Latest revision as of 03:01, 18 October 2014

B2H·RESULT

Our Bacterial Two-Hybrid System (the signal converter) is the core element of our IgEM, so that we decided to construct the IgEM based on the Bacterial Two-Hybrid System.

We begin with the Bacterial Two-Hybrid System from Agilent Technologies.[1]

The Bacterial Two-Hybrid System from Agilent Technologies has the reporter cassata on the F plasmid, which is very inconvenient for alternating the reporter gene. Thus, we constructed a reporter cassata on a plasmid backbone from the Biobrick—pSB4A5. The pSB4A5 has a low-copy repA pSC101-derived replication origin and ampicillin resistance, while pBT is a kind of plasmid that carries a low-copy p15A replication origin and confers chloramphenicol resistance and pTRG carries a low-copy ColE1 replication origin and confers tetracycline resistance. Because they have different origins and different antibiotic resistance, pBT, pTRG and pSB4A5 can co-exist in one bacterial.

pBT: We have designed three kinds of construct on pBT. The first one called pBT-M fuses λcI with multiple cloning sites (MCS). And the second one is a fusion protein named pBT-R containing λcI and RFP. Then we fuse λcI with LGF2 (the GAL4 dimerization domain) to create pBT-L.

pTRG: We have two construct on the pTRG backbone. The pTRG expresses the prey fused to the N-terminal domain of the protein rpoA. One is called pTRG-R, fusing rpoA with RFP, and the other one named pTGR-G is a fusion protein including rpoA and GAL11P (a mutant of GAL11 protein).

pRPT: Reporter cassata is constructed on pSB4A5 with a plac-Or2 promoter and a reporter gene. pRPT-GFP is the construct with GFP as the reporter gene.

LGF2 and GAL11P are proved to have strong interaction with each other and are often used as positive control in different kinds of two-hybrid system. Here, we use pBT-LGF and pTRG-GAL11P to serve as the positive control.

Later on, we acquired the mutant via point mutation, and got the construct of pBT-LGF(H), pBT-LGF(M), pBT-LGF(L). They have different strength of interaction with GAL11P.

1. Three plasmid co-transformation

In order to prove that pBT, pTRG and pRPT can coexist in the bacteria, and at the same time the antibiotics concentration is appropriate, we carried out this co-transformation experiment. The concentrations of the 1000 × antibiotic stock were 35mg/mL for Ampicillin, 50mg/mL for Chloramphenicol and 12.5mg/mL for Tetracycline. We added 1/3 of the normal amount of antibiotic stocks to prepare the three antibiotic LB.

We transformed the plasmid as the following groups:

<p1 style="text-align: center">Table.1 experiment groups of three plasmid co-transformation</p1>

R for pRPT-RFP (Amp), B for pBT-LGF( Cmr), T for pTRG-Gal11P (Tet).

After the transformation, all groups of bacteria were cultured in liquid LB containing three kinds of antibiotics for 72 hours. ⨹RBT and △RBT were respectively cultured in LB with 1 and 1/2 of each basic antibiotic concentration mentioned above. RBT, BT, RT, RB, B, R, T and control were cultured in LB with 1/3 of each basic antibiotic concentration.

<p1 style="text-align: center">Fig.1 The result of three plasmids coexistence experiment</p1>

According to the results, these three plasmids can coexist in the bacteria. We chose LB with 1/4 of each basic antibiotic concentration to screen for the coexistence of three plasmids after transformation and LB with 1/3 of each basic antibiotic concentration to culture the bacteria.

2. Test the Bacterial Two-Hybrid System

We transformed the plasmid as the following groups:

<p1 style="text-align: center">Table2 Experiment groups to test B2H system</p1>

Then the bacteria culture of these groups were measured by Bio-Tek Synergy Hybrid Reader. The excitation wavelength was 510nm, while the emission wavelength was 550nm.

<p1 style="text-align: center">Fig.2 Fluorescent intensity measured by Bio-Tek Synergy Hybrid Reader with 510nm excitation wavelength and 550nm emission wavelength. The positive control LG (pBT-LGF and pTRG-GAL11P) has significant difference compared to other groups. </p1>

The figure showed that there was a significant difference between the positive control of LG and the other experimental groups. The fluorescence intensity of the positive control was nearly 5 times larger than the ones of the other groups. RFP didn’t have any influence on the expression of GFP. The independent expression of LGF2 and GALP11P also affected the expression of GFP without conspicuousness.

