Team:Marburg:Project:Notebook:October
From 2014.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
(14 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="exp-content"> | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
- | <p>After the purification steps until the ammonium | + | <p>After the purification steps until the ammonium sulphate precipitation a SDS-gel with coomassie staining was done and WT3610 as well as Hag-D2_3 were used as a control. </p> |
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/2/2c/MR_2014-10-01_18.72.jpg" width="30%" /> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/2/2c/MR_2014-10-01_18.72.jpg" width="30%" /> | ||
- | <p>The gel shows that there is a | + | <p>The gel shows that there is a band after the ammonium sulfate precipitation which is running to low to be flagellin. The isolation was repeated several times with the same result so that we think of unstable flagellins. Additionally, a <i>B. subtilis</i> PY79 strain with a Strep-Tag integrated into the normal Hag-gene was used for isolation of flagella. They might be more stable than Hag-D2-Strep filaments.</p> |
</div> | </div> | ||
</fieldset> | </fieldset> | ||
- | <fieldset class=" | + | <fieldset class="exp25"> |
- | <legend><a name=" | + | <legend><a name="exp25.4c">25.4 Fluorometer assay with A549</a></legend> |
<div class="aim"> | <div class="aim"> | ||
<p>Aim: Checking interaction of StrepDARPidin with EpCAM on A549 Lung carcinoma cells</p> | <p>Aim: Checking interaction of StrepDARPidin with EpCAM on A549 Lung carcinoma cells</p> | ||
Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">A549</th> |
<td>1</td> | <td>1</td> | ||
<td>H</td> | <td>H</td> | ||
Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">A549</th> |
<td>2</td> | <td>2</td> | ||
<td>H</td> | <td>H</td> | ||
Line 86: | Line 86: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">A549</th> |
<td>3</td> | <td>3</td> | ||
<td>H</td> | <td>H</td> | ||
Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">A549</th> |
<td>4</td> | <td>4</td> | ||
<td>H</td> | <td>H</td> | ||
Line 102: | Line 102: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">A549</th> |
<td>5</td> | <td>5</td> | ||
<td>H</td> | <td>H</td> | ||
Line 110: | Line 110: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">A549</th> |
<td>6</td> | <td>6</td> | ||
<td>H</td> | <td>H</td> | ||
Line 118: | Line 118: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">A549</th> |
<td>7</td> | <td>7</td> | ||
<td>H</td> | <td>H</td> | ||
Line 126: | Line 126: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">A549</th> |
<td>8</td> | <td>8</td> | ||
<td>H</td> | <td>H</td> | ||
Line 134: | Line 134: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">A549</th> |
<td>9</td> | <td>9</td> | ||
<td>H</td> | <td>H</td> | ||
Line 142: | Line 142: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">A549</th> |
<td>10</td> | <td>10</td> | ||
<td>H</td> | <td>H</td> | ||
Line 150: | Line 150: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">A549</th> |
<td>11</td> | <td>11</td> | ||
<td>H</td> | <td>H</td> | ||
Line 158: | Line 158: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">A549</th> |
<td>12</td> | <td>12</td> | ||
<td>H</td> | <td>H</td> | ||
Line 178: | Line 178: | ||
<legend><a name="exp23.35">23.35 Mutagenesis PCR of pSB1C3 Hag-D2-Strep clone 1 and 2</a></legend> | <legend><a name="exp23.35">23.35 Mutagenesis PCR of pSB1C3 Hag-D2-Strep clone 1 and 2</a></legend> | ||
<div class="exp-content"> | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
- | <p>Mutagenesis Primer arrived → PCR with | + | <p>Mutagenesis Primer arrived → PCR with pSB1C3-Hag-<i>Kpn</i>I-Strep clone 1 and 2 (appr. 20 ng/µl) in 30 µl reaction</p> |
<table width="100%" border="1"> | <table width="100%" border="1"> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
Line 193: | Line 193: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row">Phusion</th> | + | <th scope="row">Phusion DNA-polymerase</th> |
<td>1</td> | <td>1</td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
Line 224: | Line 224: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="exp-content"> | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
- | <p>The structure of the flagella of the mutant strains <em>Bacillus subtilis</em> 3610 D2-Strep and <em>Bacillus subtilis</em> 3610 D2-cup should be investigated by electron microscopy. Thus cultures of strain WT3619, 3610 D2-Strep and 3610 D2-Cup were inoculated in 5 ml LB medium. The cultures were incubated shaking at 37°C until they reached the exponential phase with an | + | <p>The structure of the flagella of the mutant strains <em>Bacillus subtilis</em> 3610 D2-Strep and <em>Bacillus subtilis</em> 3610 D2-cup should be investigated by electron microscopy. Thus cultures of strain WT3619, 3610 D2-Strep and 3610 D2-Cup were inoculated in 5 ml LB medium. The cultures were incubated shaking at 37°C until they reached the exponential phase with an OD<sub>600</sub> of 0.7 - 0.8, and until the cells reached the stationary phase. The cells were kept on the same OD by storage on ice until further processing for electron microscopy.</p> |
</div> | </div> | ||
</fieldset> | </fieldset> | ||
Line 612: | Line 612: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="exp-content"> | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
- | <p>The purified Hag-D2-Strep which was left from crystallization and | + | <p>The purified Hag-D2-Strep which was left from crystallization and the purified Hag-Strep were used to make a pulldown with Streptavidin beads. We wanted to see if the Strep-Tag in the flagellin monomers can interact with the Streptavidin beads.</p> |
<table width="100%" border="1"> | <table width="100%" border="1"> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
Line 649: | Line 649: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<th scope="row">GST-bead</th> | <th scope="row">GST-bead</th> | ||
- | |||
<td>x</td> | <td>x</td> | ||
<td> </td> | <td> </td> | ||
<td> </td> | <td> </td> | ||
- | <td> | + | <td>x</td> |
+ | <td>x</td> | ||
<td>20 µL slurry</td> | <td>20 µL slurry</td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<th scope="row">Strep-bead</th> | <th scope="row">Strep-bead</th> | ||
- | |||
<td> </td> | <td> </td> | ||
<td>x</td> | <td>x</td> | ||
<td>x</td> | <td>x</td> | ||
- | <td> | + | <td> </td> |
+ | <td> </td> | ||
<td>30 µL slurry</td> | <td>30 µL slurry</td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
Line 671: | Line 671: | ||
<td>x</td> | <td>x</td> | ||
<td> </td> | <td> </td> | ||
- | <td> | + | <td>x</td> |
<td>4 nmol → 4,5 µL</td> | <td>4 nmol → 4,5 µL</td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
Line 686: | Line 686: | ||
<ul class="list"> | <ul class="list"> | ||
<li>Pd-column + bead-slurry/ 1 min. 4000 rpm, RT</li> | <li>Pd-column + bead-slurry/ 1 min. 4000 rpm, RT</li> | ||
- | <li>Add 400 | + | <li>Add 400 µL GeFi(old) - wash/ 1 min. 4000 rpm, RT</li> |
- | <li>Discard Flow through, add 400 | + | <li>Discard Flow through, add 400 µL GeFi(old) + Protein → 20 min on Turning wheel at RT</li> |
<li>1 min at 4000 rpm, RT</li> | <li>1 min at 4000 rpm, RT</li> | ||
- | <li>2 x 400 µL | + | <li>2 x 400 µL "Strep-wash" </li> |
- | <li>Elution with 40 µL | + | <li>Elution with 40 µL 'Strep-Elution'</li> |
<li>5 min. incubation at RT</li> | <li>5 min. incubation at RT</li> | ||
<li>1 min. 4000 rpm at RT, Elution in 10 µL Loading Buffer in 1,5 mL Eppi</li> | <li>1 min. 4000 rpm at RT, Elution in 10 µL Loading Buffer in 1,5 mL Eppi</li> | ||
Line 774: | Line 774: | ||
<div class="exp-content"> | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
<p>Inoculate 16 clones from the Gibson assembly (1.10.) in Lb-Cm for plasmid preparation and test restriction.</p> | <p>Inoculate 16 clones from the Gibson assembly (1.10.) in Lb-Cm for plasmid preparation and test restriction.</p> | ||
- | <p>Small colonies on the Gibson transformation plates are visible in the morning; further incubation until colonies can be inoculated in LB-Cm. Plasmids will then be isolated from the cultures and digested with | + | <p>Small colonies on the Gibson transformation plates are visible in the morning; further incubation until colonies can be inoculated in LB-Cm. Plasmids will then be isolated from the cultures and digested with <i>Pst</i>I in order to analyze the removal of the <i>Pst</i>I restriction site in the insert.</p> |
</div> | </div> | ||
</fieldset> | </fieldset> | ||
Line 1,052: | Line 1,052: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="exp-content"> | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
- | <p>In order to fuse the genes for streptavidin and cup, which both had overhangs for each other, a Gibson assembly was carried out. Two ratios of DNA addition were tested: equal volumes of streptavidin and cup were added to the Gibson mix and the other ratio was calculated according to the formula in 13.102 with R = 1. A third Gibson reaction was prepared with the digested vector pET16b, since it was thought, the primers for strep-cup were designed with overhangs to this vector. Although the vector maps show only the overhangs with restriction sites for | + | <p>In order to fuse the genes for streptavidin and cup, which both had overhangs for each other, a Gibson assembly was carried out. Two ratios of DNA addition were tested: equal volumes of streptavidin and cup were added to the Gibson mix and the other ratio was calculated according to the formula in 13.102 with R = 1. A third Gibson reaction was prepared with the digested vector pET16b, since it was thought, the primers for strep-cup were designed with overhangs to this vector. Although the vector maps show only the overhangs with restriction sites for <i>Nco</i>I and <i>Sac</i>I the reaction was prepared with the vector as well.</p> |
<table width="100%" border="1"> | <table width="100%" border="1"> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
Line 1,096: | Line 1,096: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</fieldset> | </fieldset> | ||
- | <fieldset class=" | + | <fieldset class="exp25"> |
- | <legend><a name=" | + | <legend><a name="exp25.5">25.5 new Fluorometer assay with A549</a></legend> |
<div class="aim"> | <div class="aim"> | ||
<p>Aim: Checking interaction of StrepDARPidin with EpCAM on A549 Lung carcinoma cells using a new serial dilution</p> | <p>Aim: Checking interaction of StrepDARPidin with EpCAM on A549 Lung carcinoma cells using a new serial dilution</p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="exp-content"> | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
- | <p>In order to check the interaction of StrepDARPidin with the EpCAM on | + | <p>In order to check the interaction of StrepDARPidin with the EpCAM on A549 Lung Carcinoma cells we planned an ELISA-Like assay again. Yesterday row F 1-12 of a black Fluotrac600 96-well plate was coated with 100000 cells A549/ well (counted with Neubauer-Chamber) overnight at 37°C. 100000 cells of 3T3 fibroblasts were used as negative control and as well used to coat well G6.</p> |
<p>We intended to incubate them with different concentrations of StrepDARPidin and then target the N-terminal His-Tag with and Anti-His antibody Alexa488 conjugated (1:50 endvolumen). </p> | <p>We intended to incubate them with different concentrations of StrepDARPidin and then target the N-terminal His-Tag with and Anti-His antibody Alexa488 conjugated (1:50 endvolumen). </p> | ||
