Team:Toulouse/Result/experimental-results

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)

Revision as of 16:28, 15 October 2014

Experimental results

Are our modules functionnal?

Results > Experimental results

Summary :

Chemotaxis
Binding module
Fungicides module

Chemotaxis

For this module, we performed several tests to prove the existence of chemotaxis in Bacillus subtilis wild type (WT) strain and SubtiTree bacterium towards N-Acetylglucosamine.

We wanted to see chemotaxis on petri dish. We hoped to obtain pictures with bacteria halos directed or around attractive components. Thus we tried different protocols on Bacillus subtilis.
The first one was a protocol from the Imperial College 2011 iGEM team. They put attractive compound on paper disk in the middle of a petri dish containing a medium with 0.3% agar. Cells are loaded in this medium (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Schema showing how cells are filed in the medium. (A) pipetman are used to put cells in the gelose. (B) Bacteria should move to the attractive compound which diffuses.

We did not have any result with positive test on Bacillus subtilis and with glucose as attractive compound (Figure 2-A). B. sub is attracted by many other glucides and amino-acids so we have diluted glucose in LB medium and used this solution as a target (Figure 2-B).

Figure 2: Chemotaxis test with Glucose as attractive compound (A) and Glucose in add to LB medium as attractant (B).

Anyway we did not have enough reproduccible and reliable results to be satisfied with this test. Furthermore if we are forced to add LB to sugar to observe something, it is hard to distinguish between attracting and chemotaxis effects.
We have started new tries using different protocols

1. Plug in Pond system

This protocol on which we worked is taken from a thesis (ref thèse). B.subtilis are grown overnight and if necessary bacteria cells are concentrated by centrifgation. Goal is to obtain a cells density to 8x10⁸ cells/mL. 10mL of bacteria cells are mixed with 15mL of LB medium with 1.5 % agar maintained at 50°C. We obtain a medium with 0.9 % agar at final concentration. We add tetracyclin at 25µg/mL thus growth are stopped. Plate are cooled and dryed, then well are made with punch or 1mL tips. In well attractive compound are put (Figure 3). After one hour at room temperature, we take a picture of plates and analysed results.

Figure 3: Schema showing how are made plug-in-pond tests.

On our first try with bacillus subtilis, we made three wells by plate (Figure 4).In wells we put glucose at different concentration and in one of the plate we do not put tetracyclin.

Figure 4: Plates after 12h at room temperature.

We respect the protocol and after one hour we observe nothing, it's only after 12h than we can observe an halo around well with glucose at 1M in the plate where there are no tetracyclin. Tetracyclin concentration seems to be too large and inhibit our bacteria. Thereafter we have work with tetracyclin at 15µg/mL. We retry this protocol with less tetracyclin. We made two wells by plate (Figure 5) one with attractive compound, Glucose or n-acetyl-glucosamide and one with LB medium. After 1h there are no halos, 12h after we observe something.

Figure 5: Chemotaxis test with Bacillus subtilis WT. The upper well contain attractive compound and the lower contain medium without attractive compound.

Results are not as clear as the first time, but we observe halo around well with glucose at 250mM with and without tetracyclin. We have made tries with N-acetyl-glucosamide and we see no halo, this show that our strain Bacillus subtilis 168 is not attracted by N-acetyl-glucosamide.
Results are not enough clear and reliable with plug-in-pond. We do not understand why we have to wait 12 hours to see halos. So we tried other protocols.

References:
thesis : Etude de la réponse adaptative à l'oxyde de triméthylamine et de son mécanisme de détection chez Escherichia coli et Shewanella oneidensis, 2008, Claudine Baraquet, université de la méditerranée Aix-Marseille II

2. Capillary test between two tubes also called the tubes test

After the experiment of the plug in pond, we decided to construct a system by welding two Eppendorf tubes with a capillary thanks to an electric burner.

Figure 6: Photography of the first tubes system

We tested this system with a fuchsin dye and water and we were able to observe the diffusion of fuchsin towards water. However this construction had a leakage next to the weld seam that we could not stop. Thus, the Toulouse iGEM Team asked the help from the glass blower, Patrick Chekroun. He designed two systems composed of two tubes linked by a capillary.