3. Different degrees of interaction and corresponding gene expression

We wanted to know if different degrees of interaction between bait and target could be detected by the expression of reporter gene, so we conducted a test for it. According to Patricia et al.2001, we used the technique of Site-Directed Mutagenesis (SDM) to get three mutants of LGF2. They are pBT-LGF(L)E75A (the corresponding plasmid is marked as L), D78A (pBT-LGF(M)) and R74A (pBT-LGF(H)). And they respectively have low, medium and high level of interactions with GAL11P.

We transformed the plasmid as the following groups:

<p1 style="text-align: center">Table2 </p1>

Then the bacteria culture of these groups were measured by Bio-Tek Synergy Hybrid Reader. The excitation wavelength was 510nm, while the emission wavelength was 550nm.

<p1 style="text-align: center">Fig.3 Fluorescent intensity measured by Bio-Tek Synergy Hybrid Reader with 510nm excitation wavelength and 550nm emission wavelength. Different mutants of the LGF have different strength of interaction with GAL11P. The LGF (L) has low binding affinity</p1>

The result indicated that there were considerable differences among the expression of GFP activated by L, M and H. The fluorescence intensity of H group was much larger than that of M group and M was also larger than L. This was consistent with the result in the reference and confirmed that our signal converter could distinguish the different degrees of protein-protein interaction.

