Team:Gifu/Projects/Circular&RNA
From 2014.igem.org
(56 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
It occurs after transcription. | It occurs after transcription. | ||
Splicing is catalyzed by several base sequences of the ends of introns as a ribozyme, being subjected to nucleophilic attack from intron to exon. | Splicing is catalyzed by several base sequences of the ends of introns as a ribozyme, being subjected to nucleophilic attack from intron to exon. | ||
- | So we will introduce the plasmid which places the sequence of the end of intron as a splicing ribozyme on the end of a gene coding for proteins into E. coli, and cyclize mRNA for | + | So we will introduce the plasmid which places the sequence of the end of intron as a splicing ribozyme on the end of a gene coding for proteins into <i>E. coli</i>, and cyclize mRNA for |
synthesis of long-chain, massive proteins.</p> | synthesis of long-chain, massive proteins.</p> | ||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
<h1 class="theme3"><a name="flow"></a>Project Flow</h1> | <h1 class="theme3"><a name="flow"></a>Project Flow</h1> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
- | We can use the group I intron self-splicing mechanism in td gene of T4 phage to circularize mRNA. The group I intron self-splicing is a mechanism that circularizes an intron and connects exons. It occurs after transcription. The self-splicing is catalyzed by several base sequences of the ends of introns as a ribozyme. We permuted exons and introns with the mechanism and attempted an exon circularization. So we constructed mRNA circularization devices. We induced a protein coding sequence and them into E. coli. We created circular mRNA and synthesized massive long-chain protein with it. | + | We can use the group I intron self-splicing mechanism in td gene of T4 phage to circularize mRNA. The group I intron self-splicing is a mechanism that circularizes an intron and connects exons. It occurs after transcription. The self-splicing is catalyzed by several base sequences of the ends of introns as a ribozyme. We permuted exons and introns with the mechanism and attempted an exon circularization. So we constructed mRNA circularization devices. We induced a protein coding sequence and them into <i>E. coli</i>. We created circular mRNA and synthesized massive long-chain protein with it. |
</p> | </p> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/3/3f/Gifu_project_flow.png" width="700px"></img><br> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/3/3f/Gifu_project_flow.png" width="700px"></img><br> | ||
+ | <b> Method of the synthesis of the long chain protein </b> | ||
+ | |||
<h1 class="theme3"><a name="T&M"></a>Theory & Methods</h1> | <h1 class="theme3"><a name="T&M"></a>Theory & Methods</h1> | ||
Line 52: | Line 54: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/4/41/SS1_GIFU.png" width="700px"></img><br> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/4/41/SS1_GIFU.png" width="700px"></img><br> | ||
- | <b> | + | <b>Fig.2 Self-splicing in T4 phage: the first and second step (Blue: intron, Orange: exon)</b><br><br> |
As the third step, the upstream intron bonds to the downstream intron by an attack on an adenine of the upstream intron. The attack takes place by a hydroxyl group of an end of the downstream intron. And then a circular intron is formed.(Figure 2)<br> | As the third step, the upstream intron bonds to the downstream intron by an attack on an adenine of the upstream intron. The attack takes place by a hydroxyl group of an end of the downstream intron. And then a circular intron is formed.(Figure 2)<br> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/2/2b/SS2.png" width="600px"></img><br> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/2/2b/SS2.png" width="600px"></img><br> | ||
- | <b> | + | <b>Fig.3 Self-splicing in T4 phage: the third step (Blue: intron, Orange: exon)</b><br><br> |
</p> | </p> | ||
<h2>The permuted intron-exon method: PIE method</h2> | <h2>The permuted intron-exon method: PIE method</h2> | ||
- | <p>Two exons are connected with each other in the circularization system; furthermore an exon can theoretically be circularized by the system. ( | + | <p>Two exons are connected with each other in the circularization system; furthermore an exon can theoretically be circularized by the system. (Fig.4)<br> |
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/a/a1/PIEGIFU3.png" width="650px"></img><br><br> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/a/a1/PIEGIFU3.png" width="650px"></img><br><br> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/d/d2/PIEGIFU2.png" width="600px"></img><br> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/d/d2/PIEGIFU2.png" width="600px"></img><br> | ||
- | <b> | + | <b>Fig.4 An idea of mRNA circularization (Blue: intron, Orange: exon)</b></br> |
</p> | </p> | ||
