ||
+ | </h2> | ||
+ | <fieldset class="exp24"> | ||
+ | <legend><a name="exp24.8">24.8 Test for solubility of StrepCup<a></legend> | ||
+ | <div class="aim"> | ||
+ | <p>Aim: check if StrepCup is soluble or enclosed in inclusion bodies</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
+ | <p>A second test expression was carried out in 30 ml LB-amp, which was inoculated with <i>E. coli</i> BL21(DE3) and incubated until they reached an OD<sub>600</sub> of 0.62. A 1.12 ml preinduction sample was taken and the cells were induced with 30 µl IPTG for 3 hours shaking at 37°C. After this time they reached an OD<sub>600</sub> of 1.4, so 500 µl were taken as an induction sample. The taken samples were pelleted by centrifugation, resuspended in 80 µl of water with addition of 20 µl 5x SDS loading dye. The cells were centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 20 minutes and lysed by the microfluidizer. The cell lysate was centrifuged at 20000 rpm for 20 minutes. The supernatant was withdrawn and 80 µl were taken as a sample, which was treated with 20 µl of 5x SDS loading dye. The pellet was resuspended in some buffer A from which 80 µl were taken and 20 µl of 5x SDS loading dye were added. The samples were boiled at 95°C for 10 minutes. Afterwards 10 µl of each sample was loaded onto a 12% SDS polyacrylamide gel.</p> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/6/63/SDS_PAGE_StrepCup_soluble_unsoluble_10.10.2014.png" width="30%" /> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <p>It could clearly be seen that the StrepCup was in the unsoluble fraction of the lysate.</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
</fieldset> | </fieldset> | ||
<fieldset class="exp13"> | <fieldset class="exp13"> | ||
Line 3,835: | Line 4,032: | ||
<a name="11.10.2014">11.10.2014</a> | <a name="11.10.2014">11.10.2014</a> | ||
</h2> | </h2> | ||
- | <fieldset class=" | + | <fieldset class="exp25"> |
- | <legend><a name=" | + | <legend><a name="exp25.10">25.10 new Fluorometer assay with A549 and Caco-2</a></legend> |
<div class="aim"> | <div class="aim"> | ||
<p>Aim: Checking interaction of StrepDARPidin with EpCAM on A549 Lung carcinoma cells & Caco-2 cells using a new serial dilution</p> | <p>Aim: Checking interaction of StrepDARPidin with EpCAM on A549 Lung carcinoma cells & Caco-2 cells using a new serial dilution</p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="exp-content"> | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
- | <p>This time Caco-2 (F1-6&# | + | <p>This time Caco-2 (F1-6( and A549 (G1-6) were used to coat row C of a black 96-well plate (100000 cells/ well). 100000 cells of 3T3WT fibroblasts were used as negative control and as well used to coat H2 & H3.</p> |
<p>The same protocol like in 22.5 was used for GeFi-purified StrepDARPidin.</p> | <p>The same protocol like in 22.5 was used for GeFi-purified StrepDARPidin.</p> | ||
<p>Following concentrations of StrepDARPidin dissolved in PBS pH 7,4 +2,5 % glycerin were used:</p> | <p>Following concentrations of StrepDARPidin dissolved in PBS pH 7,4 +2,5 % glycerin were used:</p> | ||
- | <br /> | + | <br /> |
<table width="100%" border="1"> | <table width="100%" border="1"> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
Line 3,963: | Line 4,160: | ||
<p>After the previous measurements the results were summarized and a graphic created:</p> | <p>After the previous measurements the results were summarized and a graphic created:</p> | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
- | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/d/da/Fluorescence_assay.jpg" width=" | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/d/da/Fluorescence_assay.jpg" width="30%" /> |
<br /> | <br /> | ||
<p>The tendency which could be seen in the previous assays can be reproduced after summarizing the previous measurements as well.</p> | <p>The tendency which could be seen in the previous assays can be reproduced after summarizing the previous measurements as well.</p> | ||
Line 4,104: | Line 4,301: | ||
</fieldset> | </fieldset> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
- | + | ||
+ | <!-- 14.10.14 --> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="notebooky-entry"> | ||
+ | <h2 class="title"> | ||
+ | <a name="14.10.2014">14.10.2014</a> | ||
+ | </h2> | ||
+ | <fieldset class="exp24"> | ||
+ | <legend><a name="exp24.9">24.9 Expression and purification of StrepCup</a></legend> | ||
+ | <div class="aim"> | ||
+ | <p>Aim: purification of StrepCup</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
+ | <p>The two 1 L cultures were harvested by centrifugation at 4000 rpm for 20 min. The pellets were resuspended in 10 ml buffer A and centrifuged again in a falcon at 4000 rpm for 15 min. Again the pellet was resuspended in 25 ml buffer A and the cells were broken by a microfluidizer. The lysate was centrifuged with 20000rpm for 20 minutes at 4°C. Samples were taken from the pellet (P1) and the supernatant (S1), which was stored on ice. The pellet was resuspended in IB-wash buffer and centrifuged again at 27000 rpm for 10 minutes. This washing step was repeated. Samples were taken from the pellet (P2) and the supernatant (S2). The pellet was covered in 5 ml 6 M guanidine-hydrochloride and stirred at room temperature until it was completely resuspended, followed by another centrifugation with 20000 rpm at 4°C for 10 min. The pellet (P3) and the supernatant (S3) were stored separately in the refrigerator at 4°C over night after taking samples of both. It was observed that the proteins contained by the supernatant were precipitating instantly as they came in contact with water to dilute the sample and/or SDS loading dye. The precipitate was rich of protein, which resulted in an almost solid, sludgy consistence. After several dilution attempts the sample was diluted 1:1000 in water (protein precipitated by contact with water) the sample was vortexed until the precipitate was gone and 80 µl were taken together with 20 µl of 5x SDS loading dye and bolied at 95°C for 10 min together with the other samples, from which none precipitated as intense as the supernatant of the gua pellet. 10 µl of all samples were transferred onto a 12 % SDS-polyacrylamide gel.</p> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/3/34/SDS_expression_StrepCup_isolation_from_IB_14.10.2014.jpg" width="30%" /> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <p>The produced StrepCup was in the unsoluble phase like expected. During the process of isolating StrepCup from the inclusion bodies it could be seen, that StrepCup always remained in the pellet. It was not possible to see the protein in the soluble phase of the guanidinium-hydrochloride treated pellet, since the previous mentioned problems of instant precipitation in contact with water or SDS loading dye.</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </fieldset> | ||
+ | <fieldset class="exp18"> | ||
+ | <legend><a name="exp18.74">18.74 Isolation of flagella from different <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> strains</a></legend> | ||
+ | <div class="aim"> | ||
+ | <p>Aim: separation of the flagella from the cells</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||