References

[1] Ailent Technologies, BacterioMatch II Two-Hybrid System Vector Kit, Instruction Manual,2011.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 <!--SYSUCHINA-->
-<h1>B2H</h1>
+<h1>B2H·RESULT</h1>
 <p>
-So as to test if our B2H (signal converter) work, we designed another plasmid to replace the M13 bacteriophage vector before the M13 part is integrated in our machine. This plasmid is pTRG.
+Our Bacterial Two-Hybrid System (the signal converter) is the core element of our IgEM, so that we decided to construct the IgEM based on the Bacterial Two-Hybrid System.
 </p>
 <p>
-The target plasmid pTRG carries a low-copy ColE1 replication origin and confers tetracycline resistance. It expresses the target protein fused to the N-terminal domain of the protein rpoA. We have constructed two plasmids under this category. One is called pTRG-R, fusing rpoA with RFP, and the other one named pTGR-G is a fusion protein including rpoA and GAL11P (a mutant of GAL11 protein).
+We begin with the Bacterial Two-Hybrid System from Agilent Technologies.[1]
 </p>
 <p>
-pBT is constructed as the final form in our machine. We have designed three kinds of fusion proteins in all. The first one called pBT-M fuses λcI with multiple cloning sites (MCS). And the second one is a fusion protein named pBT-R containing λcI and RFP. Then we fuse λcI with LGF2 (the GAL4 dimerization domain) to create pBT-L.
+The Bacterial Two-Hybrid System from Agilent Technologies has the reporter cassata on the F plasmid, which is very inconvenient for alternating the reporter gene. Thus, we constructed a reporter cassata on a plasmid backbone from the Biobrick—pSB4A5. The pSB4A5 has a low-copy repA pSC101-derived replication origin and ampicillin resistance, while pBT is a kind of plasmid that carries a low-copy p15A replication origin and confers chloramphenicol resistance and pTRG carries a low-copy ColE1 replication origin and confers tetracycline resistance. Because they have different origins and different antibiotic resistance, pBT, pTRG and pSB4A5 can co-exist in one bacterial.
 </p>
 <p>
-pRPR is also built as the final form except that the reporter gene is GFP in the following test experiments.
+<b>pBT</b>: We have designed three kinds of construct on pBT. The first one called pBT-M fuses λcI with multiple cloning sites (MCS). And the second one is a fusion protein named pBT-R containing λcI and RFP. Then we fuse λcI with LGF2 (the GAL4 dimerization domain) to create pBT-L.
+</P>
+<p>
+<b>pTRG</b>: We have two construct on the pTRG backbone. The pTRG expresses the prey fused to the N-terminal domain of the protein rpoA. One is called pTRG-R, fusing rpoA with RFP, and the other one named pTGR-G is a fusion protein including rpoA and GAL11P (a mutant of GAL11 protein).
 </p>
 <p>
-LGF2 and GAL11P are proved to have strong interaction with each other and are often used as positive control in general two-hybrid system.  (reference) RFP is BBa_J04450.
+<b>pRPT</b>: Reporter cassata is constructed on pSB4A5 with a plac-Or2 promoter and a reporter gene. pRPT-GFP is the construct with GFP as the reporter gene.
 </p>
-<h2>1. Test for three antibiotics</h2>
 <p>
-In order to guarantee the coexistence of pBT, pTRG and pRPR in the bacteria, we decided to use antibiotics as a means of stress screening. The basic concentrations we applied for each antibiotic were 35mg/mL for Ampicillin, 50mg/mL for Chloramphenicol and 12.5mg/mL for Tetracycline. We transformed the plasmid as the following groups:
+LGF2 and GAL11P are proved to have strong interaction with each other and are often used as positive control in different kinds of two-hybrid system. Here, we use pBT-LGF and pTRG-GAL11P to serve as the positive control.
+</P>
+<p>
+Later on, we acquired the mutant via point mutation, and got the construct of pBT-LGF(H), pBT-LGF(M), pBT-LGF(L). They have different strength of interaction with GAL11P.
+</P>
+<h2><b>1. Three plasmid co-transformation</b></h2>
+<p>
+In order to prove that pBT, pTRG and pRPT can coexist in the bacteria, and at the same time the antibiotics concentration is appropriate, we carried out this co-transformation experiment. The concentrations of the 1000 × antibiotic stock were 35mg/mL for Ampicillin, 50mg/mL for Chloramphenicol and 12.5mg/mL for Tetracycline. We added 1/3 of the normal amount of antibiotic stocks to prepare the three antibiotic LB.
 </p>
-<a class="fancybox" rel="group" href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/a/a4/Sysuchina_32.png"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/a/a4/Sysuchina_32.png" alt="" /></a>
 <p>
-S for pRPR-RFP (Amp), B for pBT-LGF( Cmr), T for pTRG-Gal11P (Tet). Use BL21 to perform the transformation. 50μL for each group.
+We transformed the plasmid as the following groups:
-After the transformation, all groups of bacteria were cultured in liquid LB containing three kinds of antibiotics for 72 hours. ⨹SBT and △SBT were respectively cultured in LB with 1 and 1/2 of each basic antibiotic concentration mentioned above. SBT, BT, ST, SB, B, S, T and control were cultured in LB with 1/3 of each basic antibiotic concentration.
 </p>
-<a class="fancybox" rel="group" href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/e/e8/Sysuchina_10.png"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/e/e8/Sysuchina_10.png" alt="" /></a>
+<a class="fancybox" rel="group" href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/f/f4/Sysu-Biao_3_antibiotic.png"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/f/f4/Sysu-Biao_3_antibiotic.png" alt="" /></a><br/>
-<p1>
-Fig.1 The result of three plasmids coexistence experiment
+<p1 style="text-align: center">Table.1 experiment groups of three plasmid co-transformation</p1>
-</p1>
+<p>
+R for pRPT-RFP (Amp), B for pBT-LGF( Cmr), T for pTRG-Gal11P (Tet).
+</p>
+<p>
+After the transformation, all groups of bacteria were cultured in liquid LB containing three kinds of antibiotics for 72 hours. ⨹RBT and △RBT were respectively cultured in LB with 1 and 1/2 of each basic antibiotic concentration mentioned above. RBT, BT, RT, RB, B, R, T and control were cultured in LB with 1/3 of each basic antibiotic concentration.
+</p>
+<a class="fancybox" rel="group" href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/d/d3/Sysu-Antibiotic.png"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/d/d3/Sysu-Antibiotic.png" alt="" /></a><br/>
+<p1 style="text-align: center">Fig.1 The result of three plasmids coexistence experiment</p1>