<p> The method that puts the theory into practice is the PIE method. The PIE method stands for the Permuted Intron-Exon method. A circular mRNA is made by the method.<br> | <p> The method that puts the theory into practice is the PIE method. The PIE method stands for the Permuted Intron-Exon method. A circular mRNA is made by the method.<br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
- | The protocol of PIE method ( | + | The protocol of PIE method (Fig.5)<br> |
<ol> | <ol> | ||
<li>Pick out the intron and splice site in the exon.</li> | <li>Pick out the intron and splice site in the exon.</li> | ||
Line 72: | Line 74: | ||
</p><p> | </p><p> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/9/94/PIEGIFU4.png" width="500px"></img><br> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/9/94/PIEGIFU4.png" width="500px"></img><br> | ||
- | <b> | + | <b>Fig.5 PIE method</b></br> |
</p> | </p> | ||
Line 81: | Line 83: | ||
<p>We picked out the two fragments (5’ side and 3’ side) for self-splicing from td gene of T4 phage. The fragment consists of an intron and the fragment of the exon (splicing site). | <p>We picked out the two fragments (5’ side and 3’ side) for self-splicing from td gene of T4 phage. The fragment consists of an intron and the fragment of the exon (splicing site). | ||
We integrated a promoter, the fragment of self-splicing (3’ side) and RBS(binding-site for ribosome) into a plasmid. (→ mRNA circularization device (5´ side)) | We integrated a promoter, the fragment of self-splicing (3’ side) and RBS(binding-site for ribosome) into a plasmid. (→ mRNA circularization device (5´ side)) | ||
- | We integrated the fragment of self-splicing (3’ side) and DT (double terminator) into a plasmid. (→ mRNA circularization device (3´ side))( | + | We integrated the fragment of self-splicing (3’ side) and DT (double terminator) into a plasmid. (→ mRNA circularization device (3´ side))(Fig.6) |
</p> | </p> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/6/6a/PARTSGIFU.png" width="500px"></img><br> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/6/6a/PARTSGIFU.png" width="500px"></img><br> | ||
- | <b> | + | <b>Fig.6 Parts assembly</b> |
</p> | </p> | ||
+ | <h2>The mRNA which becomes a loop</h2> | ||
<h3>Detecting circular mRNA </h3> | <h3>Detecting circular mRNA </h3> | ||
<h4>Summary of the experiment</h4> | <h4>Summary of the experiment</h4> | ||
Line 103: | Line 106: | ||
<h4>Protocol</h4> | <h4>Protocol</h4> | ||
<p><style="font-size:large;"><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Gifu/protocols2#CRD">Jump!</a></p> | <p><style="font-size:large;"><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Gifu/protocols2#CRD">Jump!</a></p> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <h3>Elucidation of the cyclization mechanism</h3> | ||
+ | <h4>Summary of the experiment</h4> | ||
+ | <p>I read the sequence of the binding site of the circular mRNA to confirm how an intronic ribozyme acted | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
<h2>Synthesizing long-chain RFP</h2> | <h2>Synthesizing long-chain RFP</h2> | ||
Line 112: | Line 121: | ||
We compared RFPs derived from RNAs in various states to assay the coloration of a long-chain RFP. | We compared RFPs derived from RNAs in various states to assay the coloration of a long-chain RFP. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
<h3>The existence of long-chain protein -1- SDS-PAGE</h3> | <h3>The existence of long-chain protein -1- SDS-PAGE</h3> | ||
Line 118: | Line 129: | ||
We confirmed the existence of the long-chain RFP derived from the circular mRNA by SDS-PAGE. <br> | We confirmed the existence of the long-chain RFP derived from the circular mRNA by SDS-PAGE. <br> | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
<h3>The existence of long-chain protein -2- Western blotting</h3> | <h3>The existence of long-chain protein -2- Western blotting</h3> | ||
<h4>Summary of the experiment</h4> | <h4>Summary of the experiment</h4> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
- | + | We examined whether the long-chain-protein synthesized by E. coli is really objective protein derived from circular mRNA. | |
</p> | </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
<h3>The determination of long-chain RFP</h3> | <h3>The determination of long-chain RFP</h3> | ||
<h4>Summary of the experiment</h4> | <h4>Summary of the experiment</h4> | ||
- | <p> | + | <p>We determined the quantity of synthesized protein and examined the efficiency of synthesis of long-chain-protein.</p> |
- | </p> | + | |
+ | <br> | ||
<h2>Synthesizing long-chain SmtA (Metallothionein)</h2> | <h2>Synthesizing long-chain SmtA (Metallothionein)</h2> | ||
<h3>Summary of the experiment</h3> | <h3>Summary of the experiment</h3> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
