Team:Gifu/Modeling
From 2014.igem.org
(7 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
<img class="mod" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/8/8e/Modeling2-V.png"></img><br><br> | <img class="mod" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/8/8e/Modeling2-V.png"></img><br><br> | ||
<img class="mod" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/a/a0/Modeling3-V.png"></img><br> | <img class="mod" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/a/a0/Modeling3-V.png"></img><br> | ||
- | <b>Figure. 1</b> | + | <b>Figure. 1 reaction mechanism of the self-splicing and position of each sequence</b> |
</p> | </p> | ||
<p>In this experiment, we carried out reverse transcription of RNA of <i>Escherichia coli</i>, and calculated the abundance ratio of each shape pattern by detecting specific sequences by using MPN-PCR (Most Probable Number-PCR). | <p>In this experiment, we carried out reverse transcription of RNA of <i>Escherichia coli</i>, and calculated the abundance ratio of each shape pattern by detecting specific sequences by using MPN-PCR (Most Probable Number-PCR). | ||
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
- | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/1/19/Modeling4V.png"></img><br><b>Figure. 2</b> | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/1/19/Modeling4V.png"></img><br><b>Figure. 2 the sequence of oligo dt primer</b> |
</p> | </p> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
</ol> | </ol> | ||
</p><p> | </p><p> | ||
- | It means, if the primer anneals to C or D, this sequence doesn’t exist in cDNA. And if the primer did not anneal at 3' end, C or D don't exist in synthesized cDNA (linear mRNA). (fig. 3)<br><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/ | + | It means, if the primer anneals to C or D, this sequence doesn’t exist in cDNA. And if the primer did not anneal at 3' end, C or D don't exist in synthesized cDNA (linear mRNA). (fig. 3)<br><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/f/fd/Modelfig3-2V.png"></img><br><b>Figure. 3 difference in amplification with the change of the binding site</b> |
</p> | </p> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/7/71/Modelfig4-1V.png"></img><br> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/7/71/Modelfig4-1V.png"></img><br> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/9/98/Modeling5-V.png"></img><br> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/9/98/Modeling5-V.png"></img><br> | ||
- | <b>Figure. 4</b> | + | <b>Figure. 4 probability on the stepⅠ</b> |
</p> | </p> | ||
<p>Step Ⅱ (fig. 5)</p> | <p>Step Ⅱ (fig. 5)</p> | ||
Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/8/80/Modelfig4-2V.png"></img><br> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/8/80/Modelfig4-2V.png"></img><br> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/f/ff/Modeling6V.png"></img><br> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/f/ff/Modeling6V.png"></img><br> | ||
- | <br><b>Figure. 5</b> | + | <br><b>Figure. 5 probability on the stepⅡ</b> |
</p> | </p> | ||
<p>Step Ⅲ (fig. 6)</p> | <p>Step Ⅲ (fig. 6)</p> | ||
Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/4/4b/Modelfig5V.png"></img><br> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/4/4b/Modelfig5V.png"></img><br> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/8/86/Modelfig6V.png"></img><br> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/8/86/Modelfig6V.png"></img><br> | ||
- | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/3/31/Modeling7V.png"></img><br><b>Figure. 6</b> | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/3/31/Modeling7V.png"></img><br><b>Figure. 6 probability on the stepⅢ</b> |
</p> | </p> | ||
Line 104: | Line 104: | ||
<h2>About A and B</h2> | <h2>About A and B</h2> | ||
<p>We carried out PCR and agarose gel electrophoresis (fig.7).</p> | <p>We carried out PCR and agarose gel electrophoresis (fig.7).</p> | ||
- | <p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/b/b3/Modelfig7V.png"></img><br><b>Figure. 7</b> | + | <p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/b/b3/Modelfig7V.png"></img><br><b>Figure. 7 agarose gel shown the result of A and B</b> |
</p> | </p> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
We carried out image analysis. We calculated the intensity of light relatively and then decided whether the objective band detected or not(figure.8 and 9). Judging from the square measure of each peak, we obtained following result (table.1). Table.1 shows a number of the positive fraction. | We carried out image analysis. We calculated the intensity of light relatively and then decided whether the objective band detected or not(figure.8 and 9). Judging from the square measure of each peak, we obtained following result (table.1). Table.1 shows a number of the positive fraction. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
- | <p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/d/db/Modelfig8V.png"></img><br><b>Figure. 8</b> | + | <p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/d/db/Modelfig8V.png"></img><br><b>Figure. 8 difference in brightness on the agarose gel of A</b> |
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
- | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/2/27/Modelfig9V.png"></img><br><b>Figure. 9</b> | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/2/27/Modelfig9V.png"></img><br><b>Figure. 9 difference in brightness on the agarose gel of B</b> |
