Team:Wageningen UR/project/greenhouse

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
(8 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 22: Line 22:
</li>
</li>
-
<li class="menu-item">
 
-
  <a href="#future">Future work</a>
 
-
 
-
</li>
 
-
 
<li class="menu-item">
<li class="menu-item">
  <a href="#ref">References</a>
  <a href="#ref">References</a>
Line 40: Line 35:
<section id="introduction">
<section id="introduction">
<h2>Introduction</h2>
<h2>Introduction</h2>
-
<p>Biological control of <i>Fusarium oxysporum</i> using other living organisms has been explored previously and identified <i>Pseudomonas spp.</i> as a possible control agent due to the production of growth inhibitory substances [1]. <i>Pseudomonas putida</i> is a root colonizing bacteria and is therefore expected to be found in the rhizosphere [2] where <i>F. oxysporum</i> attacks the plant. Engineering a bacterial platform for biological control of <i>Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense</i> (Foc) based on <i>P. putida</i> therefore shows great potential.  
+
<p>Biological control of <i>Fusarium oxysporum</i> using other living organisms has been explored previously and identified <i>Pseudomonas spp.</i> as a possible control agent due to the production of growth inhibitory substances [1]. <i>Pseudomonas putida</i> is a root colonizing bacteria and is therefore expected to be found in the rhizosphere [2] where <i>F. oxysporum</i> attacks the plant. Engineering a bacterial platform for biological control of <i>Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense</i> based on <i>P. putida</i> therefore shows great potential.  
-
In our experiments, <i>P. putida</i> was genetically modified to overexpress four different fungal growth inhibitors (2,4-DAPG, DMDS & DMTS, pyoverdine and Chitinase) to prevent Foc from entering the roots of banana plants (see <a class="soft_link" href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Wageningen_UR/project/fungal_inhibition">inhibition</a>). Functionality was tested  <a class="soft_link" href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Wageningen_UR/project/fungal_inhibition#results"><i>in vitro</i></a> and <i>in vivo</i> by applying the control agent to the soil of pot grown banana plants (Figure 1). These plants were then infected with Foc. Adverse or beneficial effects of the active compounds produced by the genetically modified biological control agent on banana plants were investigated <i>in vivo</i>.</p>
+
In our experiments, <i>P. putida</i> was genetically modified to overexpress four different fungal growth inhibitors (2,4-DAPG, DMDS & DMTS, pyoverdine and Chitinase) to prevent <i>F.oxysporum</i> from entering the roots of banana plants (see <a class="soft_link" href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Wageningen_UR/project/fungal_inhibition">inhibition</a>). Functionality was tested  <a class="soft_link" href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Wageningen_UR/project/fungal_inhibition#results"><i>in vitro</i></a> and <i>in vivo</i> by applying the control agent to the soil of pot grown banana plants (Figure 1). These plants were then infected with <i>F.oxysporum</i>. Adverse or beneficial effects of the active compounds produced by the genetically modified biological control agent on banana plants were investigated <i>in vivo</i>.</p>
<figure>
<figure>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/0/08/Wageningen_UR_greenhouse_banana_plants.JPG"width="80%"/> <figcaption style="font-size:11px;font-weight:bold">Figure 1: Banana plants in greenhouse. Plants are beeing labled and inoculated with four different strains of <i>P. putida</i> each producing a different fungal growth inhibitor.
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/0/08/Wageningen_UR_greenhouse_banana_plants.JPG"width="80%"/> <figcaption style="font-size:11px;font-weight:bold">Figure 1: Banana plants in greenhouse. Plants are beeing labled and inoculated with four different strains of <i>P. putida</i> each producing a different fungal growth inhibitor.
Line 58: Line 53:
<li><i>P. putida</i> producing pyoverdine</li>
