"
Team:Brasil-SP/Notebook/Interlab Study
From 2014.igem.org
Laisribovski (Talk | contribs) |
Laisribovski (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 110: | Line 110: | ||
| - | <p align="justify"> For the proposed specific genetic devices, we have measured fluorescence by <strong>Flow Cytometry</strong> and <strong>Fluorometry</strong>. Device 1 and 2 are equivalent assemblies, however, we did not expect equal fluorescence values since device 1 was an existing device and 2 was built | + | <p align="justify"> For the proposed specific genetic devices, we have measured fluorescence by <strong>Flow Cytometry</strong> and <strong>Fluorometry</strong>. Device 1 and 2 are equivalent assemblies, however, we did not expect equal fluorescence values since device 1 was an existing device and 2 was built. When it comes to device 3, only the promoter was changed, so it would be possible to compare different </p> |
Revision as of 02:58, 15 October 2014
Measurement Interlab StudyAs part of the first international interlab measurement study in synthetic biology, all Measurement Track teams were required to obtain fluorescence data for three specific genetic devices. They are | |||||||||||
|
Biobrick device 1: BBa_I20260, an existing device Assembly Protocol Biobrick Device 1 |
| ||||||||||
|
Biobrick device 2: BBa_J23101 + BBa_E0240, a new device built by each team Assembly Protocol Biobrick Device 2 and 3 |
| ||||||||||
|
Biobrick device 3: BBa_J23115 + BBa_E0240, a new device built by each team. Assembly Protocol Biobrick Device 2 and 3 |
| ||||||||||
ResultsFor the proposed specific genetic devices, we have measured fluorescence by Flow Cytometry and Fluorometry. Device 1 and 2 are equivalent assemblies, however, we did not expect equal fluorescence values since device 1 was an existing device and 2 was built. When it comes to device 3, only the promoter was changed, so it would be possible to compare different 
Flow cytometry - Mean values | |||||||||||