<p>In wells H1-6 gel filtration purified StrepDARPidin with 87 µM was tested, in well H 7-12 Ni-NTA purified StrepDARPidin with 280 µM.</p> | <p>In wells H1-6 gel filtration purified StrepDARPidin with 87 µM was tested, in well H 7-12 Ni-NTA purified StrepDARPidin with 280 µM.</p> | ||
Line 1,112: | Line 1,112: | ||
Col</th> | Col</th> | ||
<th scope="col">Well Row</th> | <th scope="col">Well Row</th> | ||
- | <th scope="col"> | + | <th scope="col">raw data (485, 520)</th> |
<th scope="col">Purification</th> | <th scope="col">Purification</th> | ||
<th scope="col">StrepDARPidin concentration [M]</th> | <th scope="col">StrepDARPidin concentration [M]</th> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">A549</th> |
<td>1</td> | <td>1</td> | ||
<td>F</td> | <td>F</td> | ||
Line 1,125: | Line 1,125: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">A549</th> |
<td>2</td> | <td>2</td> | ||
<td>F</td> | <td>F</td> | ||
Line 1,133: | Line 1,133: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">A549</th> |
<td>3</td> | <td>3</td> | ||
<td>F</td> | <td>F</td> | ||
Line 1,141: | Line 1,141: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">A549</th> |
<td>4</td> | <td>4</td> | ||
<td>F</td> | <td>F</td> | ||
Line 1,149: | Line 1,149: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">A549</th> |
<td>5</td> | <td>5</td> | ||
<td>F</td> | <td>F</td> | ||
Line 1,157: | Line 1,157: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">A549</th> |
<td>6</td> | <td>6</td> | ||
<td>F</td> | <td>F</td> | ||
Line 1,165: | Line 1,165: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">A549</th> |
<td>7</td> | <td>7</td> | ||
<td>F</td> | <td>F</td> | ||
Line 1,173: | Line 1,173: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">A549</th> |
<td>8</td> | <td>8</td> | ||
<td>F</td> | <td>F</td> | ||
Line 1,181: | Line 1,181: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">A549</th> |
<td>9</td> | <td>9</td> | ||
<td>F</td> | <td>F</td> | ||
Line 1,189: | Line 1,189: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">A549</th> |
<td>10</td> | <td>10</td> | ||
<td>F</td> | <td>F</td> | ||
Line 1,197: | Line 1,197: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">A549</th> |
<td>11</td> | <td>11</td> | ||
<td>F</td> | <td>F</td> | ||
Line 1,205: | Line 1,205: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">A549</th> |
<td>12</td> | <td>12</td> | ||
<td>F</td> | <td>F</td> | ||
Line 1,213: | Line 1,213: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">Empty well</th> |
<td>5</td> | <td>5</td> | ||
<td>G</td> | <td>G</td> | ||
Line 1,221: | Line 1,221: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">negative control 3T3 fibroblasts</th> |
<td>6</td> | <td>6</td> | ||
<td>G</td> | <td>G</td> | ||
Line 1,229: | Line 1,229: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">Blank</th> |
<td>7</td> | <td>7</td> | ||
<td>G</td> | <td>G</td> | ||
Line 1,237: | Line 1,237: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">positive control AB</th> |
<td>8</td> | <td>8</td> | ||
<td>G</td> | <td>G</td> | ||
Line 1,252: | Line 1,252: | ||
<p>We are able to see that the fluorescence signal decreases with increasing dilution. Unfortunately the negative control was very high as well. The t-cells were incubated in Eppis because of their non-adherent features. They were incubated with StrepDARPidin and Antibody before. The supernatant was discarded after centrifugation at 1500x g but the cells did not stay at the pellet’s position so that it was not possible to remove the whole preincubated material which might be left when measuring the control.</p> | <p>We are able to see that the fluorescence signal decreases with increasing dilution. Unfortunately the negative control was very high as well. The t-cells were incubated in Eppis because of their non-adherent features. They were incubated with StrepDARPidin and Antibody before. The supernatant was discarded after centrifugation at 1500x g but the cells did not stay at the pellet’s position so that it was not possible to remove the whole preincubated material which might be left when measuring the control.</p> | ||
<p>Additionally it is noticeable that there is the same trend for both purification methods. The lower signal from NTA-purified StrepDARPidin can be explained by the fact that the concentration was higher but the purity also lower so that even less StrepDARPidin was found in the protein aliquods. As negative Bacillus Subtilis WT culture was used which was already lysed causing the huge signal. A different EpCAM-negative cell line has to be used. </p> | <p>Additionally it is noticeable that there is the same trend for both purification methods. The lower signal from NTA-purified StrepDARPidin can be explained by the fact that the concentration was higher but the purity also lower so that even less StrepDARPidin was found in the protein aliquods. As negative Bacillus Subtilis WT culture was used which was already lysed causing the huge signal. A different EpCAM-negative cell line has to be used. </p> | ||
+ | <p>For the next measurement row C of the plate was coated with 100000 A549 cells & Caco-2 cells per well overnight and the same amount of 3T3 fibroblasts as negative control.</p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</fieldset> | </fieldset> | ||
Line 1,268: | Line 1,269: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="exp-content"> | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
- | <p>The purified Hag-D2-Strep which was left from crystallization and | + | <p>The purified Hag-D2-Strep which was left from crystallization and the purified Hag-Strep were used to make a pulldown with purified StrepDARPidin. We wanted to see if the Strep-Tag in the flagellin monomers can interact with the StrepDARPidin, especially with the Streptavidin part.</p> |
<table width="100%" border="1"> | <table width="100%" border="1"> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
Line 1,307: | Line 1,308: | ||
<td><strong>3</strong></td> | <td><strong>3</strong></td> | ||
<td><strong>4</strong></td> | <td><strong>4</strong></td> | ||
+ | <td><strong>5</strong></td> | ||
<td><strong>used</strong></td> | <td><strong>used</strong></td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td><strong>StrepDARPidin</strong></td> | <td><strong>StrepDARPidin</strong></td> | ||
- | |||
<td> </td> | <td> </td> | ||
- | |||
<td> </td> | <td> </td> | ||
+ | <td>X</td> | ||
+ | <td>X</td> | ||
+ | <td>X</td> | ||
<td>4 nmol → 40 µl</td> | <td>4 nmol → 40 µl</td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
Line 1,323: | Line 1,326: | ||
<td> </td> | <td> </td> | ||
<td>X</td> | <td>X</td> | ||
+ | <td> </td> | ||
<td> 2 nmol → 2,25 µl</td> | <td> 2 nmol → 2,25 µl</td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td><strong>Hag-Strep</strong></td> | <td><strong>Hag-Strep</strong></td> | ||
- | <td> | + | <td>X</td> |
<td> </td> | <td> </td> | ||
<td>X</td> | <td>X</td> | ||
- | <td> | + | <td> </td> |
+ | <td> </td> | ||
<td>2 nmol → 1,7 µl</td> | <td>2 nmol → 1,7 µl</td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
Line 1,341: | Line 1,346: | ||
<li>Pellet resuspended in 10 µL LB</li> | <li>Pellet resuspended in 10 µL LB</li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/b/bd/SDS_gel_competitive_Strep_beat_pulldown.jpg" width="30%" /> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
<table width="100%" border="1"> | <table width="100%" border="1"> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
Line 1,348: | Line 1,355: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td><strong>1</strong></td> | <td><strong>1</strong></td> | ||
- | <td> | + | <td>Hag-Strep</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td><strong>2</strong></td> | <td><strong>2</strong></td> | ||
- | <td> | + | <td>Hag D2-Strep</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td><strong>3</strong></td> | <td><strong>3</strong></td> | ||
- | <td>Strep | + | <td>Hag Strep + StrepDARPidin</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td><strong>4</strong></td> | <td><strong>4</strong></td> | ||
- | <td> | + | <td>Hag-D2-Strep + StrepDARPidin</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td><strong>5</strong></td> | <td><strong>5</strong></td> | ||
- | <td> | + | <td>StrepDARPidin</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td><strong>6</strong></td> | <td><strong>6</strong></td> | ||
- | <td> | + | <td>Hag-Strep + StrepDARPidin [1:5]</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td><strong>7</strong></td> | <td><strong>7</strong></td> | ||
- | <td> | + | <td>Hag-D2-Strep + StrepDARPidin [1:5]</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td><strong>8</strong></td> | <td><strong>8</strong></td> | ||
- | <td> | + | <td>Hag-Strep + StrepDARPidin [1:1]</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td><strong>9</strong></td> | <td><strong>9</strong></td> | ||
- | <td> | + | <td>Hag-D2-Strep + StrepDARPidin [1:1]</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
- | <p>The Strep- | + | <p>The competitive pulldown shows that just a small amount of protein remains in the supernatant. Hag-D2-Strep seems to be more stable than Hag-Strep. The highest amount of protein precipitates. We have assumed that the Strep-Tag/ Streptavidin-binding is very strong and causes maybe misfolding of the flagellin after binding which causes the precipitation. We plan to isolate the flagella in order to see if the same reaction takes place.</p> |
</div> | </div> | ||
+ | </fieldset> | ||
+ | <fieldset class="exp21"> | ||
+ | <legend><a name="exp21.8">21.8 Western blot with anti-Strep-Tag-AB</a></legend> | ||
+ | <div class="aim"> | ||
+ | <p>Aim: Checking interactions between Hag-D2-Strep & Anti-Strep-Tag-AB</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
+ | <p>To 2ml of culture of Bacillus subtilis (OD=1.01) 120µl H20 and 80 µl were added for lysation. 10 µl of the lysate supplied with Roti-Load (Roth, K 929.1) were loaded on a 12% polyacrylamide gel. The electrophoresis ran at max. 130 V. After finishing, the gel was blotted onto PVDF membrane (6 cm * 9 cm) at 4°C at 250mA for about 1.5 hours. Then, the membrane was washed in BSA solution (3% BSA in TBS/Tween-20, Roth, 9127.1) over night at 4°C, before it was treated with the strep-antibody (Precision Protein StrepTactin-HRP Conjugate (Bio Rad, #161-0381): 1:5000) for 1 hr at RT. The membrane was washed 3 times for 10 minutes in TBS/Tween-20. The membrane was rinsed for 1 minute with ECL solution with a chemiluminescent substrate, which was detected by a Fusion Fx Vilber Lourmat imaging system.</p> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/3/36/Western_Blot_AntiStrep.png" width="30%" /> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <p>It could be seen that in comparison to the wildtype the Hag-D2-Strep strain gave a positive signal for the StrepTag, which was incorporated into the flagellin.</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
</fieldset> | </fieldset> | ||
<fieldset class="exp23"> | <fieldset class="exp23"> | ||
