Team:Dundee/Modeling/bdsf
From 2014.igem.org
(24 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
<div class="jumbotron"> | <div class="jumbotron"> | ||
<h1>Modelling BDSF</h1> | <h1>Modelling BDSF</h1> | ||
- | <p class="lead"> | + | <p class="lead">Prediction of Cross-Talking Kinase</p> |
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="row"> | <div class="row"> | ||
<div class="col-col-sm-3 col-xs-3 col-md-3" id="nav"> | <div class="col-col-sm-3 col-xs-3 col-md-3" id="nav"> | ||
<ul class="nav list-group affix"> | <ul class="nav list-group affix"> | ||
- | <li class="list-group-item"><a href="#0" class=""> | + | <li class="list-group-item"><a href="#0" class="">Objectives</a> |
</li> | </li> | ||
- | <li class="list-group-item"><a href="#1" class=""> | + | <li class="list-group-item"><a href="#1" class="">BDSF-Induced Phosphorylation of BCAM0228[P] Mediates GFP Expression</a> |
</li> | </li> | ||
- | <li class="list-group-item"><a href="#2" class=""> | + | <li class="list-group-item"><a href="#2" class="">BCAM0228 is Phosphorylated by Unknown Compound</a> |
+ | </li> | ||
+ | <li class="list-group-item"><a href="#3" class="">Conclusion</a> | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
Line 36: | Line 38: | ||
<div class="col-xs-12"> | <div class="col-xs-12"> | ||
- | <h2>Objectives</h2> | + | <h2 id="0">Objectives</h2> |
<p> | <p> | ||
To investigate why GFP expression was high in the absence of signal in our engineered BDSF system. | To investigate why GFP expression was high in the absence of signal in our engineered BDSF system. | ||
Line 46: | Line 48: | ||
<div class="col-xs-12"> | <div class="col-xs-12"> | ||
<hr> | <hr> | ||
- | <h2>BDSF-Induced Phosphorylation of BCAM0228[P] Mediates GFP Expression</h2> | + | <h2 id="1">BDSF-Induced Phosphorylation of BCAM0228[P] Mediates GFP Expression</h2> |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
+ | We constructed models<sup>1</sup> similar to those used in the PQS system to investigate the signal-response behaviour of the BDSF system. Using the parameters defined in table 1, our results<sup>2,3</sup> verified what we had expected to happen. Phosphorylation of BCAM0228 is induced by BDSF binding to a cell receptor. BCAM0228[P] then activated the expression of GFP through the engineered <i>cbld</i> promoter. In the absence of a BDSF signal, BCAM0228 remained in its unphosphorylated form and GFP expression was repressed. Increasing the signal induced an increased GFP response (Fig 1). | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 55: | Line 58: | ||
<div class="row"> | <div class="row"> | ||
<div class="col-xs-12"> | <div class="col-xs-12"> | ||
- | < | + | |
- | + | <img class= "center img-responsive" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/a/ac/BDSF_fig1.png" /> | |
- | src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/a/ac/BDSF_fig1.png" /> | + | |
- | + | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="row"> | ||
+ | <div class="col-xs-2"> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="col-xs-8"> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <img class= "center img-responsive" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/7/76/DUN_BDSF_Table1.png"/> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="col-xs-2"> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
<div class="row"> | <div class="row"> | ||
<div class="col-xs-12"> | <div class="col-xs-12"> | ||
<hr> | <hr> | ||
- | < | + | <h2 id="2">BCAM0228 is Phosphorylated by Unknown Compound</h2> |
<p> | <p> | ||
- | Our experimental results revealed that in the absence of BDSF, the cblD promoter was active in our engineered system and hence GFP expression upregulated. | + | Our experimental results revealed that in the absence of BDSF, the <i>cblD</i> promoter was active in our engineered system and hence GFP expression upregulated. |
</p> | </p> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
<div class="row"> | <div class="row"> | ||
<div class="col-xs-12"> | <div class="col-xs-12"> | ||
- | < | + | |
- | + | <img class= "center img-responsive" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/1/1c/BDSF_fig2.png" /> | |
- | src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/1/1c/BDSF_fig2.png" /> | + | |
- | + | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 81: | Line 101: | ||
<div class="row"> | <div class="row"> | ||
<div class="col-xs-12"> | <div class="col-xs-12"> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
From our system of equations we know that the expression of GFP is dependant on the levels of BCAM0228[P]. We hypothesised that one possible mechanism by which our cell could be expressing GFP in the absence of signal was by the presence of BCAM0228[P] independent of BDSF-binding mediated phosphorylation. This suggests that an unknown compound could be phosphorylating BCAM0228 in our engineered cells. | From our system of equations we know that the expression of GFP is dependant on the levels of BCAM0228[P]. We hypothesised that one possible mechanism by which our cell could be expressing GFP in the absence of signal was by the presence of BCAM0228[P] independent of BDSF-binding mediated phosphorylation. This suggests that an unknown compound could be phosphorylating BCAM0228 in our engineered cells. | ||
Line 87: | Line 108: | ||
