Team:Evry/Biology/CellCharacterization/Antibiotics

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
(61 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<html>
<html>
-
  <div class="cd-timeline-block">
 
-
    <div class="cd-timeline-content">
 
-
      <p align="justify">
 
-
<p>
+
<FONT COLOR="blue"><h2 id="antibiotic">Sensitivity to antibiotics</h2></FONT>
 +
<br/>
 +
<div align="left">
 +
<div align="justify">
 +
<br/><br/>
 +
<p>
 +
After having succeeded to make our bacteria grow, we tested their resistance to different antibiotics. Knowing their resistance to antibiotics is very important because it will allow us to finalize protocols of selection after transformation. <br>
 +
We chose to test the most commonly used antibiotics. We included the three antibiotics used in iGEM (kanamycin, chloramphenicol and ampicilin), plus the erythromycin and the tetracyclin. We chose the erythromycin to test a conjugation protocol which required this antibiotic for <i>E.coli</i>, and we chose to test tetracyclin because it is quite often used for inducible systems.<br>
 +
</p>
 +
<br>
 +
<p>
 +
<div align="center">
 +
<b><u>Table3:</u> </b> Concentrations tested for each antibiotic <br>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/7/79/Table_concentrations_antibioULTIMATE.jpg" alt="image not found" /> <br>
 +
</div>
 +
<br>
 +
<p>
 +
We tested several concentrations of each antibiotics (cf: Table3), and we added a supplementary concentration for erythromycin because it is known to be ineffective on GRAM- bacteria. <br></p>
 +
</p>
 +
<br>
 +
<p>
 +
The sensitivity tests were performed in four different conditions (cf: Figure3). We tested on Marine Broth (MB) 1X plates, MB 0.5X plates (used for conjugation) and M9-CASA 1X (+3% NaCl). We also tested in liquid M9-CASA 1X (+3% NaCl) to have a test in liquid culture, unfortunately we cannot measure the optical density with the MB medium because of its opacity. <br>
 +
The cells' sensitivity was measured for <i>Pseudovibrio denitrificans</i>, <i>E. coli</i>, and different clones of <i>E. coli</i> transformed with plasmids and carrying an acquired resistance AmpR, KanR, CamR ou ErmR.
 +
</p>
-
<FONT COLOR="blue">
 
-
<h3>Sentivity to antibiotics</h3>
 
-
</FONT>
 
-
<br>
 
-
<br>
 
-
<br>
 
-
<br>
+
<br>
-
 
+
-
<p>
+
 +
<div align="center">
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/3/3f/Protoantibio%282%29.jpg" alt="image not found" /> <br> <br>
 +
<p><b> <u>Figure3:</u> </b> Protocol of antibiotics' tests on <i>Pseudovibrio denitrificans</i>.</p>
 +
<br>
 +
</div>
 +
<br>
 +
<p>
 +
We let all the media incubating at 30°C (with shaking for liquid cultures), and they have been checked at day 1, day 2 and day 3.
 +
In the following figures, find the results obtained after three days of cultures on plates and one day of liquid cultures.<br>
 +
</p>
 +
 +
<div align="center">
 +
<br>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/3/35/PouitULTIMATE.jpg" alt="image not found" width=100%/> <br> <br>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/6/6b/Legende2.jpg" alt="image not found"> <br> <br>
 +
<p>
 +
<b> <u>Figure4:</u> </b> Results of antibiotics' tests on MB plates. <br> On the left: Results on MB 0.5X plates. <br> On the right: Results MB 1X. <br>
 +
The number of CFU was not countable because of cellular lawn. The percentage of cell growth on plates was calculated by taking the controls of the same bacteria growing without antibiotics as reference.<br>
 +
</p>
 +
<br>
 +
</div>
 +
<br>
 +
<br>
 +
<div align="center">
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/c/c3/PouetULTIMATE.jpg" alt="image not found" width=100%/> <br> <br>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/6/6b/Legende2.jpg" alt="image not found"> <br> <br>
 +
<p>
 +
<b> <u>Figure5:</u> </b> Results of antibiotics' tests for M9-CASA+3%NaCl media. <br> On the left: Results on M9-CASA+3%NaCl 1X plates. <br> On the right: Results in liquid M9-CASA+3%NaCl 1X.
 +
<br>
 +
The number of CFU was not countable because of cellular lawn. The percentage of cell growth on plates was calculated by taking the controls of the same bacteria growing without antibiotics as reference. The ΔOD (600nm) was calculated by subtracting the initial OD (600nm) at Day 0 from the OD(600nm) of the considered day.<br>
 +
</p>
 +
</div>
 +
<br>
 +
<p>
 +
Unfortunately, results for tetracyclin on MB medium are not useful. Indeed, all our bacteria have grown. It can be because of a technical problem with the drug, or it can also be explained by the presence of some genes bringing a resistance to this drug in <i>Pseudovibrio denitrificans</i> (see section <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Evry/Biology/GenomeAssembly">Genome assembly</a>). But the death of cells on M9 plates doesn't allow us to confirm this hypothesis, even if it can be explained by a conditional expression of these genes.<br>
 +
We can also see that <i>Pseudovibrio denitrificans</i> manage to grow on very high concentrations of ampicillin. By sequencing our bacteria, we found resistance gene to ampicillin too. This drug is so not really useful, except in a huge concentration.<br>
 +
On a brighter side, according to these results, we can select Pseudovibrio denitrificans transformed  with a PSB1C3 on a concentration of chloramphenicol adjusted to the ratio 1/1000 (cf: Table3).<br>
 +
To use other drugs, best ratio (Growth on antibiotic/Growth on medium only) allowed determining optimal concentrations to use on our different media (cf: Table4).
 +
</p>
 +
<br>
 +
<br>
 +
<div align="center">
 +
<p><b> <u>Table4:</u> </b> Concentrations which can be used for selection of <i>Pseudovibrio denitrificans</i> <br></p>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/9/93/Table_finale2_antibio.jpg" alt="image not found" />
 +
<br>
 +
</div>
 +
<br>
 +
</div>
-
<span class="cd-date"></span>
 
