Team:Warwick/Human

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
(21 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 15: Line 15:
       <!--jQuery-->
       <!--jQuery-->
       <script src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.11.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
       <script src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.11.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
 +
 +
<link href="https://2014.igem.org/Template:Team:Warwick/global.css?action=raw&amp;ctype=text/css" type="text/css" rel="stylesheet">
       <!--Global CSS stylesheet implementation, linked to permanent Drive-hosted CSS file -->
       <!--Global CSS stylesheet implementation, linked to permanent Drive-hosted CSS file -->
-
       <style type="text/css">
+
       <!--<style type="text/css">
         @import url("https://googledrive.com/host/0B0qHcBpAhFaCQnZtWkUxNnVTSlk");
         @import url("https://googledrive.com/host/0B0qHcBpAhFaCQnZtWkUxNnVTSlk");
-
       </style>
+
       </style>-->
       <!--Inline JavaScript-->
       <!--Inline JavaScript-->
Line 35: Line 37:
         <!--CONTENT START-->
         <!--CONTENT START-->
          
          
-
        <img class = "headerImage" style = "width: 30%;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/f/ff/RepliconLogoON.png">
+
<a href="https://2014.igem.org/Main_Page"> <img class = "headerImage" style = "width: 12%;"  
-
        <img class = "headerImage" style = "width: 12%;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/f/f6/Warwick_logo.png">
+
src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/2/22/Logo2014v2.png"> </a>
-
         <!--img class = "headerImage" style = "width: 15%;" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/6/67/University_of_Warwick_logo.png"-->
+
          
-
         <!--img class = "headerImage" style = "width: 10%;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/0/05/ETH_Zurich_igem_logo.png"-->
+
        <a href="/Team:Warwick"> <img class = "headerImage" style = "width: 30%;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/f/ff/RepliconLogoON.png"> </a>
 +
         <a href="/Team:Warwick"> <img class = "headerImage" style = "width: 12%;"  
 +
src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/f/f6/Warwick_logo.png"> </a>
         <div id = "mainMenuBar">
         <div id = "mainMenuBar">
 +
            <li> <a href = "/Team:Warwick"> HOME </a> </li>
             <li> <a href = "/Team:Warwick/Project"> PROJECT </a> </li>
             <li> <a href = "/Team:Warwick/Project"> PROJECT </a> </li>
             <li> <a href = "/Team:Warwick/Team"> TEAM </a> </li>
             <li> <a href = "/Team:Warwick/Team"> TEAM </a> </li>
Line 46: Line 51:
             <li> <a href = "/Team:Warwick/Modelling"> MODELLING </a> </li>
             <li> <a href = "/Team:Warwick/Modelling"> MODELLING </a> </li>
             <li> <a href = "/Team:Warwick/Notebook"> NOTEBOOK </a> </li>
             <li> <a href = "/Team:Warwick/Notebook"> NOTEBOOK </a> </li>
-
             <li> <a href = "/Team:Warwick/Human"> HUMAN PRACTICES </a> </li>
+
             <li> <a href = "/Team:Warwick/Human"> <span> POLICY & PRACTICES </span> </a> </li>
-
             <li> <a href = "/Team:Warwick/Measurements"> MEASUREMENTS </a> </li>
+
             <!--<li> <a href = "/Team:Warwick/Measurements"> MEASUREMENTS </a> </li>-->
             <li> <a href = "/Team:Warwick/Interlab"> INTERLAB </a> </li>
             <li> <a href = "/Team:Warwick/Interlab"> INTERLAB </a> </li>
-
             <li> <a href = "/Team:Warwick/Attributions"> SPONSORS </a> </li>
+
             <li> <a href = "/Team:Warwick/Attributions"> ATTRIBUTIONS </a> </li>
 +
         
         </div>
         </div>
 +
 +
<div id="secondaryMenu">
 +
<li> <a href = "/Team:Warwick/Human/Survey"> SURVEY </a> </li>
 +
<li> <a href = "/Team:Warwick/Human/Changes"> PROJECT-SPECIFIC CHANGES </a> </li>
 +
<li> <a href = "/Team:Warwick/Human/Outreach"> OUTREACH </a> </li>
 +
<li> <a href = "/Team:Warwick/Human/Bioweapons"> BIOWEAPONS </a> </li>
 +
<li> <a href = "/Team:Warwick/Human/Safety"> SAFETY </a> </li>
 +
</div>
         <div id = "pageContentWrapper">
         <div id = "pageContentWrapper">
             <div id = "pageContent">
             <div id = "pageContent">
             <!-- THIS IS WHERE YOUR MAIN BODY GOES -->
             <!-- THIS IS WHERE YOUR MAIN BODY GOES -->
-
            <h1> HUMAN PRACTICES: THE INSPIRATION STATION </h1> <br> <br>
 
