Team:