<legend><a name="exp23.40">23.40 Plasmid isolation and test restriction of Hag-D2-Strep clone 1 and 2 (mutagenesis)</a></legend> | <legend><a name="exp23.40">23.40 Plasmid isolation and test restriction of Hag-D2-Strep clone 1 and 2 (mutagenesis)</a></legend> | ||
<div class="aim"> | <div class="aim"> | ||
- | <p>Aim: Analyze the removal of the | + | <p>Aim: Analyze the removal of the <i>Pst</i>I restriction site </p> |
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="exp-content"> | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
- | <p>Plasmid preparation of the inoculated E. coli cultures was performed after over night incubation. 500-600 ng of all plasmids have been digested with | + | <p>Plasmid preparation of the inoculated E. coli cultures was performed after over night incubation. 500-600 ng of all plasmids have been digested with <i>Pst</i>I for 2h (37°C). In case the <i>Pst</i>I restriction site is removed from the insert, only one fragment (linearized plasmid) should occur in the gel. If the mutagenesis PCR failed and the restriction site is still inside the plasmid 2 fragments (3000bp + 470 bp) should occur in the gel.</p> |
<table width="100%" border="1"> | <table width="100%" border="1"> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
Line 1,410: | Line 1,430: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row"><i>Pst</i>I</th> |
<td>0,5</td> | <td>0,5</td> | ||
<td>9</td> | <td>9</td> | ||
Line 1,423: | Line 1,443: | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/6/62/MR_2014-10-03_23.40.png" width="40%" /> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/6/62/MR_2014-10-03_23.40.png" width="40%" /> | ||
<p>Negative clones: 1.2, 1.4, 2.3 and 2.9</p> | <p>Negative clones: 1.2, 1.4, 2.3 and 2.9</p> | ||
- | <p> | + | <p>Only one fragment should occur in the gel in case of <i>Pst</i>I linearization.</p> |
</div> | </div> | ||
</fieldset> | </fieldset> | ||
Line 1,525: | Line 1,545: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="exp-content"> | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
- | <p>Since the last ligation yielded in barely any colonies on the plates, the vectors were not further purified after restriction with | + | <p>Since the last ligation yielded in barely any colonies on the plates, the vectors were not further purified after restriction with <i>Nco</i>I and <i>Sac</i>I, which would result in a high loss of DNA. The ligation of piGEM007, piGEM008, piGEM009 with the IPTG inducible and the strong constitutive promoter and piGEM002 with the strong constitutive promoter was carried out. The DNA ratios were calculated according to the previously used formula (13.102).</p> |
<table width="100%" border="1"> | <table width="100%" border="1"> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
Line 1,766: | Line 1,786: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="exp-content"> | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
- | <p>The parts were ready for the assembly. The same FusionPCR/Gibson assembly mixture was used like the last time to build KSI (22.10). The primers were added to the reaction after a first step of incubation at | + | <p>The parts were ready for the assembly. The same FusionPCR/Gibson assembly mixture was used like the last time to build KSI (22.10). The primers were added to the reaction after a first step of incubation at 50°C for 0.5 hours. Then the PCR was carried out as usual.</p> |
<table width="100%" border="1"> | <table width="100%" border="1"> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
Line 1,862: | Line 1,882: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</fieldset> | </fieldset> | ||
- | <fieldset class=" | + | <fieldset class="exp24"> |
- | <legend><a name=" | + | <legend><a name="exp24.4">24.4 Restriction of StrepCup and Ligation with pET16b</a></legend> |
<div class="aim"> | <div class="aim"> | ||
<p>Aim: insert the StrepCup construct in the overproduction plasmid pET16b</p> | <p>Aim: insert the StrepCup construct in the overproduction plasmid pET16b</p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="exp-content"> | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
- | <p>The purified StrepCup fragment was digested with the enzymes | + | <p>The purified StrepCup fragment was digested with the enzymes <i>Nco</i>I and <i>Xho</i>I, since the Gibson assembly of Strep and Cup with the vector yielded in only one transformand, which was considered as a spontaneous mutation in relation to the control plate, which carried one colony more.</p> |
<table width="100%" border="1"> | <table width="100%" border="1"> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
Line 1,879: | Line 1,899: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row"><i>Nco</i>I</th> |
<td>0,5</td> | <td>0,5</td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
Line 1,907: | Line 1,927: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row">StrepCup | + | <th scope="row">StrepCup <i>Nco</i>I/<i>Xho</i>I (170.8 ng/µl)</th> |
<td>0,5</td> | <td>0,5</td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row">pET16b | + | <th scope="row">pET16b <i>Nco</i>I/<i>Xho</i>I (18.1 ng/µl)</th> |
<td>16</td> | <td>16</td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
Line 1,944: | Line 1,964: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="exp-content"> | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
- | <p>Colony PCRs were performed to screen the clones for the right plasmids. Every plate carried enough colonies to pick multiple clones. Five clones of every plate was picked and this time instead of using the common gfp-reverse primer iGEM006 the primers specific for the degradation tags of the different nose plasmids were used. The ligation with the constitutive promoter should be repeated, since the fragment was not digested with | + | <p>Colony PCRs were performed to screen the clones for the right plasmids. Every plate carried enough colonies to pick multiple clones. Five clones of every plate was picked and this time instead of using the common gfp-reverse primer iGEM006 the primers specific for the degradation tags of the different nose plasmids were used. The ligation with the constitutive promoter should be repeated, since the fragment was not digested with <i>Nco</i>I and <i>Sac</i>I before.</p> |
<table width="100%" border="1"> | <table width="100%" border="1"> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
Line 2,084: | Line 2,104: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</fieldset> | </fieldset> | ||
- | <fieldset class=" | + | <fieldset class="exp25"> |
- | <legend><a name=" | + | <legend><a name="exp25.6a">25.6a Immunofluorescence microscopy at AG Grosse lab</a></legend> |
<div class="aim"> | <div class="aim"> | ||
<p>Aim: Checking the interaction of StrepDARPidin with EpCAM-positive cell lines A549 & Caco-2 via immunofluorescence Antibody staining</p> | <p>Aim: Checking the interaction of StrepDARPidin with EpCAM-positive cell lines A549 & Caco-2 via immunofluorescence Antibody staining</p> | ||
Line 2,106: | Line 2,126: | ||
<a name="05.10.2014">05.10.2014</a> | <a name="05.10.2014">05.10.2014</a> | ||
</h2> | </h2> | ||
- | <fieldset class=" | + | <fieldset class="exp25"> |
- | <legend><a name=" | + | <legend><a name="exp25.6b">25.6b Immunofluorescence microscopy at AG Grosse lab</a></legend> |
<div class="aim"> | <div class="aim"> | ||
<p>Aim: Checking the interaction of StrepDARPidin with EpCAM-positive cell lines A549 & Caco-2 via immunofluorescence Antibody staining</p> | <p>Aim: Checking the interaction of StrepDARPidin with EpCAM-positive cell lines A549 & Caco-2 via immunofluorescence Antibody staining</p> | ||
Line 2,113: | Line 2,133: | ||
<div class="exp-content"> | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
<p>The dried samples were analysed under a Laser scanning microscope Zeiss LSM Series.</p> | <p>The dried samples were analysed under a Laser scanning microscope Zeiss LSM Series.</p> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/3/39/MR_fuorescence_microscopy_anti-His_Caco2_2014_10_05.jpg" width="50%" /> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/8/89/MR_fuorescence_microscopy_anti-His_A549_2014_10_05.jpg" width="50%" /> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/8/8e/MR_fuorescence_microscopy_anti-His_NIH3T3_2014_10_05.jpg" width="50%" /> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <p>The dried samples were analysed under a Laser scanning microscope Zeiss LSM Series.</p> | ||
+ | <p>The microscopy pictures show that there is a colocalization of StrepDARPidin and membrane-associated F-actin. The Anti-His-Alexa488 antibody (green) stains the StrepDARPidin incubated A540 and Caco-2 cells generating a high intensity fluorescence signal at the cell membrane. Unspecific His-staining was detected in the nucleus of all cell lines both in presence and absence of StrepDARPidin. The negative control 3T3 fibroblasts stay unstained at the membrane.</p> | ||
+ | <p>We were able to prove that the StrepDARPidin is binding specifically to EpCAM-positive cells.</p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</fieldset> | </fieldset> | ||
Line 2,330: | Line 2,359: | ||
<legend><a name="exp23.41">23.41 Repeat test restriction</a></legend> | <legend><a name="exp23.41">23.41 Repeat test restriction</a></legend> | ||
<div class="exp-content"> | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
- | <p>New test restriction with only 200 ng plasmid DNA since the last restriction showed a lot of undigested DNA. In order to test for the removal of the | + | <p>New test restriction with only 200 ng plasmid DNA since the last restriction showed a lot of undigested DNA. In order to test for the removal of the <i>Pst</i>I restriction site 8 clones will be digested with <i>Pst</i>I and <i>Pst</i>I/<i>Eco</i>RI.</p> |
<table width="100%" border="1"> | <table width="100%" border="1"> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
Line 2,348: | Line 2,377: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row"><i>Pst</i>I</th> |
<td>0,5</td> | <td>0,5</td> | ||
<td>4,5</td> | <td>4,5</td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row"> | + | <th scope="row">i>Eco</i>RI</th> |
<td>0,5</td> | <td>0,5</td> | ||
<td>4,5</td> | <td>4,5</td> | ||
Line 2,365: | Line 2,394: | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/9/9e/MR_2014-10-05_23.41.png" width="50%" /> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/9/9e/MR_2014-10-05_23.41.png" width="50%" /> | ||
- | <p> | + | <p><i>Pst</i>I restriction should lead to a linearized plasmid, i>Eco</i>RI/<i>Pst</i>I shows the expected size of 1500 and 2000 bp. Additionally some undigested plasmid is left in the <i>Pst</i>I restriction.</p> |
<ul> | <ul> | ||
- | <li>Contamination of plasmid? New | + | <li>Contamination of plasmid? New digestion with new batch of <i>Pst</i>I and <i>Eco</i>RI.</li> |
- | <li> | + | <li><i>Pst</i>I restriction lead to a linearized plasmid and <i>Pst</i>I/<i>Eco</i>RI double digest lead to two fragments of a size of 1400 and 2000 bp</li> |
<li>Due to limited time clones 1.1 and 2.1 will be sent for sequencin</li> | <li>Due to limited time clones 1.1 and 2.1 will be sent for sequencin</li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/b/b8/MR_2014-10-05_23.41_2.png" width="50%" /> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/b/b8/MR_2014-10-05_23.41_2.png" width="50%" /> | ||
