Team:Yale/HowitWorks

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Created page with "{{CSS/Main}} {{Template:Team:Yale2014/Templates/CSS}} {{Template:Team:Yale2014/Templates/Header}} <html> <link href='http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Montserrat:400,700' r...")
 
Line 120: Line 120:
<tr><td colspan="4" height="5px"></td> </tr>
<tr><td colspan="4" height="5px"></td> </tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td colspan="12">
 +
<div class="tinycall">
 +
<h1>How it Works</h1>
 +
</div>
 +
<div class = "well">
 +
<ol type="I"><li><strong>An Improved T7 System Expression System</strong>
 +
<p> Our first challenge in making Ampersand was to develop a system that limits basal expression of our peptide, due to its toxicity to the host. Several expression systems have been designed in the past, including the T7 promoter and T7 RNA Polymerase system, to suppress protein expression. The current BL21 (DE3) strain is leaky due to the weak suppressing promoter <i>lacUV5</i> that drives T7 RNA polymerase in the DE3 strains. As a result, low levels of toxic protein are constitutively expressed, ultimately killing the host it was made in and in turn lowering the overall yield of the protein produced.</p>
 +
<p> In order to reduce the expression of T7 RNA polymerase and create an efficient system for the expression of recombinant proteins in E. coli we chose to introduce two levels of regulation:<ul style="list-style-type:square"> <li>
 +
<strong>Transcriptional Regulation:</strong> We will use pZE21 of the pZ system of vectors developed by Lutz and Buschard with the P<sub>LlacO</sub> promoter to inhibit the expression of T7 RNA polymerase.
 +
<li>
 +
<strong>Translational Regulation:</strong> We will use the artificial riboregulatory elements devised by Isaacs et al. to restrict translation of the mRNA sequence encoding T7 RNA Polymerase.<sup>9</sup>  The cis-repressing RNA (crRNA) sequence will be inserted downstream of the promoter driving T7 RNA Polymerase and upstream of the ribosomal binding site (RBS). The crRNA is complimentary to the RBS and forms a stem loop at the 5’ end of the mRNA segment, blocking ribosomal docking and translation. A second promoter, P<sub>LtetO</sub> will express the trans-activating RNA (taRNA) capable of undergoing a linear-loop interaction that will expose the RBS and allow for translation of T7 RNA Polymerase. The ribo-regulated T7 RNA Polymerase will be ultimately incorporated into the genome of strain capable of high protein production. A second pZ plasmid will contain the gene of interest expressed by a T7 promoter. </ul>
-
<tr><td colspan="4" height="15px"></td> </tr>
+
<p>
 +
In summary, the benefits to this type of system are its robustness, portability, and efficiency in that it does not require the cell to expend more energy on the constitutive synthesis of another protein. We theorize that by utilizing these two levels of control we will be able to reduce the expression of T7 RNA polymerase and produce a system with zero basal expression of the gene of interest and permit stable cloning of toxic recombinant proteins.
 +
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/e/ed/T7_Diagram_For_Wiki.png"></center>
 +
<p>
 +
                <center>
 +
                <i><strong>Figure X.</strong> This diagram illustrates the T7 riboregulation system developed to ensure low basal levels of protein expression.<sup>9</sup> </i></center><p>
 +
<li><strong>Why Mussel Adhesion Proteins?</strong>
 +
<p>The ability for mussels to survive the harsh conditions of the intertidal zone is directly related to their capability to bind to both organic and inorganic surfaces that they come in contact with. As a result, these mussels have evolved to secrete “adhesion proteins” that enable formation of powerful bonds in an otherwise deleterious aqueous environment. The quantity known as “work of adhesion (W<sub>A</sub>)” amongst interfaces in an aqueous environment is significantly less favorable due to the water-surface interactions that must be outcompeted by the adhesive if binding is to occur.<sup>10</sup> Therefore, these mussel adhesion proteins offer a promising avenue towards enhanced bioadhesives that retain functionality in aqueous environments. </p>
 +
<p>The structure responsible for the binding of mussels to these surfaces is known as the byssus, which is composed of a well-characterized assembly of approximately 25-30 proteins.<sup>10</sup> The byssus manifests itself as an outgrowth from the mussel’s “foot” composed of threads, which terminate in plaques deposited on the surface. Thus far, a total of 5 proteins, known as mussel foot proteins (mfp’s), were shown to be unique to the plaque. Of these 5 plaque proteins, mfp-3 and mfp-5 have elicited the most investigation for adhesive applications, as both are localized at the interface between the plaque and surface. Additionally, it was shown that all such mfp’s have a uniquely high concentration of tyrosine, which is post-translationally modified to 3,4-dihydroxy-L-phenylalanine (L-Dopa). Atomic force microscopy studies focusing on a single dopa residue showed that its interaction with a metal oxide surface involves a remarkably high strength, reversible coordination bond.<sup>11</sup> It has been shown that catechol oxidase enzymes present in mfp secretions are able to convert the catechol groups of L-dopa into reactive orthoquinone functionalities, which undergo irreversible covalent bonding with organic surfaces.<sup>11,12</sup> Ultimately, the high degree of surface affinity such dopa-containing peptides possess makes them novel tools in the development of biomimetic adhesive peptides.</p>
-
<tr><td colspan="4"><h2>Modeling E. coli growth producing a toxic compound</h2>
 
