Team:Penn/Magnetism

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
(2 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 17: Line 17:
<div id="textbox">
<div id="textbox">
-
<p style = "text-align: left; text-indent:0px"> AMB-1 is most useful for synthetic biology because of its rare capacity to align with magnetic fields. We attempted to explore the magnetic properties of AMB-1 as further understanding would prove AMB-1’s value as a chassis in bioremediation and other fields. </p>
+
<p style = "text-align: left; text-indent:0px"> AMB-1 is most useful for synthetic biology because of its rare capacity to align with magnetic fields.<sup>[9]</sup> We attempted to explore the magnetic properties of AMB-1 as further understanding would prove AMB-1’s value as a chassis in bioremediation and other fields. </p>
<h3 style= "text-align: left">Relationship Between OD<sub>600</sub> and T<sub>2</sub> for AMB-1</h3>
<h3 style= "text-align: left">Relationship Between OD<sub>600</sub> and T<sub>2</sub> for AMB-1</h3>
Line 47: Line 47:
</div>
</div>
<div style="position:absolute;right:5px;bottom:50px">
<div style="position:absolute;right:5px;bottom:50px">
-
<a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Penn/Microbio"><img width="80px" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/c/ca/Syn-bio-amb-1-flow-arrow.png">;
+
<a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Penn/Microbio"><img width="80px" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/thumb/archive/c/ca/20141018025849%21Syn-bio-amb-1-flow-arrow.png/120px-Syn-bio-amb-1-flow-arrow.png">;
</div>
</div>
</body>
</body>
</html>
</html>

Latest revision as of 03:01, 18 October 2014

University of Pennsylvania iGEM

AMB-1 is most useful for synthetic biology because of its rare capacity to align with magnetic fields.[9] We attempted to explore the magnetic properties of AMB-1 as further understanding would prove AMB-1’s value as a chassis in bioremediation and other fields.

Relationship Between OD600 and T2 for AMB-1

We hoped to quantify the magnetic strength of AMB-1 using spin-spin relaxation time (T2 time) and relate it to the cell concentration (OD600). To do so, we used a magnetic NMR machine (the minispec mq60, Bruker) to measure the T2 decay time of cell samples (Fig. 1). A longer T2 time indicated fewer magnetic particles, and therefore weaker magnetic properties.

Figure 1:

Results:

Since the relationship between the inverse of T2 and OD was linear, this data supports that each cell has roughly the same number of magnetosomes, and that a greater number of these magnetosomes can be correlated with stronger magnetic properties. The cell concentration and magnetic strength showed a linear relationship (1/T2) =(0.002x + 0.0016) with an R2 = 0.704.

The following video of AMB-1 was taken under 1000X magnification.


;