Figure 7: Scheme of the tubes system

As we did previously, we tested this new system with fuchsin. This experiment was made with WT Bacillus subtilis and N-Acetylglucosamine.

NB: We could not see the diffusion from one tube to the other. We made the hypothesis that it was not visible by sight because of by the small diameter of the capillary.

The following strategy was used to avoid disturbance due to pressure and liquid movement through the capillary:
- The first step was the addition of Wash Buffer until the capillary was full to avoid the presence of air bubbles which could lead to diffusion problems.
- Then, the tube 2 was plugged with the thumb while another person was adding the bacteria solution of WT Bacillus subtilis in the tube 1.
- The tube 1 was also plugged and only after the thumb could be removed of the tube 2.
- In the same way, the N-Acetylglucosamine was added in the tube 2.
- The same process was made with a xylose positive control.

NB: According to the article Chemotaxis towards sugars by Bacillus subtilis, (George W. Ordal et al., 1979), glucose and xylose have the same attractant power. We prefer a positive control instead of a negative because we were not sure that this system was efficient.

- The system was kept straight for 2hours. Every 40 minutes, we took a sample of each tube and spread it on an agar plate (dilution 1/1,000).

Figure 8: Photography of the tubes system

Unfortunately, the dilution was too high to detect any chemotaxis movement and the time was too short. We did not find any information in the literature.
As we did not have the time to optimize this protocol we preferred using the protocol of the Imperial college iGEM team 2011: the tips capillary test.

3. Tips capillary system

First tips capillary system

This protocol comes from Imperial College iGEM team 2011 and was adapted by our team in several steps (See chemotaxis protocol).

First of all, parafilm was used to close the tips:
- 15µL of each chemo-attractant was then pipetted.
- The tips with the pipette were then put on a piece of parafilm and the pipette was removed from the tip.
- The tip was sealed with a piece of parafilm. By this way, the sterility can be assured and the liquid stays inside the tip.
- To finish, the level of the solution in the tip was marked.

Figure 9: Sealing of a tip with parafilm

- After all the chemo-attractants were added in the tips, we put them on a green base to carry them. The whole process can be seen on Figure 10.
- Each tip was put in 300 µL of a bacteria solution in the wells of an Elisa plate.

Figure 10: First tips capillary system

NB: the yellow carton was used to stabilize the system and keep it straight.

- After one hour, the tips were removed from the bacteria solutions and the content of the tips was observed with Thoma cell under the microscope.

We had several problems with this system:
- The liquid level decreased during the experiment and we did not have enough liquid to fill the Thoma cell. Thus, it was not possible to count.
- The bacteria were moving and therefore, we could not proceed to a bacteria count.

Regarding these observations we decided to spread the tips content on agar plate instead of using Thoma cell and microscopy.

Second tips capillary system

Figure 11: Second tips capillary system

Improvement of the second tips capillary system

However this system was not optimal it is why we decided to use blu tack instead of parafilm:

Figure 12: Improvement of the second tips capillary system

At that point, the protocol was approved and the final test could finally start! :-)

There was just one tiny problem… we did not have our optimized bacterium with the chemotaxis gene… That is why we concentrated our efforts on WT Bacillus subtilis strain.

The main goal was to find an optimized control and to analyze the eventual chemotaxis of the WT strain. To avoid osmolality bias, we wanted to find a molecule which was non-attractant and with a similar molecular weight than the N-Acetylglucosamine (221.21 g/mol). Our first idea was to use fuchsin (Molecular weight: 337.85 g/mol).

The experiment was conducted with fuchsin as a negative control and was tested with different positive controls: glucose (25mM) and xylose (25mM).

We obtained the following result with NAG at different concentrations: 25mM, 250mM and 500mM. The tested strain was Bacillus subtilis 168:


Figure 13: Fuchsin - negative control (dilution 1/50)	Figure 14: NAG (25mM) (dilution 1/50)

The average number of colonies with the negative control is 121. On the contrary, a cell layer is observed for the NAG plates with every concentration.

