Team:BIOSINT Mexico/Switch

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Light response)
 
(21 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
  </style>
  </style>
</html>
</html>
-
 
-
[[File:Chassis.png|800px|center]]
 
<html><h1>Reset - Red light switch</h1> </html>
<html><h1>Reset - Red light switch</h1> </html>
Line 19: Line 17:
   
   
The first three hundreds nucleotides of PIF6 (BBa_K1150005) are fused to the DNA-Binding Domain of the TetR (BBa_K909007) protein and attaches to its operator site upstream a minimal promoter (PCaMV 35S BBa_K788000), also, its fused with a Nuclear Localization Sequence (NLS: BBa_K1150010) and a polyadenylation tail (PolyA: BBa_K1150012). The activation domain was used in order to induce the system expression, as proposed by Müller,K.  et al, attached to the DNA binding domain of TetR.
The first three hundreds nucleotides of PIF6 (BBa_K1150005) are fused to the DNA-Binding Domain of the TetR (BBa_K909007) protein and attaches to its operator site upstream a minimal promoter (PCaMV 35S BBa_K788000), also, its fused with a Nuclear Localization Sequence (NLS: BBa_K1150010) and a polyadenylation tail (PolyA: BBa_K1150012). The activation domain was used in order to induce the system expression, as proposed by Müller,K.  et al, attached to the DNA binding domain of TetR.
 +
[[File:Imagen1.png|500px|center]]
   
   
The first 650 amino acids (1950 bp) of the Phytochrome B (BBa_K1150004) protein are fused to an eucaryotic transactivation domain (VP16: BBa_K105001) from Herpes simplex virus, a 3 amino acid protein linker (AGS: Linker BBa_K1150013) and the NLS and PolyA, everything attached to the same minimal promoter (PCaMV).
The first 650 amino acids (1950 bp) of the Phytochrome B (BBa_K1150004) protein are fused to an eucaryotic transactivation domain (VP16: BBa_K105001) from Herpes simplex virus, a 3 amino acid protein linker (AGS: Linker BBa_K1150013) and the NLS and PolyA, everything attached to the same minimal promoter (PCaMV).
Line 25: Line 24:
   
   
The components of the PhyB transcription factor (PhyB-VP16-NLS and tetR-PIF6) were under the control of a minimal promoter, specifically, the Cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter (PCaMV 35S) to optimize the red light inducible gene expression. (Müller,K.  et al, 2013)  This promoter was selected because it is widely used on plant genetic engineering, because its strength  and constitutive nature.
The components of the PhyB transcription factor (PhyB-VP16-NLS and tetR-PIF6) were under the control of a minimal promoter, specifically, the Cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter (PCaMV 35S) to optimize the red light inducible gene expression. (Müller,K.  et al, 2013)  This promoter was selected because it is widely used on plant genetic engineering, because its strength  and constitutive nature.
 +
[[File:Imagen4.png|500px|center]]
===Light response===   
===Light response===   
-
<blockquote>[[File:Luchador.jpg|150px|right]]</blockquote>
+
[[File:Degreening.PNG|400px|thumb|right|Layout of an experimental set-up for local red light-controlled gene expression in whole plants. To prevent activation of the red light-responsive gene switch in light-grown plants, supplementary 740 nm illumination is applied that constantly returns the system to the OFF state (müller et al, 2012).]]
-
Phytochromes are photoreceptors that provide plants with circadian, seasonal, and positional information critical for the control of germination, seedling development, shade avoidance, reproduction, dormancy, and sleep movements. Phytochromes are unique among photoreceptors in their capacity to interconvert between a red-absorbing form (absorption maximum of ∼ 660 nm) and a far-red absorbing form (absorption maximum of ∼ 730 nm), which occur in a dynamic equilibrium within plant cells, corresponding to the proportions of red and far-red energy in ambient light. Because pigments in stems and leaves absorb wavelengths below about 700 nm, this provides plants with an elegant system for detecting their position relative to other plants, with which the plants compete for light. Certain aspects of phytochrome-mediated development outside of flowering plants are strikingly similar to those that have been characterized in Arabidopsis thaliana and other angiosperms. However, early diverging land plants have fewer distinct phytochrome gene lineages, suggesting that both diversification and subfunctionalization have been important in the evolution of the phytochrome gene family. There is evidence that subfunctionalization proceeded by the partitioning among paralogues of photosensory specificity, physiological response modes, and light-regulated gene expression and protein stability. Parallel events of duplication and functional divergence may have coincided with the evolution of canopy shade and the increasing complexity of the light environment. Within angiosperms, patterns of functional divergence are clade-specific and the roles of phytochromes in A. thaliana change across environments, attesting to the evolutionary flexibility and contemporaneous plasticity of phytochrome signalling in the control of development.
+
Proteins responsive to light called photoreceptors are present in plant cells and its main function is to provide information about the environment, about circadian, seasonal and positional information. This information is crucial in plant development, given that it controls many processes of the organism such as germination, seedling development, sleep movements and many others (Mathew, 2006), and also, activate or regulate some cellular pathways, like chloroplast movement, cytoplasmic motility or endoreduplication
-
+
 
