Team:ITESM-CEM/Project/Data
From 2014.igem.org
AENCARNACION (Talk | contribs) |
AENCARNACION (Talk | contribs) |
||
(49 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
<sub2><a href="#One" style="color: #FFF;">PCR's</a></sub2> | <sub2><a href="#One" style="color: #FFF;">PCR's</a></sub2> | ||
- | <sub2><a href="#Two" style="color: #FFF;"> | + | <sub2><a href="#Two" style="color: #FFF;">Digestions</a></sub2> |
- | <sub2><a href="#Three" style="color: #FFF;"> | + | <sub2><a href="#Three" style="color: #FFF;">Mammalian Cells Transfection</a></sub2> |
<sub2><a href="#Four" style="color: #FFF;">Protein Expression</a></sub2> | <sub2><a href="#Four" style="color: #FFF;">Protein Expression</a></sub2> | ||
- | <sub2><a href="#Five" style="color: #FFF;">NeoR</a></sub2> | + | <sub2><a href="#Five" style="color: #FFF;">NeoR characterization</a></sub2> |
+ | <sub2><a href="#Six" style="color: #FFF;">Enzymes</a></sub2> | ||
</ul></td> | </ul></td> | ||
<td><img src="images/spacer.gif" width="1" height="28" alt=""></td> | <td><img src="images/spacer.gif" width="1" height="28" alt=""></td> | ||
Line 89: | Line 90: | ||
<!--INICIO CONTENIDO--> | <!--INICIO CONTENIDO--> | ||
- | |||
- | <a name="One"><h2 | + | <a name="One"><h2>PCR's for sequence isolation</h2></a> |
- | + | <p class="centeredImage"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/b/ba/PCR_gel_1.jpg" width="217" height="336" hspace="20" BORDER=10></p><br> | |
- | <p><pie><b>Gel 1.</b>High Fidelity PCRs Electrophoresis Gel . Well content: | + | |
+ | <p><pie><b>Gel 1.</b>High Fidelity PCRs Electrophoresis Gel . Well content: 1) NeoR PCR(786pb) 2)CMV Promoter PCR(588bp) 3) f1ori PCR 4) BGHPA PCR (228bp).</p></pie><br> | ||
- | |||
<h4>Biobricks in plasmid psB1C3</h4> | <h4>Biobricks in plasmid psB1C3</h4> | ||
Line 105: | Line 105: | ||
<p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-word;">The ligation (view Material and Methods) of BGHPA was made with J04450 (psB1C3 with RFP protein). The BB_J04450 by itself produces red colonies and grows in the antibiotic Cloramphenicol. After the ligation and transformation, only the white colonies were selected. An extraction from a white colony growing on 50ml LB Cam+ was made in order to perform gel electrophoresis as shown in figure B.</p><br> | <p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-word;">The ligation (view Material and Methods) of BGHPA was made with J04450 (psB1C3 with RFP protein). The BB_J04450 by itself produces red colonies and grows in the antibiotic Cloramphenicol. After the ligation and transformation, only the white colonies were selected. An extraction from a white colony growing on 50ml LB Cam+ was made in order to perform gel electrophoresis as shown in figure B.</p><br> | ||
- | <p> | + | <p class="centeredImage"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/0/07/IMG-20141016-WA0008.jpg" width="210" height="373" hspace="20" BORDER=10></p><br> |
<p><pie><b>Figure A.</b> Isolated BGHPA transformed colony. </p></pie><br> | <p><pie><b>Figure A.</b> Isolated BGHPA transformed colony. </p></pie><br> | ||
- | <p> | + | <p class="centeredImage"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/d/de/GEL_PCR_2.jpg" width="210" height="570" hspace="20" BORDER=10></p><br> |
<p><pie><b>Figure B.</b> BGHPA in plasmid psB1C3 gel electrophoresis. Lane 2. </p></pie><br> | <p><pie><b>Figure B.</b> BGHPA in plasmid psB1C3 gel electrophoresis. Lane 2. </p></pie><br> | ||
Line 117: | Line 117: | ||
<p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-word;">The ligation (view material and methods) of CMV was made with J04450 (psB1C3 with RFP protein). The BB_J04450 by itself produces red colonies and grows in the antibiotic Cloramphenicol. After the ligation and transformation, only the white colonies were selected. An extraction from a white colony growing on 50ml LB Cam+ was made in order to perform gel electrophoresis as shown in figure B.</p><br> | <p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-word;">The ligation (view material and methods) of CMV was made with J04450 (psB1C3 with RFP protein). The BB_J04450 by itself produces red colonies and grows in the antibiotic Cloramphenicol. After the ligation and transformation, only the white colonies were selected. An extraction from a white colony growing on 50ml LB Cam+ was made in order to perform gel electrophoresis as shown in figure B.</p><br> | ||
- | <p> | + | <p class="centeredImage"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/6/6c/IMG-20141016-WA0010.jpg" width="500" height="308" hspace="20" BORDER=10></p><br> |
<p><pie><b>Figure A.</b> Isolated CMV transformed colony. </p></pie><br> | <p><pie><b>Figure A.</b> Isolated CMV transformed colony. </p></pie><br> | ||
