"
Team:Imperial/coculture
From 2014.igem.org
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
</section> | </section> | ||
| + | <img class="image-full" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/7/7e/IC14-coculture-1.jpg"/> | ||
<section id="introduction"> | <section id="introduction"> | ||
<h2>Introduction</h2> | <h2>Introduction</h2> | ||
| Line 49: | Line 50: | ||
<p>In order to have a stable co-culture, at least in the timescales we are conducting our growth and functionalisation, we need to identify potential interactions and regulate the growth of each species. The main variable identified for the interactions was identified as the carbon source of the HS media used, which requires an initial experiment that can inform the choice/combination of carbon source(s) used for the actual experiment containing <em>E. coli</em> with an Anderson promoter controlled RFP gene (J23104) in J61002 and the Kombucha Isolated strain. </p> | <p>In order to have a stable co-culture, at least in the timescales we are conducting our growth and functionalisation, we need to identify potential interactions and regulate the growth of each species. The main variable identified for the interactions was identified as the carbon source of the HS media used, which requires an initial experiment that can inform the choice/combination of carbon source(s) used for the actual experiment containing <em>E. coli</em> with an Anderson promoter controlled RFP gene (J23104) in J61002 and the Kombucha Isolated strain. </p> | ||
</section> | </section> | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
<section id="methods"> | <section id="methods"> | ||
<h2>Methods</h2> | <h2>Methods</h2> | ||
Revision as of 15:09, 17 October 2014
Co-culturing
Overview
Key Achievements
Introduction
The idea of combining E. coli as an efficient cloning organism since it has the largest library of well characterised parts available and G. xylinus as a robust efficient cellulose producing host came about as a way to take advantage of the characteristics of each host. E. coli DH10B has a very short division time of 30 min whereas the Kombucha Isolated Gluconacetobacter strain has been producing bacterial cellulose robustly in a co-culture with yeast. For these reasons, the aim was to have E. coli produce customisable proteins of interest such as metal binding phytochelatin, linked to cellulose binding domains (CBD), simultaneously with cellulose being produced by G. xylinus allowing these proteins to attach to the material, effectively making it a 1 step functionalisation.
In a co-culture of the cellulose-producing and protein-producing species there will be competition for resources and space, and potentially also a symbiosis of some kind. The main hypothesis of this co-culture experiment is that G. xylinus would orient itself in the oxygen rich layers towards the top of the media due to being an obligate aerobe as explained in the BC synthesis pathway section whereas E. coli would orient itself throughout the media but expectedly have a higher concentration in the oxygen depleted bottom media.
In order to have a stable co-culture, at least in the timescales we are conducting our growth and functionalisation, we need to identify potential interactions and regulate the growth of each species. The main variable identified for the interactions was identified as the carbon source of the HS media used, which requires an initial experiment that can inform the choice/combination of carbon source(s) used for the actual experiment containing E. coli with an Anderson promoter controlled RFP gene (J23104) in J61002 and the Kombucha Isolated strain.
Methods
Results
References