-
+
Phytochromes are some kind of photoreceptors sensitive to different shades of red light, with a range of reception between 620 and 740 approximately, including deep red and far red light (∼660 nm and ∼740 nm wavelength). Because of its nature, and the difference with other plant pigments, that only absorb wavelengths lower than 700 nm, these molecules are specific for detecting small changes in environment, like detecting the the length of the day or the relative position to other plants. (Mathew, 2006)
-
Photoreceptors function at the interface between organisms and their environments, providing information that is critical for the appropriate timing of growth and developmental transitions. The exquisite fine-tuning of land plants to their light environments is manifest in numerous phenomena, from the coordinated control by three distinct photoreceptor systems of branching in the filamentous protonemata of a moss (Uenaka et al . 2005) to the preconditioning by a single photoreceptor that enables germinating Arabidopsis seedlings to anticipate their most likely environment (Mazzella et al. 2005). Such responsiveness to environmental signals is useful only if it is not lost when new environments are encountered, and when plant form and life histories change. In order to promote survival, photoreceptor systems must be robustly linked to the signalling networks that ensure suitable responses.
+
 
-
+
PIF6 construct (PIF6-TetR BD-NLS) and Phytochrome-B construct (PhyB-VP16 AD-AGS-NLS-PolyA) are both attached to the same promoter, so the expression of both constructs is equal and the concentration of both proteins is the same. In the cytoplasm, these proteins are found floating free in the cytosol when the environmental conditions are normal.  
-
At the same time, both information gathering and processing must be flexible enough to change when new challenges are presented. In the case of phytochromes, the principal photosensory function is to detect the relative proportions of red (R) and far-red (FR) energy in ambient light (Smith 1982). While this basic function has been conserved through millions of years of prokaryotic and eukaryotic evolution, the organisms in which they are found have diversified profoundly. The responses induced by light signals are concomitantly diverse, shaped by the morphologies, life histories, and environments of the photoreceptorbearing organisms.
+
 
-
+
However, absorption of photons of deep red light (660 nm) makes the proteins form a complex, thus, going through its active form, and switching the system to its ON state. Alike, if cells are exposed to far red light (740 nm wavelength) the system could be permanently turning to the off state (Mueller et al, 2013)
-
The diversity of phytochrome-mediated regulatory functions in major clades of green plants (green algae and land plants) reveals how a single photosensory function has evolved to meet many specific needs and reveals the ecological importance of phytochromes for all plants. Phytochromes control cellular responses and tropisms such  as chloroplast movement, cytoplasmic motility, endoreduplication, and nyctinastic movements, and of tropisms such as gravitropism, polarotropism, and phototropism (e.g. Wada & Kadota 1989; Kim et al. 1993; Haupt & Häder 1994; Hangarter 1997; Gendreau et al. 1998; Takagi et al. 2003).
+
 