- | <p> | + | <p class="centeredImage"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/e/e9/PCR_gel_3.jpg" width="300" height="437" hspace="20" BORDER=10></p><br> |
<p><pie><b>Figure B.</b> CMV in plasmid psB1C3 gel electrophoresis. Lanes 1-3. </p></pie><br> | <p><pie><b>Figure B.</b> CMV in plasmid psB1C3 gel electrophoresis. Lanes 1-3. </p></pie><br> | ||
Line 129: | Line 129: | ||
<p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-word;">The ligation (view material and methods) of NeoR was made with J04450 (psB1C3 with RFP protein). The BB_J04450 by itself produces red colonies and grows in the antibiotic Cloramphenicol. After the ligation and transformation 8 (Figure A), only the white colonies were selected. An extraction from a white colony growing on 50ml LB Cam+ was made in order to perform gel electrophoresis as shown in Figure B. On lane 8, NeoR extraction is shown with the three bands isoforms, they are barely visible because the plasmid extraction was diluted 5 fold.</p><br> | <p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-word;">The ligation (view material and methods) of NeoR was made with J04450 (psB1C3 with RFP protein). The BB_J04450 by itself produces red colonies and grows in the antibiotic Cloramphenicol. After the ligation and transformation 8 (Figure A), only the white colonies were selected. An extraction from a white colony growing on 50ml LB Cam+ was made in order to perform gel electrophoresis as shown in Figure B. On lane 8, NeoR extraction is shown with the three bands isoforms, they are barely visible because the plasmid extraction was diluted 5 fold.</p><br> | ||
- | <p> | + | <p class="centeredImage"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/a/ab/IMG-20141016-WA0012.jpg" width="210" height="373" hspace="20" BORDER=10></p><br> |
<p><pie><b>Figure A.</b> Isolated NeoR transformed colony. </p></pie><br> | <p><pie><b>Figure A.</b> Isolated NeoR transformed colony. </p></pie><br> | ||
- | <p> | + | <p class="centeredImage"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/d/d1/PCR_gel_4.jpg" width="500" height="308" hspace="20" BORDER=10></p><br> |
<p><pie><b>Figure B.</b> NeoR in plasmid psB1C3 gel electrophoresis.<br> Lanes:<br> 2-4. NeoR in psB1C3 digestion with XhoI. <br> 6-8. NeoR in psB1C3. <br> 10-12. CMV in psB1C3. <br> </p></pie><br> | <p><pie><b>Figure B.</b> NeoR in plasmid psB1C3 gel electrophoresis.<br> Lanes:<br> 2-4. NeoR in psB1C3 digestion with XhoI. <br> 6-8. NeoR in psB1C3. <br> 10-12. CMV in psB1C3. <br> </p></pie><br> | ||
Line 139: | Line 139: | ||
<gotop><a href="#top">Back to top ↑</a></gotop><br><br> | <gotop><a href="#top">Back to top ↑</a></gotop><br><br> | ||
- | <a name="Two"><h2> | + | <a name="Two"><h2>Gene isolation testing via digestion</h2></a> |
- | <p> | + | |
+ | <h4>CMV</h4> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-word;">A digestion proof of the CMV construction in pSB1C3 is shown on lane 1 (Figure A); when compared to the analysis performed in silico (Figure B), both band patterns coincided.</p><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p class="centeredImage"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/e/ee/PCR_gel_5.jpg" width="350" height="468" hspace="20" BORDER=10></p><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p><pie><b>Figure A.</b> Lane 5. CMV digestion with XhoI. </p></pie><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p class="centeredImage"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/5/5d/PCR_in_silico_1.jpg" width="600" height="290" hspace="20" BORDER=10></p><br> | ||
+ | <p><pie><b>Figure B.</b> In silico CMV-psB1C3 digestion. </p></pie><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <h4>NeoR</h4> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-word;">On the second, third and fourth lanes we can see the NeoR in pSB1C3 digestion with XhoI (Figure A). Even though dim bands can be seen because of the dilution of the original extraction, the banding pattern complies with what was expected from the in silico digestion of this construct (Figure B). The longest DNA fragment is undigested plasmid.</p><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p class="centeredImage"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/4/4f/PCR_gel_6.jpg" width="600" height="370" hspace="20" BORDER=10></p><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p><pie><b>Figure A.</b> Lanes 2-4. NeoR digestion with XhoI. </p></pie><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p class="centeredImage"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/d/d4/PCR_in_silico_2.jpg" width="600" height="337" hspace="20" BORDER=10></p><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p><pie><b>Figure B.