- | We cultured E. coli that the SmtA semi-permanent generator is integrated into in the presence of zinc to examine the activity of a long-chain SmtA. | + | We cultured <i>E. coli</i> that the SmtA semi-permanent generator is integrated into in the presence of zinc to examine the activity of a long-chain SmtA. |
</p> | </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
<h1 class="theme3"><a name="results"></a>Results&Data analysis</h1> | <h1 class="theme3"><a name="results"></a>Results&Data analysis</h1> | ||
Line 141: | Line 159: | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/4/41/CircularRNA.png" width="500px" class="pic"></img> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/4/41/CircularRNA.png" width="500px" class="pic"></img> | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
+ | <b>Fig.7 RT-PCR of RNA which carried out each nuclease processing<b/> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
Positive: 3,5,6<br> | Positive: 3,5,6<br> | ||
Line 163: | Line 182: | ||
Therefore, the RNA that is decomposed by the endoribonuclease but is not decomposed by the exoribonuclease exists. We think this RNA is the circular mRNA! | Therefore, the RNA that is decomposed by the endoribonuclease but is not decomposed by the exoribonuclease exists. We think this RNA is the circular mRNA! | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <h2>Elucidation of the cyclization mechanism</h2> | ||
+ | <p>After having reverse-transcripted it, I amplified a joining part between the intron by PCR and read sequence. I show below the sequence for the junction of 3'intron parts and 5'intron parts.</p> | ||
+ | <p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/d/d3/Circular_mRNA_confirm.png" width="600px"></img> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <p>As a result of having read Sequence, I understood that U of 5'intron was combined with C of 3'intron and mRNA became a loop.</p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
<h2>The existence of a long-chain protein</h2> | <h2>The existence of a long-chain protein</h2> | ||
Line 169: | Line 198: | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/7/76/PROTEIN1.png" width="500px" class="pic"></img> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/7/76/PROTEIN1.png" width="500px" class="pic"></img> | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
+ | <b>Fig.8 SDS-PAGE of RFP produced in <i>E. coli</i> </b> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
1. RFP from linear RNA (with stop codon)<br> | 1. RFP from linear RNA (with stop codon)<br> | ||
Line 181: | Line 211: | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/b/bc/PROTEIN2.png" width="500px" class="pic"></img> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/b/bc/PROTEIN2.png" width="500px" class="pic"></img> | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
+ | <b>Fig.9 extending Fig.8</b> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
There is a long-chain protein near a band that indicates 250 kDa. The molecular weight of a monomeric RFP is 25423.7(→ BBa_E1010), so we guess that the protein is not less than decameric RFP. | There is a long-chain protein near a band that indicates 250 kDa. The molecular weight of a monomeric RFP is 25423.7(→ BBa_E1010), so we guess that the protein is not less than decameric RFP. | ||
Line 187: | Line 218: | ||
There will be three reasons that ribosome leaves. | There will be three reasons that ribosome leaves. | ||
<ol> | <ol> | ||
- | <li> | + | <li>It is caused by a distortion to occur to the cyclic mRNA.</li> |
- | <li> | + | <li>When other ribosome was binded, the ribosome which turned around was pushed outside of the circular mRNA.</li> |
- | <li> | + | <li>Originally there may be little tRNA like a rare codon.</li> |
</ol> | </ol> | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
<h3>RFP -2- Western blotting</h3> | <h3>RFP -2- Western blotting</h3> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
- | + | We separated “long-chain RFP” from cell bodies by 12%, 10%, 7% of SDS-PAGE and transferred PVDF membrane. | |
+ | After that we performed Western blot by using peroxidase-labeled RFP antibody (rabbit) and color coupler (DAB). | ||
+ | We showed below the result. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | As a result of having dyed gel of SDS-PAGE in CBB after the membrane transfer. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/2/2b/%E3%82%A6%E3%82%A8%E3%82%B9%E3%82%BF%E3%83%B3%E3%83%96%E3%83%AD%E3%83%83%E3%83%88_%E6%AE%8B%E6%B8%A3.png" width="600px"></img> | ||
+ | <b>Fig.10 SDS-PAGE by each concentration gel</b> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | As a result of dyed gel after the membrane transcription. | ||
+ | The protein more than 100KDa was not transferred and stayed in gel of 12%. | ||
+ | The protein more than 250KDa was not transferred and stayed in gel of 10% | ||