-
+
Phytochrome-PIF6 complex in its active form triggers the transcription of two small interference RNAs which are complementaries to two RBSs presents in the de-greening construct, thus, shouting off permanently this system.
-
+
[[File:Imagen2.jpg|450px|center]]
-
However, it is the role of phytochromes in the major developmental pathways of germination, de-etiolation, shade avoidance, and flowering that is likely to have had the biggest impact on the establishment and ecological success of the major clades of land plants. A review of the literature reveals the surprisingly early appearance of several responses considered to be important in the ecology of angiosperms, including differential control of germination in open and shaded habitats, delay of development in the dark coupled with rapid developmental responses to light signals, and shade avoidance. Moreover, the gene phylogeny suggests that functional diversification in red- and far-red sensing, perhaps coinciding with increasing complexity in the light environment due to the origin of canopy shade, has been important in ferns, gymnosperms, and angiosperms.
+
<html><h2>Modeling</h2> </html>
<html><h2>Modeling</h2> </html>
 +
 +
'''Equations for Phytochrome-PIF6 complex'''
 +
<br>In order to produce proteins, in the cell, two main reactions happen. First, DNA is transcripted to mRNA and then it is translated to a peptide sequence, it could be represented in the reaction by:
 +
[[File:BIOSINTmodelEC1.png|500px|center]]
 +
All these reactions are mediated by two specific enzymes, which are RNA polymerase (transcription) and ribosome (translation). These reactions have been well described in literature and can be modeled to a Ordinary Differential Equation system.
 +
<br>The rate of production of the PhyB construct is given by the rate of transcription of the protein from the mRNA molecule and the degradation of the messenger. Therefore:
 +
[[File:BIOSINTmodelEC2.png|550px|center]]
 +
Where γ is the translation rate of the cell, and α is the degradation of the degradation rate of the protein.
 +
<br>Also, the concentration of the messenger molecule is given by the equation
 +
[[File:BIOSINTmodelEC3.png|650px|center]]
 +
Where a represents the activity of the promoter, that is related to the capacity of being activated or suppressed by a transcription factor; β is the maximal production rate of the CaMV promoter (which is attached upstream to PhyB) and is a linear function dependent on the time of the reaction; as in the last equation, α is the degradation rate.
 +
<br>Also, since PCaMV is a constitutive promoter, the value of its activity is equal to 1. So the equation is reduced to 
 +
[[File:BIOSINTmodelEC4.png|600px|center]]
 +
As PIF6 construct is connected to the same promoter, the equations of its expression are deduced by the same way, so:
 +
[[File:BIOSINTmodelEC5.png|500px|center]]
 +
[[File:BIOSINTmodelEC6.png|600px|center]]
 +
In our system, both expressed gene constructs are part of another reaction in presence of deep red light (660 nm lightwave). When photoreceptor protein (PhyB construct) detects deep red light, it fuses to its interaction factor (PIF6 construct) and form a protein
 +
<br>For the complex creation, follow the following reaction in presence of 660 nm light.
 +
[[File:BIOSINTmodelEC7.png|500px|center]]
 +
Where Ku is the constant of the reaction, and is on concentration units. And K-u is the constant for the inverse reaction (separation of the complex), and the active form of the complex can be abbreviated as CPPA. Then, we can infer the concentration of active complex by the equation.
 +
[[File:BIOSINTmodelEC8.png|900px|center]]
 +
Also, in presence of far red light, the complex passes to its inactive form, represented as CPPI, by the following reaction:
 +
[[File:BIOSINTmodelEC9.png|300px|center]]
 +
Where KD is the constant of the reaction and K-D equals zero, because deactivated complex can’t return to its active form.
 +
[[File:BIOSINTmodelEC10.png|500px|center]]
 +
Then, if we despise the degradation rate of the inactivation of the protein complex, we can simplify the calculi of concentration of active photo protein by replacing 6 in 5.
 +
[[File:BIOSINTmodelEC11.png|880px|center]]
 +
 +
'''Equations for the repressor system'''
 +
<br>The active protein complex that is formed by phyb construct and pif6 construct becomes a transcription factor that activates the production of two small interference RNAs. One is specific for the RBS1 sequence and the other for the IRES sequence.
 +
<br>Since the complex has a binding domain that joins to the promoter inducible PCMV, the rate of production of the siRNAs is given by the strength of the promoter and its activity (which is proportional to the activation by CPPA).
 +
<br>Since the activator has to bind to the DNA molecule in the promoter site, we use Hill’s function for macromolecules binding.
 +
<br>From:
 +
[[File:BIOSINTmodelEC.23.png|550px|center]]
 +
Can be deduced for promoters with activators:
 +
[[File:BIOSINTmodelEC.24.png|500px|center]]
 +
To find the complete demonstrations for the Hill’s equation for inducible promoters, you can visit Aberdeen 2009 wiki.
 +
<br>Then, the activity for our promoter can be expressed as:
 +
[[File:BIOSINTmodelEC.25.png|500px|center]]
 +
Where βPCMV is the maximum expression achieved by our promoter. Kd is the constant is the equilibrium constant for the attachement of the inducer and the promoter, and n is the Hill’s coefficient for the cooperative ligation Induce-promoter.
 +
<br>
 +
<br>Since the affinity of the tow molecules is high, the Hill’s coefficient is n>1, then, aPCMV, is also greater than one. Thus, the equations that models the expression of siRNAs are:
 +
[[File:BIOSINTmodelEC.26.png|550px|center]]
 +
[[File:BIOSINTmodelEC.27.png|550px|center]]
 +
 +
And given that both sequences are connected to the same promoter, the activity is the same for siRBS1 and siIRES.
 +
<html><h2>Results</h2> </html>
<html><h2>Results</h2> </html>
-
<html><h2>References</h2> </html>
+
We fused the promoter PCMV (BBa_K747096) to a YFP reporter (BBa_E0030).
 +
 