</b> In silico NeoR-psB1C3 digestion. </p></pie><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <h4>BGHPA</h4> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-word;">A digestion proof of the BGHPA construction in pSB1C3 is shown on lane 5 (Figure A). When compared to the analysis performed in silico (Figure B), both band patterns coincided.</p><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p class="centeredImage"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/a/a1/PCR_gel_7.jpg" width="350" height="450" hspace="20" BORDER=10></p><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p><pie><b>Figure A.</b> Lane 5. BGHPA digestion with XhoI. </p></pie><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p class="centeredImage"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/b/b7/In_silico_3.jpg" width="600" height="277" hspace="20" BORDER=10></p><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p><pie><b>Figure B.</b> In silico BGHPA-psB1C3 digestion. </p></pie><br> | ||
+ | |||
<gotop><a href="#top">Back to top ↑</a></gotop><br><br> | <gotop><a href="#top">Back to top ↑</a></gotop><br><br> | ||
- | <a name="Three"><h2> | + | <a name="Three"><h2>Mammalian Cells Transfection</h2></a> |
- | + | ||
+ | <h4>7-Dehydratase in mammalian expression plasmid</h4><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p class="centeredImage"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/0/01/Gel11.jpg" width="300" height="348" hspace="20" BORDER=10></p><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <p><pie><b>Figure 1.</b> Gel electrophoresis 0.8% agarose. 7-dehydratase plasmid extraction. Lanes: 1, Invitrogen 1Kb Plus Ladder (5uL). 2, unknown sample. 3, 7-dehydratase in pcDNA 3.1 Myc-His A plasmid extraction. (5 uL) | ||
+ | 4, unknown sample. </p></pie><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-word;">The image below shows the presence of the correct ligation of 7-dehydratase in pcDNA 3.1 Myc-His A. No RNA or protein contamination is to be seen.</p><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p class="centeredImage"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/7/77/Gel12.jpg" width="600" height="210" hspace="20" BORDER=10></p><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p><pie><b>Figure 2.</b> In silico restriction analysis of sense insertion of 7-dehydratase in pcDNA 3.1 Myc-His A. Three fragments are generated with XhoI and ScaI.</p></pie><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p class="centeredImage"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/1/1f/Gel13.jpg" width="600" height="242" hspace="20" BORDER=10></p><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p><pie><b>Figure 3.</b> In silico restriction analysis of anti-sense insertion of 7-dehydratase in pcDNA 3.1 Myc-His A. Three fragments are generated with XhoI and ScaI.</p></pie><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p class="centeredImage"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/f/f1/Gel14.jpg" width="250" height="403" hspace="20" BORDER=10></p><br> | ||
+ | <p><pie><b>Figure 4.</b>7-dehydratase plasmid restriction. Lanes: 1, Invitrogen 1Kb Plus Ladder. 2, unknown sample. 3, unknown sample. 4, 7-dehydratase in pcDNA 3.1 Myc-His A plasmid extraction.</p></pie><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-word;">Comparing the analysis of restriction in silico of 7- dehydratase in pcDNA 3.1 Myc-His A (Figure 2) against the electrophoresis gel shown in the image above (Figure 4), the three expected bands can be seen (4072 bp, 1462 bp, 526 bp. Shown with arrows.) This shows that the enzyme was correctly inserted into the plasmid.</p><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <h2>CMV, F1 origin of replication and BHGPA characterization</h4><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-word;">Once a construction which included the biobricks CMV promoter, and BGHPA polyadenylation signal was built, using GFP (BBa_E0240) as a marker of gene expression; the plasmid was transfected into monkey kidney cells (MARC-145 cell line) using the protocol previously described (see Materials and Methods) in order to assess its functionality in an eukaryotic environment. A photograph of the cells before transfection, taken with an inverted phase microscope, is shown in figure 1.</p><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p class="centeredImage"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/0/06/C%C3%A9lulas_antes_de_transfectar.jpg" width="500" height="372" hspace="20" BORDER=10></p><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p><pie><b>Figure 1.</b> MARC-145 cells before transfection as seen with an inverted phase microscope. </p></pie><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-word;">Another photograph was taken using the inverted phase microscope 48 hours after transfection. Two control experiments were run: one without lipofectamine, and another one with lipofectamine and no plasmid. Figure 2 shows a comparison between both controls and the experiment. Cell growth exists for all samples because Geneticin selection cannot yet be measured.