Team:UFAM Brazil/7-8-2014

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
Line 11: Line 11:
<tr><td colspan="3"><p>  Unfortunately, we couldn’t transform the diluted DNA from the 2013 DNA kit. </p>
<tr><td colspan="3"><p>  Unfortunately, we couldn’t transform the diluted DNA from the 2013 DNA kit. </p>
-
<p> Today ,instead of trying to transform using JM110 by washing it with sorbitol 1M or use a commercial cell. We used Escherichia coli DH5α chemically competent cell to transform biobrick BBa_E0840.</p>
+
<p> Today, instead of trying to transform using JM110 by washing it with sorbitol 1M or using a commercial cell, we used <i>Escherichia coli</i> DH5α chemically competent cell to transform biobrick BBa_E0840.</p>
-
<p> We also transformed Escherichia coli DH5α with  pUC72 having approximately  1.000ng/ul and 1ng/ul, because we wanted to find out if the reason why the diluted DNA didn’t work was dut to its low concentration.</p>
+
<p> We also transformed <i>Escherichia coli</i> DH5α with  pUC72 having approximately  1.000ng/ul and 1ng/ul, because we wanted to find out if the reason why the diluted DNA didn’t work was due to its low concentration.</p>
</td></tr>
</td></tr>

Latest revision as of 20:58, 15 October 2014

07/08/2014

Unfortunately, we couldn’t transform the diluted DNA from the 2013 DNA kit.

Today, instead of trying to transform using JM110 by washing it with sorbitol 1M or using a commercial cell, we used Escherichia coli DH5α chemically competent cell to transform biobrick BBa_E0840.

We also transformed Escherichia coli DH5α with pUC72 having approximately 1.000ng/ul and 1ng/ul, because we wanted to find out if the reason why the diluted DNA didn’t work was due to its low concentration.

Back Next