Team:Oxford/P&P environmental impact
From 2014.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
(14 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 80: | Line 80: | ||
<h1blue2><center>Atmosphere</center></h1blue2> | <h1blue2><center>Atmosphere</center></h1blue2> | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
- | The Environmental Protection Agency has expressed fears that even short lived halocarbons may have a significant detrimental effect on the global atmosphere, as well as concerns about our relative lack of understanding of the environmental effects of these compounds<font style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 70%;">1</font>. Several chlorinated solvents are listed by the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) as a hazardous air pollutant (HAP) under the U.S. Clean Air Act<font style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 70%;">2</font>. However, various environmental NGOs and organisations maintain that current regulation of chlorinated solvent disposal is inadequate - for example, chlorinated solvents are not regulated under the Montreal Protocol despite evidence that they may contribute to ozone depletion. | + | The Environmental Protection Agency has expressed fears that even short lived halocarbons may have a significant detrimental effect on the global atmosphere, as well as concerns about our relative lack of understanding of the environmental effects of these compounds<font style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 70%;">1</font>. Several chlorinated solvents are listed by the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) as a hazardous air pollutant (HAP) under the U.S. Clean Air Act<font style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 70%;">2</font> . However, various environmental NGOs and organisations maintain that current regulation of chlorinated solvent disposal is inadequate - for example, chlorinated solvents are not regulated under the Montreal Protocol despite evidence that they may contribute to ozone depletion. |
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
<h1blue2> Photochemical Smog</h1blue2> | <h1blue2> Photochemical Smog</h1blue2> | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
- | TCE and PBRC have both been linked to photochemical smog. Both these chemicals are used extensively in the textiles industry and current disposal is inadequate. Photochemical smog is a unique form of air pollution, caused by reactions between sunlight and pollutants. The products of these reactions are generally 'secondary' pollutants such as hydrocarbons or ozone (which in the lower atmosphere is not desirable as it causes irritation to the respiratory tract)<font style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 70%;">3</font>. | + | TCE and PBRC have both been linked to photochemical smog. Both these chemicals are used extensively in the textiles industry and current disposal is inadequate. Photochemical smog is a unique form of air pollution, caused by reactions between sunlight and pollutants. The products of these reactions are generally 'secondary' pollutants such as hydrocarbons or ozone (which in the lower atmosphere is not desirable as it causes irritation to the respiratory tract)<font style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 70%;">3</font> . |
<br> | <br> | ||
Photochemical smog is known to cause respiratory problems in humans and animals. Because the chemicals can travel on the wind, the problem can potentially affect all areas although it tends to be most serious in large cities. | Photochemical smog is known to cause respiratory problems in humans and animals. Because the chemicals can travel on the wind, the problem can potentially affect all areas although it tends to be most serious in large cities. | ||
Line 90: | Line 90: | ||
<h1blue2>Global Warming</h1blue2> | <h1blue2>Global Warming</h1blue2> | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
- | Dichloromethane has a Global Warming Potential (GWP) ten times greater than that of carbon dioxide, whilst trichloromethane has a GWP 30 times greater. At the time of writing, the GWPs of tetrachloroethene and trichloroethene are not known, but are expected to be comparable to those for DCM and TCM. | + | Dichloromethane has a Global Warming Potential (GWP) ten times greater than that of carbon dioxide, whilst trichloromethane has a GWP 30 times greater. At the time of writing, the GWPs of tetrachloroethene and trichloroethene are not known, but are expected to be comparable to those for DCM and TCM<font style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 70%;">4</font>. |
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
<h1blue2> Acid Rain</h1blue2> | <h1blue2> Acid Rain</h1blue2> | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