- | <p>Result: | + | <p>Result: <i>Pst</i>I is contaminated with i>Eco</i>RI.</p> |
</div> | </div> | ||
</fieldset> | </fieldset> | ||
Line 2,526: | Line 2,555: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="exp-content"> | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
- | <p>Clone 6 was picked to inoculate a miniprep in LB-ampicillin. The plasmid was | + | <p>Clone 6 was picked to inoculate a miniprep in LB-ampicillin. The plasmid was isolated after 8 hours of incubation at 37°C. A control restriction was carried out with the enzymes <i>Nco</i>I, <i>Eco</i>RI and <i>Pst</i>I; a negative clone would result in bands of the size of 394 bp, 748 bp and 4569 bp; a positive clone would yield bands in size of 748 bp, 865 bp and 4569 bp. Lane 2 showed the fragments in the expected size.</p> |
</div> | </div> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/5/56/PET16b_StrepCup_restriction.png" width="20%" /> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/5/56/PET16b_StrepCup_restriction.png" width="20%" /> | ||
Line 2,708: | Line 2,737: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<p>Applied onto a gel nothing could be seen.</p> | <p>Applied onto a gel nothing could be seen.</p> | ||
+ | </fieldset> | ||
+ | <fieldset class="exp25" | ||
+ | <legend><a name="exp25.7">25.7 new Fluorometer assay with A549 and Caco-2</a></legend> | ||
+ | <div class="aim"> | ||
+ | <p>Aim: Checking interaction of StrepDARPidin with EpCAM on A549 Lung carcinoma cells & Caco-2 cells using a new serial dilution</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
+ | <p>This time Caco-2 (C1-6) and A549 (C7-12) were used to coat row C of a black 96-well plate (100000 cells/ well). 100000 cells of 3T3 fibroblasts were used as negative control and as well used to coat 2 wells (G10 & G11) which was done overnight.</p> | ||
+ | <p>The same protocol like in 22.5 was used or GeFi-purified StrepDARPidin.</p> | ||
+ | <p>Following concentrations of StrepDARPidin dissolved in PBS (pH 7,4) +2,5 % glycerin were used:</p> | ||
+ | <table width="100%" border="1"> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">Content</th> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">Well Col</th> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">Well Row</th> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">raw data (485, 520)</th> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">Purification</th> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">StrepDARPidin concentration [M]</th> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">Caco-2</th> | ||
+ | <td>1;1</td> | ||
+ | <td>C</td> | ||
+ | <td>344</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>25 µM</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">Caco-2</th> | ||
+ | <td>2;2</td> | ||
+ | <td>C</td> | ||
+ | <td>538</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>2.5 µM</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">Caco-2</th> | ||
+ | <td>3;3</td> | ||
+ | <td>C</td> | ||
+ | <td>386</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>250 nM</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">Caco-2</th> | ||
+ | <td>4;4</td> | ||
+ | <td>C</td> | ||
+ | <td>319</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>25 nM</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">Caco-2</th> | ||
+ | <td>5;5</td> | ||
+ | <td>C</td> | ||
+ | <td>281</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>2.5 nM</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">Caco-2</th> | ||
+ | <td>6;6</td> | ||
+ | <td>C</td> | ||
+ | <td>259</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>250 pM</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">A549</th> | ||
+ | <td>7;7</td> | ||
+ | <td>C</td> | ||
+ | <td>422</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>25 µM</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">A549</th> | ||
+ | <td>8;8</td> | ||
+ | <td>C</td> | ||
+ | <td>396</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>2,5 µM</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">A549</th> | ||
+ | <td>9;9</td> | ||
+ | <td>C</td> | ||
+ | <td>273</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>250 nM</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">A549</th> | ||
+ | <td>10;10</td> | ||
+ | <td>C</td> | ||
+ | <td>247</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>25 nM</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">A549</th> | ||
+ | <td>11;11</td> | ||
+ | <td>C</td> | ||
+ | <td>288</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>2,5 nM</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">A549</th> | ||
+ | <td>12;12</td> | ||
+ | <td>C</td> | ||
+ | <td>272</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>250 pM</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">Blank</th> | ||
+ | <td>5;9</td> | ||
+ | <td>G</td> | ||
+ | <td>197</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">negative control 3T3 fibroblast</th> | ||
+ | <td>6;10</td> | ||
+ | <td>G</td> | ||
+ | <td>355</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>25 µM</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">negative control 3T3 fibroblast</th> | ||
+ | <td>7;11</td> | ||
+ | <td>G</td> | ||
+ | <td>305</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>25 µ</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">positive AB-control</th> | ||
+ | <td>8,12</td> | ||
+ | <td>G</td> | ||
+ | <td>3950</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <p>The serial dilution shows that the signal is decreasing for both cell lines. The Caco-2 Cells have a higher signal. The experiment should be repeated.</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
</fieldset> | </fieldset> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 2,884: | Line 3,067: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="exp-content"> | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
- | <p>To transform Bacillus a huge amount of plasmid is needed. For this reason 100 ml culture with <em>E. coli</em> for every nose plasmid with a metallosensitive promoter was harvested and the plasmids were | + | <p>To transform Bacillus a huge amount of plasmid is needed. For this reason 100 ml culture with <em>E. coli</em> for every nose plasmid with a metallosensitive promoter was harvested and the plasmids were isolated according to the protocol in the Qiagen Plasmid Plus Maxi Kit. One exception was made, since no QIAvac plus 24 was available and no vacuum pump. Thus the filtered cell lysate was loaded onto the columns by centrifugation. </p> |
</div> | </div> | ||
</fieldset> | </fieldset> | ||
Line 2,920: | Line 3,103: | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
+ | </fieldset> | ||
+ | <fieldset class="exp23"> | ||
+ | <legend><a name="exp23.46">23.46 PCR amplification of the Arc1p-C domain fragment and the PheA domain fragment</a></legend> | ||
+ | <div class="aim"> | ||
+ | <p>Aim: Fragments are needed for the cloning of two new biobricks</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
+ | <table width="100%" border="1"> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="col"> </th> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">Arc1p (µl)</th> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">PheA (µl)</th> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">Water</th> | ||
+ | <td>24</td> | ||
+ | <td>24</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">HF Buffer 5x</th> | ||
+ | <td>10</td> | ||
+ | <td>10</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">Phusion DNA-polymerase</th> | ||
+ | <td>1</td> | ||
+ | <td>1</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">Primer for (1:50)</th> | ||
+ | <td>6.5</td> | ||
+ | <td>6.5</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">Primer rev (1:50)</th> | ||
+ | <td>6.5</td> | ||
+ | <td>6.5</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">Template (20 ng/µl)</th> | ||
+ | <td>1</td> | ||
+ | <td>1</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">dNTP mix (10 mM each)</th> | ||
+ | <td>1</td> | ||
+ | <td>1</td> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/2/27/MR_20141008_amplification_Arc1p_bb_cloning.png" width="30%" /> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/0/0a/MR_20141008_amplification_PheA_bb_cloning.png" width="30%" /> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <p>Both fragments could be amplified (in a duplicate) and will be used for further cloning processes. The gel for the PheA domain did not run straight, but the approximate expected size can be seen.</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </fieldset> | ||
+ | <fieldset class="exp23"> | ||
+ | <legend><a name="exp23.47">23.47 Restriction of pSB1C3 and the amplified fragments with <i>Xba</i>I and <i>Pst</i>I</a></legend> | ||
+ | <div class="aim"> | ||
+ | <p>Aim: Digested plasmid and DNA fragments are needed</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
+ | <p>The iGEM vector pSB1C3 and the fragments resulting from the previous PCR will be digested with <i>Xba</i>I and <i>Pst</i>I for a following ligation and transformation.</p> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <table width="100%" border="1"> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">Reaction Mix</th> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">pSB1C3 (µl)</th> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">Arc1p (µl)</th> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">PheA (µl)</th> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row"><i>Pst</i>I</th> | ||
+ | <td>0.5</td> | ||
+ | <td>0.5</td> | ||
+ | <td>0.5</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row"><i>Xba</i>I</th> | ||
+ | <td>0.5</td> | ||
+ | <td>0.5</td> | ||
+ | <td>0.5</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">Buffer 2.1 10x</th> | ||
+ | <td>2.0</td> | ||
+ | <td>2.0</td> | ||
+ | <td>2.0</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">Water</th> | ||
+ | <td>14</td> | ||
+ | <td>12</td> | ||
+ | <td>9<td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <p>Digestion at room temperature over night.</p> | ||
</fieldset> | </fieldset> | ||
<fieldset class="exp13"> | <fieldset class="exp13"> | ||
Line 3,084: | Line 3,367: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="exp-content"> | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
- | <p>30 ml LB-ampicillin were inoculated with cells of <i>E. coli</i> BL21(DE3) pET16b_StrepCup from plate. This culture was incubated shaking at 37°C until they reached an | + | <p>30 ml LB-ampicillin were inoculated with cells of <i>E. coli</i> BL21(DE3) pET16b_StrepCup from plate. This culture was incubated shaking at 37°C until they reached an OD<sub>600</sub> of 0.58. A preinduction sample was taken (1.2 ml = (0.7 * 0.7) / (0.7 * 0.58)), the cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 14000 rpm for 1 minute, followed by resuspension in 80 µl water and 20 µl 5X SDS loading dye. The culture was induced with 30 µl IPTG for 3 hours. Another sample was taken afterwards, at this time point the culture reached an OD<sub>600</sub> of 1.2 (0.583 ml = (0.7 * 0.7 / 0.7 * 1.2)). These samples were boiled at 95°C for 10 minutes and then analyzed by SDS-PAGE (12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel). |