-
<div class="well"><p>
 
-
We sought out to determine the optimal time to induce the E. coli in order to produce the largest quantity of antimicrobial peptides.  We hypothesized that the optimal induction time would be around mid-log, when the E. coli are growing fastest and there are enough bacteria to produce a significant amount of peptide before the population levels drop. To test this theory, we created a theoretical model using MATLAB, using E. coli logistical growth combined with exponential decay (due to the antimicrobial peptide) at different induction times, as represented in the graphic below.
 
-
</p></div>
 
-
</td>
 
 +
 +
</div>
 +
</td>
</tr>
</tr>
-
 
-
 
-
 
-
<tr>
 
-
<td colspan="4" align="middle"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/thumb/d/d9/Presentation1model.jpg/800px-Presentation1model.jpg"></td></tr>
 
-
 
-
 
-
</tr>
 
-
 
-
<tr><td colspan="2"><h2>Determining Optimal Time to Induce Expression</h2>
 
-
<div class = "well">
 
-
<p>
 
-
We simulated a 24 hour period and determined the optimal time to induce the cells is around mid-log (~7.5 hours). Inducing at this time maximizes production of the peptide.  The graph below shows E. coli growth with induction at different times.  They follow a logistic growth model until the inducer is added and then there is an exponential decay. </p>
 
-
 
-
<p>Overlayed with this graph is a plot of <strong>total production of of the peptide vs. time of induction</strong>, (with induction at every 6 minutes over a 24 hour period). The highest production of peptide over the lifespan of these bacteria is represented by the peak of this plot, which corresponds to induction at mid-log, as we previously hypothesized.<br/> The MATLAB code for our model can be found <strong>Here</strong>.
 
-
</p>
 
-
</div>
 
-
</tr>
 
-
 
-
<tr><td colspan="4" align = "middle">
 
-
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/9/99/Graphwithdatapoint.png">
 
-
</td> </tr>
 
-
</table>
 
-
 
</html>
</html>
{{Template:Team:Yale2014/Templates/Footer}}
{{Template:Team:Yale2014/Templates/Footer}}

Latest revision as of 23:48, 17 October 2014

Main Campus:
Molecular, Cellular & Developmental Biology
219 Prospect Street
P.O. Box 208103
New Haven, CT 06520
Phone: 203.432.3783
igem@yale.edu
natalie.ma@yale.edu (Graduate Advisor)
Copyright (c) 2014 Yale IGEM

How it Works

How it Works

  1. An Improved T7 System Expression System

    Our first challenge in making Ampersand was to develop a system that limits basal expression of our peptide, due to its toxicity to the host. Several expression systems have been designed in the past, including the T7 promoter and T7 RNA Polymerase system, to suppress protein expression. The current BL21 (DE3) strain is leaky due to the weak suppressing promoter lacUV5 that drives T7 RNA polymerase in the DE3 strains. As a result, low levels of toxic protein are constitutively expressed, ultimately killing the host it was made in and in turn lowering the overall yield of the protein produced.