- | In the lower atmosphere degradation of chlorinated solvents is initiated by a reaction with the hydroxyl radical, and forms a variety of products including hydrochloric acid, formic acid, and phosgene (the colourless gas infamous for its use as a chemical weapon during World War One). These compounds dissolve in clouds and rain water, and are ultimately deposited from the atmosphere in acid the form of rain and snow. | + | In the lower atmosphere degradation of chlorinated solvents is initiated by a reaction with the hydroxyl radical, and forms a variety of products including hydrochloric acid, formic acid, and phosgene (the colourless gas infamous for its use as a chemical weapon during World War One). These compounds dissolve in clouds and rain water, and are ultimately deposited from the atmosphere in acid the form of rain and snow<font style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 70%;">5</font> . |
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
- | Further, trichloroacetic acid (TCA) can be formed as a minor product in the atmospheric de-gradation of some chlorinated solvents. Studies have shown that TCA is broadly distributed in precipitation, surface water and soil on a global scale. Since the observed levels in soil in some areas have been found to exceed the accepted 'safe' levels (2.4 μg/kg for terrestrial organisms) the European Commission instructed producers of the relevant solvents to carry out extensive studies of the origin and fate of environmental TCA. Although the results of these studies suggest that TCA levels in soils could not be explained by precipitation alone, the European Union Risk Assessment nevertheless concluded that “it is considered unlikely that depo-sition of TCA from the atmosphere will by itself lead to levels of TCA in soil that pose a risk for ter-restrial organisms”<font style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 70%;"> | + | Further, trichloroacetic acid (TCA) can be formed as a minor product in the atmospheric de-gradation of some chlorinated solvents. Studies have shown that TCA is broadly distributed in precipitation, surface water and soil on a global scale. Since the observed levels in soil in some areas have been found to exceed the accepted 'safe' levels (2.4 μg/kg for terrestrial organisms) the European Commission instructed producers of the relevant solvents to carry out extensive studies of the origin and fate of environmental TCA. Although the results of these studies suggest that TCA levels in soils could not be explained by precipitation alone, the European Union Risk Assessment nevertheless concluded that “it is considered unlikely that depo-sition of TCA from the atmosphere will by itself lead to levels of TCA in soil that pose a risk for ter-restrial organisms”<font style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 70%;">6</font> . |
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
+ | |||
<h1blue2> References</h1blue2> | <h1blue2> References</h1blue2> | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
- | <font style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 70%;">1</font> US Environmental Protection Agency | + | <font style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 70%;">1</font>US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) - Methyl Chloride Hazard Summary (Updated 2000). |
<br> | <br> | ||
- | <font style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 70%;">2</font>US Clean Air Act. | + | <font style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 70%;">2</font> US Clean Air Act. |
<br> | <br> | ||
- | <font style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 70%;">3</font> | + | <font style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 70%;">3</font> Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. |
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <font style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 70%;">4</font> United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (GHG Data: Global Warming Potentials). | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <font style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 70%;">5</font> United States Environmental Protection Agency. | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <font style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 70%;">6</font> European Union Commission: Risk Assessment for Trichloroacetic Acid. | ||
+ | </div> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
- | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 125: | Line 132: | ||
<h1blue2>Humans</h1blue2> | <h1blue2>Humans</h1blue2> | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