</p> | </p> | ||
+ | <b>table. 1 a number of the positive fraction on A and B</b></p> | ||
<p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/9/9f/Modeltable1V.png"></img><br> | <p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/9/9f/Modeltable1V.png"></img><br> | ||
- | |||
<p>The ratio (B/A) which shows that the reaction doesn’t proceed is expressed the following.</p> | <p>The ratio (B/A) which shows that the reaction doesn’t proceed is expressed the following.</p> | ||
<p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/6/6e/Modeling11V.png"></img></p> | <p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/6/6e/Modeling11V.png"></img></p> | ||
Line 120: | Line 120: | ||
<p>We carried out PCR and agarose gel electrophoresis (fig.10).</p> | <p>We carried out PCR and agarose gel electrophoresis (fig.10).</p> | ||
<p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/c/cf/Modelfig12V.png"><br> | <p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/c/cf/Modelfig12V.png"><br> | ||
- | <b>Figure. 10</b></p> | + | <b>Figure. 10 agarose gel shown the result of C and D</b></p> |
<p> | <p> | ||
We carried out image analysis. We calculated the intensity of light relatively and then decided whether the objective band detected or not (figure.11 and 12). Judging from the square measure of each peak, we obtained following result (table. 2). Table.2 shows a number of the positive fraction. | We carried out image analysis. We calculated the intensity of light relatively and then decided whether the objective band detected or not (figure.11 and 12). Judging from the square measure of each peak, we obtained following result (table. 2). Table.2 shows a number of the positive fraction. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
- | <p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/6/60/Modelfig10V.png"></img><br><b>Figure. 11</b> | + | <p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/6/60/Modelfig10V.png"></img><br><b>Figure. 11 difference in brightness on the agarose gel of C</b> |
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
- | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/f/f8/Modelfig11V.png"></img><br><b>Figure. 12</b> | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/f/f8/Modelfig11V.png"></img><br><b>Figure. 12 difference in brightness on the agarose gel of D</b> |
</p> | </p> | ||
+ | <b> table. 2 a number of the positive fraction on C and D</b></p> | ||
<p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/b/b2/Modeltable2V.png"></img><br> | <p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/b/b2/Modeltable2V.png"></img><br> | ||
- | |||
<p>We show the ratio (C/D) as follows.</p> | <p>We show the ratio (C/D) as follows.</p> | ||
- | <p>https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/0/08/Modeling10V.png</p> | + | <p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/0/08/Modeling10V.png"></img></p> |
<p>The ratio of RNA cyclization was 2.5%. | <p>The ratio of RNA cyclization was 2.5%. | ||
The abundance ratio of stepⅠwas 4.7%. In other words, the rate of reaction was 95.3%. | The abundance ratio of stepⅠwas 4.7%. In other words, the rate of reaction was 95.3%. | ||
- | The abundance ratio of stepⅡwas 92.8%. In stepⅡ, the sequence of the 5’intron attack on the 3’intron. It shows that this reaction is the rate-limiting step in the process of cyclization. If you can streamline this step, usability of the circular mRNA may widen.</p> | + | The abundance ratio of stepⅡwas 92.8%. In stepⅡ, the sequence of the 5’intron attack on the 3’intron. It shows that this reaction is the rate-limiting step in the process of circularization. Why this step is the rate-limiting step? It is conceivable that because distance of 5’introns and 3’intron is far. So we think that the shorter protein coding gene is, the more efficiency of RNA cyclization increase. </br>If you can streamline this step, usability of the circular mRNA may widen.</p> |
<h1 class="theme3">Support from other team</h1> | <h1 class="theme3">Support from other team</h1> | ||
- | <p>Because our theme “Circular mRNA” is qualitative experiment, we had a hard time with Modeling. That’s why | + | <p>Because our theme “Circular mRNA” is qualitative experiment, we had a hard time with Modeling. That’s why a member of UT-Tokyo advised us the Modeling about our theme. </p> |
<p><ol type="Ⅰ"> | <p><ol type="Ⅰ"> | ||
<li><b>Growth curve of <i>E. coli</i> and overexpression of protein by circular mRNA | <li><b>Growth curve of <i>E. coli</i> and overexpression of protein by circular mRNA |
Latest revision as of 03:33, 18 October 2014
Modeling
Summary
We examined the efficiency of circularization of mRNA in E. coli. The mRNA synthesized by transcription of induced plasmid may be considered that there are mainly 3 shape patterns in the process of circularization (fig.1).
Figure. 1 reaction mechanism of the self-splicing and position of each sequence
In this experiment, we carried out reverse transcription of RNA of Escherichia coli, and calculated the abundance ratio of each shape pattern by detecting specific sequences by using MPN-PCR (Most Probable Number-PCR).
By examining the abundance ratio of sequence A, B or C, D , and B / A shows the probability that the reaction doesn’t start (step Ⅰ). Also, we can calculate the probability that RNA will cyclize (step Ⅱ,Ⅲ) by C and D. By examining them, we investigated the rate-limiting step in the process of cyclization or probability to cyclization of the RNA.