Thus, we assumed that WT Bacillus subtilis was more attracted by NAG than fuchsin. Indeed we can neglect the bacterial growth because the test only lasts one hour. We also neglect diffusion and osmolality phenomena for the previous reasons.

Unfortunately for us we forgot one major effect… Can you believe that fuchsin solution contains about 15% of ethanol?!!! This concentration can lead to the death of some cells which probably happened to our results.

This incredible discovery destroyed all of our hopes about the God of chemotaxis! :-(

However, our team did not give up on synthetic biology and on our strength! Indeed, after days of disappointment and no time left for lab work, we raised from ashes and tried to find another negative control.

We finally used galactose (25mM) as a negative control. The article Chemotaxis towards sugars by Bacillus subtilis (George W. Ordal et al., 1979) proved that it was a poor attractant.

We made our tests again with this new molecule and glucose (25mM) as positive control.

Figure 15: Final results (dilution : 1/10,000)

NB: It was our last experiment. Unfortunately we were running out of time and we could not do much more test. We would like to do the experiment with a lower dilution and repeat it several times.

Our results are not statistically significant however this result has been proved in literature.

Binding module

1. Preliminary experiments

Purpose

The first experiment deals with the culture conditions to see if Bacillus subtilis can resist to a low temperature and with the CBB buffer. To do that, several bacterial concentrations have been tested starting with an OD of 0.1 and diluting this solution to get estimated ODs of 0.05, 0.025, 0.01. These different Bacillus subtilis solutions were incubated 1 hour at 4°C with 500µL of CBB or water. Finally a cell count on Thoma cell counting chamber was performed.

Results

The bacterial solutions could not be counted because of two main problems: the too high number of bacteria with the 0.1 OD or the too low number of bacteria with the 0.01 OD. Thus, the study is mostly focused on the intermediate values (Figure 16).
First of all, a same cell concentration can be noticed with the presence of CBB or water with estimated ODs of 0.05 or 0.025. Moreover, twice less cells can be found in the lowest concentrations in bacteria comparing to the 0.05 OD concentration which is in agreement with the dilution ratio.
Thus, the experimental conditions regarding the presence of CBB and the incubation temperature at 4°C do not harm the cell surviving.

Figure 16: CBB presence has no effect on bacteria. The bacterial concentration was measured regarding the presence or the absence of CBB for the observed OD (0.1) or estimated ODs (0.05, 0.025, 0.01).

2. Binding test using engineered B. subtilis

Purpose

Transformed Bacillus subtilis with the binding module is able to produce a protein composed of the bacterial peptidoglycan bonding of LycT and the GbpA 4th domain of Vibrio cholerae allowing the chitin bonding. The synthetic bacterium is put with special beads composed of the polymer miming the fungal pathogen wall. After several washes, bacteria specifically attached to the chitin are put on plates and counted.

Results

The first observation is that both bacterial solutions of wild type Bacillus subtilis and SubtiTree have the same concentration : 105 bacteria/mL (Figure 17). Even though there is no significant difference between both strains after the first wash, the second wash has a major effect since it allows 40 times more Wild Type bacteria to come off the beads. This result correlates with the number of bacteria binded to the beads for the synthetic strain with the binding module.
Thus, the binding system seems to function correctly and leads to the bacterial attachment on the chitin.

Figure 17: Attachment of Bacillus subtilis with binding module to chitin. The WT bacteria or the bacteria with the binding system concentration has been determined during the different steps of the binding test. The stars represent a significant difference observed with a Student test with p<0.05.

3. Microscopic observations

Purpose

We want to observe the SubtiTree's binding on beads coated with chitin. In order to perform a 3D reconstruction showing this interaction, we use confocal laser scanning microscope. Through the use of a fluorochrome (Syto9), we can highlight the presence of bacteria on the surface of the beads (individualized by phase-contrast). A first calibration step determine the minimum threshold to remove the background noise and the natural fluorescence.

Results

First, we note the great bacterial presence on the surface of beads coated with chitin. These images seem to highlight their interactions.

