Team:Oxford/intellectual property3

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Blanked the page)
 
(9 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
-
__NOTOC__
 
-
{{:Team:Oxford/templates/header}}
 
-
<div class="abcdefg">
 
-
<div class="container cf row">
 
-
<h1>Intellectual Property</h1>
 
-
 
-
<div class="news_block">
 
-
<p>"If a true “modern bioeconomy” is to emerge in the years ahead, intellectual property will no doubt play a
 
-
critical role. Intellectual property rights – the manner in which they are recognised, traded and managed,
 
-
nationally as well as globally – will influence the form such a bioeconomy takes, where it will flourish and
 
-
flounder, and to whom the principal benefits will flow..."<font style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 70%;">1</font></p>
 
-
[[File:OxiGEM IP.jpg|400px|right|alt text]]
 
-
<p> "Intellectual property increasingly constitutes the terrain upon which disputes over
 
-
North-South inequalities are waged..." </p>
 
-
 
-
</div>
 
-
 
-
<div class="news_block">
 
-
<h2> Should I file a patent application? </h2>
 
-
[[File:Oxigem IP flowchart.jpg|800px|right|alt text]]
 
-
</div>
 
-
 
-
<h2> Conflicting Effects of IP Protection </h2>
 
-
 
-
<p> Incentivising Innovation </p>
 
-
<p> Early studies based on data from individual countries found that patents positively influenced innovation by 15-25%. <font style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 70%;">2</font> </p>
 
-
 
-
<p>Encouraging Openness </p>
 
-
 
-
<p> Creation of Monopoly </p>
 
-
<p>Other research expresses concern that patents on initial discoveries may delay, hamper, and deter innovations building on this patented work. <font style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 70%;">3</font> </p>
 
-
 
-
<p> ...But the paper warns against the dangers of continuing to analyse IP issues from within the 'innovation versus access' paradigm/dichotomy. </p>
 
-
 
-
</div>
 
-
{{:Team:Oxford/templates/footer}}
 

Latest revision as of 08:38, 13 August 2014