Experiment
We extracted total RNA from E. coli and then carried out the reverse transcription. This time we used the two types of primer; oligo dt primer and random primer. And we carried out reverse transcription with them. We serially diluted obtained cDNA, and calculated abundance rate by using MPN-PCR.
Case 1: Determination of the sequence A and B
We carried out reverse transcription with the oligo dt primer which is complementary to the poly A sequence at the 3 'end of the mRNA (fig.2).
Figure. 2 the sequence of oligo dt primer
Oligo dt primer anneals specifically to the 3 'end of the mRNA, so the ratio of reverse transcription of A and B are the same. Thus, B/A calculated by the MPN-PCR shows the abundance ratio of step Ⅰ, that is, the probability that no reaction started.
Case 2: Determination of the sequence C and D
Since there’s no poly A sequence on the mRNA after starting cyclization, it’s impossible to use the oligo dt primer. Therefore, we use the random primer. However, some problems arise when we determine them with random primer.
Problems
Reverse transcription is carried out in the following steps.
- Primer is added to RNA.
- The cDNA is synthesized by reverse transcriptase.
- Inactivation of reverse transcriptase
It means, if the primer anneals to C or D, this sequence doesn’t exist in cDNA. And if the primer did not anneal at 3' end, C or D don't exist in synthesized cDNA (linear mRNA). (fig. 3)
Figure. 3 difference in amplification with the change of the binding site
We calculated the ratio made C or D in cDNA each step when we carried out reverse transcription with random primer.
- The ratio of random primer annealing depended on only base pairs of RNA.
- When mRNA was transcribed from DNA, transcription finished at the same sequence.
- There was no shape pattern of RNA without figure 1.
On the step Ⅰ, when random primer annealed the sequence which is cyclized and its 3’ end, the ratio that D is reverse transcribed is the following.
Step Ⅰ (fig. 4)
Figure. 4 probability on the stepⅠ
Step Ⅱ (fig. 5)
Figure. 5 probability on the stepⅡ
Step Ⅲ (fig. 6)
Figure. 6 probability on the stepⅢ
The C/D calculated in this experiment shows the following.
aⅠand aⅡ show the following.
From the above, by examining the C/D, we are able to calculate the abundance ratio of stepⅢ ; the abundance ratio of the cyclization of the RNA.
Result&Data analysis
About A and B
We carried out PCR and agarose gel electrophoresis (fig.7).
Figure. 7 agarose gel shown the result of A and B
We carried out image analysis. We calculated the intensity of light relatively and then decided whether the objective band detected or not(figure.8 and 9). Judging from the square measure of each peak, we obtained following result (table.1). Table.1 shows a number of the positive fraction.
Figure. 8 difference in brightness on the agarose gel of A
Figure. 9 difference in brightness on the agarose gel of B
The ratio (B/A) which shows that the reaction doesn’t proceed is expressed the following.
About C and D
We carried out PCR and agarose gel electrophoresis (fig.10).
Figure. 10 agarose gel shown the result of C and D
We carried out image analysis. We calculated the intensity of light relatively and then decided whether the objective band detected or not (figure.11 and 12). Judging from the square measure of each peak, we obtained following result (table. 2). Table.2 shows a number of the positive fraction.
Figure. 11 difference in brightness on the agarose gel of C
Figure. 12 difference in brightness on the agarose gel of D
We show the ratio (C/D) as follows.
The ratio of RNA cyclization was 2.5%. The abundance ratio of stepⅠwas 4.7%. In other words, the rate of reaction was 95.3%. The abundance ratio of stepⅡwas 92.8%. In stepⅡ, the sequence of the 5’intron attack on the 3’intron. It shows that this reaction is the rate-limiting step in the process of circularization. Why this step is the rate-limiting step? It is conceivable that because distance of 5’introns and 3’intron is far. So we think that the shorter protein coding gene is, the more efficiency of RNA cyclization increase. If you can streamline this step, usability of the circular mRNA may widen.
Support from other team
Because our theme “Circular mRNA” is qualitative experiment, we had a hard time with Modeling. That’s why a member of UT-Tokyo advised us the Modeling about our theme.
- Growth curve of E. coli and overexpression of protein by circular mRNA
→How much does the synthesis of long-chain protein influence growth of E. coli?
By comparing our result with control (empty vector or non-plasmid), we decide parameter. We also learnt it from UT-Tokyo that past studies will be good references for these population dynamics.
https://2013.igem.org/Team:British_Columbia/Modeling - Does the strength of circular mRNA depend on the length of exon?
If we can make a parameter which shows how long the insert is the most stable when we had Circular mRNA, this will be helpful for the correction of the model.
We greatly appreciate UT-Tokyo taught us Modeling despite their busy.