Team:UCL/sociology
From 2014.igem.org
(Trial) |
|||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
<!--begin main content--> | <!--begin main content--> | ||
- | + | ||
<!--begin row-fluid--> | <!--begin row-fluid--> | ||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
<h4>The Sustainable Governance of Synthetic Biology</h2> | <h4>The Sustainable Governance of Synthetic Biology</h2> | ||
- | + | <p> Ecological Modernisation; Responsible Ecological Innovation; ... </p> | |
- | < | + | <h4>Ethnographic Study and Discourse Analysis</h4> |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <p> Interviews, Focus group, ... </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <h4>Simulation of Stakeholder Negotiations</h4> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p> Model United Nations-based meeting with team members being assigned the role of a relevant stakeholder in the debate revolving around synthetic biology and the case of genetically engineering micro-organisms to tackle the problem of carcinogenic Azo-dye compounds.</p> | ||
<html> | <html> |
Revision as of 16:41, 11 July 2014
Overview
Introduction
(Considering the complex and novel nature of scientific practices in synthetic biology there is a need to look at adapted forms of governance that deal with processes of innovation in a reflexive manner. This is seen as necessary in order to devise policies that can accommodate a sustainable development of the emerging technology within society. Considering the environmental risks to which they are ascribed, policy frameworks ought to engender effective governance that seeks to foster good science, not to hamper it. It also recognises that good science goes hand in hand with open, clear, transparent regulation to ensure both trust and accountability. Another prominent feature of synthetic biology is its ‘cross-borderness’, in addition to the embedded scientific uncertainty. It simultaneously crosses the borders of scientific disciplines, industrial sectors, and geopolitical areas. Considering the transboundary and uncertain nature of this emerging technology it might be interesting to look at how policies are being developed within the framework of transnational governance. Some views support the idea that synthetic biology policies should not only be regulated from a top down perspective through governments, but that non-governmental stakeholders and organisations should be able to engage in self-regulation. The transboundary – and transnational nature of synthetic biology practices makes it pertinent to examine biosecurity and sustainable innovation discourses at the level of transnational governance structures such as iGEM. The latter holds a series of promising characteristics with regard to innovative regulatory frameworks.)
The Sustainable Governance of Synthetic Biology
Ecological Modernisation; Responsible Ecological Innovation; ...
Ethnographic Study and Discourse Analysis
Interviews, Focus group, ...
Simulation of Stakeholder Negotiations
Model United Nations-based meeting with team members being assigned the role of a relevant stakeholder in the debate revolving around synthetic biology and the case of genetically engineering micro-organisms to tackle the problem of carcinogenic Azo-dye compounds.