Team:ULB-Brussels/Project

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
m
(J'ai clarifié quelques pgrases (mineur) , et j'ai supprimé la fin d'une phrase apparemment résultant d'une suppression intempestive ("Type II TA operons are negatively regulated").)
Line 31: Line 31:
<p>Production of recombinant proteins by microorganisms such as bacteria ($\small Escherichia$ $\small Coli$) or yeasts ($\small Saccharomyces$ $\SCere$, $\small Pichia$ $\small Pastoris$) is a key process in pharmacy (vaccines, insulin) and biotechnology (enzymes, antibodies). On industrial scale, proteins and other biological molecules are produced in bioreactors.  
<p>Production of recombinant proteins by microorganisms such as bacteria ($\small Escherichia$ $\small Coli$) or yeasts ($\small Saccharomyces$ $\SCere$, $\small Pichia$ $\small Pastoris$) is a key process in pharmacy (vaccines, insulin) and biotechnology (enzymes, antibodies). On industrial scale, proteins and other biological molecules are produced in bioreactors.  
<h3>Heterogeneity in bioreactors</h3>
<h3>Heterogeneity in bioreactors</h3>
-
Microorganisms used to produce recombinant proteins in bioreactors are often seen as a homogeneous population, yet stressed subpopulations may arise in these reactors, resulting in reduced quantity and quality of production, as stressed cells consume nutrients and space but have an altered productivity (Davey et al., 1996). Several factors may induce heterogeneity in a population : desynchronisation in cell cycle phases, emergence of mutants and new genotypes or variation in physico-chemical conditions within the reactor (Muller et al., 2010). Getting rid of these stressed subpopulations might be an effective way to increase both quality and quantity of production in bioreactors. </p>
+
Microorganisms used to produce recombinant proteins in bioreactors are often seen as a homogeneous population. However, stressed subpopulations may appear, resulting in reduced quantity and quality of the production. Indeed,stressed cells consume nutrients and space but have a reduced productivity (Davey et al., 1996). Several factors may induce heterogeneity in a population : desynchronisation in cell cycle phases, emergence of mutants and new genotypes or variation in physico-chemical conditions within the reactor (Muller et al., 2010). Getting rid of these stressed subpopulations might be an effective way to increase both quality and quantity of production in bioreactors. </p>
<h3>The Mighty Coli solution</h3>
<h3>The Mighty Coli solution</h3>
-
<p>To reduce inefficient production due to population heterogeneity in bioreactors, we designed $\MyColi$, a synthetic $\EColi$ that suicides when it enters a stressed physiological state. </p>
+
<p>To reduce inefficient production due to population heterogeneity in bioreactors, we designed $\MyColi$, a synthetic $\EColi$ that dies when it enters a stressed physiological state or when its production decreases.
-
<!-- or when its production goes under a threshold. ...</p> What threshold? do we obtain an experimental result like this? -->
+
<br/>
<br/>
<!--
<!--
Line 55: Line 54:
<p>$\small Toxin$-$\small Antitoxin$ (TA) systems are  
<p>$\small Toxin$-$\small Antitoxin$ (TA) systems are  
-
couples of linked genes encoding for a toxic protein and an inhibitor of this toxin.  
+
two linked genes encoding respectively for a stable toxic protein and an unstable inhibitor of this toxin.  
-
To ensure the survival of bacteria expressing one of these toxins, the corresponding antitoxin must also be expressed.  
+
Thus, to ensure the survival of bacteria expressing one of these toxins, the corresponding antitoxin must be continuously expressed in order to compensate its unstability.  
-
TA systems can be contained on mobile genetic elements such as plasmids. When a bacteria possessing such a plasmid divides, the generated daughter cells might not inherit this plasmid due to a stochastic partition. In this case, the antitoxin, which is often unstable, is quickly degraded, allowing the toxin to perform its function and kill the daugther cell in a process known as $\small Post$-$\small Segregational$ $\small Killing$ (PSK) [<b>Fig. 1</b>]. This system allows a plasmid to be selected and maintained in a bacterial population even if it doesn't confer any advantage. Therefore, TA systems can be seen as selfish entities, virtually making bacteria addicted to them (Hayes & Van Melderen, 2011).</p>
+
TA systems naturally occur in mobile genetic elements such as plasmids, and are used to maintain the plasmid in the microbial populattion. When a bacterium possessing such a plasmid divides, the generated daughter cells might not inherit a copy of the plasmid due to a stochastic partition. In this case, the antitoxin, unstable, is quickly degraded, allowing the toxin to perform its function and kill the daugther cell in a process known as $\small Post$-$\small Segregational$ $\small Killing$ (PSK) [<b>Fig. 1</b>]. This system allows a plasmid to be selected and maintained in a bacterial population even if it doesn't confer any advantage for the host. Therefore, TA systems can be seen as selfish entities, virtually making bacteria addicted to them (Hayes & Van Melderen, 2011).</p>
<br/>
<br/>
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/a/ad/PSK.png">
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/a/ad/PSK.png">
Line 71: Line 70:
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/5/57/TIITA.png">
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/5/57/TIITA.png">
</center>
</center>
-
<br/><font size="1"><b>Figure 2 </b>: Type II TA systems. In such systems, toxins and antitoxins are translated from the same polycistronic mRNA. The toxin is a protein that inhibits a vital function (translation, replication, peptidoglycan synthesis, etc.) and the antitoxin is another protein that binds this toxin, preventing it from causing harm to the cell. This antitoxin is often unstable and subject to proteolytic degradation. Should the transcription of the TA operon stops, the antitoxin would swiftly be degraded, allowing the toxin to kill or damage the cell. Type II TA operons are negatively regulated their respective toxin-antitoxin complexes.</font>
+
<br/><font size="1"><b>Figure 2 </b>: Type II TA systems. In such systems, toxins and antitoxins are translated from the same polycistronic mRNA. The toxin is a protein that inhibits a vital function (translation, replication, peptidoglycan synthesis, etc.) and the antitoxin is another protein that binds to this toxin, preventing it from causing harm to the cell. This antitoxin is often unstable and subject to proteolytic degradation. Should the transcription of the TA operon stops, the antitoxin would swiftly be degraded, allowing the toxin to kill or damage the cell. Type II TA operons are negatively regulated.</font>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
Line 82: Line 81:
<h3>CcdBA and the DNA gyrase</h3>
<h3>CcdBA and the DNA gyrase</h3>
-
CcdBA is the most studied type II TA system where CcdB is the toxin and CcdA the antitoxin. CcdB is an inhibitor of the DNA gyrase, an enzyme that supercoils circular DNA, such as bacterial chromosomes and plasmids, making it more compact. DNA gyrase complexes must bind to DNA to perform supercoiling. CcdB binds this subunit when bound to DNA, inhibiting its activity, resulting in DNA double strand breaks, activation of emergency signals and possibly death <b>[Fig. 3]</b> (Dao-Thi et al., 2005).  
+
CcdBA is the most studied type II TA system where CcdB is the toxin and CcdA the antitoxin. CcdB is an inhibitor of the DNA gyrase, an enzyme that supercoils circular DNA, such as bacterial chromosomes and plasmids, making it more compact. DNA gyrase complexes must bind to DNA to perform supercoiling. CcdB binds the DNA gyrase subunit that binds to DNA and inhibits its activity when it is bound to DNA, resulting in DNA double strand breaks, activation of emergency signals and possibly death of the cell <b>[Fig. 3]</b> (Dao-Thi et al., 2005).  
</p>
</p>