</p><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p class="centeredImage"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/f/f8/Controles_y_GFP_depsues_de_transfecci%C3%B3n.JPG" width="560" height="143" hspace="20" BORDER=10></p><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <p><pie><b>Figure 2.</b> From left to right, control cells treated with no lipofectamine, control cells treated with lipofectamine and no plasmid and cells exposed to lipofectamine and plasmid. Photographs were taken using an inverted phase microscope. Cell growth is seen for all the experiments. </p></pie><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-word;">Since cell growth exists for all cultures, the experiment was treated with UV light at 395nm in order to asses for fluorescence, which would be a proof of gene expression. The results of this analysis are shown in figure 3, where fluorescence can be seen. However, it can be easily seen that transfection efficiency is not as high as predicted.</p><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p class="centeredImage"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/6/61/Fluorescencia_despu%C3%A9s_de_transfecci%C3%B3n.jpg" width="500" height="373" hspace="20" BORDER=10></p><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p><pie><b>Figure 3.</b> Lipofected cells containing the GFP-expressing device exposed to UV radiation. Lipofection efficiency is low but construction funtionality is proven by the fluorescence observed. </p></pie><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-word;">Because gene expression exists, as seen in figure 3, we can correctly infer that both biobricks: CMV promoter, and BGHPA polyadenylation signal are properly working. If this was not the case, transcription would either not be possible or be unable to cease, because of a lack of termination signals. The existence of fluorescence reveals the presence of a functional GFP protein, which in turn proves that both bioparts are functional.</p><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-word;">Finally, figure 4 shows the results for transfection of a construction including CMV promoter, BGHPA, and one of the enzymes cloned by the team (7-dehidratase). However, due to a lack of time, characterization of gene expression for this construction was not performed.</p><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p class="centeredImage"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/a/a5/Dehidratasa_despu%C3%A9s_de_transfecci%C3%B3n.jpg" width="500" height="373" hspace="20" BORDER=10></p><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p><pie><b>Figure 4.</b> Lipofected cells containing the 7-dehydratase expressing plasmid construction as seen after transfection. </p></pie><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
<gotop><a href="#top">Back to top ↑</a></gotop><br><br> | <gotop><a href="#top">Back to top ↑</a></gotop><br><br> | ||
Line 168: | Line 257: | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
- | <p class="centeredImage"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/ | + | <p><pie><b>Image 1.</b>Comparative graph showing cell number per ml in both groups.</p></pie><br> |
+ | |||
+ | <p class="centeredImage"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/9/9b/GraficaneoR.jpg" height="297" width="600" align="middle" hspace="10" BORDER=10><br></p><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p><pie><b>Table 1.</b>CFU count</p></pie><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p class="centeredImage"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/d/da/Tabla3_neor.jpg" height="179" width="600" align="middle" hspace="10" BORDER=10><br></p><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-word;">Based on the CFU count, the neomycin concentration expected to properly work as a selective antibiotic is 100 ug/ml and above. Any concentration below this point showed colonies in forms of clusters which were sometimes impossible to quantify and therefore it could be the cause of experimental difficulties to obtain isolated colonies.</p><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <gotop><a href="#top">Back to top ↑</a></gotop><br><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <a name="Six"><h2>Enzymes</h2></a> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <h4>BBa_K1313000</h4> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <p class="centeredImage"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/4/4a/Colo2.png" height="400" width="392" align="middle" hspace="10" BORDER=10><br></p><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p><pie><b>Figure 1.