Team:UIUC Illinois/Results

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
(54 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 14: Line 14:
<center><p style="font-size: 400% ">Results</p></center>
<center><p style="font-size: 400% ">Results</p></center>
-
<br><center><p style="font-size: 150% "><i>"I have had my results for a long time: but I do not yet know how I am to arrive at them. ~Karl Friedrich Gauss"</i></p></center></br>
+
<br><center><p style="font-size: 150% "><i>"I have had my results for a long time: but I do not yet know how I am to arrive at them."</i></p></center></br>
-
<br><center>-James Watson, 1986</br></center>
+
<br><center>Karl Friedrich Gauss</br></center>
 +
<br>
 +
<br><h2>Feeding Assay</h2></br>
 +
To determine the functionality of pdCAF3, we designed a feeding assay to observe the growth of E. coli in theobromine and caffeine. The simple assay used M9 minimal media that contained caffeine, theobromine or neither. The pdCAF3 we received included a guaB knockout, which inhibited the strain’s use of guanine unless it came from a methyl-xanthine carbon source such as caffeine or theobromine. This meant that the bacteria containing the pdCAF3 plasmid could not grow without caffeine or theobromine present. We cultured the pdCAF3-containing E. coli in a theobromine M9 solution, caffeine M9 solution and a solution of just M9 media. We additionally cultured wild type E. coli without the pdCAF3 plasmid in the same solutions. The samples incubated in a shaker and we examined them after three days. The wild type grew in all three solutions, which was the expected result because it had no restrictions on its growth. The pdCAF3 strain grew in the caffeine and theobromine solution, but not in the purely M9 solution. This demonstrated the bacteria’s dependence on the guanine of caffeine and theobromine and confirmed the functionality of the pdCAF3 plasmid.
-
  <div class="leftparagraph">
+
Experimental analysis began with verifying biobrick BBa_K734000. To verify growth from solely caffeine or theobromine, the organisms were sent to us from UT Austin with the guaB gene knocked out. Guanine comes from xanthine, which is a necessary factor for microbial growth. Without the ability to produce guanine, xanthine degradation is imperative for guanine biosynthesis therefore addicting the microorganisms to caffeine. We set out experimentally to show that theobromine degradation could also be used for xanthine degradation using the same N-Demethylation pathway. Our results are as follow:
-
<h2>Environmental Remediation</h2>
+
-
<br><b>Waste Matters</b></br>
+
-
Knowing that caffeine could be degraded, we wondered what became of the coffee plants that were used and abused for the world's most socially acceptable drug. Coffee production is no light matter. Large amounts of water go into coffee processing, and subsequently a large amount of waste is developed. "Commercial coffee is obtained from coffee
+
-
cherries, 6% of which generate the coffee powder
+
-
whereas the remaining 94% constitute the by-
+
-
products such as husk, pulp water etc." [3]
+
-
The massive waste production is not the only problem. It's easy to think the dry mass could be repurposed as a carbon & nitrogen source for animals and plants. However, reactions to stimulants such as caffeine are far reaching. It has been shown that caffeine can "inhibit seed
+
-
germination and growth of seedlings"(Friedman
+
-
and Waller 1983) as well as stunt the growth of cattle. By decaffeinating the waste, it can subsequently be used as feed and fertilizer and therefore have positive economical effects. Who knows, if coffee waste decreases and the coffee producers have an extra source of income, your next cup of coffee might be cheaper!
+
-
<br><p><center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/d/d2/CoffeeWaste3.jpg" alt="Smiley face" width="80%" height="450"></center></p></br>
+
-
<br>To ameliorate this issue of waste, we looked to different pathways that could prove utile degrading xanthine waste. One organism, Pseudomonas putida CBB1 contained a set of genes that encoded for a caffeine dehydrogenase pathway. Instead of the N-Demethylation characteristic of our aforementioned puppy probiotic operon, we explored the caffeine dehydrogenase mechanism. In contrast to N-Demethylation, this pathway is a direct method to go directly to Trimethyl Uric Acid, another "safe" compound for the host animal who cannot degrade caffeine! We began to develop primers that would isolate the cdhA, B, and C genes, and moreso amplify out the entire operon, however our PCRs were unsuccessful.
 
