Team:UANL Mty-Mexico/wetlab/mini project
From 2014.igem.org
GilbertoRdz (Talk | contribs) |
GilbertoRdz (Talk | contribs) |
||
(12 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
<td style="padding:12px"><p align="justify"> | <td style="padding:12px"><p align="justify"> | ||
- | <p align=" | + | <p align="justify"><b><font color="black" size="5px">Introduction</font></b> |
- | + | ||
<p>It is know that TetR (like others transcriptional repressors) can allow a basal expression. Because of that, it would be a good idea to reduce that basal expression using a molecular tool which does not cause noise to circuits and systems.</p> | <p>It is know that TetR (like others transcriptional repressors) can allow a basal expression. Because of that, it would be a good idea to reduce that basal expression using a molecular tool which does not cause noise to circuits and systems.</p> | ||
- | <p>The last year our team participated with the project “Thermo coli” (<a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:UANL_Mty-Mexico">Team: UANL_Mty-Mexico</a>). The main biobrick (K1140006) that we used was composed for the fluorescent protein mCherry (E1010) regulated by the ptet promoter (R0040) and a 37°C thermometer. This year we decided to use that biobrick part to develop a mini-project. We want to | + | <p>The last year our team participated with the project “Thermo coli” (<a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:UANL_Mty-Mexico">Team: UANL_Mty-Mexico</a>). The main biobrick (K1140006) that we used was composed for the fluorescent protein mCherry (E1010) regulated by the ptet promoter (R0040) and a 37°C thermometer. This year we decided to use that biobrick part to develop a mini-project. We want to prove if it is possible to enhance the repression of a gene by a combined use of the repressor protein TetR (transcriptional regulation) and a RNA thermometer (post-transcriptional regulation).</p> |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | <p>The fluorescent part was synthetized based on the promoter ptet (R0040), a RBS fused to a RNA thermometer which was obtained on a previous work ( | + | <p align="justify"><b><font color="black" size="5px">Constructions and Parts</font></b> |
+ | <p>The fluorescent part was synthetized based on the promoter ptet (R0040), a RBS fused to a RNA thermometer which was obtained on a previous work (1), the mCherry (E1010) and the transcriptional terminator T7 (B0010-B0012). </p> | ||
<figure> <center> | <figure> <center> | ||
Line 69: | Line 67: | ||
</figure> </center> | </figure> </center> | ||
- | <p>We constructed TetR | + | <p>We constructed TetR generator switch different constitutive promoters. We used the promoters J23109, J23106 and J23111 with the relative force 106, 1185 and 1487, respectively.These parts have a RBS (B0034), the CDS for the TetR repressor (C0040) and the T7 transcriptional terminator (B0010-B0012). Moreover, we used the biobrick part K145201 as a positive control to expression of TetR, because it is a generator with promoter force 396. Also the RBS and transcriptional terminator are both the same. </p> |
<figure> <center> | <figure> <center> | ||
Line 77: | Line 75: | ||
</figure> </center> | </figure> </center> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
- | <p align=" | + | <p align="justify"><b><font color="black" size="5px">Measurements</font></b> |
- | <p>For the measurements, we made constructions in order to have the biobrick parts in compatible plasmids. It means that those which codifies to mCherry are in pSB2K3 and the tetR genes are in pSB1A2. | + | <p>For the measurements, we made constructions in order to have the biobrick parts in compatible plasmids. It means that those which codifies to mCherry are in pSB2K3 and the tetR genes are in pSB1A2. The bacteria <i>E. coli</i> Top10 were transformed to have the next 7 cultures: </p> |
- | The bacteria E. coli Top10 were transformed to have the next 7 cultures: </p> | + | |
Line 111: | Line 108: | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <p>The cultures were growth at 25 and 37°C for 15 hours. The conditions were the same as it is indicated in protocols. The wave lengths that we used were 530+/-25 (excitation) and 590+/-35 (Emission). </p> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
- | <p align=" | + | <p align="justify"><b><font color="black" size="5px">Results</font></b> |
+ | |||
<p> First, we had to prove the function of our construction ptet + mCherry (K1480002). So, it was decided to prove its fluorescence with and without repressor. That TetR generator is the one has been proved before that works (K145201). The results are shown in table 2. </p> | <p> First, we had to prove the function of our construction ptet + mCherry (K1480002). So, it was decided to prove its fluorescence with and without repressor. That TetR generator is the one has been proved before that works (K145201). The results are shown in table 2. </p> | ||
Line 121: | Line 121: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th align="center"> Table 2. Repression over K1480002</th> | + | <th align="center"> Table 2. Repression over K1480002.</th> |