+ | Most of the long chain protein more than 250KDa was transferred on PVDF membrane. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | The result of having performed Western blot of membrane. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/6/6d/Gifu_Western_blot.png" width="600px"></img> | ||
+ | <b>Fig.11 Western blotting</b> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | A band was detected and was able to confirm that an antibody was connected, and it was developed a pigment by DAB. | ||
+ | A band of RFP (27KDa) was detected clearly when we watched the membrane which transferred from 12% and 10% gel after color development. | ||
+ | However, if gel density is high, it is hard to elute the long chain protein. | ||
+ | So it is hard for us to show that long chain protein was detected from this date. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <h3>The determination of long-chain RFP</h3> | ||
+ | <p>We aimed to find how much long-chain RFP would be synthesized per cell body of <i>E. coli</i>. | ||
+ | RFP combines with Histag. So it ought to have gained monomer RFP and long-chain RFP by conducting affinity chromatography with Ni-NTA. However, the long-chain RFP was insolubilized and produced precipitation because it is polymer compound. And it could not combine with the Ni-NTA column, flowing out in flow-through. So it was difficult to refine the long-chain RFP, which has different size. | ||
+ | On the other hand, the monomer RFP combined with the Ni-NTA column, being able to refine them using imidazole. By using these monomer RFP, we tried to calculate protein mass of the long-chain RFP. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <h4>Protocol</h4> | ||
+ | <ol><li><i>E. coli</i>, which can synthesize long-chain protein, was cultivated for 3 hours, after that, IPTG, which is an inducing substance, was added, and it was cultivated for further 10 hours. 5mL of culture solution that reached the stationary phase was taken, it was centrifuged, the supernatant was removed, and 300µL of 1×PBS was added. The cell body was crushed, it was centrifuged, and supernatant was separated from precipitation. The supernatant was refined with Ni-NTA, creating almost pure monomer RFP solution. The solution was refined in 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, and 32 times, measuring Abs (280nm) of each solution by using an absorbance meter. And protein concentration of each solution from the molecular absorbance coefficient and the molecular weight of RBS was calculated.</li> | ||
+ | <li>1mL of culture solution that reached the stationary phase was taken, it was centrifuged, the supernatant was removed, and 1mL of 1×PBS was added. Using this solution as a sample, an undiluted solution and a 10 times diluted solution are prepared.</li> | ||
+ | <li>4µL of each sample solution and each monomer RFP solution of different dilution rate were applied on the gel. Each of them was separated by the 10% SDS-PAGE, dyeing by CBB. After that, using the image processing software (ImageJ), analytical curve based on “the total sum of its brightness and area of dyeing” and “the already known concentrate of monomer solution” was made. Adapting the former, the concentration of long-chain RFP was calculated.</li> | ||
+ | <li>On the other hand, to calculate the number of cultivated <i>E. coli</i> easily, OD¬600 of culture solution was measured. Using the conversion formula of <i>E. coli</i> (the number of cell bodies), the number of cell bodies from the value of OD600 was calculated. </li> | ||
+ | <li>From the number of cell bodies and the concentration of long-chain RFP, the mass of long-chain RFP per cell body was calculated.</li> | ||
+ | <li>And also, if silk fabrics are made of 900g raw silk by this <i>E. coli</i>, the number of cell bodies that is needed for it was estimated. We assumed that the fibers of same length from the same weight of raw silk and the long-chain RFP.</li></ol> | ||
+ | <h4>Result</h4> | ||
+ | <p>The following table is the concentration of each monomer RFP solution determined from the absorbance.</p> | ||
+ | <b>Table 1. The concentration of each monomer RFP solution corresponding to the absorbance on 280nm</b> | ||
+ | <p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/c/c3/RFP1.png"></p> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <p>We calculated the sum of the stained area with the chromaticity from the picture. We made a calibration curve from “the sum of the stained area with the chromaticity of the gel” and “known concentration of the monomer solution”. The result is shown in the following table.</p> | ||
+ | <b>Table 2. The concentration of monomer RFP and polymer RFP</b> | ||
+ | <p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/0/09/RFP2.png"></p> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/7/73/RFP4.png"></p> | ||
+ | <b>Fig.12 calibration curve</b> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/b/bb/RFP3.png"></p> | ||
+ | <b>Fig.13 The result of 10% SDS-PAGE </b><br> | ||
