Team:Austin Texas/kit
From 2014.igem.org
(→Incorporation Value) |
(→Accuracy of Incorporation) |
||
Line 160: | Line 160: | ||
=Results and Data= | =Results and Data= | ||
- | == | + | ==Fidelity of Incorporation== |
- | [[File:UT_Austin_2014_Kit_Normalized_GFP_to_RFP_graph.png|thumb|600px|Figure 3. Graph showing the level of GFP fluorescence relative to RFP fluorescence.]] | + | [[File:UT_Austin_2014_Kit_Normalized_GFP_to_RFP_graph.png|thumb|600px|Figure 3. Graph showing the level of GFP fluorescence relative to RFP fluorescence. Each pStG plasmid is referred to based upon the tRNA synthetase/tRNA pair present in the specific plasmid. Each of these plasmids was then paired with either pFRY or pFRYC and grown in the presence or absence of a specific ncAA.]] |
- | The | + | The fidelity of each ncAA sythetase/tRNA pair was measured by comparing the GFP production of pStG/pFRY strains in (+/-) ncAA conditions. In the absence of a non-cannonical only RFP should be translated. Translation is expected to terminate between RFP and GFP at the amber stop codon (UAG) on linker sequence on pFRY. Alternatively, translation should continue through the linker in the presence of a certain non-cannonical due to its incorporation at UAG. In this case, RFP and GFP should both be translated. The fluorescence of RFP and GFP is detectable with fluorometer. |
Revision as of 00:56, 15 October 2014
|