Figure 18: Microscopic view of bead surfaces coated with chitin

Using ImageJ software, we are able to create 3D pictures and movies of those comments.

Figure 19: A short movie of 3D bead surfaces coated with chitin

Finally we want to observe the bacteria after the second wash. When our bacterium has the binding module, results suggest a lower number of bacteria in the washing solution. SubtiTree is retained by the beads.

Figure 20: Microscopic view of bacteria after washing

Finally, overall results are consistent with the presence of functional binding system.

Fungicides module

1. Preliminary experiments

Tests with commercial peptides and controls

The first tests were accomplished with commercial GAFP-1 and D4E1 peptides at different concentrations (12.5µM, 25µM, 100µM). These tests were performed on different fungal strains sharing the same phylum with Ceratocystis Platani. As Ceratocystis Platani is pathogenic, we could not perform tests directly with this fungus.
After several days at 30°C, the PDA (Potato Dextrose Agar) plates couvered with fungus and commercial peptides were analyzed.

An inhibition halo was noticeable with commercial D4E1 peptide at 100µM on Aspergillus brasiliensis. Less bright halos were also present with lower concentrations. Concerning commercial GAFP-1, we did not notice any effect in the tested conditions.As positive control, a well-known chemical fungicide was used: the Copper Sulfate. The inhibition of the fungal growth was complete at 20mg/ml, and at 10mg/ml a darker halo appeared around the pad filled with Copper Sulfate as we can see on the figure below. This corresponds to a sporing halo in response to the stress generated by the fungicide.

Given these results, we concluded that very high fungicide concentrations are required to inhibit the fungal growth. Following these tests, new conditions were adopted in order not to encourage too much fungal growth over bacterial growth. The culture medium was adjusted to fit our objective and to approximate the conditions found in the trees: a 'sap-like' medium was elaborated. The incubations were then carried at room temperature.

2. Test with SubtiTree

In order to test Bacillus subtilis mutants, it was essential to find the right balance between the fungal growth and the bacterial one. This condition was necessary to get a high concentration of peptides. In our genetic constructions, these peptides are designed to be exported in the extracellular medium.

The transformed Bacillus subtilis strains grew at 37°C during 72h and were tested. After centrifugation, the supernatant and the resuspended pellet were placed on pads and disposed on plates previously seeded with a defined number of conidia (see protocols to have more details). After several days at room temperature, an inhibition halo of Trichoderma reesei's growth was clearly observable for the strain expressing D4E1 gene. The inhibition was even more noticeable with the strain carrying the operon GAFP-1 + D4E1 (see the photos below).
However, no effect was detected for the strain expressing the GAFP-1 gene, supposing a synergistic effect between these two peptides.
Regarding EcAMP and the triple-fungicides operon, no effect has been detected on the fungal growth. Several factors can explain these results: a number of post-transcriptional modifications are required to have a functional EcAMP and in addition to that, sequencing results of these constructs showed some differences with the original designed sequence.

Inhibition halos are not visible with supernatants, probably because of their low concentrations in the extracellular medium. Another effect was noted with the same strains expressing D4E1 and GAFP-1 + D4E1 on another fungus Aspergillus brasiliansis. This effect is comparable to the one previously noted with low concentration of sulfate copper.

Figure 21

Figure 22

The choice of our chassis appears to be optimal as we noted that wild type Bacillus subtilis disturbs the hyphae growth of the fungi. Some strains of Bacillus subtilis (qst 713) are already used as Biofungicides for use on several minor crops to treat a variety of plant diseases and fungal pathogens.
After this set of experiments, the strains expressing D4E1 and expressing GAFP-1 + D4E1 have shown to be the best candidates to play a major role in the fight against fungal diseases such as Canker stain. Keeping in mind our objective, we decided to tests these strains in model plants : Nicotiana benthamiana and Arabidopsis thaliana.
These tests were performed in the National Institute for the Agronomic Research by experts in this domain.