<br /> | <br /> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/f/f7/SDS.png" width="30%" /> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/f/f7/SDS.png" width="30%" /> | ||
Line 3,095: | Line 3,378: | ||
<div class="aim"> | <div class="aim"> | ||
<p>Aim: check nose - lac/const plasmids for correct insert | <p>Aim: check nose - lac/const plasmids for correct insert | ||
+ | </div> | ||
<div class="exp-content"> | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
<p>Since there could have been a confusion after isolating the plasmids, which could have been the reason for the last negative control PCR on the lac plasmids, every reverse primer for the nose plasmids with the ssrA-tags and without the degradation tag were tested. The following table went for every of the nose plasmids with the lac-promoter, not only for the shown piGEM002 + lac In addition to that, a control PCR was performed with the the three existing nose plasmids with constitutive promoter piGEM002/007 and 008, another control PCR was done for piGEM008 + Cu sensitive promoter, which was the last one missing of the nose-plasmids with the metallosensitive promoters.</p> | <p>Since there could have been a confusion after isolating the plasmids, which could have been the reason for the last negative control PCR on the lac plasmids, every reverse primer for the nose plasmids with the ssrA-tags and without the degradation tag were tested. The following table went for every of the nose plasmids with the lac-promoter, not only for the shown piGEM002 + lac In addition to that, a control PCR was performed with the the three existing nose plasmids with constitutive promoter piGEM002/007 and 008, another control PCR was done for piGEM008 + Cu sensitive promoter, which was the last one missing of the nose-plasmids with the metallosensitive promoters.</p> | ||
Line 3,131: | Line 3,415: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | <th scope="row">piGEM002/007/008 + const. | + | <th scope="row">piGEM002/007/008 + const. %#040;ca 40 ng/µl)</th> |
<td>-</td> | <td>-</td> | ||
<td>-</td> | <td>-</td> | ||
Line 3,314: | Line 3,598: | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
- | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/4/42/CPCR_lac_plasmids_09.10.2014.png" width=" | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/4/42/CPCR_lac_plasmids_09.10.2014.png" width="30%" /> |
<br /> | <br /> | ||
- | <p>For the colony PCR several positive clones could be seen that exposed a band in the height of ca 1000 bp, clone 9 was chosen to work with in the further steps. The control PCR on the nose - lac plasmids was negative for all plasmids. Some showed two very thin bands of ca 750 bp and 1000 bp size. The expected fragment should have a size of | + | <p>For the colony PCR several positive clones could be seen that exposed a band in the height of ca 1000 bp, clone 9 was chosen to work with in the further steps. The control PCR on the nose - lac plasmids was negative for all plasmids. Some showed two very thin bands of ca 750 bp and 1000 bp size. The expected fragment should have a size of approx. 818 bp. These findings were striking, since the colony PCR for the clones from which the plasmids were isolated were positive.</p> |
<p>The control PCR for the plasmids piGEM002/007 + const and piGEM008 + Cu were positive. The clones containing these plasmids were used to inoculate 100 ml LB+ampicillin for a maxi prep.</p> | <p>The control PCR for the plasmids piGEM002/007 + const and piGEM008 + Cu were positive. The clones containing these plasmids were used to inoculate 100 ml LB+ampicillin for a maxi prep.</p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 3,326: | Line 3,610: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="exp-content"> | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
- | <p>The colony PCR for the clones containing the nose plasmids were positive but the control PCR with the | + | <p>The colony PCR for the clones containing the nose plasmids were positive but the control PCR with the isolated plasmids were negative. Since colony PCRs are a less reliable method than the control PCR on the isolated plasmid or a control restriction, the plasmids should be negative. To be sure a control restriction with <i>Bam</i>HI and <i>Hind</i>III was carried out with these plasmids. The positive plasmids should result in fragments of 4194 bp and 2620 bp size, the negative plasmid should not be digested by <i>Hind</I>III, because the only restriction site for <i>Hind</I>III is in the IPTG inducible promoter. As a control piGEM030 was cut with <i>Hind</I>III and <i>Nco</i>I (1172 bp, 5246 bp and 241 bp) and piGEM008 + const was cut with <i>Bam</i>HI and <i>Nco</i>I (4189 bp + 2757 for a positive plasmid, 4189 bp and 2518 bp for a negative plasmid). |
<br /> | <br /> | ||
<table width="100%" border="1"> | <table width="100%" border="1"> | ||
Line 3,541: | Line 3,825: | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
- | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/9/95/Kontroll_verdau_und_Colony_PCR_lac_plasmide_09.10.2014.png" width=" | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/9/95/Kontroll_verdau_und_Colony_PCR_lac_plasmide_09.10.2014.png" width="40%" /> |
<br /> | <br /> | ||
<p>The control restriction of the nose plasmids was negative, the plasmid just seemed to be linearized and not cut into two fragments. That means that the <i>Hind</i>III could not cut since the IPTG inducible promoter was not contained in the plasmids. However, also the control piGEM030 did not show the expected bands. It could be possible that <i>Hind</i>III did not work correctly, since it was no HF enzyme and used in the CutSmart buffer of NEB, but according to the NEB Double Digest Finder <i>Hind</i>III was able to cut in CutSmart only with the half of its optimal activity. That was the reason, why the double amount of <I>Hind</i>III was chosen.</p> | <p>The control restriction of the nose plasmids was negative, the plasmid just seemed to be linearized and not cut into two fragments. That means that the <i>Hind</i>III could not cut since the IPTG inducible promoter was not contained in the plasmids. However, also the control piGEM030 did not show the expected bands. It could be possible that <i>Hind</i>III did not work correctly, since it was no HF enzyme and used in the CutSmart buffer of NEB, but according to the NEB Double Digest Finder <i>Hind</i>III was able to cut in CutSmart only with the half of its optimal activity. That was the reason, why the double amount of <I>Hind</i>III was chosen.</p> | ||
Line 3,547: | Line 3,831: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</fieldset> | </fieldset> | ||
- | <fieldset class=" | + | <fieldset class="exp25"> |
- | <legend><a name=" | + | <legend><a name="exp25.9">25.9 new Fluorometer assay with A549 and Caco-2</a></legend> |
<div class="aim"> | <div class="aim"> | ||
<p>Aim: Checking interaction of StrepDARPidin with EpCAM on A549 Lung carcinoma cells & Caco-2 cells using a new serial dilution</p> | <p>Aim: Checking interaction of StrepDARPidin with EpCAM on A549 Lung carcinoma cells & Caco-2 cells using a new serial dilution</p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="exp-content"> | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
- | <p>This time Caco-2 | + | <p>This time Caco-2 (A1-6) and A549 (B1-6) were used to coat row C of a black 96-well plate (100000 cells/ well). 100000 cells of 3T3 WT fibroblasts were used as negative control and as well used to coat C5.</p> |
<p>The same protocol like in 22.5 was used or GeFi-purified StrepDARPidin.</p> | <p>The same protocol like in 22.5 was used or GeFi-purified StrepDARPidin.</p> | ||
<p>Following concentrations of StrepDARPidin dissolved in PBS pH 7,4 +2,5 % glycerin were used:</p> | <p>Following concentrations of StrepDARPidin dissolved in PBS pH 7,4 +2,5 % glycerin were used:</p> | ||
Line 3,771: | Line 4,055: | ||
<p>The serial dilution shows that the signal is decreasing for both cell lines. The Caco-2 Cells have a higher signal compared to A549.</p> | <p>The serial dilution shows that the signal is decreasing for both cell lines. The Caco-2 Cells have a higher signal compared to A549.</p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
+ | </fieldset> | ||
+ | <fieldset class="exp23"> | ||
+ | <legend><a name="exp23.48">23.48 Purification of digested plasmid and fragments</a></legend> | ||
+ | <div class="aim"> | ||
+ | <p>Aim: In order to improve the ligation results pure DNA samples are needed</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
+ | <p>All digested samples have been purified via gel extraction, resulting in the following concentration:</p> | ||
+ | <ul class="list"> | ||
+ | <li>pSB1C3= 19 ng/µl</li> | ||
+ | <li>Arc1p= 25 ng/µl</li> | ||
+ | <li>PheA= 23 ng/µl</li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </fieldset> | ||
+ | <fieldset class="exp23"> | ||
+ | <legend><a name="exp23.49">23.49 Ligation of digested plasmid and inserts</a></legend> | ||
+ | <div class="aim"> | ||
+ | <p>Aim: Ligate plasmids for further transformation</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <table width="100%" border="1"> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">Ligation Mix</th> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">pSB11C3 + Arc1p (µl)</th> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">pSB11C3 + PheA (µl)</th> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">Water</th> | ||
+ | <td>0</td> | ||
+ | <td>4.3</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">HF Buffer 10x</th> | ||
+ | <td>2.0</td> | ||
+ | <td>2.0</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">T4 Ligase</th> | ||
+ | <td>1.0</td> | ||
+ | <td>1.0</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">Insert</th> | ||
+ | <td>7.6</td> | ||
+ | <td>9</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">Vector</th> | ||
+ | <td>9.4</td> | ||
+ | <td>3.7</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <p>The ligation was performed at 16°C for 3h.</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </fieldset> | ||
+ | <fieldset class="exp23"> | ||
+ | <legend><a name="exp23.50">23.50 Transformation of competent <i>E. coli</i> XL-1-Blue with ligated plasmid</a></legend> | ||
+ | <div class="aim"> | ||
+ | <p>Aim: Ligate plasmids for further transformation</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
+ | <p>After the ligation the reaction was inactivated by incubating the reaction mix at 85%deg;C for 10 minutes. Afterwards chemically competent <i>E. coli</i> XL-1-blue were transformed with the whole reaction mix. Standard <i>E. coli</i> transformation protocol was used.</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
</fieldset> | </fieldset> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <!-- 10.10.14 --> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="notebooky-entry"> | ||
+ | <h2 class="title"> | ||
+ | <a name="10.10.2014">10.10.2014</a> | ||
+ | </h2> | ||
+ | <fieldset class="exp24"> | ||
+ | <legend><a name="exp24.8">24.8 Test for solubility of StrepCup</a></legend> | ||