-
</div>
 
</div>
</div>
</html>
</html>

Latest revision as of 02:02, 18 October 2014

Sensitivity to antibiotics




After having succeeded to make our bacteria grow, we tested their resistance to different antibiotics. Knowing their resistance to antibiotics is very important because it will allow us to finalize protocols of selection after transformation.
We chose to test the most commonly used antibiotics. We included the three antibiotics used in iGEM (kanamycin, chloramphenicol and ampicilin), plus the erythromycin and the tetracyclin. We chose the erythromycin to test a conjugation protocol which required this antibiotic for E.coli, and we chose to test tetracyclin because it is quite often used for inducible systems.


Table3: Concentrations tested for each antibiotic
image not found

We tested several concentrations of each antibiotics (cf: Table3), and we added a supplementary concentration for erythromycin because it is known to be ineffective on GRAM- bacteria.


The sensitivity tests were performed in four different conditions (cf: Figure3). We tested on Marine Broth (MB) 1X plates, MB 0.5X plates (used for conjugation) and M9-CASA 1X (+3% NaCl). We also tested in liquid M9-CASA 1X (+3% NaCl) to have a test in liquid culture, unfortunately we cannot measure the optical density with the MB medium because of its opacity.
The cells' sensitivity was measured for Pseudovibrio denitrificans, E. coli, and different clones of E. coli transformed with plasmids and carrying an acquired resistance AmpR, KanR, CamR ou ErmR.


image not found

Figure3: Protocol of antibiotics' tests on Pseudovibrio denitrificans.



We let all the media incubating at 30°C (with shaking for liquid cultures), and they have been checked at day 1, day 2 and day 3. In the following figures, find the results obtained after three days of cultures on plates and one day of liquid cultures.


image not found

image not found

Figure4: Results of antibiotics' tests on MB plates.
On the left: Results on MB 0.5X plates.
On the right: Results MB 1X.
The number of CFU was not countable because of cellular lawn. The percentage of cell growth on plates was calculated by taking the controls of the same bacteria growing without antibiotics as reference.




image not found

image not found

Figure5: Results of antibiotics' tests for M9-CASA+3%NaCl media.
On the left: Results on M9-CASA+3%NaCl 1X plates.
On the right: Results in liquid M9-CASA+3%NaCl 1X.
The number of CFU was not countable because of cellular lawn. The percentage of cell growth on plates was calculated by taking the controls of the same bacteria growing without antibiotics as reference. The ΔOD (600nm) was calculated by subtracting the initial OD (600nm) at Day 0 from the OD(600nm) of the considered day.


Unfortunately, results for tetracyclin on MB medium are not useful. Indeed, all our bacteria have grown. It can be because of a technical problem with the drug, or it can also be explained by the presence of some genes bringing a resistance to this drug in Pseudovibrio denitrificans (see section Genome assembly). But the death of cells on M9 plates doesn't allow us to confirm this hypothesis, even if it can be explained by a conditional expression of these genes.
We can also see that Pseudovibrio denitrificans manage to grow on very high concentrations of ampicillin. By sequencing our bacteria, we found resistance gene to ampicillin too. This drug is so not really useful, except in a huge concentration.
On a brighter side, according to these results, we can select Pseudovibrio denitrificans transformed with a PSB1C3 on a concentration of chloramphenicol adjusted to the ratio 1/1000 (cf: Table3).
To use other drugs, best ratio (Growth on antibiotic/Growth on medium only) allowed determining optimal concentrations to use on our different media (cf: Table4).



Table4: Concentrations which can be used for selection of Pseudovibrio denitrificans

image not found