Tracks/Software/Judging

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(2014 Software Track Judging)
 
(5 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
<!--
{{CSS/Main}}
{{CSS/Main}}
{{NavBar}}
{{NavBar}}
<html>
<html>
 +
<!--
<style type="text/css">
<style type="text/css">
#software {display: block;}
#software {display: block;}
Line 30: Line 32:
===Bronze Medal===
===Bronze Medal===
-
#Register the team, have a great summer, and have fun attending the Regional Jamboree and World Championship Jamboree.
+
#Register the team, have a great summer, and have fun attending the Jamboree in Boston.
#Create and share a description of the team's project via the iGEM wiki.
#Create and share a description of the team's project via the iGEM wiki.
#Present a Poster and Talk at the Regional Jamboree and World Championship Jamboree.
#Present a Poster and Talk at the Regional Jamboree and World Championship Jamboree.
Line 42: Line 44:
* Basic code documentation for outside developers
* Basic code documentation for outside developers
* Detailed installation or setup instructions for users (if applicable)
* Detailed installation or setup instructions for users (if applicable)
-
** for web servers: provide Docker container of your server (details are being worked on by iGEM headquarters)
+
** for web servers: provide [https://www.docker.io/ Docker] container of your server (details are being worked on by iGEM headquarters)
* Basic user guide
* Basic user guide
Line 74: Line 76:
===Bonus points===
===Bonus points===
 +
 +
None of the bonus points are a strict requirement but you have to collect at least one or three of them in order to earn the Silver or Gold medal, respectively.
* 2-3 points for: experimental validation of your software or algorithm (experiments can be outsourced to other teams, labs or companies)
* 2-3 points for: experimental validation of your software or algorithm (experiments can be outsourced to other teams, labs or companies)
Line 81: Line 85:
* 1 point for: development of a well documented library for other developers rather than "only" stand-alone Apps for end users
* 1 point for: development of a well documented library for other developers rather than "only" stand-alone Apps for end users
* 1-2 points for: surprising us with something that is so cool or new that we would have never thought of it
* 1-2 points for: surprising us with something that is so cool or new that we would have never thought of it
 +
 +
Please note, these requirements are preliminary and will still be changed and fine-tuned by the software committee. Feel free to contact the software committee to ask for clarification or participate in the discussion.
Please note, these requirements are preliminary and will still be changed and fine-tuned by the software committee. Feel free to contact the software committee to ask for clarification or participate in the discussion.
 +
 +
-->

Latest revision as of 22:08, 10 July 2014