Team:Penn/Magnetism
From 2014.igem.org
Ameyvrudhula (Talk | contribs) |
|||
(4 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
<div id="textbox"> | <div id="textbox"> | ||
- | <p style = "text-align: left; text-indent:0px"> AMB-1 is most useful for synthetic biology because of its rare capacity to align with magnetic fields. We attempted to explore the magnetic properties of AMB-1 as further understanding would prove AMB-1’s value as a chassis in bioremediation and other fields. </p> | + | <p style = "text-align: left; text-indent:0px"> AMB-1 is most useful for synthetic biology because of its rare capacity to align with magnetic fields.<sup>[9]</sup> We attempted to explore the magnetic properties of AMB-1 as further understanding would prove AMB-1’s value as a chassis in bioremediation and other fields. </p> |
- | <h3 style= "text-align: left">Relationship Between | + | <h3 style= "text-align: left">Relationship Between OD<sub>600</sub> and T<sub>2</sub> for AMB-1</h3> |
- | <p style = "text-align: left; text-indent:0px">We hoped to quantify the magnetic strength of AMB-1 using spin-spin relaxation time ( | + | <p style = "text-align: left; text-indent:0px">We hoped to quantify the magnetic strength of AMB-1 using spin-spin relaxation time (T<sub>2</sub> time) and relate it to the cell concentration (OD<sub>600</sub>). To do so, we used a magnetic NMR machine (the minispec mq60, Bruker) to measure the T<sub>2</sub> decay time of cell samples (Fig. 1). A longer T2 time indicated fewer magnetic particles, and therefore weaker magnetic properties. |
</p> | </p> | ||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
<h3 style= "text-align: left; font-size: 18px;">Results:</h3> | <h3 style= "text-align: left; font-size: 18px;">Results:</h3> | ||
- | <p style = "text-align: left; text-indent:0px">Since the relationship between the inverse of | + | <p style = "text-align: left; text-indent:0px">Since the relationship between the inverse of T<sub>2</sub> and OD was linear, this data supports that each cell has roughly the same number of magnetosomes, and that a greater number of these magnetosomes can be correlated with stronger magnetic properties. The cell concentration and magnetic strength showed a linear relationship <b>(1/T<sub>2</sub>) =(0.002x + 0.0016)</b> with an R<sup>2</sup> = 0.704. |
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div style="position:absolute;right:5px;bottom:50px"> | <div style="position:absolute;right:5px;bottom:50px"> | ||
- | <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Penn/Microbio"><img width="80px" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/c/ca/Syn-bio-amb-1-flow-arrow.png">; | + | <a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Penn/Microbio"><img width="80px" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/thumb/archive/c/ca/20141018025849%21Syn-bio-amb-1-flow-arrow.png/120px-Syn-bio-amb-1-flow-arrow.png">; |
</div> | </div> | ||
</body> | </body> | ||
</html> | </html> |
Latest revision as of 03:01, 18 October 2014
AMB-1 is most useful for synthetic biology because of its rare capacity to align with magnetic fields.[9] We attempted to explore the magnetic properties of AMB-1 as further understanding would prove AMB-1’s value as a chassis in bioremediation and other fields.
Relationship Between OD600 and T2 for AMB-1
We hoped to quantify the magnetic strength of AMB-1 using spin-spin relaxation time (T2 time) and relate it to the cell concentration (OD600). To do so, we used a magnetic NMR machine (the minispec mq60, Bruker) to measure the T2 decay time of cell samples (Fig. 1). A longer T2 time indicated fewer magnetic particles, and therefore weaker magnetic properties.
Figure 1:
Results:
Since the relationship between the inverse of T2 and OD was linear, this data supports that each cell has roughly the same number of magnetosomes, and that a greater number of these magnetosomes can be correlated with stronger magnetic properties. The cell concentration and magnetic strength showed a linear relationship (1/T2) =(0.002x + 0.0016) with an R2 = 0.704.
The following video of AMB-1 was taken under 1000X magnification.