Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Results/Biosafety/Challenges

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(part3)
 
(3 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 67: Line 67:
     <h6>Remaining Challenges</h6>
     <h6>Remaining Challenges</h6>
       <p>
       <p>
-
The <i>E. coli</i> strains KRX <i>&Delta;alr</i> <i>&Delta;dadX</i> and DH5&alpha; <i>&Delta;alr</i> <i>&Delta;dadX</i> respectivly showed a strict dependance of D-alanine but as mentioned above the ratio of false-positive was slightly higher compared to the selection on the antibiotic selection using Chlormaphenicol and even on the negative plate some colony forming untis were obervable, while there were no on the LB plate containing 30 mg/L Chloramphenicol. This effect migth due to some revertants of the D-alanine auxotropy and the corresponding selection pressure.<br>
+
The <i>E.&nbsp;coli</i> strains KRX <i>&Delta;alr</i> <i>&Delta;dadX</i> and DH5&alpha; <i>&Delta;alr</i> <i>&Delta;dadX</i> respectively showed a strict dependence of D-alanine, but as mentioned <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec/Results/Biosafety/TransformationEfficiency">before</a> the ratio of false-positive transformants was slightly higher compared to the selection ratio on the antibiotic selection with chlormaphenicol. Even on the negative plate some colony forming untis were observable, while there were no colonies on the LB plate containing 30&nbsp;mg/L Chloramphenicol. This effect migth be due to some revertants to the D-alanine auxotrophy and to the corresponding selection pressure.
-
Therefore the Revertants were analyzed by streking out an overnight culture of the strain DH5&alpha; <i>&Delta;alr</i> <i>&Delta;dadX</i> and DH5&alpha; <i>&Delta;alr</i> <i>kan:dadX</i> on normal LB and several dilution on LB medium containing 5 mM D-alanine. The same procedure was performed with the transformation approach. In both cases the nearly the same revertants rate of 3,4 10<sup>-7</sup> (overnight culture) and 3,11 10<sup>-7</sup> &plusmn; 2,29 10<sup>-7</sup> (Transformation) was estimated. Beside there was no significante difference between the revertion ratio of the strain DH5&alpha; <i>&Delta;alr</i> <i>&Delta;dadX</i> (3,27 10<sup>-7</sup> &plusmn; 2,27 10<sup>-7</sup>) and DH5&alpha; <i>&Delta;alr</i> <i>kan:dadX</i> (2,95 10<sup>-7</sup> &plusmn; 2,65 10<sup>-7</sup>), so that an effect by some contamination could be excluded and so the additional colonies probably some revertants which are able to accumulate D-alanine in some way.<br>
+
<br>
-
A possible explantion might be a point mutation in the coding sequence of the methionine repressor <i>metJ</i>, resulting in a similar mutation rate of 7 x 10<sup>-7</sup> (<a href="#Kang2011">Kang&nbsp;<i>et&nbsp;al.</i>,&nbsp;2011</a>). Under normal circumstances the MetJ represses all essential genes for the biosynthesis of L-methionin like <i>metA, metB, metC, MetF, metE</i> and <i>metK</i> as well as the genes of the <i>metD</i> operon by using <i>S</i>-adenosylmethionine (SAM) as cofactor, see Figure x below. <br>
+
Therefore, the revertants were analyzed by spreading an overnight culture of the strains DH5&alpha; <i>&Delta;alr</i> <i>&Delta;dadX</i> and DH5&alpha; <i>&Delta;alr</i> <i>kan:dadX</i> on normal LB and several dilution onto LB medium containing 5&nbsp;mM D-alanine. The same procedure was performed with the transformation approach. In both cases nearly the same revertants rate of 3.4 10<sup>-7</sup> (overnight culture) and 3.11 10<sup>-7</sup> &plusmn; 2.29 10<sup>-7</sup> (transformation) was investigated. There was no significant difference between the ratio of revertants of the strain DH5&alpha; <i>&Delta;alr</i> <i>&Delta;dadX</i> (3.27 10<sup>-7</sup> &plusmn; 2.27 10<sup>-7</sup>) and DH5&alpha; <i>&Delta;alr</i> <i>kan:dadX</i> (2.95 10<sup>-7</sup> &plusmn; 2.65 10<sup>-7</sup>), which indicates that an effect by contamination can be excluded and additional colonies are probably revertants which are able to accumulate D-alanine in some way.
 +
<br>
 +
A possible explanation might be a point mutation in the coding sequence of the methionine repressor <i>metJ</i>, resulting in a similar mutation rate of 7 x 10<sup>-7</sup> (<a href="#Kang2011">Kang&nbsp;<i>et&nbsp;al.</i>,&nbsp;2011</a>). Under normal circumstances the MetJ represses all essential genes for the biosynthesis of L-methionin like <i>metA, metB, metC, MetF, metE</i> and <i>metK</i> as well as the genes of the <i>metD</i> operon by using <i>S</i>-adenosylmethionine (SAM) as cofactor (Figure 11).
<br>
<br>
<center>
<center>
-
<div class="element" style="margin:10px; padding:10px; text-align:center; width:450px">  
+
<div class="element" style="margin:10px; padding:10px; text-align:center; width:600px">  
-
       <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/b/b2/Bielefeld_CeBiTec_2014-10-17_MetJ-supressor.png" target="_blank"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/b/b2/Bielefeld_CeBiTec_2014-10-17_MetJ-supressor.png" width="450px"></a><br>
+
       <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/b/b2/Bielefeld_CeBiTec_2014-10-17_MetJ-supressor.png" target="_blank"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/b/b2/Bielefeld_CeBiTec_2014-10-17_MetJ-supressor.png" width="600px"></a><br>
-
<font size="2" style="text-align:center;"><b>Figure 11:</b> Suprresion of the Methionins biopsynthesis by MetJ. A point mutation within this repressor leads to a higher expression of MetC, which is also able to catalyze the conversion from L-alanine into D-alanine in <i>E. coli</i>.</font>
+
<font size="2" style="text-align:center;"><b>Figure 11:</b> Supprression of the Methionine biopsynthesis by MetJ. A point mutation within the repressor leads to a higher expression of MetC, which is also able to catalyze the conversion from L-alanine into D-alanine in <i>E.&nbsp;coli</i>.</font>
</div>
</div>
</center>
</center>
-
 
