Team:Warwick/Human/Changes
From 2014.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
- | h1>Project Specific Changes</h1 | + | <h1>Project Specific Changes</h1> |
<p>As part of the project we looked to spread synthetic biology throughout the community. We approached this feat through several different avenues.</p> | <p>As part of the project we looked to spread synthetic biology throughout the community. We approached this feat through several different avenues.</p> | ||
Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
We started small and simple, with the obvious question on how people perceive our system? | We started small and simple, with the obvious question on how people perceive our system? | ||
- | We decided to conduct a Q + A session, in which academics, students and the wider public were in attendance. | + | We decided to conduct a Q + A session, in which academics, students and the wider public were in attendance. Whilst lost of interesting questions were asked, we collectively became stuck when faced with the following question: |
+ | <br> <p> What have you done to ensure your system is practical and safe? </p> </br> | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
Revision as of 20:30, 17 October 2014
Project Specific Changes
As part of the project we looked to spread synthetic biology throughout the community. We approached this feat through several different avenues.
Our project came into fruition after extensive debate and discussion, the idea of introducing a mechanism by which RNA can be propagated is both conceptually and theoretically appealing. Using our replicon system to target production of a siRNA directed against a target (DPP-IV) shows just one of many applications that our system holds. Initially, it was not so straight forward when considering additional elements that we might require – for safety of the system was not on our minds. However, after due deliberation we decided to embark and ask questions and most importantly, seek answers. We started small and simple, with the obvious question on how people perceive our system? We decided to conduct a Q + A session, in which academics, students and the wider public were in attendance. Whilst lost of interesting questions were asked, we collectively became stuck when faced with the following question:What have you done to ensure your system is practical and safe?