|
|
(9 intermediate revisions not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
- | __NOTOC__
| |
- | {{:Team:Oxford/templates/header}}
| |
| | | |
- | <div class="abcdefg">
| |
- | <div class="container cf row">
| |
- | <h1>Intellectual Property</h1>
| |
- |
| |
- | <div class="news_block">
| |
- | <p>"If a true “modern bioeconomy” is to emerge in the years ahead, intellectual property will no doubt play a
| |
- | critical role. Intellectual property rights – the manner in which they are recognised, traded and managed,
| |
- | nationally as well as globally – will influence the form such a bioeconomy takes, where it will flourish and
| |
- | flounder, and to whom the principal benefits will flow..."<font style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 70%;">1</font></p>
| |
- | [[File:OxiGEM IP.jpg|400px|right|alt text]]
| |
- | <p> "Intellectual property increasingly constitutes the terrain upon which disputes over
| |
- | North-South inequalities are waged..." </p>
| |
- |
| |
- | </div>
| |
- |
| |
- | <div class="news_block">
| |
- | <h2> Should I file a patent application? </h2>
| |
- | [[File:Oxigem IP flowchart.jpg|800px|right|alt text]]
| |
- | </div>
| |
- |
| |
- | <h2> Conflicting Effects of IP Protection </h2>
| |
- |
| |
- | <p> Incentivising Innovation </p>
| |
- | <p> Early studies based on data from individual countries found that patents positively influenced innovation by 15-25%. <font style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 70%;">2</font> </p>
| |
- |
| |
- | <p>Encouraging Openness </p>
| |
- |
| |
- | <p> Creation of Monopoly </p>
| |
- | <p>Other research expresses concern that patents on initial discoveries may delay, hamper, and deter innovations building on this patented work. <font style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 70%;">3</font> </p>
| |
- |
| |
- | <p> ...But the paper warns against the dangers of continuing to analyse IP issues from within the 'innovation versus access' paradigm/dichotomy. </p>
| |
- |
| |
- | </div>
| |
- | {{:Team:Oxford/templates/footer}}
| |