- | The Reference Dose (an estimate of the maximum level of continuous exposure to the human population which is unlikely to pose any significant risk of detrimental effects (excluding the risk of cancer of the course of a lifetime)) for DCM is 0.06 milligrams per kilogram of body weight per day. Worryingly, DCM has been found in some urban air and at some hazardous waste sites at average concentrations of 11 ppb of air, and the average daily intake of methylene chloride from outdoor air in three U.S. cities may reach 309 micrograms per day, suggesting it is entirely possible that intake may exceeds the reference dose in individual cases. | + | The Reference Dose (an estimate of the maximum level of continuous exposure to the human population which is unlikely to pose any significant risk of detrimental effects (excluding the risk of cancer of the course of a lifetime)) for DCM is 0.06 milligrams per kilogram of body weight per day<font style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 70%;">1</font> . Worryingly, DCM has been found in some urban air and at some hazardous waste sites at average concentrations of 11 ppb of air, and the average daily intake of methylene chloride from outdoor air in three U.S. cities may reach 309 micrograms per day, suggesting it is entirely possible that intake may exceeds the reference dose in individual cases<font style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 70%;">2</font> . |
- | The most frequent and dangerous exposure to chlorinated solvents generally occur in workplaces where the chemical is present. Workers are at risk of breathing in chlorinated solvents or accidently coming into skin contact with chemicals. Previous studies have shown concentrations of up to 1,000 ppm of DCM in air (note that 1 part per million is 1,000 times more than 1 part per billion) have been detected in general work areas, and even higher concentrations of up to 1,400 ppm have been detected in samples in the breathing zone of some workers. Such exposure levels far exceed the current recommended federal limits; The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) estimated that 1 million workers may be exposed to dangerous levels of dichloromethane, and for chlorinated solvents generally the figure is much higher. | + | The most frequent and dangerous exposure to chlorinated solvents generally occur in workplaces where the chemical is present. Workers are at risk of breathing in chlorinated solvents or accidently coming into skin contact with chemicals. Previous studies have shown concentrations of up to 1,000 ppm of DCM in air (note that 1 part per million is 1,000 times more than 1 part per billion) have been detected in general work areas, and even higher concentrations of up to 1,400 ppm have been detected in samples in the breathing zone of some workers. Such exposure levels far exceed the current recommended federal limits; The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) estimated that 1 million workers may be exposed to dangerous levels of dichloromethane, and for chlorinated solvents generally the figure is much higher<font style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 70%;">3</font>. |
<br> | <br> | ||
- | DCM and other chlorinated solvents can have a devastating impact on human health. Case studies of DCM poisoning during paint stripping operations have shown that overexposure can be fatal to humans. Acute inhalation exposure can cause short term damage to the central nervous system including detriment to visual, auditory, and psychomotor functions, and irritation to the nose and throat. | + | DCM and other chlorinated solvents can have a devastating impact on human health. Case studies of DCM poisoning during paint stripping operations have shown that overexposure can be fatal to humans. Acute inhalation exposure can cause short term damage to the central nervous system including detriment to visual, auditory, and psychomotor functions, and irritation to the nose and throat. <br> |
- | The major effects of chronic inhalation of DCM are also effects on the nervous system, including headaches, nausea, memory loss, and possibly dizziness. There is currently a lack of research indicating whether there may be developmental or reproductive effects in humans, although animal studies have previously shown that if DCM passes through the placental barrier there is a high risk of skeletal variations and/or lower fetal body weight. DCM is also considered to be a probable human carcinogen. Although research in this area is incomplete, animal studies have shown a sharp increase in liver and lung cancer and in mammary gland tumors following exposure to DCM. The US Environmental Protection Agency has concluded that, by a weight of evidence evaluation, 'dichloromethane is [and should be treated as] carcinogenic by a mutagenic mode of action'. | + | The major effects of chronic inhalation of DCM are also effects on the nervous system, including headaches, nausea, memory loss, and possibly dizziness. There is currently a lack of research indicating whether there may be developmental or reproductive effects in humans, although animal studies have previously shown that if DCM passes through the placental barrier there is a high risk of skeletal variations and/or lower fetal body weight. DCM is also considered to be a probable human carcinogen. Although research in this area is incomplete, animal studies have shown a sharp increase in liver and lung cancer and in mammary gland tumors following exposure to DCM. The US Environmental Protection Agency has concluded that, by a weight of evidence evaluation, 'dichloromethane is [and should be treated as] carcinogenic by a mutagenic mode of action'<font style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 70%;">4</font>. |