Revision as of 17:07, 25 September 2014

$~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ \newcommand{\MyColi}{{\small Mighty\hspace{0.12cm}Coli}} \newcommand{\Stabi}{\small Stabi}$ $\newcommand{\EColi}{\small E.coli} \newcommand{\SCere}{\small S.cerevisae}\\[0cm] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ \newcommand{\PI}{\small PI}$ $\newcommand{\Igo}{\Large\mathcal{I}} \newcommand{\Tgo}{\Large\mathcal{T}} \newcommand{\Ogo}{\Large\mathcal{O}} ~$ Example of a hierarchical menu in CSS

carousel slider





- Université Libre de Bruxelles -


An introduction to MightyColi



$\Ogo$ur $\MyColi$ project is based on several biological concepts, like production mechanisms of proteins & toxin-antitoxin systems, and bioengineering topics, like bioreactor optimization & effect of an additional peptide.

Recombinant Proteins

Production of recombinant proteins by microorganisms such as bacteria ($\small Escherichia$ $\small Coli$) or yeasts ($\small Saccharomyces$ $\SCere$, $\small Pichia$ $\small Pastoris$) is a key process in pharmacy (vaccines, insulin) and biotechnology (enzymes, antibodies). On industrial scale, proteins and other biological molecules are produced in bioreactors.

Heterogeneity in bioreactors

Microorganisms used to produce recombinant proteins in bioreactors are often seen as a homogeneous population. However, stressed subpopulations may appear, resulting in reduced quantity and quality of the production. Indeed,stressed cells consume nutrients and space but have a reduced productivity (Davey et al., 1996). Several factors may induce heterogeneity in a population : desynchronisation in cell cycle phases, emergence of mutants and new genotypes or variation in physico-chemical conditions within the reactor (Muller et al., 2010). Getting rid of these stressed subpopulations might be an effective way to increase both quality and quantity of production in bioreactors.

The Mighty Coli solution

To reduce inefficient production due to population heterogeneity in bioreactors, we designed $\MyColi$, a synthetic $\EColi$ that dies when it enters a stressed physiological state or when its production decreases.


