Team:EPF Lausanne/Judging

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 85: Line 85:
<h3>Judging form</h3>
<h3>Judging form</h3>
-
<p>The can be found <a href=" ">here</a>.</p>
+
<p>The judging form can be found <a href="https://igem.org/2014_Judging_Form?id=1486">here</a>.</p>
<h2>Medal criteria</h2>
<h2>Medal criteria</h2>

Revision as of 18:25, 6 October 2014

JUDGING

Judging form

The judging form can be found here.

Medal criteria

Bronze

EPF_Lausanne Team registration
Judging form Complete judging form
Wiki Team Wiki
Present a poster and a talk at the iGEM Jamboree
Attributions The description of each project must clearly attribute work done by the students and distinguish it from work done by others, including host labs, advisors, instructors, sponsors, professional website designers, artists, and commercial services.
BBa_K1486001 Document at least one new standard BioBrick Part or Device used in your project/central to your project and submit this part to the iGEM Registry

Silver

BBa_K1486002 Experimentally validate that at least one new BioBrick Part or Device of your own design and construction works as expected.
BBa_K1486002 Document the characterization of this part in the “Main Page” section of that Part’s/Device’s Registry entry.
BBa_K1486002 Submit this new part to the iGEM Parts Registry
Safety Page iGEM projects involve important questions beyond the bench, for example relating to (but not limited to) ethics, sustainability, social justice, safety, security, or intellectual property rights. Articulate at least one question encountered by your team, and describe how your team considered the(se) question(s) within your project. Include attributions to all experts and stakeholders consulted.

Gold

BBa_K1486045 ?? Improve the function OR characterization of an existing BioBrick Part or Device (created by another team or your own institution in a previous year), enter this information in the Registry.
Safety Page iGEM projects involve important questions beyond the bench, for example relating to (but not limited to) ethics, sustainability, social justice, safety, security, or intellectual property rights. Describe an approach that your team used to address at least one of these questions. Evaluate your approach, including whether it allowed you to answer your question(s), how it influenced the team’s scientific project, and how it might be adapted for others to use (within and beyond iGEM).

Sponsors