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
<h1blue2>Animals</h1blue2> | <h1blue2>Animals</h1blue2> | ||
Line 139: | Line 146: | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
The No Observed Effect Concentration (NOEC) for the most sensitive species of plants was 46 μg/m. In some areas levels may exceed this, due to contamination of soil and groundwater. There is currently a worrying lack of understanding and research into the effects of chlorinated solvents on plant life. | The No Observed Effect Concentration (NOEC) for the most sensitive species of plants was 46 μg/m. In some areas levels may exceed this, due to contamination of soil and groundwater. There is currently a worrying lack of understanding and research into the effects of chlorinated solvents on plant life. | ||
- | + | <br><br> | |
+ | <h1blue2>References</h1blue2> | ||
+ | <br><br> | ||
+ | <font style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 70%;">1</font> Figures taken from: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/hlthef/methylen.html (Environmental Protection Agency).<br> | ||
+ | <font style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 70%;">2</font> Figures taken from: See ibid.<br> | ||
+ | <font style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 70%;">3</font>National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.<br> | ||
+ | <font style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 70%;">4</font> US Environmental Protection Agency (see specifically http://www.epa.gov/IRIS/subst/0070.htm). | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
Line 163: | Line 176: | ||
<h1blue2> Ground Water</h1blue2> | <h1blue2> Ground Water</h1blue2> | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
- | TCE and TeCE are amongst the common contaminants and are particularly tricky to deal with due to the fact that their biodegradation pathways start off with reductive dechlorination to vinyl chloride, which in an anaerobic environment works fine. But then the process often gets stuck at vinyl chloride as that is typically oxidised in groundwater. With VC being far more carcinogenic than TCE and TeCE this is a problem. | + | TCE and TeCE are amongst the common contaminants and are particularly tricky to deal with due to the fact that their biodegradation pathways start off with reductive dechlorination to vinyl chloride, which in an anaerobic environment works fine. But then the process often gets stuck at vinyl chloride as that is typically oxidised in groundwater. With VC being far more carcinogenic than TCE and TeCE this is a problem<font style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 70%;">1</font>. |
<br> TCE is probably the prevalent groundwater contaminant these days. | <br> TCE is probably the prevalent groundwater contaminant these days. | ||
- | In a public health statement, the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ASTDR) admitted that we do not know precisely how long chlorinated solvents may remain in the soil. What we do know, however, is that chlorinated solvents are a 'big deal' in groundwater - in fact, they are the most frequently detected groundwater contaminant in the USA. ASTDR also concedes that there is a possibility of contamination of drinking water by chlorinated solvents including dichloromethane1. | + | In a public health statement, the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ASTDR) admitted that we do not know precisely how long chlorinated solvents may |
+ | |||
+ | remain in the soil. <font style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 70%;">2</font>What we do know, however, is that chlorinated solvents are a 'big deal' in groundwater - in fact, they are the most frequently detected groundwater contaminant in the USA. ASTDR also concedes that there is a possibility of contamination of drinking water by chlorinated solvents including dichloromethane1<font style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 70%;">3</font>. | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
Line 171: | Line 186: | ||
<h1blue2>Surface Water</h1blue2> | <h1blue2>Surface Water</h1blue2> | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
- | Chlorinated solvent pollution also affect surface water - although these chemicals tend to volatilise, and are extensively diluted in big rivers, the environmental and drinking water quality standards are very low in comparison to their solubility. The figures are not trivial; according to the US Agency for Toxic Substances, averages of 68 ppb of methylene chloride in surface water and 98 ppb methylene chloride in groundwater have been found at some hazardous waste | + | Chlorinated solvent pollution also affect surface water - although these chemicals tend to volatilise, and are extensively diluted in big rivers, the environmental and drinking water quality standards are very low in comparison to their solubility. The figures are not trivial; according to the US Agency for Toxic Substances, averages of 68 ppb of methylene chloride in surface water and 98 ppb methylene chloride in groundwater have been found at some hazardous waste sites<font style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 70%;">4</font>. |