+ | <div class="aim"> | ||
+ | <p>Aim: check if StrepCup is soluble or enclosed in inclusion bodies</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
+ | <p>A second test expression was carried out in 30 ml LB-amp, which was inoculated with <i>E. coli</i> BL21(DE3) and incubated until they reached an OD<sub>600</sub> of 0.62. A 1.12 ml preinduction sample was taken and the cells were induced with 30 µl IPTG for 3 hours shaking at 37°C. After this time they reached an OD<sub>600</sub> of 1.4, so 500 µl were taken as an induction sample. The taken samples were pelleted by centrifugation, resuspended in 80 µl of water with addition of 20 µl 5x SDS loading dye. The cells were centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 20 minutes and lysed by the microfluidizer. The cell lysate was centrifuged at 20000 rpm for 20 minutes. The supernatant was withdrawn and 80 µl were taken as a sample, which was treated with 20 µl of 5x SDS loading dye. The pellet was resuspended in some buffer A from which 80 µl were taken and 20 µl of 5x SDS loading dye were added. The samples were boiled at 95°C for 10 minutes. Afterwards 10 µl of each sample was loaded onto a 12% SDS polyacrylamide gel.</p> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/6/63/SDS_PAGE_StrepCup_soluble_unsoluble_10.10.2014.png" width="30%" /> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <p>It could clearly be seen that the StrepCup was in the unsoluble fraction of the lysate.</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </fieldset> | ||
+ | <fieldset class="exp13"> | ||
+ | <legend><a name="exp13.115">13.115 Ligation of piGEM008/009 with constitutive promoter</a></legend> | ||
+ | <div class="aim"> | ||
+ | <p>Aim: ligate the digested vector with the constitutive promoter</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
+ | <p>Since the control PCR for piGEM008 with the constitutive promoter was negative and not even the colony PCR for piGEM009 with the constitutive promoter was positive, the ligation with these two plasmids was repeated.</p> | ||
+ | <table width="100%" border="1"> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">Component</th> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">Ligation I (µl)</th> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">Ligation II (µl)</th> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>piGEM008 (ca 196.7 ng/µl)</td> | ||
+ | <td>5.2</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>piGEM009 (ca 218.3 ng/µl)</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>3.05</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>constitutive promoter (ca 49.3 ng/µl)</td> | ||
+ | <td>2.3</td> | ||
+ | <td>4.45</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>T4 ligase</td> | ||
+ | <td>0.5</td> | ||
+ | <td>0.5</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>Ligation buffer 10x</td> | ||
+ | <td>2</td> | ||
+ | <td>2</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>Water</td> | ||
+ | <td>10</td> | ||
+ | <td>10</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>Total</td> | ||
+ | <td>20</td> | ||
+ | <td>20</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <p>The reaction was incubated at room temperature for over one hour and afterwards used to transform competent <i>E. coli</i> XLIBlue, which were plated out on LB-ampicillin and incubated at 37°C over night.</p> | ||
+ | <p>Additionally, clones were picked from the old ligation plates to inoculate cultures of LB-ampicillin for plasmid preps.</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </fieldset> | ||
+ | <fieldset class="exp23"> | ||
+ | <legend><a name="exp23.51">23.51 Inoculation of presumably positive clones from the ligation plates</a></legend> | ||
+ | <div class="aim"> | ||
+ | <p>Aim: Grow cultures for the isolation of plasmid psB1C3 with the two new Biobricks</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
+ | <p>Two clones for every biobrick plasmid were inoculated in liquid LB-CM (10:30) for plasmid isolation.</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </fieldset> | ||
+ | <fieldset class="exp23"> | ||
+ | <legend><a name="exp23.52a">23.52a Plasmid isolation and test digest</a></legend> | ||
+ | <div class="aim"> | ||
+ | <p>Aim: Analyze the plasmids for the insertion of the fragments into the plasmid</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
+ | <p>Plasmid isolation of the pSB1C3 plasmid from <i>E. coli</i> was performed with the Quiagen Mini-prep kit. Plasmid concentration was determined with a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (100-120 ng/µl).</p> | ||
+ | <p>Restriction: 4 µl plasmid in a total 10 µl restriction mix</p> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <table width="100%" border="1"> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">Component</th> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">Restriction mix (µl)</th> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">Water</th> | ||
+ | <td>12.0</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">CutSmart 10x</th> | ||
+ | <td>2.0</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="col"><i>Xba</i>I</th> | ||
+ | <td>0.5</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="col"><i>Pst</i>I</th> | ||
+ | <td>0.5</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">Plasmid (600 ng/µl)</th> | ||
+ | <td>5.0</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <p>Gel analysis of the digested plasmids reveals that all clones are negative, new ligation will be performed with a higher amount of insert.</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </fieldset> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <!-- 11.10.14 --> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="notebooky-entry"> | ||
+ | <h2 class="title"> | ||
+ | <a name="11.10.2014">11.10.2014</a> | ||
+ | </h2> | ||
+ | <fieldset class="exp25"> | ||
+ | <legend><a name="exp25.10">25.10 new Fluorometer assay with A549 and Caco-2</a></legend> | ||
+ | <div class="aim"> | ||
+ | <p>Aim: Checking interaction of StrepDARPidin with EpCAM on A549 Lung carcinoma cells & Caco-2 cells using a new serial dilution</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
+ | <p>This time Caco-2 (F1-6( and A549 (G1-6) were used to coat row C of a black 96-well plate (100000 cells/ well). 100000 cells of 3T3WT fibroblasts were used as negative control and as well used to coat H2 & H3.</p> | ||
+ | <p>The same protocol like in 22.5 was used for GeFi-purified StrepDARPidin.</p> | ||
+ | <p>Following concentrations of StrepDARPidin dissolved in PBS pH 7,4 +2,5 % glycerin were used:</p> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <table width="100%" border="1"> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">Content</th> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">Well Col</th> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">Well Row</th> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">Blank corrected raw data (485, 520)</th> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">StrepDARPidin concentration (M)</th> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>Caco-2</td> | ||
+ | <td>1</td> | ||
+ | <td>F</td> | ||
+ | <td>382</td> | ||
+ | <td>25 µM</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>Caco-2</td> | ||
+ | <td>2</td> | ||
+ | <td>F</td> | ||
+ | <td>556</td> | ||
+ | <td>2,5 µM</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>Caco-2</td> | ||
+ | <td>3</td> | ||
+ | <td>F</td> | ||
+ | <td>550</td> | ||
+ | <td>250 nM</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>Caco-2</td> | ||
+ | <td>4</td> | ||
+ | <td>A</td> | ||
+ | <td>522</td> | ||
+ | <td>25 nM</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>Caco-2</td> | ||
+ | <td>5</td> | ||
+ | <td>F</td> | ||
+ | <td>541</td> | ||
+ | <td>2,5 nM</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>Caco-2</td> | ||
+ | <td>6</td> | ||
+ | <td>F</td> | ||
+ | <td>548</td> | ||
+ | <td>250 pM</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>A549</td> | ||
+ | <td>1</td> | ||
+ | <td>G</td> | ||
+ | <td>407</td> | ||
+ | <td>25 µM</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>A549</td> | ||
+ | <td>2</td> | ||
+ | <td>G</td> | ||
+ | <td>491</td> | ||
+ | <td>2,5 µM</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>A549</td> | ||
+ | <td>3</td> | ||
+ | <td>G</td> | ||
+ | <td>557</td> | ||
+ | <td>250 nM</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>A549</td> | ||
+ | <td>4</td> | ||
+ | <td>G</td> | ||
+ | <td>359</td> | ||
+ | <td>25 nM</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>A549</td> | ||
+ | <td>5</td> | ||
+ | <td>G</td> | ||
+ | <td>338</td> | ||
+ | <td>2,5 nM</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>A549</td> | ||
+ | <td>6</td> | ||
+ | <td>G</td> | ||
+ | <td>632</td> | ||
+ | <td>250 pM</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>negative control 3T3WT fibroblasts</td> | ||
+ | <td>2</td> | ||
+ | <td>H</td> | ||
+ | <td>409</td> | ||
+ | <td>25 µM</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>negative control 3T3WT fibroblasts</td> | ||
+ | <td>3</td> | ||
+ | <td>H</td> | ||
+ | <td>468</td> | ||
+ | <td>2,5 µM</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>Pos. control AB</td> | ||
+ | <td>4</td> | ||
+ | <td>H</td> | ||
+ | <td>3786</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <p>The serial dilution shows that the signal is decreasing for both cell lines. The Caco-2 Cells have a higher signal.</p> | ||
+ | <p>After the previous measurements the results were summarized and a graphic created:</p> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/d/da/Fluorescence_assay.jpg" width="30%" /> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <p>The tendency which could be seen in the previous assays can be reproduced after summarizing the previous measurements as well.</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </fieldset> | ||
+ | <fieldset class="exp13"> | ||
+ | <legend><a name="exp13.116">13.116 Making new competent <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> PY79 cells</a></legend> | ||
+ | <div class="aim"> | ||
+ | <p>Aim: making competent cells to transform Bacillus subtilis PY79 with the Nose-plasmids</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
+ | <p>Since the previous cells were not competent, a new try to make competent <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> PY79 was carried out. The procedure was performed according to the protocol using the SPC- and SPII-media. This time the cells were not centrifuged at 4°C but at room temperature, which should be gentler for the cells, since they do not need to induce cold stress responses that could affect the competence. The cells were tested for transformation efficiency by transforming them with each 25 µl and 50 µl of each nose plasmid with a metallosensitive promoter. After adding the plasmid DNA to 200 µl cells in a test tube, they were incubated shaking a 37°C for 30 minutes. Afterwards they were plated out on LB-chloramphenicol (5 µg/ml) were incubated at 37°C.</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </fieldset> | ||
+ | <fieldset class="exp13"> | ||
+ | <legend><a name="exp13.117">13.117 control restriction of nose plasmids with the constitutive promoter</a></legend> | ||