<li><i>P. putida</i> producing pyoverdine</li>
<li><i>P. putida</i> producing chitinase</li>
<li><i>P. putida</i> producing chitinase</li>
-
<li>Culture mix of number 1,2,3, and 4</i>
+
<li>Culture mix of number 2,3,4 and 5</i>
<li>Water (control)</li>
<li>Water (control)</li>
</ol>
</ol>
<br/>
<br/>
-
<p>To give the control agent the possibility of colonizing the rhizosphere before confronting the plant with Foc the plants were inoculated with the different <i>Pseudomonas putida</i> constructs 48 hours prior to fungal inoculation. 5 ml of bacterial inoculum was applied by inserting it with a syringe close to the roots (at OD<sub>600</sub> of 0.25) (Figure 2). Two days later 5 ml of the fungal inoculum (spore-count of 1 million spores per ml) was applied likewise. Additionally, two maize kernels inoculated with Foc were applied to the soil of each plant to conserve the inoculum within the pot. Since the production of the fungal growth inhibitors in this test organisms is induced by IPTG the plants are watered with a solution containing IPTG.</p>
+
<p>To give the control agent the possibility of colonizing the rhizosphere before confronting the plant with <i>F.oxysporum</i> the plants were inoculated with the different <i>Pseudomonas putida</i> constructs 48 hours prior to fungal inoculation. 5 ml of bacterial inoculum was applied by inserting it with a syringe close to the roots (at OD<sub>600</sub> of 0.25) (Figure 2). Two days later 5 ml of the fungal inoculum (spore-count of 1 million spores per ml) was applied likewise. Additionally, two maize kernels inoculated with <i>F.oxysporum</i> were applied to the soil of each plant to conserve the inoculum within the pot. Since the production of the fungal growth inhibitors in this test organisms is induced by IPTG the plants are watered with a solution containing IPTG.</p>
<figure>
<figure>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/6/69/Wageningen_UR_greenhouse_injecting_plants.JPG"width="80%"/> <figcaption style="font-size:11px;font-weight:bold">Figure 2: Injecting <i>P. putida</i> inoculum into the rhizosphere of banana plants.
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/6/69/Wageningen_UR_greenhouse_injecting_plants.JPG"width="80%"/> <figcaption style="font-size:11px;font-weight:bold">Figure 2: Injecting <i>P. putida</i> inoculum into the rhizosphere of banana plants.
Line 69: Line 64:
<br/>
<br/>
-
<p>Degree of wilt and fungal biomass of plants inoculated with Foc and the different biological control agents will be determined. Non-inoculated plants and plants solely inoculated with the biological control agent but not with Foc will serve as control. Possible positive or negative effects on growth will be tested by determining the above ground biomass of the banana plant after four weeks. </p>
+
<p>Degree of wilt and fungal biomass of plants inoculated with <i>F.oxysporum</i> and the different biological control agents will be determined. Non-inoculated plants and plants solely inoculated with the biological control agent but not with <i>F.oxysporum</i> will serve as control. Possible positive or negative effects on growth will be tested by determining the above ground biomass of the banana plant after four weeks. </p>
<br/>
<br/>
Line 76: Line 71:
<h2>Results</h2>
<h2>Results</h2>
<br/>
<br/>
-
<p>So far our banana plants are growing nicely (Figure 3). Final results can unfortunately not be obtained before the Wiki-freeze so make sure to attend our presentation during the iGEM Jamboree in Boston to find out what more. </p>
+
<p>So far our banana plants are growing nicely (Figure 3). Final results can unfortunately not be obtained before the Wiki-freeze so make sure to attend our presentation during the iGEM <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Giant_Jamboree"  class="soft_link">Jamboree</a> in Boston to find out what happened. </p>
<br/>
<br/>
<figure>
<figure>
Line 83: Line 78:
</figcaption> </figure>
</figcaption> </figure>
 +
<br>
 +
<p style="float:right"><b>Continue to <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Wageningen_UR/project/kill-switch"  class="soft_link"> Kill-Switch >></a> </b>
-
 