3. In planta tests with SubtiTree

The goal of the project is to introduce the trasnformed bacteria in a diseased tree. So it is necessary to perform in planta tests to judge the fungus-killing abilities of the two strains selected after the previous set of experiments.
SubtiTree is first inoculated in two model plants (Arabidopsis thaliana and Nicotiana benthamiana). After this step, a phytopathogenic fungus (Sclerotinia sclerotiorum) is placed on the leaves.
These tests were made in association with Sylvain Raffaële and Marielle Barascud of the National Institute for the Agronomic Research laboratory.

Twenty-four hours after SubtiTree inoculation, no phenotypic modification of the leaves can be detected. We can conclude that our bacterium, its introduction and the fungicides production in plants don't have deleterious effects.
Without proper treatment, the drop of the pyhtopathogenic fungus on Nicotiana benthamiana's leaves causes a necrosis halo which can be measured after 40h. The lesion size and the number of inoculated sites seem reduced by B. subtilis expressing DE41 or GAFP1-D4E1, unlike with the WT bacterium. A second set of experiments is expected to be more statistically precise.
We did not observe any significant results for Arabidopsis thaliana because of the use of two plants batches with different ages.
We can therefore conclude that when SubtiTree is in plant physiological conditions, it is harmless to the plant, and that the production of fungicides is effective, reducing the leaves' necrosis .

Thanks to the diversity of anti-fungal peptides, this strategy can be adapted to different types of diseases, with different degree of specifity, etc.