+ | <div class="aim"> | ||
+ | <p>Aim: check the plasmids for the correct insertion of the promoter</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
+ | <p>The plasmids were isolated from the inoculated cultures (13.115; 2 clones piGEM002 + const, 6 clones piGEM007 + const, 5 clones piGEM008 + const and 4 clones piGEM009 + const) and digested with the enzymes <i>Nco</i>I-HF and <i>Eco</i>RI-HF. Negative plasmids should yield fragments in size of 476 and 6190 (for piGEM002) or 6235 bp (for piGEM007/008/009). The positive plasmids should result in fragments in the size of 711 and 6190/6235 bp.</p> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <table width="100%" border="1"> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">Component</th> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">Volumes (µl)</th> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>piGEM002/007/008/009 + const (ca 400 ng/µl)</td> | ||
+ | <td>5</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td><i>Nco</i>I-HF</td> | ||
+ | <td>0.5</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td><i>Eco</i>RI-HF</td> | ||
+ | <td>0.5</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>CutSmart 10x</td> | ||
+ | <td>2</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>Water</td> | ||
+ | <td>12</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>Total</td> | ||
+ | <td>20</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <p>The reactions were incubated at 37°C for over one hour, 3 µl 6x Purple Loading Dye were added and 7 µl of the restrictions were applied onto a 1% agarose gel.</p> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/e/e7/Control_restriction_nose_%2B_const_11.10.2014.png" width="50%" /> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <p>The undigested piGEM002 was taken as a control. The isolated plasmids from the piGEM002 + const ligation plates did not yield in two fragments but look linearized. The clones 5 and 6 of piGEM007 + const, 4 and 5 of piGEM008 + const were positive. No plasmid of piGEM009 + const was positive.</p> | ||
+ | <p>The plasmids piGEM002 + const and piGEM007 + const were already confirmed as positive by the control PCR (13.113), now piGEM008 + const was positive as well, only piGEM009 + const was missing, so 10 clones from the old and new ligation plates were picked and used to inoculate more cultures LB-amp for plasmid isolation.</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </fieldset> | ||
+ | <fieldset class="exp23"> | ||
+ | <legend><a name="exp23.53">23.53 New Ligation and transformation</a></legend> | ||
+ | <div class="aim"> | ||
+ | <p>Aim: Analyze the plasmids for the insertion of the fragments into the plasmid</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
+ | <p>In order to calculate the needed amount of insert and vector the iGEM ligation calculator was used. For this reaction a higher amount of insert was used (1:5)</p> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <table width="100%" border="1"> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">Ligation Mix</th> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">pSB11C3 + Arc1p (µl)</th> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">pSB11C3 + PheA (µl)</th> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">Water</th> | ||
+ | <td>0.6</td> | ||
+ | <td>5.5</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">HF Buffer 10x</th> | ||
+ | <td>2.0</td> | ||
+ | <td>2.0</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">T4 Ligase</th> | ||
+ | <td>1.0</td> | ||
+ | <td>1.0</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">Insert</th> | ||
+ | <td>9.0</td> | ||
+ | <td>9.0</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">Vector</th> | ||
+ | <td>7.4</td> | ||
+ | <td>2.5</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <p>The ligation was performed at 16°C for 3 hours. | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <p>After the ligation the reaction was inactivated by incubating the reaction mix at 85°C for 10 minutes. Afterwards chemically competent <i>E. coli</i> XL-1-blue were transformed with the whole reaction mix. Standard <i>E. coli</i> transformation protocol was used. | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </fieldset> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <!-- 12.10.14 --> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="notebooky-entry"> | ||
+ | <h2 class="title"> | ||
+ | <a name="12.10.2014">12.10.2014</a> | ||
+ | </h2> | ||
+ | <fieldset class="exp13"> | ||
+ | <legend><a name="exp13.118">13.118 control restriction of piGEM009 with the constitutive promoter</a></legend> | ||
+ | <div class="aim"> | ||
+ | <p>Aim: check the plasmid for the correct insertion of the promoter</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
+ | <p>The plasmids were isolated from the cultures (13.117) and digested again with the enzymes <i>Nco</i>I and <i>Eco</i>RI. The expected fragments were the same like in 13.117.</p> | ||
+ | <table width="100%" border="1"> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">Component</th> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">Volumes (µl)</th> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>piGEM009 + const (200-400 ng/µl)</td> | ||
+ | <td>5</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td><i>Nco</i>I-HF</td> | ||
+ | <td>0.5</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td><i>Eco</i>RI-HF</td> | ||
+ | <td>0.5</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>CutSmart 10x</td> | ||
+ | <td>2</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>Water</td> | ||
+ | <td>12</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>Total</td> | ||
+ | <td>20</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <p>The reactions were incubated at 37°C for over one hour, 3 µl 6x Purple Loading Dye were added and 7 µl of the restrictions were applied onto a 1% agarose gel.</p> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/c/c6/Restriktion_piGEM009_const_12.10.2014.png" width="40%" /> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <p>The O‘ Gene Ruler 1 kb DNA ladder of Thermo Scientific was used as a marker. All cut fragments were in the size of ca. 500 bp (and the backbone at around 6000 bp), which meant, the plasmids did not contain the constitutive promoter.</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </fieldset> | ||
+ | <fieldset class="exp23"> | ||
+ | <legend><a name="exp23.51b">23.51b Inoculation of presumably positive clones from the ligation plates</a></legend> | ||
+ | <div class="aim"> | ||
+ | <p>Aim: Grow cultures for the isolation of plasmid psB1C3 with the two new Biobricks</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
+ | <p>Two clones for every biobrick plasmid were inoculated in liquid LB-CM for plasmid isolation.</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </fieldset> | ||
+ | <fieldset class="exp23"> | ||
+ | <legend><a name="exp23.52b">23.52b Plasmid isolation and test restriction</a></legend> | ||
+ | <div class="aim"> | ||
+ | <p>Aim: Analyse the plasmids for the insertion of the fragments into the plasmid</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
+ | <p>Plasmid isolation of the pSB1C3 plasmid from <i>E.coli</i> was performed with the Quiagen Mini-prep kit. Plasmid concentration was determined with a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (90-135 ng/µl).</p> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <table width="100%" border="1"> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">Component</th> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">Restriction mix (µl)</th> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">Water</th> | ||
+ | <td>12.0</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">CutSmart 10x</th> | ||
+ | <td>2.0</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="col"><i>Xba</i>I</th> | ||
+ | <td>0.5</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="col"><i>Pst</i>I</th> | ||
+ | <td>0.5</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">Plasmid (600 ng/µl)</th> | ||
+ | <td>5.0</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/3/32/MR_20141012_test_digest_pSB1C3_Arc1p_PstI_XbaI.png" width="30%" /> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/c/c8/MR_20141012_test_digest_pSB1C3_PheA_PstI_XbaI.png" width="30%" /> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <p>Both plasmids have been cloned successfully as visible in the two agarose gels. The expected inserts could be cut out of the iGEM plasmid pSB1C3.</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </fieldset> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <!-- 13.10.14 --> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="notebooky-entry"> | ||
+ | <h2 class="title"> | ||
+ | <a name="13.10.2014">13.10.2014</a> | ||
+ | </h2> | ||
+ | <fieldset class="exp18"> | ||
+ | <legend><a name="exp18.74">18.74 Isolation of flagella from different <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> strains</a></legend> | ||
+ | <div class="aim"> | ||
+ | <p>Aim: separation of the flagella from the cells</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
+ | <p>Since the flagella of the <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> mutants Hag-D2-Strep or Hag-Strep were needed for affinity assays together with the StrepDARPidin and the cancer cell lines, the flagella should be isolated. Based on the pictures of the electron microscopy it was observed, that the Hag-D2-Cup strain formed flagella, which are shorter than these of the wildtype, which could mean that they break. However, the mutant flagellin should be expressed and so the Cup on the flagella should be able to fish for ions. In order to confirm that, the flagella of D2-Cup should be isolated as well. 1L LB each were inoculated with <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> 3610wt, Hag-D2-Strep, Hag-D2-Cup and Py79 Hag-Strep in 5 L Erlenmeyer flasks with baffles and incubated shaking at 37°C over night.</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </fieldset> | ||
+ | <fieldset class="exp24"> | ||
+ | <legend><a name="exp24.9">24.9 Expression and purification of StrepCup</a></legend> | ||
+ | <div class="aim"> | ||
+ | <p>Aim: expression of Streptavidin-Cup</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
+ | <p>The Streptavidin-Cup construct sould also be overproduced, purified and tested for ion binding capacity or interaction with StrepTags of the flagella mutants. For this reason 2x 1 L LB-ampicillin was inoculated with <i>E. coli</i> BL21(DE3) pET16b_StrepCup. The medium also contained 50 ml 25 % (w/v; 12.5 g/50ml) lactose as an inducer of the expression. The cultures were incubated shaking at 30°C over night.</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </fieldset> | ||
+ | <fieldset class="exp23"> | ||
+ | <legend><a name="exp23.53">23.53 Sequencing of BBa-K1329004 and BBa-K1329005</a></legend> | ||
+ | <div class="aim"> | ||
+ | <p>Aim: check for the correct sequence of the biobricks</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