Comparing Fig 2 to Fig 1, it is clear that the model predicts that the expression of GFP is higher when BCAM0228 is being constitutively phosphorylated than in the “normal” case. Moreover, we are also able to conclude that the model predicts that the presence of BDSF has very little effect on the overall expression of GFP when the constitutive phosphorylation process is operating. | Comparing Fig 2 to Fig 1, it is clear that the model predicts that the expression of GFP is higher when BCAM0228 is being constitutively phosphorylated than in the “normal” case. Moreover, we are also able to conclude that the model predicts that the presence of BDSF has very little effect on the overall expression of GFP when the constitutive phosphorylation process is operating. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 92: | Line 114: | ||
<div class="row"> | <div class="row"> | ||
<div class="col-xs-12"> | <div class="col-xs-12"> | ||
- | <h2>Conclusions</h2> | + | <h2 id="3">Conclusions</h2> |
<p> | <p> | ||
Line 99: | Line 121: | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="row"> | ||
+ | <div class="col-12"> | ||
<div id="ref"> | <div id="ref"> | ||
- | <h3>References</h3> | + | <h3>References</h3> |
+ | <p> | ||
+ | <sup>1</sup><a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/0/0b/Appendix_2_-_BDSF.pdf">https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/0/0b/Appendix_2_-_BDSF.pdf</a><br> | ||
+ | <sup>2</sup><a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/2/28/Final_setup_bdsf.m">https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/2/28/Final_setup_bdsf.m</a><br> | ||
+ | <sup>3</sup><a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/4/4f/Final_solver_bdsf.m">https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/4/4f/Final_solver_bdsf.m</a><br> | ||
+ | <sup>4</sup>Leake, M. et al. (2008) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 105, 15376-15381.<br> | ||
+ | <sup>5</sup>Andrea J. Twigg & David Sherratt (1980) Nature 283, 216 - 218. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <!--END OF CONTENT--> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
<div class="row" id="btnRow"> | <div class="row" id="btnRow"> | ||
<div class="btn-group btn-group-justified"> | <div class="btn-group btn-group-justified"> | ||
<div class="btn-group"> | <div class="btn-group"> | ||
- | <a href="" class="btn btn-default toLesson">Previous | + | <a href="pqs" class="btn btn-default toLesson">Previous Lesson: Modelling: PQS</a> |
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="btn-group"> | <div class="btn-group"> | ||
Line 120: | Line 156: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="btn-group"> | <div class="btn-group"> | ||
- | <a href=" | + | <a href="dsf" class="btn btn-default toLesson">Next Lesson: Modelling: DSF</a> |
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 142: | Line 178: | ||
$('.submenu li').addClass('hide'); | $('.submenu li').addClass('hide'); | ||
} | } | ||
- | |||
- | |||
}); | }); | ||
+ | |||
+ | $( "#info" ).click( function() { | ||
+ | $('#welcomeNote').appendTo("body"); | ||
+ | $("#welcomeNote").modal(); | ||
+ | }); | ||
</script> | </script> | ||
</body> | </body> | ||
</html> | </html> | ||
+ | {{:Team:Dundee/Template/welcomeNoteSchool}} |
Latest revision as of 22:23, 17 October 2014
Modelling BDSF
Prediction of Cross-Talking Kinase
Objectives
To investigate why GFP expression was high in the absence of signal in our engineered BDSF system.
BDSF-Induced Phosphorylation of BCAM0228[P] Mediates GFP Expression
We constructed models1 similar to those used in the PQS system to investigate the signal-response behaviour of the BDSF system. Using the parameters defined in table 1, our results2,3 verified what we had expected to happen. Phosphorylation of BCAM0228 is induced by BDSF binding to a cell receptor. BCAM0228[P] then activated the expression of GFP through the engineered cbld promoter. In the absence of a BDSF signal, BCAM0228 remained in its unphosphorylated form and GFP expression was repressed. Increasing the signal induced an increased GFP response (Fig 1).
BCAM0228 is Phosphorylated by Unknown Compound
Our experimental results revealed that in the absence of BDSF, the cblD promoter was active in our engineered system and hence GFP expression upregulated.
From our system of equations we know that the expression of GFP is dependant on the levels of BCAM0228[P]. We hypothesised that one possible mechanism by which our cell could be expressing GFP in the absence of signal was by the presence of BCAM0228[P] independent of BDSF-binding mediated phosphorylation. This suggests that an unknown compound could be phosphorylating BCAM0228 in our engineered cells.
Comparing Fig 2 to Fig 1, it is clear that the model predicts that the expression of GFP is higher when BCAM0228 is being constitutively phosphorylated than in the “normal” case. Moreover, we are also able to conclude that the model predicts that the presence of BDSF has very little effect on the overall expression of GFP when the constitutive phosphorylation process is operating.
Conclusions
Our models predict that an as yet unknown agent phosphorylates BCAM0228 in the absence of a BDSF signal and that in fact the level of the BDSF signal has little quantifiable effect on GFP expression in our engineered cells.
References
1https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/0/0b/Appendix_2_-_BDSF.pdf
2https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/2/28/Final_setup_bdsf.m
3https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/4/4f/Final_solver_bdsf.m
4Leake, M. et al. (2008) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 105, 15376-15381.
5Andrea J. Twigg & David Sherratt (1980) Nature 283, 216 - 218.