+ | <p>Following table shows the number of bacteria which synthesizes long-chain protein calculated by OD600. And we calculate the amount of the proteins which one bacterial cell (E. coli) synthesized from concentration of the protein (the above).</p> | ||
+ | <b>Table 3. Cell mass of <i>E. coli</i> by the measurement of OD600</b> | ||
+ | <p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/4/48/RFP5.png"></p> | ||
+ | <p>In order to create 900 grams of polymer RFP to making silk fabric, we need many bacterial cell as below. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/b/bb/Bacteria_mass.png"width="700px"></p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <h4>examination</h4> | ||
+ | <p>It showed that Circular mRNA / liner mRNA=0.026 in Modeling. It can not be said that a high ratio. However, the ratio of polymer RFP / monomer RFP=0.71, we found that long-chain protein is synthesized in relatively large amounts. This shows Circular RNA is better in the ability to synthesize protein than linear RNA. </p> | ||
+ | <p>There is a problem that the way to synthesize of long-chain proteins using circular RNA. It can not adapt to all kind of proteins, Efficiency of RNA cyclization is low, and so on. | ||
+ | However, if you improve that problems or devise a way to use, the method of synthesizing protein using circular mRNA will be useful enough basis.</p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
<h2>Activation of a long-chain protein</h2> | <h2>Activation of a long-chain protein</h2> | ||
- | <h3>The | + | <h3>The determination of long-chain RFP</h3> |
<p> | <p> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/0/0e/RFPGIFU.png" width="500px" class="pic"></img> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/0/0e/RFPGIFU.png" width="500px" class="pic"></img> | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
+ | <b>Fig.14 <i>E. coli</i> which synthesize each RFP</b> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
1.RFP from linear RNA (with stop codon)<br> | 1.RFP from linear RNA (with stop codon)<br> | ||
Line 215: | Line 318: | ||
1.The RFP polymer is too huge, so it becomes an inclusion body.<br> | 1.The RFP polymer is too huge, so it becomes an inclusion body.<br> | ||
2.The repetitive amino acid sequences are too near, so the conformation of the RFP polymer is in disorder.<br> | 2.The repetitive amino acid sequences are too near, so the conformation of the RFP polymer is in disorder.<br> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | On the other hand, we understand that long chain protein was detected than 150KDa on the membrane which transferred from 7% gel. | ||
+ | Because we used RFP antibody derived from a rabbit, this date shows that detected long chain protein is protein derived from RFP. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
+ | <h2>Synthesizing long-chain SmtA (Metallothionein)</h2> | ||
+ | <h3>Confirmation of the synthesis</h3> | ||
+ | <p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/f/f7/Gifu_project_metarotionein_sds-page.png" width="500" alt="メタロチオネインのsds-page画像"/></p> | ||
+ | <b>Fig.15 SDS-PAGE of the long chain protein of SmtA </b> | ||
- | <p> | + | <p>I was able to confirm protein more than 250KDa in SmtA. Because the metallothionine is the simple structure protein which only adsorbs metal such as Zn, the Cd, even if it becomes a long chain, it's not lose activity </p> |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
<h1 class="theme3"><a name="futurework"></a>Future Works</h1> | <h1 class="theme3"><a name="futurework"></a>Future Works</h1> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
Our future work is the improvement of a functionality of a long-chain protein. For example, SmtA (Metallothionein) can catch heavy metal ions such as Zn<sup>2+</sup>. We think that a protein sheet made of long-chain SmtA (Metallothionein) prevents heavy metal from leak from factories.</br> | Our future work is the improvement of a functionality of a long-chain protein. For example, SmtA (Metallothionein) can catch heavy metal ions such as Zn<sup>2+</sup>. We think that a protein sheet made of long-chain SmtA (Metallothionein) prevents heavy metal from leak from factories.</br> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/2/2a/FUTUREGIFU1.png" width="500px"></img><br></p> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/2/2a/FUTUREGIFU1.png" width="500px"></img><br></p> | ||
- | + | <b>Fig.16 there is a lot of long chain protein in future</b> | |
<p style="font-size:x-large; font-weight:bold;">If the improvement of a long-chain protein is achieved, we can gain practical achievements in many directions. | <p style="font-size:x-large; font-weight:bold;">If the improvement of a long-chain protein is achieved, we can gain practical achievements in many directions. | ||
</p> | </p> |
Latest revision as of 03:59, 18 October 2014