<tr></table> | <tr></table> | ||
Line 147: | Line 147: | ||
<figure> <center> | <figure> <center> | ||
- | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/ | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/7/78/Graph_result_2.jpg" width=600px> |
<figcaption><span class="text-muted"><font size="2">Figure 4. Graph of previous results. | <figcaption><span class="text-muted"><font size="2">Figure 4. Graph of previous results. | ||
</span></font> <br></figcaption> | </span></font> <br></figcaption> | ||
Line 164: | Line 164: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th align="center"> Table | + | <th align="center"> Table 3. Repression over K1140003.</th> |
<tr></table> | <tr></table> | ||
Line 170: | Line 170: | ||
<th align="left"> </th> | <th align="left"> </th> | ||
<th align="left"> Without repressor</th> | <th align="left"> Without repressor</th> | ||
- | <th align="left"> | + | <th align="left"> K1480003</th> |
- | <th align="left"> | + | <th align="left"> K145201</th> |
- | <th align="left"> | + | <th align="left"> K1480004</th> |
- | <th align="left"> | + | <th align="left"> K1480005</th> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> <td> </td> <td> 2770</td> <td> 852 </td> <td>868</td> <td>731</td> <td>738 </td> </tr> | <tr> <td> </td> <td> 2770</td> <td> 852 </td> <td>868</td> <td>731</td> <td>738 </td> </tr> | ||
Line 197: | Line 197: | ||
+ | <figure> <center> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/a/a9/TetR_repressors%28FCBUANL2014%29.JPG" width=600px> | ||
+ | <figcaption><span class="text-muted"><font size="2">Figure 5. Mean and SD of every set of results of table 3. | ||
+ | </span></font> <br></figcaption> | ||
+ | </center> | ||
+ | </figure> | ||
+ | <p>The next experimental section could not be achieved properly because there were issues with the cultures. Even so we here we present some partial results about repression using the combinated effect of a transcriptional factor (TetR) and RNA thermometer under the influece of changes in temperature. <p> | ||
+ | <center><table style="width:80%"> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th align="center"> Table 4. Effect of temperature and TetR.</th> | ||
+ | <tr></table> | ||
+ | <table style="width:100%"> | ||
+ | <th align="left"> Temperature </th> | ||
+ | <th align="left"> </th> | ||
+ | <th align="left"> </th> | ||
+ | <th align="left"> </th> | ||
+ | <th align="left"> Without repressor</th> | ||
+ | <th align="left"> </th> | ||
+ | <th align="left"> </th> | ||
+ | <th align="left"> </th> | ||
+ | <th align="left"> K1480003</th> | ||
+ | <th align="left"> </th> | ||
+ | <th align="left"> </th> | ||
+ | <th align="left"> </th> | ||
+ | <th align="left"> K145201</th> | ||
+ | <th align="left"> </th> | ||
+ | <th align="left"> </th> | ||
+ | <th align="left"> </th> | ||
+ | <th align="left"> K1480004</th> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> <td>25°C </td> <td> 816.2</td> <td> 759.8</td> <td>1240.7</td> <td>1478</td> <td>509.5</td> <td>510.5</td> <td>656.8 </td> <td>671.6 </td> <td>565.4 </td> <td>429.9 </td> <td>1271.7 </td> <td>884.3 </td> <td>553.8 </td> <td>306.1 </td> <td>638.3 </td> <td>670.3</td> </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> <td>37°C</td> <td> 2770.5</td> <td>2622 </td> <td>3294.9 </td> <td>3492.5 </td> <td>852.4 </td> <td>827.4 </td> <td>866.8 </td> <td>946.2 </td> <td> 868</td> <td> 766.6</td> <td>1212.9 </td> <td>1212.4 </td> <td>731.9 </td> <td>780.9 </td> <td> 898.7</td> <td>813.9 </td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </table> | ||
+ | </center> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
- | < | + | <figure> <center> |
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/a/a8/Graph_3_miniproject.jpg" width=600px> | ||
+ | <figcaption><span class="text-muted"><font size="2">Figure 6. The blue color represent the clones that were cultivated to 25°C and the red is for 37°C. All the clones have ptet and the 37°C RNA thermometer. Below it is shown the repressor used. | ||
+ | </span></font> <br></figcaption> | ||
+ | </center> | ||
+ | </figure> | ||
- | <p>Neupert J, Karcher D and Bock R (2008) Design of simple synthetic RNA thermometers for temperature- controlled gene expression in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res36:e124. </p> | + | |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <p align="justify"><b><font color="black" size="5px">Discussion</font></b> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <p>We can see (table 2) that the construction K1480002 is functional because there was a decrease in the relative fluorescence of the five clones used. So it can be a useful control to prove the fluorescence variation in K1140006 due to temperature changes. </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p>The part K1140006 has been proved against the four TetR generators that we have. In the table 3 and figure 5 we are able to see that was effect over the promoter, so we can proceed to the next experimenal section.