Parts

@@ Line 145: / Line 145: @@
 <p class="texte">We wanted to see chemotaxis on petri dish. We hoped to obtain pictures with bacteria halos directed or around attractive components. Thus we tried different protocols on <i>Bacillus subtilis</i>.</br>
-The first one was a protocol from the Imperial College <a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:Imperial_College_London/Protocols_Chemotaxis">2011 iGEM team</a>. They put attractive compound on paper disk in the middle of a petri dish containing a medium with 0.3% agar. Cells are loaded in this medium (Fig 1).</p>
+The first one was a protocol from the Imperial College <a href="https://2011.igem.org/Team:Imperial_College_London/Protocols_Chemotaxis">2011 iGEM team</a>. They put attractive compound on paper disk in the middle of a petri dish containing a medium with 0.3% agar. Cells are loaded in this medium (Figure 1).</p>
 <center><img SRC="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/0/05/Schema_1.png" alt="schema Figure 1" style="width:500px"></center>
-<p class="legend">Fig1 : schema showing how cells are filed in the medium. (A) pipetman are used to put cells in the gelose. (B)Bacteria should move to the attractive compound which diffuses.</p>
+<p class="legend">Figure 1: Schema showing how cells are filed in the medium. (A) pipetman are used to put cells in the gelose. (B) Bacteria should move to the attractive compound which diffuses.</p>
-<p class="texte">We did not have any result with positive test on <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> and with glucose as attractive compound (Fig 2-A). <i>B. sub</i> is attracted by many other glucides and amino-acids so we have diluted glucose in LB medium and used this solution as a target (Fig 2-B).</p>
+<p class="texte">We did not have any result with positive test on <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> and with glucose as attractive compound (Figure 2-A). <i>B. sub</i> is attracted by many other glucides and amino-acids so we have diluted glucose in LB medium and used this solution as a target (Figure 2-B).</p>
 <center><img SRC="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/f/ff/Fig2_AetB.png" alt="Figure 2" style="width:750px"></center>
-<p class="legend">Fig 2 Chemotaxis test with Glucose as attractive compound(A) and Glucose in add to LB medium as attractant (B).</p>
+<p class="legend">Figure 2: Chemotaxis test with Glucose as attractive compound (A) and Glucose in add to LB medium as attractant (B).</p>
 <p class="texte"><We could not notice any difference between the petri dish with or without glucose on paper. With an addition of LB medium to sugar, a large halo around paper disk is observed. This halo may corresponds to cells attracted by solution, or it may be diffusion of the mix.</br>
@@ Line 164: / Line 164: @@
 <p class="texte">
-This protocol on which we worked is taken from a thesis (ref thèse). B.subtilis are grown overnight and if necessary bacteria cells are concentrated by centrifgation. Goal is to obtain a cells density to 8x10⁸ cells/mL. 10mL of bacteria cells are mixed with 15mL of LB medium with 1.5 % agar maintained at 50°C. We obtain a medium with 0.9 % agar at final concentration. We add tetracyclin at 25µg/mL thus growth are stopped. Plate are cooled and dryed, then well are made with punch or 1mL tips. In well attractive compound are put (Fig3). After one hour at room temperature, we take a picture of plates and analysed results.
+This protocol on which we worked is taken from a thesis (ref thèse). B.subtilis are grown overnight and if necessary bacteria cells are concentrated by centrifgation. Goal is to obtain a cells density to 8x10⁸ cells/mL. 10mL of bacteria cells are mixed with 15mL of LB medium with 1.5 % agar maintained at 50°C. We obtain a medium with 0.9 % agar at final concentration. We add tetracyclin at 25µg/mL thus growth are stopped. Plate are cooled and dryed, then well are made with punch or 1mL tips. In well attractive compound are put (Figure 3). After one hour at room temperature, we take a picture of plates and analysed results.
 </p>
 <center><img SRC="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/c/cd/Fig3.png" alt="Figure 3" style="width:400px"></center>
-<p class="legend">Fig 3 : schema showing how are made plug-in-pond tests.</p>
+<p class="legend">Figure 3: Schema showing how are made plug-in-pond tests.</p>
 <p class="texte">
-On our first try with bacillus subtilis, we made three wells by plate (Fig4).In wells we put glucose at different concentration and in one of the plate we do not put tetracyclin.
+On our first try with bacillus subtilis, we made three wells by plate (Figure 4).In wells we put glucose at different concentration and in one of the plate we do not put tetracyclin.
 </p>
 <center><img SRC="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/c/ce/Fig4.png" alt="Figure 4" style="width:400px"></center>
-<p class="legend">Fig 4 : Plates after 12h at room temperature.</p>
+<p class="legend">Figure 4: Plates after 12h at room temperature.</p>
 <p class="texte">
 We respect the protocol and after one hour we observe nothing, it's only after 12h than we can observe an halo around well with glucose at 1M in the plate where there are no tetracyclin. Tetracyclin concentration seems to be too large and inhibit our bacteria. Thereafter we have work with tetracyclin at 15µg/mL.
