Team:Oxford/policy and practices
From 2014.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Line 87: | Line 87: | ||
<h1purple>Intellectual Property….</h1purple> | <h1purple>Intellectual Property….</h1purple> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
- | <h2purple>Determining the ownership of the intellectual property of a project is crucial for any team hoping to develop their ideas beyond the Jamboree. Our report looks at how the iGEM community can navigate this controversial and difficult issue. </h2purple> | + | <h2purple> |
+ | Determining the ownership of the intellectual property of a project is crucial for any team hoping to develop their ideas beyond the Jamboree. Our report looks at how the iGEM community can navigate this controversial and difficult issue, and the implications of intellectual property policy for product development, and for shaping the future of the iGEM competition and by extension the field of synthetic biology as a whole... </h2purple> | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
</div></a> | </div></a> | ||
Line 97: | Line 98: | ||
<h1orange>Communication….</h1orange> | <h1orange>Communication….</h1orange> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
- | <h2orange> | + | <h2orange>As we quickly discovered working in such an interdisciplinary team, effective communication between disciplines is is essential to the development of any synthetic biology project. We </h2orange> |
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
</div></a> | </div></a> | ||
Line 109: | Line 110: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<h2blue3> | <h2blue3> | ||
- | Determining the ownership of the intellectual property of a project is crucial for any team hoping to develop their ideas beyond the Jamboree. Our report looks at how the iGEM community can navigate this controversial and difficult issue. | + | Determining the ownership of the intellectual property of a project is crucial for any team hoping to develop their ideas beyond the Jamboree. Our report looks at how the iGEM community can navigate this controversial and difficult issue, and the implications of intellectual property policy for product development, and for shaping the future of the iGEM competition and by extension the field of synthetic biology as a whole... |
</h2blue3><br><br> | </h2blue3><br><br> | ||
</div></a> | </div></a> | ||
Line 121: | Line 122: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<h2green> | <h2green> | ||
- | iGEM has been steadily expanding since its beginnings in 2004 | + | Of course, none of this would be possible without the iGEM competition itself, which has been steadily expanding since its beginnings in 2004 and has grown from 5 to over 200 teams in the last 10 years. As the first ever Oxford team, we are more than a little late to the party! Our team has researched the growing contribution made by the rest of Europe to the competition, of which we hope to become a part from 2014 onwards... |
</h2green><br><br> | </h2green><br><br> | ||
</div></a> | </div></a> |
Revision as of 10:39, 12 October 2014