</p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p>This last section we can see (table 4 and figure 6) the variation of fluorescence due to temperature and TetR. While the temperature was 37°C, just TetR was repressing. On the oder hand, we have the added effect of temperature dropping where the temperature was lower than in the 37°C experiment.</p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <p align="justify"><b><font color="black" size="5px">Conclusion</font></b> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <p>Those partial results allow us to know that the combined repression was stronger than just using a transcriptional repressor. We obviously know further experiments are going to be required.</p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <p align="justify"><b><font color="black" size="5px">References</font></b> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | [1] Neupert J, Karcher D and Bock R (2008) Design of simple synthetic RNA thermometers for temperature- controlled gene expression in <i>Escherichia coli</i>. Nucleic Acids Res36:e124.</p> | ||
Latest revision as of 03:54, 18 October 2014
|
Introduction It is know that TetR (like others transcriptional repressors) can allow a basal expression. Because of that, it would be a good idea to reduce that basal expression using a molecular tool which does not cause noise to circuits and systems. The last year our team participated with the project “Thermo coli” (Team: UANL_Mty-Mexico). The main biobrick (K1140006) that we used was composed for the fluorescent protein mCherry (E1010) regulated by the ptet promoter (R0040) and a 37°C thermometer. This year we decided to use that biobrick part to develop a mini-project. We want to prove if it is possible to enhance the repression of a gene by a combined use of the repressor protein TetR (transcriptional regulation) and a RNA thermometer (post-transcriptional regulation). Constructions and Parts The fluorescent part was synthetized based on the promoter ptet (R0040), a RBS fused to a RNA thermometer which was obtained on a previous work (1), the mCherry (E1010) and the transcriptional terminator T7 (B0010-B0012). Also, it was constructed a part that does not have a thermometer, so that we could see its effect on the fluorescence. This part was constructed using the same promoter (R0040) with the RFP/mCherry protein generator (K081014). We constructed TetR generator switch different constitutive promoters. We used the promoters J23109, J23106 and J23111 with the relative force 106, 1185 and 1487, respectively.These parts have a RBS (B0034), the CDS for the TetR repressor (C0040) and the T7 transcriptional terminator (B0010-B0012). Moreover, we used the biobrick part K145201 as a positive control to expression of TetR, because it is a generator with promoter force 396. Also the RBS and transcriptional terminator are both the same. Measurements For the measurements, we made constructions in order to have the biobrick parts in compatible plasmids. It means that those which codifies to mCherry are in pSB2K3 and the tetR genes are in pSB1A2. The bacteria E. coli Top10 were transformed to have the next 7 cultures:
The cultures were growth at 25 and 37°C for 15 hours. The conditions were the same as it is indicated in protocols. The wave lengths that we used were 530+/-25 (excitation) and 590+/-35 (Emission). Results First, we had to prove the function of our construction ptet + mCherry (K1480002). So, it was decided to prove its fluorescence with and without repressor. That TetR generator is the one has been proved before that works (K145201). The results are shown in table 2.
Then, we started to prove our synthetic part (K1140006) with the set generators TetR. The results are shown in the next table.
The next experimental section could not be achieved properly because there were issues with the cultures. Even so we here we present some partial results about repression using the combinated effect of a transcriptional factor (TetR) and RNA thermometer under the influece of changes in temperature.
Discussion We can see (table 2) that the construction K1480002 is functional because there was a decrease in the relative fluorescence of the five clones used. So it can be a useful control to prove the fluorescence variation in K1140006 due to temperature changes. The part K1140006 has been proved against the four TetR generators that we have. In the table 3 and figure 5 we are able to see that was effect over the promoter, so we can proceed to the next experimenal section. This last section we can see (table 4 and figure 6) the variation of fluorescence due to temperature and TetR. While the temperature was 37°C, just TetR was repressing. On the oder hand, we have the added effect of temperature dropping where the temperature was lower than in the 37°C experiment. Conclusion Those partial results allow us to know that the combined repression was stronger than just using a transcriptional repressor. We obviously know further experiments are going to be required. References
|