-We retry this protocol with less tetracyclin. We made two wells by plate (Fig5) one with attractive compound, Glucose or n-acetyl-glucosamide and one with LB medium. After 1h there are no halos, 12h after we observe something.
+We retry this protocol with less tetracyclin. We made two wells by plate (Figure 5) one with attractive compound, Glucose or n-acetyl-glucosamide and one with LB medium. After 1h there are no halos, 12h after we observe something.
 </p>
 <center><img SRC="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/c/c3/Bsubtilis_result.png" alt="Figure 5" style="width:750px"></center>
-<p class="legend">Figure 5:Chemotaxis test with Bacillus subtilis WT. The upper well contain attractive compound and the lower contain medium without attractive compound. </p>
+<p class="legend">Figure 5: Chemotaxis test with Bacillus subtilis WT. The upper well contain attractive compound and the lower contain medium without attractive compound. </p>
 <p class="texte">
@@ Line 203: / Line 203: @@
 <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/f/fb/Chemotaxis_-_eppendorf.png"></center>
-<p class="legend">Figure 1: Photography of the first tubes system</p>
+<p class="legend">Figure 6: Photography of the first tubes system</p>
 <p class="texte">We tested this system with a fuchsin dye and water and we were able to observe the diffusion of fuchsin towards water. However this construction had a leakage next to the weld seam that we could not stop.
@@ Line 210: / Line 210: @@
 <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/2/2b/Chemotaxis_-_tubes.png"><center>
-<p class="legend">Figure 2: Scheme of the tubes system</p>
+<p class="legend">Figure 7: Scheme of the tubes system</p>
 <p class="texte">As we did previously, we tested this new system with fuchsin. This experiment was made with WT <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> and N-Acetylglucosamine.
@@ Line 229: / Line 229: @@
 <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/1/1b/Chemotaxis_-_tubes_photo.png"></center>
-<p class="legend">Figure 3: Photography of the tubes system</p>
+<p class="legend">Figure 8: Photography of the tubes system</p>
@@ Line 247: / Line 247: @@
 <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/9/94/Chemotaxis_-_tip.png"></center>
-<p class="legend">Figure 4: Sealing of a tip with parafilm</p>
+<p class="legend">Figure 9: Sealing of a tip with parafilm</p>
-<p class="texte">- After all the chemo-attractants were added in the tips, we put them on a green base to carry them. The whole process can be seen on Figure 5.<br>
+<p class="texte">- After all the chemo-attractants were added in the tips, we put them on a green base to carry them. The whole process can be seen on Figure 10.<br>
 - Each tip was put in 300 µL of a bacteria solution in the wells of an Elisa plate.<br></p>
 <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/0/05/Chemotaxis_-_tip_and_support.png"></center>
-<p class="legend">Figure 5: First tips capillary system</p>
+<p class="legend">Figure 10: First tips capillary system</p>
 <p class="texte"><i>NB: the yellow carton was used to stabilize the system and keep it straight.</i><br>
@@ Line 269: / Line 269: @@
 <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/e/e4/Chemotaxis_-_pipette.png"></center>
-<p class="legend">Figure 6: Second tips capillary system</p>
+<p class="legend">Figure 11: Second tips capillary system</p>
 <p class="title3">Improvement of the second tips capillary system</p>
@@ Line 275: / Line 275: @@
 <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/4/42/Chemotaxis_-_pipette_and_blu_tack.png"></center>
-<p class="legend">Figure 7: Improvement of the second tips capillary system</p>
+<p class="legend">Figure 12: Improvement of the second tips capillary system</p>
 <p class="texte"><b>At that point, the protocol was approved and the final test could finally start! :-)</b><br>
@@ Line 291: / Line 291: @@
 <tr><td align=center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/8/8c/Chemotaxis_-_results_fuch.png"></td>
 <td align=center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/f/fd/Chemotaxis_-_results_fuchsin.png"></td></tr>
-<tr><td align=center><p class="legend">Figure 8: Fuchsin - negative control (dilution 1/50)</p></td>
+<tr><td align=center><p class="legend">Figure 13: Fuchsin - negative control (dilution 1/50)</p></td>
-<td align=center><p class="legend">Figure 9: NAG (25mM) (dilution 1/50)</p></td></tr>
+<td align=center><p class="legend">Figure 14: NAG (25mM) (dilution 1/50)</p></td></tr>
 </table></center><br>
 <p class="texte">The average number of colonies with the negative control is 121. On the contrary, a cell layer is observed for the NAG plates with every concentration.<br>
@@ Line 309: / Line 309: @@
 <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/8/86/Chemotaxis_-_final_results.png"></center>
-<p class="legend">Figure 10 : Final results (dilution : 1/10,000)</p>
+<p class="legend">Figure 15: Final results (dilution : 1/10,000)</p>
 <p class="texte"><i>NB: It was our last experiment. Unfortunately we were running out of time and we could not do much more test. We would like to do the experiment with a lower dilution and repeat it several times.</i><br>
@@ Line 323: / Line 323: @@
 <p class="title3">Results</p>
-<p class="texte">The bacterial solutions could not be counted because of two main problems: the too high number of bacteria with the 0.1 OD or the too low number of bacteria with the 0.01 OD. Thus, the study is mostly focused on the intermediate values (Figure 1).