-
 
-
<br/>
 
-
</section>
 
-
<section id="future">
 
-
<h2>Future work</h2>
 
-
<br/>
 
</section>
</section>
-
<section id="ref">
+
<section id="ref">
 +
<h2>References<h2/>
<h2>References<h2/>
<ol id="references">
<ol id="references">

Latest revision as of 03:08, 18 October 2014

Wageningen UR iGEM 2014

Greenhouse: In vivo testing of fungal inhibition


Introduction

Biological control of Fusarium oxysporum using other living organisms has been explored previously and identified Pseudomonas spp. as a possible control agent due to the production of growth inhibitory substances [1]. Pseudomonas putida is a root colonizing bacteria and is therefore expected to be found in the rhizosphere [2] where F. oxysporum attacks the plant. Engineering a bacterial platform for biological control of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense based on P. putida therefore shows great potential. In our experiments, P. putida was genetically modified to overexpress four different fungal growth inhibitors (2,4-DAPG, DMDS & DMTS, pyoverdine and Chitinase) to prevent F.oxysporum from entering the roots of banana plants (see inhibition). Functionality was tested in vitro and in vivo by applying the control agent to the soil of pot grown banana plants (Figure 1). These plants were then infected with F.oxysporum. Adverse or beneficial effects of the active compounds produced by the genetically modified biological control agent on banana plants were investigated in vivo.

Figure 1: Banana plants in greenhouse. Plants are beeing labled and inoculated with four different strains of P. putida each producing a different fungal growth inhibitor.

Application

Four different Pseudomonas putida strains are tested for their functionality as a biological control agents. The modified organisms were applied to the soil. Each organism produces a different active compound. Additional treatments involve a culture mix containing an equal share of each modified organism and a water control. Plants treated with the wild type Pseudomonas putida strain serve as control to confirm that the effects are based on the over expressed active compounds. Different treatments are listed below.


Treatments:

  1. Wildtype P. putida KT2440
  2. P. putida producing 2,4-DAPG
  3. P. putida producing DMDS and DMTS
  4. P. putida producing pyoverdine
  5. P. putida producing chitinase
  6. Culture mix of number 2,3,4 and 5
  7. Water (control)

To give the control agent the possibility of colonizing the rhizosphere before confronting the plant with F.oxysporum the plants were inoculated with the different Pseudomonas putida constructs 48 hours prior to fungal inoculation. 5 ml of bacterial inoculum was applied by inserting it with a syringe close to the roots (at OD600 of 0.25) (Figure 2). Two days later 5 ml of the fungal inoculum (spore-count of 1 million spores per ml) was applied likewise. Additionally, two maize kernels inoculated with F.oxysporum were applied to the soil of each plant to conserve the inoculum within the pot. Since the production of the fungal growth inhibitors in this test organisms is induced by IPTG the plants are watered with a solution containing IPTG.

Figure 2: Injecting P. putida inoculum into the rhizosphere of banana plants.

Degree of wilt and fungal biomass of plants inoculated with F.oxysporum and the different biological control agents will be determined. Non-inoculated plants and plants solely inoculated with the biological control agent but not with F.oxysporum will serve as control. Possible positive or negative effects on growth will be tested by determining the above ground biomass of the banana plant after four weeks.


Results


So far our banana plants are growing nicely (Figure 3). Final results can unfortunately not be obtained before the Wiki-freeze so make sure to attend our presentation during the iGEM Jamboree in Boston to find out what happened.


Figure 3: Banana plants two weeks after inoculation.

Continue to Kill-Switch >>

References

  1. Lemanceau P. Alabouvette C. (1991) Biological control of fusarium diseases by fluorescent Pseudomonas and non-pathogenic Fusarium. Crop Protection. Vol. 10 Issue 4: 279–286
  2. Espinosa-Urgel M, Kolter R, Ramos JL.(2002) Root colonization by Pseudomonas putida: love at first sight. Microbiology. Feb;148(Pt 2):341-3.