 <p>
 According to the results, these three plasmids can coexist in the bacteria. We chose LB with 1/4 of each basic antibiotic concentration to screen for the coexistence of three plasmids after transformation and LB with 1/3 of each basic antibiotic concentration to culture the bacteria.
 </p>
-<h2>2. Test for B2H</h2>
+<h2><b>2. Test the Bacterial Two-Hybrid System</b></h2>
 <p>
 We transformed the plasmid as the following groups:
 </p>
-<a class="fancybox" rel="group" href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/a/a9/Sysuchina_33.PNG"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/a/a9/Sysuchina_33.PNG" alt="" /></a>
+<a class="fancybox" rel="group" href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/2/2f/Sysu-Biao_B2H_system.png"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/2/2f/Sysu-Biao_B2H_system.png" alt="" /></a><br/>
+<p1 style="text-align: center">Table2 Experiment groups to test B2H system</p1>
 <p>
-Then the bacteria of these groups were tested for the expression level of reporter gene-GFP. The excitation wavelength was 510nm, while the absorption wavelength was 550nm.
+Then the bacteria culture of these groups were measured by Bio-Tek Synergy Hybrid Reader. The excitation wavelength was 510nm, while the emission wavelength was 550nm.
 </p>
-<a class="fancybox" rel="group" href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/b/b1/Sysuchina_12.PNG"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/b/b1/Sysuchina_12.PNG" alt="" /></a>
+<a class="fancybox" rel="group" href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/5/57/Sysu-B2H_system.png"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/5/57/Sysu-B2H_system.png" alt="" /></a><br/>
+<p1 style="text-align: center">Fig.2 Fluorescent intensity measured by Bio-Tek Synergy Hybrid Reader with 510nm excitation wavelength and 550nm emission wavelength. The positive control LG (pBT-LGF and pTRG-GAL11P) has significant difference compared to other groups. </p1>
 <p>
-The resulting figure showed that there was a significant difference between the positive control of LG and the other experimental groups. The fluorescence intensity of the positive control was nearly 5 times larger than the ones of the other groups. RFP didn’t have any influence on the expression of GFP. The independent expression of LGF2 and GALP11P also affected the expression of GFP without conspicuousness.
+The figure showed that there was a significant difference between the positive control of LG and the other experimental groups. The fluorescence intensity of the positive control was nearly 5 times larger than the ones of the other groups. RFP didn’t have any influence on the expression of GFP. The independent expression of LGF2 and GALP11P also affected the expression of GFP without conspicuousness.
 </p>
-<h2>3. Test for different degrees of interaction and corresponding gene expression</h2>
+<h2><b>3. Different degrees of interaction and corresponding gene expression</b></h2>
 <p>
-We wanted to know if different degrees of interaction between bait and target could be detected by the expression of reporter gene, so we conducted a test for it. According to Recruitment of the transcriptional machinery through GAL11P: structure and interactions of the GAL4 dimerization domain (Patricia et al.2001), we used the technique of Site-Directed Mutagenesis (SDM) to get three mutants of LGF2. They are E75A (the corresponding plasmid is marked as L), D78A (M) and R74A (H). And they respectively have low, medium and high level of interactions with GAL11P.
+We wanted to know if different degrees of interaction between bait and target could be detected by the expression of reporter gene, so we conducted a test for it. According to <em>Patricia et al.2001</em>, we used the technique of Site-Directed Mutagenesis (SDM) to get three mutants of LGF2. They are pBT-LGF(L)E75A (the corresponding plasmid is marked as L), D78A (pBT-LGF(M)) and R74A (pBT-LGF(H)). And they respectively have low, medium and high level of interactions with GAL11P.
 </p>
 <p>
@@ Line 54: / Line 80: @@
 groups:
 </p>
-<a class="fancybox" rel="group" href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/a/a3/Sysuchina_34.png"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/a/a3/Sysuchina_34.png" alt="" /></a>
+<a class="fancybox" rel="group" href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/a/a1/Sysu-Biao_HML.png"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/a/a1/Sysu-Biao_HML.png" alt="" /></a><br/>
+<p1 style="text-align: center">Table2 </p1>
 <p>
-Then the bacteria of these groups were tested for the expression level of reporter gene-GFP. The excitation wavelength was 510nm, while the absorption wavelength was 550nm.
+Then the bacteria culture of these groups were measured by Bio-Tek Synergy Hybrid Reader. The excitation wavelength was 510nm, while the emission wavelength was 550nm.
 </p>
-<a class="fancybox" rel="group" href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/8/81/Sysuchina_35.png"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/8/81/Sysuchina_35.png" alt="" /></a>
+<a class="fancybox" rel="group" href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/c/c3/SysuchinaT2HML.png"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/c/c3/SysuchinaT2HML.png" alt="" /></a><br/>
+<p1 style="text-align: center">Fig.3 Fluorescent intensity measured by Bio-Tek Synergy Hybrid Reader with 510nm excitation wavelength and 550nm emission wavelength. Different mutants of the LGF have different strength of interaction with GAL11P. The LGF (L) has low binding affinity</p1>
 <p>
 The result indicated that there were considerable differences among the expression of GFP activated by L, M and H. The fluorescence intensity of H group was much larger than that of M group and M was also larger than L. This was consistent with the result in the reference and confirmed that our signal converter could distinguish the different degrees of protein-protein interaction.
+</p>
+<h3>
+References
+</h3>
+<p>
+[1] Ailent Technologies, BacterioMatch II Two-Hybrid System Vector Kit, Instruction Manual,2011.<br />
 </p>
 <!--SYSUCHINA!-->

Team:SYSU-China/file/Project/Result/B2H.html

From 2014.igem.org

Latest revision as of 03:01, 18 October 2014

Contents

B2H·RESULT

1. Three plasmid co-transformation

2. Test the Bacterial Two-Hybrid System

3. Different degrees of interaction and corresponding gene expression

References