-
Figure X:
 
-
<br>
 
-
 
-
It could be demonstrated that in the presence of L-methionine all genes affected are surpressed and no revertants are observable, and that the reversion could not be quantified in its absence, suggesting that there is an other methionin-repressible enzyme able to accumulate D-alanine in <i>E. coli</i>. The revertants formed in the absence of L-methionin showed a higher expression of the Cystathionin &beta;-lyase and point mutations in the MetJ repressor like R42C. It could be shwon that a strict D-alanine auxotrophy can be restore by a plasmidar expression of the natural <i>metJ</i> repressor or the additional deletion of <i>metC</i> (<a href="#Kang2011">Kang&nbsp;<i>et&nbsp;al.</i>,&nbsp;2011</a>).<br>
 
-
Up to now the antibiotic-free selection could be demonstrated only for normal plasmids like <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1465401">BBa_K1465401</a> as Backbone (3163 bp) and <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_J04450">BBa_J04450</a> (RFP, 1069 bp), <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1465401">BBa_I13522</a> (GFP, 937 bp) respectivley as insert, resulting in a plasmid-size of 4232 bp and 4100 bp.
 
<br>
<br>
 +
It was demonstrated that in the presence of L-methionine all affected genes are suppressed, no revertants are observable, and the reversion could not be quantified in its absence. This suggests that there is another methionine-repressible enzyme, which is able to accumulate D-alanine in <i>E.&nbsp;coli</i>. The revertants formed in the absence of L-methionine showed a higher expression of the Cystathionine &beta;-lyase and point mutations in the MetJ repressor like R42C. It was demonstrated that a strict D-alanine auxotrophy can be restored by an expression of the natural <i>metJ</i> repressor from a plasmid or the additional deletion of <i>metC</i> (<a href="#Kang2011">Kang&nbsp;<i>et&nbsp;al.</i>,&nbsp;2011</a>).
<br>
<br>
-
Diskussion der ratio im Vergleich zur Trafoeff und der Plasmidgröße nach GFP
+
Until now the antibiotic-free selection was only demonstrated for small plasmids like <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1465401">BBa_K1465401</a> as a backbone (3163 bp) and <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_J04450">BBa_J04450</a> (RFP, 1069 bp) as an insert, resulting in a plasmid-size of 4232 bp. For greater plasmids or more complicated cloning approaches the transformation and selection might be problematic if none or very few positive colonies are formed. In such a case the ratio of false-positive transformants might be higher which necessitates the addition of L-methionine or the deletion of <i>metC</i> to obtain an effective selection. For easy cloning approaches an effective selection might be already possible without L-methionine or an additional deletion of <i>metC</i>.
-
Empfehlung Methionin oder metC
+
       </p>
       </p>