 +
In order to measure its expression, we culture transformed E.coli in agar plates and measured the fluorescense intensity every 45 minutes. After that, we obtained the following data. [Fig.1]
 +
 
 +
:::[[File:1res.png|150px|thumb|left|'''Figure 1''' YFP intensity every 45 minutes.]]
 +
 
 +
We made three repetitions, so in order to model the equation, we obtained the mean measure, therefore:
 +
 
 +
[[File:2res.png|300px|center]]
 +
 +
We analysed the data and using the Wolfram Mathematica software, we obtained the following equation that fits the data.
 +
If we plot this equation, we obtain:
 +
 
 +
[[File:Model1res.png|400px|center]]
 +
 +
Where we can see that the intensity of YFP grows directly proportional to the time and concentration of the molecule.
 +
 
 +
<blockquote><font size="3">[[File:4res.png|600px|thumb|left|'''Figure 1'''intensity of YFP grows directly proportional to the time and concentration of the molecule.
 +
''.]]</font></blockquote>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<html><h2>References</h2>  
 +
<p>Müller, K., Siegel, D., Jahnke, F. R., Gerrer, K., Wend, S., Decker, E. L., ... & Zurbriggen, M. D. (2014). A red light-controlled synthetic gene expression switch for plant systems. Molecular BioSystems, 10(7), 1679-1688.
 +
 
 +
<p>Mathews, S. (2006). Phytochrome‐mediated development in land plants: red light sensing evolves to meet the challenges of changing light environments.Molecular Ecology, 15(12), 3483-3503.
 +
</html>

Latest revision as of 03:47, 18 October 2014

Reset - Red light switch

Description

We incorporate a red light-responsive gene expression system using far red (740 nm) light wave. This far red light sensor works as a switch that inactivates the expression of the de-greening system genes, is based on the interaction between the Phytochrome B and the phytochrome-interacting factor 6 (PIF6) from A. thaliana (Müller,K. et al, 2013).

In the literature, the switch used two different light waves, deep red (660 nm) for the activation, and far red (740 nm) for the immediate and permanent deactivation of the de-greening system. However, for this project, we designed a system responsive only for the far red light and which only function is the inactivation of the degreening of the plant.