+<p class="texte">The bacterial solutions could not be counted because of two main problems: the too high number of bacteria with the 0.1 OD or the too low number of bacteria with the 0.01 OD. Thus, the study is mostly focused on the intermediate values (Figure 16).
 <br/>First of all, a same cell concentration can be noticed with the presence of CBB or water with estimated ODs of 0.05 or 0.025. Moreover, twice less cells can be found in the lowest concentrations in bacteria comparing to the 0.05 OD concentration which is in agreement with the dilution ratio.
 <br/>Thus, the experimental conditions regarding the presence of CBB and the incubation temperature at 4°C do not harm the cell surviving.
@@ Line 332: / Line 332: @@
 </br>
-<p class="texte">Figure 1: CBB presence has no effect on bacteria. The bacterial concentration was measured regarding  <span style="color:#0000FF">the presence</span> or <span style="color:#FF0000">the absence </span>of CBB for the observed OD (0.1) or estimated ODs (0.05, 0.025, 0.01).
+<p class="legend">Figure 16: CBB presence has no effect on bacteria. The bacterial concentration was measured regarding  <span style="color:#0000FF">the presence</span> or <span style="color:#FF0000">the absence </span>of CBB for the observed OD (0.1) or estimated ODs (0.05, 0.025, 0.01).
 </p>
@@ Line 341: / Line 341: @@
 <p class="title3">Results</p>
-<p class="texte">The first observation is that both bacterial solutions of wild type <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> and SubtiTree have the same concentration : 105 bacteria/mL (Figure 2). Even though there is no significant difference between both strains after the first wash, the second wash has a major effect since it allows 40 times more Wild Type bacteria to come off the beads. This result correlates with the number of bacteria binded to the beads for the synthetic strain with the binding module.
+<p class="texte">The first observation is that both bacterial solutions of wild type <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> and SubtiTree have the same concentration : 105 bacteria/mL (Figure 17). Even though there is no significant difference between both strains after the first wash, the second wash has a major effect since it allows 40 times more Wild Type bacteria to come off the beads. This result correlates with the number of bacteria binded to the beads for the synthetic strain with the binding module.
 <br/>Thus, the binding system seems to function correctly and leads to the bacterial attachment on the chitin.</p>
@@ Line 348: / Line 348: @@
 </br>
-<p class="texte">Figure 2:   Attachment of <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> with binding module to chitin. <span style="color:#0000FF">The WT bacteria</span> or <span style="color:#FF0000">the bacteria with the binding system</span> concentration has been determined during the different steps of the binding test. The stars represent a significant difference observed with a Student test with p<0.05.</p>
+<p class="legend">Figure 17:   Attachment of <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> with binding module to chitin. <span style="color:#0000FF">The WT bacteria</span> or <span style="color:#FF0000">the bacteria with the binding system</span> concentration has been determined during the different steps of the binding test. The stars represent a significant difference observed with a Student test with p<0.05.</p>
 <p class="title2">3. Microscopic observations</p>
@@ Line 359: / Line 359: @@
 <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/archive/5/53/20141013073044!Photo_billes_microscopie.png" width="45%"></center>
 </br>
-<p class="texte">Figure ***: </p>
+<p class="legend">Figure 18: Microscopic view of bead surfaces coated with chitin</p>
 <p class="texte">Using ImageJ software, we are able to create 3D pictures and movies of those comments. </br></p>
 <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/5/53/Photo_billes_microscopie.png" width="45%"><iframe width="420" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/G3xpYnkUr3o" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></center>
 </br>
-<p class="texte">Figure ***: </p>
+<p class="legend">Figure 19: A short movie of 3D bead surfaces coated with chitin</p>
 <p class="texte">Finally we want to observe the bacteria after the second wash. When our bacterium has the binding module, results suggest a lower number of bacteria in the washing solution. SubtiTree is retained by the beads.</p>
 <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/9/97/Photo_lavage_microscopie.png" width="45%"></center>
-<p class="texte">Figure ***:
+<p class="legend">Figure 20: Microscopic view of bacteria after washing
 </p>
@@ Line 406: / Line 406: @@
 </br>
-<img style="width:400px; " src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/c/c2/Resultfong.jpg"> Figure X
+<img style="width:400px; " src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/c/c2/Resultfong.jpg"> <p class="legend">Figure 21</p>
-<img style="width:400px; " src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/9/92/Results_fong_2.jpg"> Figure X
+<img style="width:400px; " src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/9/92/Results_fong_2.jpg"> <p class="legend">Figure 22</p>
 </br>

Team:Toulouse/Result/experimental-results

From 2014.igem.org

Revision as of 16:28, 15 October 2014

Experimental results

Summary :

iGEM Toulouse 2014

Let's talk

Socialize