-
           
 
-
<div id="leftBoxx">
 
-
<h3> BIOWEAPONS </h3>
 
-
<ul> <li> What are our project's key vulnerabilities? That is, in what ways is our replicon system susceptible to weaponisation and ill-purpose? </li>
 
-
<li> Are there cases of synthetic biology being hijacked by malevolent forces in the first, that we might better insulate our project against such activities? </li>
 
-
<li> We could include a history of bioweaponry and their use, from before their outlawing at the 1975 Asilomar conference, to modern day use, illegal by international standards, in Syria. </li>
 
-
<li> To the end of better understanding the threat our work could possess, we have attempted to contact a friend of Will's at the <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/defence-science-and-technology-laboratory"> Defence Science and Technology Laboratory </a>, who transform discoveries in the fields of science and technology into functional defence and security material. We are awaiting a reply. </li> </ul>
 
-
</div>
 
-
<div id="rightBoxx">
+
<p> The ideas contained within the domain of <b> policy and practices </b> are absolutely fundamental to the iGEM vision. This is science for the global public good; open, accessible, international, non-profit, and for social and environmental benefit. Creating a project that is both feasible and socially useful is essential, and so is researching, experimenting and implementing it in a safe and ethical fashion. Public engagement is also an essential component of the human practices effort. Educating people about synthetic biology helps to allay fears that it is some horrible government conspiracy to breed battle-ready bunny rabbits, allowing the advantages made possible by established synthetic-biological advances to be better reaped by society. It is not some illicit science conducted underground in secretive labs, but a transparent endeavour available for exploration by undergraduate students, even those with zero experience in the biological sciences. Most importantly, we remembered at all times that proper relaxation and <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/7/73/Warwick_Human_Avengers.jpg"> good humour </a> is essential to a healthy mind and body, and to resisting stress and other such unforgiving malignancies. </p>
-
<h3> FUTUREPROOFING SYNBIO </h3>
+
-
<p> Synthetic biology is a new frontier in science. It is regulated by governments, but having been around for less time, may well have been subject to less meticulous scrutiny by all interested parties. An interesting exercise would be creating a slider of sorts, which dictates how stringently an imagined government controls the investigation of synthetic biology. Too little, and you run into issues of bioterrorism and accidental environmental contamination; too much, and you run the risk of stifling all research in a web of beauracratic frustration. Futureprooding would be about examining different existing models of regulation, deciding where they fit on the scale, and examining these case studies to determine the most effective solution, so as to support and not suffocate a burgeoning and potentially revolutionary field of scientific investigation. </p>
+
-
</div> <br>
+
-
<h2> Synthetic Biology: Reality v Hype </h2>  
+
<p> To these ends, we undertook a <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Warwick/Human/Survey"> survey </a>, whose recipients included members of other iGEM teams, members of the public, and members of our university community (staff, student and faculty). We <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Warwick/Human/Changes"> adapted </a> our project given the considerations mentioned above, and given the responses we received to said survey. We conducted <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Warwick/Human/Changes"> outreach </a>, including hosting an A-level student in the lab for a number of weeks. We constantly assessed our <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Warwick/Human/Safety"> safety </a>, looking at measures employed by our institution to avoid accident, the bodies that exist here to maintain proper scrutiny of experimental work and how to contact them in the event of a problem, and whether any of the substances of life forms which we were so gleefully reconstituting posed any danger to ourselves or the outside world. Finally, we thought about the potential for our replicon, the subject of so much work, to be exploited and misused by those with a scurrilous agenda, and particularly looked at how it might be hijacked for use as a <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Warwick/Human/Changes"> bioweapon </a>, including some discussion of the history of biological warfare. </p>
-
<p> Scientific skepticism has many different definitions, as a team we define it as a method to examine the claims about the world. The skeptical way of thinking is embodied in the scientific method, starting the generation of a hypothesis -  the acceptance or rejection of which is dependent on evidence, which must be robust, reliable and verifiable. Syntethic biology as a relative new discipline could then be seen to be a hype to generate interest, rather than a reality, as with all areas of science - results, if produced are rarely reproducible and verified.  
+
<p> Please indulge yourself in these investigations using the secondary navigation bar above, and remember, <b> the cake is a lie </b>. </p><br><br>
-
How then as a team, do we realize the use of synthetic biology in the world today and in the future, do we believe that it is a reality that will become more prevalent or does synthetic biology make bold claims, without evidence to justify such claims?
+
<img style="width:70%;" align="middle" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/a/a5/Warwick_Human_Global.jpg"><br><br>
-
Chelsey – Synthetic biology is trying to make solutions to problems that already have well characterized solutions available. For example - industrial processes which utilize chemical based methods. Translating and modifying organisms to scale up the same processes is a complex undertaking. However, it is important to realize that synthetic biology is a relatively new scientific discipline and as such, hype is used to generate interest – as with all areas of science today. I see synthetic biology growing in popularity for the future and can be a new way of solving problems, but only if the complexity of biological systems is further unravelled.
 