+ | <p>Sequencing samples have been prepared in a concentration of 50 - 100 ng/µl and primers were added. Plasmids were then sequenced by eurofins mwg.</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </fieldset> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <!-- 14.10.14 --> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="notebooky-entry"> | ||
+ | <h2 class="title"> | ||
+ | <a name="14.10.2014">14.10.2014</a> | ||
+ | </h2> | ||
+ | <fieldset class="exp24"> | ||
+ | <legend><a name="exp24.9">24.9 Expression and purification of StrepCup</a></legend> | ||
+ | <div class="aim"> | ||
+ | <p>Aim: purification of StrepCup</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
+ | <p>The two 1 L cultures were harvested by centrifugation at 4000 rpm for 20 min. The pellets were resuspended in 10 ml buffer A and centrifuged again in a falcon at 4000 rpm for 15 min. Again the pellet was resuspended in 25 ml buffer A and the cells were broken by a microfluidizer. The lysate was centrifuged with 20000rpm for 20 minutes at 4°C. Samples were taken from the pellet (P1) and the supernatant (S1), which was stored on ice. The pellet was resuspended in IB-wash buffer and centrifuged again at 27000 rpm for 10 minutes. This washing step was repeated. Samples were taken from the pellet (P2) and the supernatant (S2). The pellet was covered in 5 ml 6 M guanidine-hydrochloride and stirred at room temperature until it was completely resuspended, followed by another centrifugation with 20000 rpm at 4°C for 10 min. The pellet (P3) and the supernatant (S3) were stored separately in the refrigerator at 4°C over night after taking samples of both. It was observed that the proteins contained by the supernatant were precipitating instantly as they came in contact with water to dilute the sample and/or SDS loading dye. The precipitate was rich of protein, which resulted in an almost solid, sludgy consistence. After several dilution attempts the sample was diluted 1:1000 in water (protein precipitated by contact with water) the sample was vortexed until the precipitate was gone and 80 µl were taken together with 20 µl of 5x SDS loading dye and bolied at 95°C for 10 min together with the other samples, from which none precipitated as intense as the supernatant of the gua pellet. 10 µl of all samples were transferred onto a 12 % SDS-polyacrylamide gel.</p> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/3/34/SDS_expression_StrepCup_isolation_from_IB_14.10.2014.jpg" width="30%" /> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <p>The produced StrepCup was in the unsoluble phase like expected. During the process of isolating StrepCup from the inclusion bodies it could be seen, that StrepCup always remained in the pellet. It was not possible to see the protein in the soluble phase of the guanidinium-hydrochloride treated pellet, since the previous mentioned problems of instant precipitation in contact with water or SDS loading dye.</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </fieldset> | ||
+ | <fieldset class="exp18"> | ||
+ | <legend><a name="exp18.74a">18.74a Isolation of flagella from different <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> strains</a></legend> | ||
+ | <div class="aim"> | ||
+ | <p>Aim: separation of the flagella from the cells</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
+ | <p>Strains: Wildtype 3610, PY-Strep, Hag-D2-Strep, Hag-D2-Cup</p> | ||
+ | <p>The different cultures were harvested by centrifugation at 4000 rpm for 20 minutes. The pellets were resuspended in 30 ml 0.1 M TRIS/HCl buffer pH 8.0 containing 0.5 % Brij-58. 330 µl of a 10 mg/ml lysozyme solution were added and the lysis was performed in a roller at 4°C until the samples were mostly clear.</p> | ||
+ | <p>20 µl of RNase free DNase was added and lysis continued for another 30 min. The bacterial debris was removed by centrifugation at 10.000 rpm for 10 min, followed by an ultracentrifugation step of the supernatant at 100.000 rpm for 90 min (4°C).</p> | ||
+ | <p>For the analysis of flagella via SDS-PAGE 1 ml with OD<sub>600</sub> 0.7 was prepared for every sample by centrifugation and subsequent heating to 95°C (10 min). Cell pellets were centrifuged and resuspended in 40 µL water and 10 µL SDS loading dye (5x).</p> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/1/18/MR_20141014_flagella_isolation_cells_before_after_lysis.png" width="30%" /> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <p>Calculated size of flagellin is about 37 kDa, running slightly higher than the fourth band of the unstained protein marker (first line). Flagellin is present in the wildtype sample before and after cell lysis. Other proteins can be seen for PY-Strep before (higher than Hag) and after (lower than Hag) cell lysis. The two Hag constructs with the inserted D2 domain run a bit higher than wildtype flagellin and are present after cell lysis in a small amount.</p> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/9/92/MR_20141014_flagella_isolation_supernatant_before_after_lysis.png" width="30%" /> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <p>Flagellin is present in the wildtype supernatant before and after cell lysis. Before lysis no flagellin can be seen in the supernatant of the other three strains. Differing proteins bands can be seen for these three strains in the supernatant after cell lysis.</p> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/3/3f/MR_20141014_flagella_isolation_pellets_after_ultracentrifugation.png" width="30%" /> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <p>A high amount of flagellin is present after cell lysis of wildtype <i>B. subtilis</i>. A thin band can be seen for Hag-D2-Cup before cell lysis and a thicker band for Hag-D2-Strep that does not fit the size of flagellin. The supernatant of the ultra-centrifugation step was transferred to a new falcon and the pellet was resuspended in 3 ml standard saline citrate buffer (pH 7.3) and both fractions were stored at 4°C overnight.</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </fieldset> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <!-- 15.10.14 --> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="notebooky-entry"> | ||
+ | <h2 class="title"> | ||
+ | <a name="15.10.2014">15.10.2014</a> | ||
+ | </h2> | ||
+ | <fieldset class="exp18"> | ||
+ | <legend><a name="exp18.74b">18.74b Isolation of flagella from different <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> strains II</a></legend> | ||
+ | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
+ | <p>20% ammonium sulphate were added to the pellet resulting from the ultracentrifugation resuspended in standard saline citrate buffer (pH 7.3). The obtained precipitant was analysed in an SDS PAGE gel.</p> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/8/8c/MR_20141014_flagella_isolation_ammoniumsulphate_precipitation.png" width="30%" /> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <p>A high amount of flagellin is present in the ultracentrifugation pellet of the wildtype cells after lysis. A mixture of proteins can be seen for Hag-D2-Strep after cell lysis. It can be assumed that flagellin hag-D2-Strep is partially unstable. Anyway, the analysis of presumably isolated flagella was continued.</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </fieldset> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <!-- 16.10.14 --> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="notebooky-entry"> | ||
+ | <h2 class="title"> | ||
+ | <a name="16.10.2014">16.10.2014</a> | ||
+ | </h2> | ||
+ | <fieldset class="exp24"> | ||
+ | <legend><a name="exp23.54">23.54 Sequencing results</a></legend> | ||
+ | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
+ | <p>Both plasmid have been sequenced and the correct inserts are in the iGEM backbone pSB1C3.</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </fieldset> | ||
+ | <fieldset class="exp23"> | ||
+ | <legend><a name="exp23.55">23.55 Send Biobricks to registry</a></legend> | ||
+ | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
+ | <p>Preparation of both bricks:</p> | ||
+ | <ul class="list"> | ||
+ | <li>15 µl plasmid DNA (app. 200 ng/µl) in PCR cup</li> | ||
+ | <li>Tape with Biobrick number around the PCR cup</li> | ||
+ | <li>Parafilm wrapped around the whole Eppendorf cup</li> | ||
+ | <li>50 ml Falkon with Shipping number, team name and shipping date</li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <table width="100%" border="1"> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">Part number</th> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">Name</th> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">Part:BBa_K1329004</th> | ||
+ | <td>synthetic catalyst part 1: tRNA scaffold</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">Part:BBa_K1329005</th> | ||
+ | <td>Synthetic catalyst part 2</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </fieldset> | ||
+ | <fieldset class="exp18"> | ||
+ | <legend><a name="exp18.75">18.75 Investigation the interaction between the isolated flagella and StrepDARPidin</a></legend> | ||
+ | <div class="aim"> | ||
+ | <p>Aim: A possible interaction of the flagella with StrepDARPidin should be visualized by electron microscopy</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
+ | <p>In order to visualize the interaction of the StrepDARPidin, the protein was incubated with the precipitated flagella and subsequently stained for electron microscopy.</p> | ||
+ | <p>Samples prepared:</p> | ||
+ | <ul class="list"> | ||
+ | <li>1 = Hag-D2-Strep (1.2 mg/ml)</li> | ||
+ | <li>2 = Wildtype (2 mg/ml)</li> | ||
+ | <li>3 = PY-Strep (0.4 mg/ml)</li> | ||
+ | <li>4 = Hag-D2-Strep + StrepDARPidin (1:10)</li> | ||
+ | <li>5 = Wildtype+ StrepDARPidin (1:10)</li> | ||
+ | <li>6 = PY-Strep+ StrepDARPidin (1:10)</li> | ||
+ | <li>7 = StrepDARPidin (7 mg/ml)</li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <table width="100%" border="1"> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">Number</th> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">Flagellin</th> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">StrepDARPidin</th> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">Buffer (Saline citrate)</th> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>1</td> | ||
+ | <td>50 µl</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>50 µl</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>2</td> | ||
+ | <td>200 µl</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>3</td> | ||
+ | <td>80 µl</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>20 µl</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>4</td> | ||
+ | <td>3.5 µl</td> | ||
+ | <td>10 µl</td> | ||
+ | <td>36.5 µl</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>5</td> | ||
+ | <td>17.5 µl</td> | ||
+ | <td>10 µl</td> | ||
+ | <td>50 µl</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>6</td> | ||
+ | <td>6 µl</td> | ||
+ | <td>10 µl</td> | ||
+ | <td>34 µl</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td>7</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>10 µl</td> | ||
+ | <td>40 µl</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <p>Incubation on ice for 19 minutes before samples were stained for electron microscopy.</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </fieldset> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||