    In order to reduce the expression of T7 RNA polymerase and create an efficient system for the expression of recombinant proteins in E. coli we chose to introduce two levels of regulation:

    • Transcriptional Regulation: We will use pZE21 of the pZ system of vectors developed by Lutz and Buschard with the PLlacO promoter to inhibit the expression of T7 RNA polymerase.
    • Translational Regulation: We will use the artificial riboregulatory elements devised by Isaacs et al. to restrict translation of the mRNA sequence encoding T7 RNA Polymerase.9 The cis-repressing RNA (crRNA) sequence will be inserted downstream of the promoter driving T7 RNA Polymerase and upstream of the ribosomal binding site (RBS). The crRNA is complimentary to the RBS and forms a stem loop at the 5’ end of the mRNA segment, blocking ribosomal docking and translation. A second promoter, PLtetO will express the trans-activating RNA (taRNA) capable of undergoing a linear-loop interaction that will expose the RBS and allow for translation of T7 RNA Polymerase. The ribo-regulated T7 RNA Polymerase will be ultimately incorporated into the genome of strain capable of high protein production. A second pZ plasmid will contain the gene of interest expressed by a T7 promoter.

    In summary, the benefits to this type of system are its robustness, portability, and efficiency in that it does not require the cell to expend more energy on the constitutive synthesis of another protein. We theorize that by utilizing these two levels of control we will be able to reduce the expression of T7 RNA polymerase and produce a system with zero basal expression of the gene of interest and permit stable cloning of toxic recombinant proteins.

    Figure X. This diagram illustrates the T7 riboregulation system developed to ensure low basal levels of protein expression.9

  2. Why Mussel Adhesion Proteins?

    The ability for mussels to survive the harsh conditions of the intertidal zone is directly related to their capability to bind to both organic and inorganic surfaces that they come in contact with. As a result, these mussels have evolved to secrete “adhesion proteins” that enable formation of powerful bonds in an otherwise deleterious aqueous environment. The quantity known as “work of adhesion (WA)” amongst interfaces in an aqueous environment is significantly less favorable due to the water-surface interactions that must be outcompeted by the adhesive if binding is to occur.10 Therefore, these mussel adhesion proteins offer a promising avenue towards enhanced bioadhesives that retain functionality in aqueous environments.

    The structure responsible for the binding of mussels to these surfaces is known as the byssus, which is composed of a well-characterized assembly of approximately 25-30 proteins.10 The byssus manifests itself as an outgrowth from the mussel’s “foot” composed of threads, which terminate in plaques deposited on the surface. Thus far, a total of 5 proteins, known as mussel foot proteins (mfp’s), were shown to be unique to the plaque. Of these 5 plaque proteins, mfp-3 and mfp-5 have elicited the most investigation for adhesive applications, as both are localized at the interface between the plaque and surface. Additionally, it was shown that all such mfp’s have a uniquely high concentration of tyrosine, which is post-translationally modified to 3,4-dihydroxy-L-phenylalanine (L-Dopa). Atomic force microscopy studies focusing on a single dopa residue showed that its interaction with a metal oxide surface involves a remarkably high strength, reversible coordination bond.11 It has been shown that catechol oxidase enzymes present in mfp secretions are able to convert the catechol groups of L-dopa into reactive orthoquinone functionalities, which undergo irreversible covalent bonding with organic surfaces.11,12 Ultimately, the high degree of surface affinity such dopa-containing peptides possess makes them novel tools in the development of biomimetic adhesive peptides.