-
 
-
Leo –
 
-
Synthetic biology doesn’t have any particular advantage over traditional methods currently; with this being dependent on the scope of the project being conducted. For traditional biotechnological projects, it can become a valuable asset. However, for the majority of projects which are biologically complex – it is not currently feasible. Whether large scale companies will utilize synthetic biology in the future is an interesting question – of course, in the world today, scientific ventures that are the most interesting have to also have an impact commercially to be relevant.
 
-
 
-
 
-
Waqar – Having been the one conducting the team interviews and gaging responses of the team on synthetic biology. I come to an opinion where I think that synthetic biology is hyped to an extent but will also become an ever increasing reality in the future.  Synthetic biology may offer better methods/approaches/outlook to problems that exist currently. In particular, crop production being a major problem - with a growing population that is expected to reach 9 billion by 2050 it becomes imperative to improve yield and quality of crops with the limited agricultural land available. The diseases of today will still be the diseases of tomorrow, cancer, heart disease, MS, diabetes, TB, malaria, dengue and many others. Whilst research in such areas has been promising, it remains an open question whether synthetic biology can contribute or even be the magical cure.
 
-
 
-
Will – Has great potential in the future, but hype is just an inevitable part of science today. Trying to take experiments and redefine them in a different way is great, but it’s a safe way of doing science and merits little in return. Take the analogy of a fruit tree, picking the lowest branch yields the smallest fruit but putting in the work to get to the highest branch gives the largest fruit. In synthetic biology there is a lot of talk about standardization and hierarchical abstraction, but few examples rarely exist.
 
Line 93: Line 86:
         <!--CONTENT END-->
         <!--CONTENT END-->
-
       </div>
+
       <!--</div>-->
   </body>
   </body>
-
 
+
<footer>
 +
  <p>Created by: iGEM Warwick</p>
 +
  <p>Contact information: <a href="mailto:igem.warwick@gmail.com">
 +
  igem.warwick@gmail.com</a></p>
 +
</footer>
</html>
</html>

Latest revision as of 02:19, 18 October 2014

The ideas contained within the domain of policy and practices are absolutely fundamental to the iGEM vision. This is science for the global public good; open, accessible, international, non-profit, and for social and environmental benefit. Creating a project that is both feasible and socially useful is essential, and so is researching, experimenting and implementing it in a safe and ethical fashion. Public engagement is also an essential component of the human practices effort. Educating people about synthetic biology helps to allay fears that it is some horrible government conspiracy to breed battle-ready bunny rabbits, allowing the advantages made possible by established synthetic-biological advances to be better reaped by society. It is not some illicit science conducted underground in secretive labs, but a transparent endeavour available for exploration by undergraduate students, even those with zero experience in the biological sciences. Most importantly, we remembered at all times that proper relaxation and good humour is essential to a healthy mind and body, and to resisting stress and other such unforgiving malignancies.

To these ends, we undertook a survey , whose recipients included members of other iGEM teams, members of the public, and members of our university community (staff, student and faculty). We adapted our project given the considerations mentioned above, and given the responses we received to said survey. We conducted outreach , including hosting an A-level student in the lab for a number of weeks. We constantly assessed our safety , looking at measures employed by our institution to avoid accident, the bodies that exist here to maintain proper scrutiny of experimental work and how to contact them in the event of a problem, and whether any of the substances of life forms which we were so gleefully reconstituting posed any danger to ourselves or the outside world. Finally, we thought about the potential for our replicon, the subject of so much work, to be exploited and misused by those with a scurrilous agenda, and particularly looked at how it might be hijacked for use as a bioweapon , including some discussion of the history of biological warfare.

Please indulge yourself in these investigations using the secondary navigation bar above, and remember, the cake is a lie .





Retrieved from "http://2014.igem.org/Team:Warwick/Human"