The first three hundreds nucleotides of PIF6 (BBa_K1150005) are fused to the DNA-Binding Domain of the TetR (BBa_K909007) protein and attaches to its operator site upstream a minimal promoter (PCaMV 35S BBa_K788000), also, its fused with a Nuclear Localization Sequence (NLS: BBa_K1150010) and a polyadenylation tail (PolyA: BBa_K1150012). The activation domain was used in order to induce the system expression, as proposed by Müller,K. et al, attached to the DNA binding domain of TetR.

Imagen1.png

The first 650 amino acids (1950 bp) of the Phytochrome B (BBa_K1150004) protein are fused to an eucaryotic transactivation domain (VP16: BBa_K105001) from Herpes simplex virus, a 3 amino acid protein linker (AGS: Linker BBa_K1150013) and the NLS and PolyA, everything attached to the same minimal promoter (PCaMV).

In presence of far red light, the phytochrome and PIF6 complex will transform to its active form, and subsequently, it will activate the production of the small interference RNAs (RBS1 and IRES), that binds to the mRNA of the de-greening system at the RBSs positions, thus, stopping the binding of the ribosomes and the traduction of the messenger to protein. Also, on dark times this system can be turned OFF for several hours (Müller,K. et al, 2013)

The components of the PhyB transcription factor (PhyB-VP16-NLS and tetR-PIF6) were under the control of a minimal promoter, specifically, the Cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter (PCaMV 35S) to optimize the red light inducible gene expression. (Müller,K. et al, 2013) This promoter was selected because it is widely used on plant genetic engineering, because its strength and constitutive nature.

Imagen4.png

Light response

Layout of an experimental set-up for local red light-controlled gene expression in whole plants. To prevent activation of the red light-responsive gene switch in light-grown plants, supplementary 740 nm illumination is applied that constantly returns the system to the OFF state (müller et al, 2012).

Proteins responsive to light called photoreceptors are present in plant cells and its main function is to provide information about the environment, about circadian, seasonal and positional information. This information is crucial in plant development, given that it controls many processes of the organism such as germination, seedling development, sleep movements and many others (Mathew, 2006), and also, activate or regulate some cellular pathways, like chloroplast movement, cytoplasmic motility or endoreduplication

Phytochromes are some kind of photoreceptors sensitive to different shades of red light, with a range of reception between 620 and 740 approximately, including deep red and far red light (∼660 nm and ∼740 nm wavelength). Because of its nature, and the difference with other plant pigments, that only absorb wavelengths lower than 700 nm, these molecules are specific for detecting small changes in environment, like detecting the the length of the day or the relative position to other plants. (Mathew, 2006)

PIF6 construct (PIF6-TetR BD-NLS) and Phytochrome-B construct (PhyB-VP16 AD-AGS-NLS-PolyA) are both attached to the same promoter, so the expression of both constructs is equal and the concentration of both proteins is the same. In the cytoplasm, these proteins are found floating free in the cytosol when the environmental conditions are normal.

However, absorption of photons of deep red light (660 nm) makes the proteins form a complex, thus, going through its active form, and switching the system to its ON state. Alike, if cells are exposed to far red light (740 nm wavelength) the system could be permanently turning to the off state (Mueller et al, 2013)

Phytochrome-PIF6 complex in its active form triggers the transcription of two small interference RNAs which are complementaries to two RBSs presents in the de-greening construct, thus, shouting off permanently this system.

Imagen2.jpg

Modeling

Equations for Phytochrome-PIF6 complex
In order to produce proteins, in the cell, two main reactions happen. First, DNA is transcripted to mRNA and then it is translated to a peptide sequence, it could be represented in the reaction by:

BIOSINTmodelEC1.png

All these reactions are mediated by two specific enzymes, which are RNA polymerase (transcription) and ribosome (translation). These reactions have been well described in literature and can be modeled to a Ordinary Differential Equation system.
The rate of production of the PhyB construct is given by the rate of transcription of the protein from the mRNA molecule and the degradation of the messenger. Therefore:

BIOSINTmodelEC2.png

Where γ is the translation rate of the cell, and α is the degradation of the degradation rate of the protein.
Also, the concentration of the messenger molecule is given by the equation