</b> Growth of isolated white colony showing a successful transformation with cholesterol oxidase enzyme in LB plate with chloramphenicol (35 mg/ul).</p></pie><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p class="centeredImage"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/7/78/Colo25.png" height="329" width="418" align="middle" hspace="10" BORDER=10><br></p><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p><pie><b>Figure 2.</b>Gel electrophoresis 0.8% agarose. Extraction of cholesterol oxidase enzyme ligated in psB1C3 (September 5th, 2014) Lane M: Marker Invitrogen DNA Ladder 1kb Plus (5 uL), Lane 5: Cholesterol oxidase in pSB1C3 plasmid (5uL). | ||
+ | </p></pie><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-word;">The image below shows the presence of the correct ligation of Cholesterol oxidase in pSB1C3.</p><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p class="centeredImage"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/7/7a/Colo253.png" height="268" width="600" align="middle" hspace="10" BORDER=10><br></p><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p><pie><b>Figure 3.</b> In silico restriction analysis of psB1C3 with cholesterol oxidase. Fragments generated with PstI and EcoRI.</p></pie><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-word;">Comparing the analysis of restriction in silico of cholesterol oxidase in pSB1C3 (Figure 3) against the electrophoresis gel shown in the image below, the two expected bands can be seen (2033 bp, 956 bp. Shown in boxes.) This shows that the enzyme was correctly inserted into the plasmid.</p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p class="centeredImage"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/8/8d/Colosd.png" height="487" width="343" align="middle" hspace="10" BORDER=10><br></p><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p><pie><b>Image 4.</b>Gel electrophoresis 0.8% agarose. Cholesterol oxidase restriction with EcoRI and PstI (September 23th, 2014) Lane M: Marker Invitrogen DNA Ladder 1kb Plus (5 uL), Lane 1: Undigested cholesterol oxidase (5 uL), Lane 2 and 3: empty, Lane 4: Cholesterol oxidase enzyme digestion with EcoRI and PstI (10 uL). | ||
+ | </p></pie><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <h4>BBa_K1313001</h4> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p class="centeredImage"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/7/7d/Jjj3.png" width="350" height="465" hspace="10" BORDER=10></p><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p><pie><b>Figure 1.</b> Growth of isolated white colony showing a successful transformation with Oxoacyl-reductase in psB1C3; LB plate with cloramphenicol (35 ug/ml).</p></pie><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-word;">The sequence coding for oxoacyl-reductase was subcloned into the BioBrick BBa_J04450, a psB1C3 plasmid containing a coding region for RFP and chloramphenicol resistance as a selection marker. | ||
+ | This ligation was further transformed into E. coli DH5α and grown both on LB plates, and liquid LB media with 1% v/v of antibiotic (35 ug/ml). | ||
+ | A photo of the colonies obtained after replatting the bacteria is shown. This is a valid proof of construction structure, since oxoacyl was previously contained in an ampicillin resistance-containing plasmid and colonies are white. This can only be explained by a functional chloramphenicol resistance (provided by psB1C3 plasmid), and an insertion that occurred in the middle of the RFP-coding region of the backbone. </p><br> | ||
+ | <h4>BBa_K1313002</h4> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p class="centeredImage"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/e/ed/Colo1.jpg" width="400" height="360" hspace="10" BORDER=10></p><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p><pie><b>Figure 1.</b> Growth of white colonies of 7-dehydratase enzyme in psB1C3; LB plate with cloramphenicol (35 ug/ml). </p></pie><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-word;">The ligation of 7-dehydratase was made with J04450 (psB1C3 with RFP protein). The BB_J04450 by itself, produces red colonies and grows in the antibiotic Cloramphenicol. After the ligation and transformation, only the white colonies were selected. 7-dehydratase was previously in pUC57 (Ampicillin Resistance), this gives us more certainty that the white colony is in fact, the correct ligation of 7-dehydratase in pSB1C3, otherwise, colonies wouldn’t have grown due to cloramphenicol, or red colonies would have been seen.</p><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p class="centeredImage"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/4/44/Gel3.png" width="180" height="473" hspace="10" BORDER=10></p><br> | ||
