Team:ULB-Brussels/Project/WetLab
From 2014.igem.org
m |
m (ULg & spaces) |
||
Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
- | The different constructions which are presented on this page are made by PCR amplification (construction of the inserts), homologous recombination (ligation of each insert in a vector containing an antibiotic resistance gene), electroporation of the recombinant vectors into E.coli, and growth on selective medium. The fusion of one sequence to another will be noted by the symbol “::” (e.g. the fusion of RFP and GFP separated by the 2A peptide is noted RFP::2A::GFP). | + | <p>The different constructions which are presented on this page are made by PCR amplification (construction of the inserts), homologous recombination (ligation of each insert in a vector containing an antibiotic resistance gene), electroporation of the recombinant vectors into E.coli, and growth on selective medium. The fusion of one sequence to another will be noted by the symbol “::” (e.g. the fusion of RFP and GFP separated by the 2A peptide is noted RFP::2A::GFP).</p> |
<h1>II. E.coli Chassis </h1> | <h1>II. E.coli Chassis </h1> | ||
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
<h2>A. Screening of the post transcriptional cleavage activity of different 2A-like sequences in E.coli</h2> | <h2>A. Screening of the post transcriptional cleavage activity of different 2A-like sequences in E.coli</h2> | ||
- | <p>In order to make a screening of the post transcriptional cleavage activity of different 2A peptides in E.coli, we designed two strategies:< | + | <p>In order to make a screening of the post transcriptional cleavage activity of different 2A peptides in E.coli, we designed two strategies:</p>$\hspace{0.25cm}$ |
- A positive selection of bacteria where the cleavage occurs by using a RFP::2A::phoA fusion.<br>$\hspace{0.25cm}$ | - A positive selection of bacteria where the cleavage occurs by using a RFP::2A::phoA fusion.<br>$\hspace{0.25cm}$ | ||
- A negative selection of bacteria where the cleavage occurs by using a RFP::2A::ccdB fusion.</p> | - A negative selection of bacteria where the cleavage occurs by using a RFP::2A::ccdB fusion.</p> | ||
Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
<h3><font color="#000050"> 1. Positive selection using RFP:: 2A::phoA </font></h3> | <h3><font color="#000050"> 1. Positive selection using RFP:: 2A::phoA </font></h3> | ||
<p>Alkaline phosphatase (phoA) is a periplasmic enzyme whose activity is easily detectable, even at low level, on chromogenic substrate (XP-medium (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate)). It is usually used to study protein secretion, but we will use it as a molecular marker for the activity of the 2A peptide. If phoA is correctly synthetized and exported in the periplasm, the substrate acquires a characteristic blue color. (Hoffman and Wright 1985; van Geest and Lolkema 2000) | <p>Alkaline phosphatase (phoA) is a periplasmic enzyme whose activity is easily detectable, even at low level, on chromogenic substrate (XP-medium (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate)). It is usually used to study protein secretion, but we will use it as a molecular marker for the activity of the 2A peptide. If phoA is correctly synthetized and exported in the periplasm, the substrate acquires a characteristic blue color. (Hoffman and Wright 1985; van Geest and Lolkema 2000) | ||
- | <p>In order to assess the efficacity of the 2A peptid, we need to design a plasmid containing 2 molecular markers (the red fluorescent protein (RFP) and phoA separated by a 2A peptide (RFP::2A::phoA). After cloning this plasmid in bacteria lacking the phoA gene in their genome (those bacteria were obtained from E.coli Keio Knockout collection) and after growth on chromogenic and selective XP-medium, we should be able to observe 4 types of results: < | + | <p>In order to assess the efficacity of the 2A peptid, we need to design a plasmid containing 2 molecular markers (the red fluorescent protein (RFP) and phoA separated by a 2A peptide (RFP::2A::phoA). After cloning this plasmid in bacteria lacking the phoA gene in their genome (those bacteria were obtained from E.coli Keio Knockout collection) and after growth on chromogenic and selective XP-medium, we should be able to observe 4 types of results: </p>$\hspace{0.25cm}$ |
1. Colourless colonies and blue medium <br>$\hspace{0.25cm}$ | 1. Colourless colonies and blue medium <br>$\hspace{0.25cm}$ | ||
2. Colourless colonies and colourless medium <br>$\hspace{0.25cm}$ | 2. Colourless colonies and colourless medium <br>$\hspace{0.25cm}$ | ||
Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
The second control is actually a control experiment, which will be done by insertion of proline::phoA sequences into bacteria lacking the phoA gene, and growth on chromogenic and selective XP-medium. </p> | The second control is actually a control experiment, which will be done by insertion of proline::phoA sequences into bacteria lacking the phoA gene, and growth on chromogenic and selective XP-medium. </p> | ||