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
<h1blue2>Drinking Water</h1blue2> | <h1blue2>Drinking Water</h1blue2> | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
- | Conventional water treatment techniques (coagulation, sedimentation, filtration and chlorination) have been found to have a little or no effect in reducing concentrations of DCM in drinking water. Due to the volatile organic nature of DCM, there are two existing treatment technologies that public water systems can use: air stripping and granular activated carbon (GAC) adsorption The U.S. EPA recommends packed tower aeration (PTA) as a best available technology (BAT) for DCM removal in drinking water below the U.S. EPA Maximum Contaminant Level of 5 µg/L. However it should be noted that the selection of an appropriate treatment process for a specific water supply will depend on the characteristics of the raw water supply and the operational condition of the specific treatment method. | + | Conventional water treatment techniques (coagulation, sedimentation, filtration and chlorination) have been found to have a little or no effect in reducing concentrations of DCM in drinking water. Due to the volatile organic nature of DCM, there are two existing treatment technologies that public water systems can use: air stripping and granular activated carbon (GAC) adsorption The U.S. EPA recommends packed tower aeration (PTA) as a best available technology (BAT) for DCM removal in drinking water below the U.S. EPA Maximum Contaminant Level of 5 µg/L. However it should be noted that the selection of an appropriate treatment process for a specific water supply will depend on the characteristics of the raw water supply and the operational condition of the specific treatment method<font style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 70%;">5</font>. |
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
- | + | <h1blue2> References</h1blue2> | |
+ | <br><br> | ||
+ | <font style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 70%;">1</font>Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (US, Atlanta) - Toxological Profile http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/PHS/PHS.asp?id=232&tid=42. <br> | ||
+ | <font style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 70%;">2</font>See Ibid.<br> | ||
+ | <font style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 70%;">3</font>Dr Frederic Coulon (Department of Environmental Science and Technology, School of Applied Sciences, Cranfield University) - by personal communication to Oxford iGEM. <br> | ||
+ | <font style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 70%;">4</font>See ibid at [1].<br> | ||
+ | <font style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 70%;">5</font>See ibid at [3]. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
Line 197: | Line 218: | ||
<h1blue2><center>Marine Environment</center></h1blue2> | <h1blue2><center>Marine Environment</center></h1blue2> | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
- | Chlorinated solvents are generally highly volatile and only sparingly soluble in water. Even if traces of solvents are briefly present in aqueous waste streams, they volatilise from rivers and lakes with a half-life of about a month or less, unless they are trapped in groundwater. Nevertheless, presence of chlorinated solvents is a concern due to its potential impact on marine life... | + | Chlorinated solvents are generally highly volatile and only sparingly soluble in water. Even if traces of solvents are briefly present in aqueous waste streams, they volatilise from rivers and lakes with a half-life of about a month or less, unless they are trapped in groundwater. Nevertheless, presence of chlorinated solvents is a concern due to its potential impact on marine life<font style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 70%;">1</font>... |
+ | <br><br> | ||
+ | <h1blue2> References</h1blue2> | ||
+ | <br><br> | ||
+ | <font style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 70%;">1</font>See for example: Environmental Monitoring and Assessment | ||
+ | October 2004, Volume 97, Issue 1-3, pp 3-22; EuroChlor Risk Assessment for the Marine Environment (Dichloromethane). | ||
+ | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
Line 220: | Line 247: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
- | <div class = "white_news_block"> | + | <div class = "white_news_block" style="background-color:transparent;"> |
<h1blue2>References</h1blue2> | <h1blue2>References</h1blue2> | ||
<br> [1] Euro Chlor - Methyl Chloride Facts & Figures (http://www.eurochlor.org/chlorinated-solvents-(ecsa)/facts-figures/methylene-chloride-(dcm).aspx). | <br> [1] Euro Chlor - Methyl Chloride Facts & Figures (http://www.eurochlor.org/chlorinated-solvents-(ecsa)/facts-figures/methylene-chloride-(dcm).aspx). |
Latest revision as of 03:37, 18 October 2014