Team:Oxford/intellectual property3

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Blanked the page)
 
(4 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
-
__NOTOC__
 
-
{{:Team:Oxford/templates/header}}
 
-
<div class="abcdefg">
 
-
<div class="container cf row">
 
-
<h1>Intellectual Property</h1>
 
-
 
-
<div class="news_block">
 
-
[[File:OxiGEM IP.jpg|400px|right|alt text]]
 
-
<p>"If a true “modern bioeconomy” is to emerge in the years ahead, intellectual property will no doubt play a
 
-
critical role. Intellectual property rights – the manner in which they are recognised, traded and managed,
 
-
nationally as well as globally – will influence the form such a bioeconomy takes, where it will flourish and
 
-
flounder, and to whom the principal benefits will flow..."<font style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 70%;">1</font></p>
 
-
<p> "Intellectual property increasingly constitutes the terrain upon which disputes over
 
-
North-South inequalities are waged..." </p>
 
-
<p> "No good case exists for the inequality of real and intellectual property, because no good case can exist for treating with special disfavor the work of the spirit and the mind." (Mark Helprin) </p>
 
-
<br>
 
-
</div>
 
-
 
-
<div class="news_block">
 
-
<h2> Should I file a patent application? </h2>
 
-
<p> Whether or not to file a patent application can be a tricky decision - below are some of the factors you may wish to take into account in deciding whether this is the right course of action...
 
-
[[File:OxigemIP Flowchart2.jpg|800px|center]]
 
-
</div>
 
-
 
-
<div class="news_block">
 
-
<h2> Conflicting Effects of IP Protection </h2>
 
-
 
-
<p> Incentivising Innovation </p>
 
-
<p> Early studies based on data from individual countries found that patents positively influenced innovation by 15-25%. <font style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 70%;">2</font> </p>
 
-
 
-
<p>Encouraging Openness </p>
 
-
 
-
<p> Creation of Monopoly </p>
 
-
<p>Other research expresses concern that patents on initial discoveries may delay, hamper, and deter innovations building on this patented work. <font style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 70%;">3</font> </p>
 
-
 
-
<p> ...But the paper warns against the dangers of continuing to analyse IP issues from within the 'innovation versus access' paradigm/dichotomy. </p>
 
-
 
-
</div>
 
-
{{:Team:Oxford/templates/footer}}
 

Latest revision as of 08:38, 13 August 2014