+ | <p><pie><b>Figure 2.</b>Gel electrophoresis 0.8% agarose. 7-Dehydratase in pSB1C3 extraction. Lane M: Marker Invitrogen DNA Ladder 1kb Plus (5 uL), Lane 2: Plasmid extraction (5 uL).</p></pie><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-word;">The image above shows the presence of the correct ligation of 7-dehydratase in pSB1C3.No RNA or protein contamination is to be seen. Nevertheless, the sample concentration is high and less sample should be analyzed in the electrophoresis.</p><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p class="centeredImage"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/e/e2/Gel33.png" width="600" height="287" hspace="10" BORDER=10></p><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p><pie><b>Figure 3.</b> In silico restriction analysis of psB1C3 with 7-dehydratase. Three fragments are generated with XhoI. | ||
+ | </p></pie><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <p class="centeredImage"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/0/0d/Gel1.png" width="250" height="461" hspace="10" BORDER=10></p><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p><pie><b>Figure 4.</b>Gel electrophoresis 0.8% agarose. Comprobation of 7- dehydratase in pSB1C3 digestion with Xho I. | ||
+ | Lane M: Marker Invitrogen DNA Ladder 1kb Plus (5 uL), Lane 1: Digestion of 7- dehydratase in pSB1C3. | ||
+ | </p></pie><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-word;">Comparing the restriction in silico analysis of 7- dehydratase in pSB1C3 (Figure 3) with the electrophoresis gel shown in Figure 4, the three expected bands (1650 bp, 1000 bp, 250 bp. Shown with arrows.) were obtained. An additional band of approximately 3500 bp is seen at the top of the gel, this band corresponds to undigested plasmid. This shows that less plasmid has to be digested and less sample has to be loaded.</p><br> | ||
+ | <gotop><a href="#top">Back to top ↑</a></gotop><br><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <h4>BBa_K1313003</h4> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p class="centeredImage"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/b/bf/Colo3.png" width="315" height="315" hspace="10" BORDER=10></p><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p><pie><b>Figure 1.</b> Growth of red and white colonies of B0034 + Oxoacyl-reductase ligation in pSB1C3; LB plate with cloramphenicol (35 ug/ml).</p></pie><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-word;">The ligation of this enzyme and the RBS B0034 was in J00450, which has the RFP protein encoded. The left half of the Petri dish shows undesired colonies, because they are red-colored. Nonetheles, the right half shows white colonies, representing a succesful ligation of B0034 and Oxoacyl Reductase given the fact that the RFP protein sequence was cut out during this restrction/ligation. </p><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p class="centeredImage"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/1/18/J%C2%B4psd.png" width="600" height="286" hspace="10" BORDER=10></p><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p><pie><b>Figure 2.</b>In silico restriction analysis of psB1C3 with B0034 + Oxoacyl-Reductase. Two fragments are generated with EcoRI and PstI.</p></pie><br> | ||
- | <p class="centeredImage"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/ | + | <p class="centeredImage"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/5/58/Jjj.png" width="400" height="409" hspace="10" BORDER=10></p><br> |
- | <p | + | <p><pie><b>Figure 3.</b> 0.8% agarose gel electrophoresis. B0034 +Oxoacyl in psB1C3 extraction and digestion. Lane 1: 1 Kb plus DNA Ladder Invitrogen (10 ul). Lane 2: B0034 + Oxoacyl Reductase in psB1C3 extraction. Lane 3: B0034 + Oxoacyl Reductase in psB1C3 digestion with EcoRI and PstI |
+ | </p></pie><br> | ||
- | |||
+ | <p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-word;">Results observed in Lane 2 are consistent with the expected ones, given that the band is of approximately 3000 bp and the expected one was of 3030. At the same time, lane 3 shows expected results from the in silico digestion. However, the 997 bp band is too thin to observe, the team believes this is due to low concentration of digested plasmid. However, the 2033 band can be clearly identified. These results were the beginning of the expected mammalian expression plasmid construction, however due to time issues, we were not able to ligate other Biobricks necessary.</p><br> | ||
<gotop><a href="#top">Back to top ↑</a></gotop><br><br> | <gotop><a href="#top">Back to top ↑</a></gotop><br><br> | ||
<!--FIN CONTENIDO--> | <!--FIN CONTENIDO--> |
Latest revision as of 03:46, 18 October 2014
ITESM-CEM | Enzy7-K me |
|
||||
Project
|
|||||
| |||||
|
|||||
|