BIOSINTmodelEC3.png

Where a represents the activity of the promoter, that is related to the capacity of being activated or suppressed by a transcription factor; β is the maximal production rate of the CaMV promoter (which is attached upstream to PhyB) and is a linear function dependent on the time of the reaction; as in the last equation, α is the degradation rate.
Also, since PCaMV is a constitutive promoter, the value of its activity is equal to 1. So the equation is reduced to

BIOSINTmodelEC4.png

As PIF6 construct is connected to the same promoter, the equations of its expression are deduced by the same way, so:

BIOSINTmodelEC5.png
BIOSINTmodelEC6.png

In our system, both expressed gene constructs are part of another reaction in presence of deep red light (660 nm lightwave). When photoreceptor protein (PhyB construct) detects deep red light, it fuses to its interaction factor (PIF6 construct) and form a protein
For the complex creation, follow the following reaction in presence of 660 nm light.

BIOSINTmodelEC7.png

Where Ku is the constant of the reaction, and is on concentration units. And K-u is the constant for the inverse reaction (separation of the complex), and the active form of the complex can be abbreviated as CPPA. Then, we can infer the concentration of active complex by the equation.

BIOSINTmodelEC8.png

Also, in presence of far red light, the complex passes to its inactive form, represented as CPPI, by the following reaction:

BIOSINTmodelEC9.png

Where KD is the constant of the reaction and K-D equals zero, because deactivated complex can’t return to its active form.

BIOSINTmodelEC10.png

Then, if we despise the degradation rate of the inactivation of the protein complex, we can simplify the calculi of concentration of active photo protein by replacing 6 in 5.

BIOSINTmodelEC11.png

Equations for the repressor system
The active protein complex that is formed by phyb construct and pif6 construct becomes a transcription factor that activates the production of two small interference RNAs. One is specific for the RBS1 sequence and the other for the IRES sequence.
Since the complex has a binding domain that joins to the promoter inducible PCMV, the rate of production of the siRNAs is given by the strength of the promoter and its activity (which is proportional to the activation by CPPA).
Since the activator has to bind to the DNA molecule in the promoter site, we use Hill’s function for macromolecules binding.
From:

BIOSINTmodelEC.23.png

Can be deduced for promoters with activators:

BIOSINTmodelEC.24.png

To find the complete demonstrations for the Hill’s equation for inducible promoters, you can visit Aberdeen 2009 wiki.
Then, the activity for our promoter can be expressed as:

BIOSINTmodelEC.25.png

Where βPCMV is the maximum expression achieved by our promoter. Kd is the constant is the equilibrium constant for the attachement of the inducer and the promoter, and n is the Hill’s coefficient for the cooperative ligation Induce-promoter.

Since the affinity of the tow molecules is high, the Hill’s coefficient is n>1, then, aPCMV, is also greater than one. Thus, the equations that models the expression of siRNAs are:

BIOSINTmodelEC.26.png
BIOSINTmodelEC.27.png

And given that both sequences are connected to the same promoter, the activity is the same for siRBS1 and siIRES.


Results

We fused the promoter PCMV (BBa_K747096) to a YFP reporter (BBa_E0030).

In order to measure its expression, we culture transformed E.coli in agar plates and measured the fluorescense intensity every 45 minutes. After that, we obtained the following data. [Fig.1]

Figure 1 YFP intensity every 45 minutes.

We made three repetitions, so in order to model the equation, we obtained the mean measure, therefore:

2res.png

We analysed the data and using the Wolfram Mathematica software, we obtained the following equation that fits the data. If we plot this equation, we obtain:

Model1res.png

Where we can see that the intensity of YFP grows directly proportional to the time and concentration of the molecule.

Figure 1intensity of YFP grows directly proportional to the time and concentration of the molecule. .


References

Müller, K., Siegel, D., Jahnke, F. R., Gerrer, K., Wend, S., Decker, E. L., ... & Zurbriggen, M. D. (2014). A red light-controlled synthetic gene expression switch for plant systems. Molecular BioSystems, 10(7), 1679-1688.

Mathews, S. (2006). Phytochrome‐mediated development in land plants: red light sensing evolves to meet the challenges of changing light environments.Molecular Ecology, 15(12), 3483-3503.