<p>Indeed, the N-terminal extremity of phoA is a signal sequence that allows it to be translocated into the bacterial periplasm, where it will be folded in its active form. (Hoffman and Wright 1985; van Geest and Lolkema 2000) It means that the addition of the prolin from the 2A peptide to the N-extremity of phoA (Luke, 2012) could possibly disrupt the translocation process. If such a phenomenon should occur, our positive screening would reveal only negative results for phoA, even when the 2A peptide works correctly. We must thus design this control experiment in order to check that the translocation of phoA in the periplasm occurs even if we add a prolin on its N-extremity. | <p>Indeed, the N-terminal extremity of phoA is a signal sequence that allows it to be translocated into the bacterial periplasm, where it will be folded in its active form. (Hoffman and Wright 1985; van Geest and Lolkema 2000) It means that the addition of the prolin from the 2A peptide to the N-extremity of phoA (Luke, 2012) could possibly disrupt the translocation process. If such a phenomenon should occur, our positive screening would reveal only negative results for phoA, even when the 2A peptide works correctly. We must thus design this control experiment in order to check that the translocation of phoA in the periplasm occurs even if we add a prolin on its N-extremity. | ||
- | The control experiment should produce one of the following results: < | + | The control experiment should produce one of the following results: </p>$\hspace{0.25cm}$ |
- Colonies on blue medium <br>$\hspace{0.25cm}$ | - Colonies on blue medium <br>$\hspace{0.25cm}$ | ||
- Colonies on colourless medium.</p> | - Colonies on colourless medium.</p> | ||
Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
<h3><font color="#000050"> 2. Negative selection using RFP::2A::ccdB </font></h3> | <h3><font color="#000050"> 2. Negative selection using RFP::2A::ccdB </font></h3> | ||
<p>This second screening will serve as an independent test of the first screening. | <p>This second screening will serve as an independent test of the first screening. | ||
- | CcdB is a prokaryotic toxin affecting the DNA gyrase, which leads to the death of the cell. (Van Melderen, 2010) After growth on selective medium, the construction RFP::2A::ccdB expressed by our bacteria should lead to 3 kinds of results: < | + | CcdB is a prokaryotic toxin affecting the DNA gyrase, which leads to the death of the cell. (Van Melderen, 2010) After growth on selective medium, the construction RFP::2A::ccdB expressed by our bacteria should lead to 3 kinds of results: </p>$\hspace{0.25cm}$ |
1. Red colonies <br>$\hspace{0.25cm}$ | 1. Red colonies <br>$\hspace{0.25cm}$ | ||
2. Colourless colonies <br>$\hspace{0.25cm}$ | 2. Colourless colonies <br>$\hspace{0.25cm}$ | ||
Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
<h3><font color="#000050"> 1. Analysis of the improvement in the quantity of the product </font></h3> | <h3><font color="#000050"> 1. Analysis of the improvement in the quantity of the product </font></h3> | ||
- | <p>The quantification of yield improvement shall be done by spectrophotometry in collaboration with F. Delvigne from the University of Liège ( | + | <p>The quantification of yield improvement shall be done by spectrophotometry in collaboration with F. Delvigne from the University of Liège (ULg), using scale-down reactors to reproduce in the lab the conditions occurring within large bioreactors. (Delvigne et al., 2009) We will compare the GFP production yield of a common E.coli bacterium and the one of an E.coli expressing the Mighty Coli system (one plasmid containing the ccdB gene, and the other containing the construction GFP::2A::ccdA).</p> |
<h3><font color="#000050"> 2. Analysis of the efficiency to reduce the heterogeneity of population </font></h3> | <h3><font color="#000050"> 2. Analysis of the efficiency to reduce the heterogeneity of population </font></h3> | ||
<p>If we have the time, it will be done with the collaboration F. Delvigne from the University of Liège (Ulg), using scale-down reactors to reproduce in the lab the conditions occurring within large bioreactors. (Delvigne et al., 2009)</p> | <p>If we have the time, it will be done with the collaboration F. Delvigne from the University of Liège (Ulg), using scale-down reactors to reproduce in the lab the conditions occurring within large bioreactors. (Delvigne et al., 2009)</p> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
Line 111: | Line 112: | ||
Indeed, this protein possesses several isoforms, each of them the resulting of a mutation of the original Apol1 gene, and the concentration of each can be easily measured. We will thus compare the relative concentrations of the isoforms of Apol1 produced by a common yeast with those of a yeast expressing the Mighty Coli system (one plasmid containing the Kid gene, and the other containing the construction Apol1::P2A::Kis).</p> | Indeed, this protein possesses several isoforms, each of them the resulting of a mutation of the original Apol1 gene, and the concentration of each can be easily measured. We will thus compare the relative concentrations of the isoforms of Apol1 produced by a common yeast with those of a yeast expressing the Mighty Coli system (one plasmid containing the Kid gene, and the other containing the construction Apol1::P2A::Kis).</p> | ||
<p>Since all the frameshift mutations affecting the plasmid containing Apol1 will also disrupt the translation of the antitoxin, we expect the mutated forms of Apol1 to be far less produced by the Mighty Coli yeasts.</p> | <p>Since all the frameshift mutations affecting the plasmid containing Apol1 will also disrupt the translation of the antitoxin, we expect the mutated forms of Apol1 to be far less produced by the Mighty Coli yeasts.</p> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
Revision as of 13:52, 11 October 2014
$~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ \newcommand{\MyColi}{{\small Mighty\hspace{0.12cm}Coli}} \newcommand{\Stabi}{\small Stabi}$ $\newcommand{\EColi}{\small E.coli} \newcommand{\SCere}{\small S.cerevisae}\\[0cm] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ \newcommand{\PI}{\small PI}$ $\newcommand{\Igo}{\Large\mathcal{I}} \newcommand{\Tgo}{\Large\mathcal{T}} \newcommand{\Ogo}{\Large\mathcal{O}} ~$
|
---|