Team:ULB-Brussels/Project/WetLab
From 2014.igem.org
m (Units with a point"" : pas de virgule!) |
m |
||
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
The preliminary version of $\MyColi$ consists in 2 plasmids: one constitutively expressed carrying the gene of a toxin, the other inducible and carrying the gene of an antitoxin linked with the gene of the $\small Green$ $\small Fluorescent$ $\small Protein$ (GFP) by the 2A peptide gene (Cf. [Fig. m1] in Modelling pages). </p> | The preliminary version of $\MyColi$ consists in 2 plasmids: one constitutively expressed carrying the gene of a toxin, the other inducible and carrying the gene of an antitoxin linked with the gene of the $\small Green$ $\small Fluorescent$ $\small Protein$ (GFP) by the 2A peptide gene (Cf. [Fig. m1] in Modelling pages). </p> | ||
<!-- + To add Figure 1 "$\MyColi$ concept"--> | <!-- + To add Figure 1 "$\MyColi$ concept"--> | ||
- | <p> | + | <p>As mentionned in the introduction, the 2A peptide sequence allows the post-transcriptional cleavage of 1 ARN sequence into 2 amino-acid sequences: one upstream and one downstream of peptide. The C-terminal extremity of the upstream protein is thus fused with the N-terminal extremity of p2A, and N-terminal extremity of the downstream protein is fused with the last amino-acid of p2A (a prolin). There are several 2A-like sequences, but it could not be found in the litterature a 2A peptide that worked within E.coli. The 2A peptide P2A was found to function properly in ''S.cerevisiae''.</p> |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
--> | --> | ||
- | We thus decided to separate our WetLab in two separate projects: on the first hand, we | + | We thus decided to separate our WetLab in two separate projects: on the first hand, we would try to find a 2A-like peptide that works in $\small Escherichia$ $\small Coli$ (F2A f.e.); on the other hand, we will build the $\MyColi$ system in $\small Saccharomyces$ $\small Cerevisiae$ using the P2A peptide. We will thus use two different TA Systems: ccdB-ccdA for $\EColi$, and Kid-Kis for $\SCere$ (respectively Toxin-Antitoxin). </p> |
<h2>II. E.Coli Chassis </h2> | <h2>II. E.Coli Chassis </h2> | ||
- | <h3>A. Screening of different | + | <h3>A. Screening of different 2A-like sequences</h3> |
- | <p>In order to make an effective screening of different 2A peptides, we will need to design a plasmid containing 2 molecular markers (the $\small Red$ $\small Fluorescent$ $\small Protein$ (RFP) and the alkaline phosphatase (phoA)) separated by a 2A peptide (RFP:: | + | <p>In order to make an effective screening of different 2A peptides (referred to as "2A" in the rest of this work), we will need to design a plasmid containing 2 molecular markers (the $\small Red$ $\small Fluorescent$ $\small Protein$ (RFP) and the alkaline phosphatase (phoA)) separated by a 2A peptide (RFP::2A::phoA). After cloning this plasmid in bacteria lacking the phoA gene in their genome and after growth on chromogenic and selective XP-medium, we should be able to observe 4 types of results: </p> |
1. Colourless colonies and medium </p> | 1. Colourless colonies and medium </p> | ||
2. Green colonies and colourless medium</p> | 2. Green colonies and colourless medium</p> | ||
3. Colourless colonies and blue medium</p> | 3. Colourless colonies and blue medium</p> | ||
4. Green colonies and blue medium.</p> | 4. Green colonies and blue medium.</p> | ||
- | <p>In the first three cases, | + | <p>In the first three cases, 2A would not work properly: there is some problem at the translational or post-translational level (case 1.: for both proteins; case 2.: for GFP only ; case 3.: for phoA only). In the 4th case, 2A would work as expected: GFP is separated from phoA during the translation, and both proteins remain active after the separation. </p> |
<p>However, we are only interested in the translational problem, which are linked to the peptide 2A, and not in the post-translational problems, which are linked to the molecular markers we use (RFP and phoA). We must thus design another experiment in order to eliminate the impact that the post-traditional effects could have on the screening. </p> | <p>However, we are only interested in the translational problem, which are linked to the peptide 2A, and not in the post-translational problems, which are linked to the molecular markers we use (RFP and phoA). We must thus design another experiment in order to eliminate the impact that the post-traditional effects could have on the screening. </p> | ||
<h3>B. Construction and quantification of the Mighty Coli system </h3> | <h3>B. Construction and quantification of the Mighty Coli system </h3> | ||
- | <p>If we could find 2A peptide which work within $\EColi$, we could build our $\MyColi$ system into it. It would be done by PCR amplification (construction of the RFP-p2A-ccdA and ccdB inserts), homologous recombination (ligation of each insert in a vector carrying a different resistance gene), electroporation of the recombinant vectors into $\EColi$, and growth on selective medium. </p> | + | <p>If we could find a 2A peptide which work within $\EColi$, we could build our $\MyColi$ system into it. It would be done by PCR amplification (construction of the RFP-p2A-ccdA and ccdB inserts), homologous recombination (ligation of each insert in a vector carrying a different resistance gene), electroporation of the recombinant vectors into $\EColi$, and growth on selective medium. </p> |
<p>However, in order to have a valid experiment, we must first test the effect of the toxin (ccdB) alone on the bacteria – that is, the effect of the toxin without the antitoxin. </p> | <p>However, in order to have a valid experiment, we must first test the effect of the toxin (ccdB) alone on the bacteria – that is, the effect of the toxin without the antitoxin. </p> | ||
Revision as of 16:40, 30 September 2014
$~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ \newcommand{\MyColi}{{\small Mighty\hspace{0.12cm}Coli}} \newcommand{\Stabi}{\small Stabi}$ $\newcommand{\EColi}{\small E.coli} \newcommand{\SCere}{\small S.cerevisae}\\[0cm] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ \newcommand{\PI}{\small PI}$ $\newcommand{\Igo}{\Large\mathcal{I}} \newcommand{\Tgo}{\Large\mathcal{T}} \newcommand{\Ogo}{\Large\mathcal{O}} ~$
|
---|