Latest revision as of 00:54, 18 October 2014


Biosafety - Antibiotic-free Selection

Remaining Challenges

The E. coli strains KRX Δalr ΔdadX and DH5α Δalr ΔdadX respectively showed a strict dependence of D-alanine, but as mentioned before the ratio of false-positive transformants was slightly higher compared to the selection ratio on the antibiotic selection with chlormaphenicol. Even on the negative plate some colony forming untis were observable, while there were no colonies on the LB plate containing 30 mg/L Chloramphenicol. This effect migth be due to some revertants to the D-alanine auxotrophy and to the corresponding selection pressure.
Therefore, the revertants were analyzed by spreading an overnight culture of the strains DH5α Δalr ΔdadX and DH5α Δalr kan:dadX on normal LB and several dilution onto LB medium containing 5 mM D-alanine. The same procedure was performed with the transformation approach. In both cases nearly the same revertants rate of 3.4 10-7 (overnight culture) and 3.11 10-7 ± 2.29 10-7 (transformation) was investigated. There was no significant difference between the ratio of revertants of the strain DH5α Δalr ΔdadX (3.27 10-7 ± 2.27 10-7) and DH5α Δalr kan:dadX (2.95 10-7 ± 2.65 10-7), which indicates that an effect by contamination can be excluded and additional colonies are probably revertants which are able to accumulate D-alanine in some way.
A possible explanation might be a point mutation in the coding sequence of the methionine repressor metJ, resulting in a similar mutation rate of 7 x 10-7 (Kang et al., 2011). Under normal circumstances the MetJ represses all essential genes for the biosynthesis of L-methionin like metA, metB, metC, MetF, metE and metK as well as the genes of the metD operon by using S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) as cofactor (Figure 11).


Figure 11: Supprression of the Methionine biopsynthesis by MetJ. A point mutation within the repressor leads to a higher expression of MetC, which is also able to catalyze the conversion from L-alanine into D-alanine in E. coli.

It was demonstrated that in the presence of L-methionine all affected genes are suppressed, no revertants are observable, and the reversion could not be quantified in its absence. This suggests that there is another methionine-repressible enzyme, which is able to accumulate D-alanine in E. coli. The revertants formed in the absence of L-methionine showed a higher expression of the Cystathionine β-lyase and point mutations in the MetJ repressor like R42C. It was demonstrated that a strict D-alanine auxotrophy can be restored by an expression of the natural metJ repressor from a plasmid or the additional deletion of metC (Kang et al., 2011).
Until now the antibiotic-free selection was only demonstrated for small plasmids like BBa_K1465401 as a backbone (3163 bp) and BBa_J04450 (RFP, 1069 bp) as an insert, resulting in a plasmid-size of 4232 bp. For greater plasmids or more complicated cloning approaches the transformation and selection might be problematic if none or very few positive colonies are formed. In such a case the ratio of false-positive transformants might be higher which necessitates the addition of L-methionine or the deletion of metC to obtain an effective selection. For easy cloning approaches an effective selection might be already possible without L-methionine or an additional deletion of metC.

References

  • Kang L, Shaw AC, Xu D, Xia W, Zhang J, Deng J, Wöldike HF, Liu Y, Su J. (2011) Upregulation of MetC is essential for D-alanine-independent growth of an alr/dadX-deficient Escherichia coli strain. Journal of bacteriology, vol. 193, pp. 1098 - 1106.