Toxin-Antitoxin Systems

$\small Toxin$-$\small Antitoxin$ (TA) systems are two linked genes encoding respectively for a stable toxic protein and an unstable inhibitor of this toxin. Thus, to ensure the survival of bacteria expressing one of these toxins, the corresponding antitoxin must be continuously expressed in order to compensate its unstability. TA systems naturally occur in mobile genetic elements such as plasmids, and are used to maintain the plasmid in the microbial populattion. When a bacterium possessing such a plasmid divides, the generated daughter cells might not inherit a copy of the plasmid due to a stochastic partition. In this case, the antitoxin, unstable, is quickly degraded, allowing the toxin to perform its function and kill the daugther cell in a process known as $\small Post$-$\small Segregational$ $\small Killing$ (PSK) [Fig. 1]. This system allows a plasmid to be selected and maintained in a bacterial population even if it doesn't confer any advantage for the host. Therefore, TA systems can be seen as selfish entities, virtually making bacteria addicted to them (Hayes & Van Melderen, 2011).



Figure 1 $:\hspace{0.16cm}$ PSK and plasmid addiction. Cells that inherit a plasmid encoding a TA system can grow normally. As there is no system to part plasmids equivalently in daughter cells, some cells might not receive a plasmid during division. Such cells would still have toxins and antitoxins but these will not be renewed due to the loss of TA genes. Antitoxins are often unstable and quickly degraded by a protease under these conditions, leaving the toxins free and able to kill the cell, effectively eliminating cells losing plasmids that encode TA systems.

TA systems can be divided into five groups, depending on the molecular nature of its components (Hayes & Van Melderen, 2011). We will mainly use II TAs in which both components are proteins and the antitoxin binds to the toxin, preventing it from performing its function [Fig. 2]. Toxin functions and structures in type II TA systems are diversified, allowing us to chose how cells will die when stressed. Two systems will be used to illustrate our project : CcdBA and Kid/Kis.



Figure 2 : Type II TA systems. In such systems, toxins and antitoxins are translated from the same polycistronic mRNA. The toxin is a protein that inhibits a vital function (translation, replication, peptidoglycan synthesis, etc.) and the antitoxin is another protein that binds to this toxin, preventing it from causing harm to the cell. This antitoxin is often unstable and subject to proteolytic degradation. Should the transcription of the TA operon stops, the antitoxin would swiftly be degraded, allowing the toxin to kill or damage the cell. Type II TA operons are negatively regulated.

CcdBA and the DNA gyrase

CcdBA is the most studied type II TA system where CcdB is the toxin and CcdA the antitoxin. CcdB is an inhibitor of the DNA gyrase, an enzyme that supercoils circular DNA, such as bacterial chromosomes and plasmids, making it more compact. DNA gyrase complexes must bind to DNA to perform supercoiling. CcdB binds the DNA gyrase subunit that binds to DNA and inhibits its activity when it is bound to DNA, resulting in DNA double strand breaks, activation of emergency signals and possibly death of the cell [Fig. 3] (Dao-Thi et al., 2005).



Figure 3 $:\hspace{0.16cm}$ DNA gyrase mechanism & CcdB poisoning. $\hspace{0.2cm}a)$ The DNA gyrase is a tetramer made of two GyrA and two GyrB subunits. $\hspace{0.2cm}b)$ An undefined DNAsegment (G-segment) can bind between two GyrB subunits. $\hspace{0.2cm}c)$ Another segment (T-segment) binds, situated between both GyrA subunits of the complex. $\hspace{0.2cm}d)$ The gyrase catalyses a double strand break in the G-segment. $\hspace{0.2cm}e)$ The T-segment is translocated from GyrA to GyrB subunits, above the G-segment. $\hspace{0.2cm}f)$ Both ends of the G-segment are joined and supercoiled DNA is released from the complex. $\hspace{0.2cm}g)$ CcdB binds to GyrA subunits. $\hspace{0.2cm}h)$ CcdB prevents the gyrase from joining G-segment ends, resulting in DNA double strand breaks.

We want to construct a biological system selecting only highly productive cells. By coupling the production of a $\small Protein$ $\small of$ $\small Interest$ (PI) with an antitoxin (A-Tox) in a strain expressing its corresponding toxin, we hope that stressed cells experiencing a drop in PI productivity will be killed by the ensuing drop in A-Tox production. There are many ways to couple the production of two proteins, f.e. polycistronic mRNAs in procaryotes or Internal Ribosome Entry Sites. We chose to use a 2A peptide to pair the PI and the A-Tox.

The 2A Peptide

New text about p2A in this page.

Bibliography

  • H.M. Davey & D.B. Kell, (1996). Flow cytometry and cell sorting of heterogeneous microbial populations: the importance of single-cell analyses. Microbiological reviews, 60(4), 641-696.
  • F. Hayes & L. Van Melderen, (2011). Toxins-antitoxins: diversity, evolution and function. Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 46(5), 386-408.
  • S. Müller, H. Harms & T. Bley, (2010). Origin and analysis of microbial population heterogeneity in bioprocesses. Current opinion in biotechnology, 21(1), 100-113.
  • M.H. Dao-Thi, L. Van Melderen, E. De Genst, H. Afif, L. Buts, L. Wyns & R. Loris, (2005). Molecular basis of gyrase poisoning by the addiction toxin CcdB. Journal of molecular biology, 348(5), 1091-1102.
WetLab & Methods >