Team:Oxford/references2

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Blanked the page)
 
(One intermediate revision not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
-
__NOTOC__
 
-
{{:Team:Oxford/templates/header}}
 
-
<div class="abcdefg">
 
-
<div class="container cf row">
 
-
<h1>References</h1>
 
-
<h2> Chlorinated Solvents </h2>
 
-
<p><font style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 70%;">1</font>  http://download.springer.com/static/pdf/195/art%253A10.1007%252FBF02987485.pdf?auth66=1407495087_ae638ec384c0ed8f2a6b0855567445cc&ext=.pdf </p>
 
-
 
-
<h2> Intellectual Property </h2>
 
-
<p><font style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 70%;">1</font> http://www.oecd.org/sti/futures/long-termtechnologicalsocietalchallenges/40181372.pdf </p>
 
-
 
-
<p><font style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 70%;">2</font> Gold et al., “Unexamined Assumptions”, supra note 4 at 303-04, citing M. Schankerman, “How Valuable Is Patent Protection? Estimates By Technology Field” (1998) 29:77 RAND J. of Economics 77; M. Schankerman & A. Pakes, “Estimates of the Value of Patent Rights in European Countries During the Post-1950 Period” (1986) 96 The Economic Journal 1052; E. Mansfield, M. Schwartz & S. Wagner, “Imitation Costs and Patents: An Empirical Study” (1981) 91 The Economic Journal 907. </p>
 
-
 
-
<p><font style="vertical-align: super; font-size: 70%;">3</font> E. Richard Gold et al., “The Unexamined Assumptions of Intellectual Property: Adopting an Evaluative Approach to Patenting Biotechnological Innovation” (2004) 18 Public Affairs Quarterly 299 [hereinafter Gold et al., “Unexamined Assumptions”]. </p>
 
-
 
-
{{:Team:Oxford/templates/footer}}
 

Latest revision as of 00:56, 18 October 2014