-
<br><p><center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/7/7f/F3medium.gif" alt="Smiley face" width="400" height="200"></center>
 
-
</br></p>
 
 +
<br><p><center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/f/f5/Screenshot_from_2014-10-17_18-05-39.png" alt="Smiley_face" width="450" height="80"/></center></p>
 +
<center>Figure 1. All organisms were grown on M9 Media with specified amounts of Theobromine & Caffeine. Refer to lab notebook.[reduce font size] </center>
 +
<br>
 +
By verifiying that our ΔguaB cells could only grow in media with caffeine or theobromine present, we verified that part BBa_K734000 was functional. Subsequent experiments involved monitoring growth through an arrary of theobromine amounts. HPLC results indiciating linear degradation of theobromine have yet to arrive!
 +
<br>
 +
<h2> Reconstruction of pdCAF</h2>
 +
<br>To qualify with iGEM standards, all illegal cutsites were made to be removed.
 +
<br><p><center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/5/52/Screenshot_from_2014-10-17_185143.png" alt="Smiley_face" width="800" height="150"/></center></p>
 +
<center>Figure 2. Cut sites were removed using standard PCR procedure.[reduce font size] </center>
 +
<br>
 +
The design of our original Golden Gate reaction had two goals in mind: insert our operon into the standardized backbone pSB1C3 with lactobacillus promoter, and remove all illegal biobrick restriction sites. We designed primers using the type II restriction enzyme BsaI. The properties type II restriction enzymes allowed us to introduce single-base mutations at the sites incompatible with biobrick standard enzymes EcoRI, PstI, SpeI and XbaI. Additionally, we used the primers to introduce and amplify the first and second halves of our promoter into our operon and vector. By including the promoter sequence within the primers, we avoided having to order the physical DNA. We attempted this assembly design multiple times without success. The design was eventually changed to transfer the operon directly to a lactobacillus shuttle vector pnz8048. Unfortunately, this design also failed. We tried enacting the later design in multiple steps, using PCR to put individual fragments into joint fragments, and combing the resultant pieces into our completed part. However, this approach was unsuccessful and failed at different steps each time
-
  </div>
 
-
 
 
-
  <div class="rightparagraph">
 
-
<h2>Yogurt</h2>
+
<h2>Lactobacillus</h2>
-
    <p><b>Let's get cultured.</b>
+
<br>To create our probiotic, it was mandatory that we transform our gene into a strain of Lactobacillus. With the help of the Miller lab at UIUC, we were able to culture our cells anaerobically. Using shuttle vector pnZ8048, the initiative was to induce Chloramphenicol resistance into the cells. When trying to transform with our frozen stocks of electrocompetent cells with our shuttle vector, we realized that Plantarum, and many Lactobacillus species have to be cultured fresh almost every day. The advent of this realization had been temporally placed conveniently near part submission, ergo results are to come.<br>
-
<br>The final piece to our project aimed at propagating the demethylation proteins in some sort of food vector. We figured making yogurt via Lactobacillus fermentation was our best shot. It is widely known that yogurt is made through fermentation. Species such as Lactobacillus plantarum in yogurt break down lactose and produce lactic acid, the product which gives yogurt it's texture as well as taste. Having the culture that creates the yogurt simultaneously produce assistive proteins seemed like a clear shot to us!
+
-
<p><br><center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/a/a0/Lactobacillus.jpg" alt="Smiley face" width="350" height="350">
+
<div class="leftparagraph">
-
 
+
<br><center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/thumb/5/5a/Lactobrocilluserlenmeyer.jpg/400px-Lactobrocilluserlenmeyer.jpg" alt="Smiley_face" width="300" height="450"/></center>
-
</center></br></p>
+
<center><br><i>Lactobacillus Plantarum WCFS1 Culture at 30C O/N</i></br></center>
-
  </div>
+
</div>
 +
<div class="rightparagraph">
 +
<br>Stock cultures of Lactobacillus Plantarum WCFS1 were grown anaerobically overnight. Seed cultures were created using overnight cultures and transformation was done using a protocol provided to us by the UIUC Miller lab. Grown in MRS media, WCFS1 had a relatively quick proliferation time. Our primary transformations all failed to grow on chloramphenicol plates, therefore we decided that culturing methods, as well as transformations had to be adjusted. </br></div>
</html>
</html>
-
 
-
 
{{:Team:UIUC_Illinois/Footer}}
{{:Team:UIUC_Illinois/Footer}}

Latest revision as of 02:55, 18 October 2014


Results


"I have had my results for a long time: but I do not yet know how I am to arrive at them."



Karl Friedrich Gauss


Feeding Assay


To determine the functionality of pdCAF3, we designed a feeding assay to observe the growth of E. coli in theobromine and caffeine. The simple assay used M9 minimal media that contained caffeine, theobromine or neither. The pdCAF3 we received included a guaB knockout, which inhibited the strain’s use of guanine unless it came from a methyl-xanthine carbon source such as caffeine or theobromine. This meant that the bacteria containing the pdCAF3 plasmid could not grow without caffeine or theobromine present. We cultured the pdCAF3-containing E. coli in a theobromine M9 solution, caffeine M9 solution and a solution of just M9 media. We additionally cultured wild type E. coli without the pdCAF3 plasmid in the same solutions. The samples incubated in a shaker and we examined them after three days. The wild type grew in all three solutions, which was the expected result because it had no restrictions on its growth. The pdCAF3 strain grew in the caffeine and theobromine solution, but not in the purely M9 solution. This demonstrated the bacteria’s dependence on the guanine of caffeine and theobromine and confirmed the functionality of the pdCAF3 plasmid. Experimental analysis began with verifying biobrick BBa_K734000. To verify growth from solely caffeine or theobromine, the organisms were sent to us from UT Austin with the guaB gene knocked out. Guanine comes from xanthine, which is a necessary factor for microbial growth. Without the ability to produce guanine, xanthine degradation is imperative for guanine biosynthesis therefore addicting the microorganisms to caffeine. We set out experimentally to show that theobromine degradation could also be used for xanthine degradation using the same N-Demethylation pathway. Our results are as follow:

Smiley_face

Figure 1. All organisms were grown on M9 Media with specified amounts of Theobromine & Caffeine. Refer to lab notebook.[reduce font size]

By verifiying that our ΔguaB cells could only grow in media with caffeine or theobromine present, we verified that part BBa_K734000 was functional. Subsequent experiments involved monitoring growth through an arrary of theobromine amounts. HPLC results indiciating linear degradation of theobromine have yet to arrive!

Reconstruction of pdCAF


To qualify with iGEM standards, all illegal cutsites were made to be removed.

Smiley_face

Figure 2. Cut sites were removed using standard PCR procedure.[reduce font size]

The design of our original Golden Gate reaction had two goals in mind: insert our operon into the standardized backbone pSB1C3 with lactobacillus promoter, and remove all illegal biobrick restriction sites. We designed primers using the type II restriction enzyme BsaI. The properties type II restriction enzymes allowed us to introduce single-base mutations at the sites incompatible with biobrick standard enzymes EcoRI, PstI, SpeI and XbaI. Additionally, we used the primers to introduce and amplify the first and second halves of our promoter into our operon and vector. By including the promoter sequence within the primers, we avoided having to order the physical DNA. We attempted this assembly design multiple times without success. The design was eventually changed to transfer the operon directly to a lactobacillus shuttle vector pnz8048. Unfortunately, this design also failed. We tried enacting the later design in multiple steps, using PCR to put individual fragments into joint fragments, and combing the resultant pieces into our completed part. However, this approach was unsuccessful and failed at different steps each time

Lactobacillus


To create our probiotic, it was mandatory that we transform our gene into a strain of Lactobacillus. With the help of the Miller lab at UIUC, we were able to culture our cells anaerobically. Using shuttle vector pnZ8048, the initiative was to induce Chloramphenicol resistance into the cells. When trying to transform with our frozen stocks of electrocompetent cells with our shuttle vector, we realized that Plantarum, and many Lactobacillus species have to be cultured fresh almost every day. The advent of this realization had been temporally placed conveniently near part submission, ergo results are to come.

Smiley_face

Lactobacillus Plantarum WCFS1 Culture at 30C O/N

Stock cultures of Lactobacillus Plantarum WCFS1 were grown anaerobically overnight. Seed cultures were created using overnight cultures and transformation was done using a protocol provided to us by the UIUC Miller lab. Grown in MRS media, WCFS1 had a relatively quick proliferation time. Our primary transformations all failed to grow on chloramphenicol plates, therefore we decided that culturing methods, as well as transformations had to be adjusted.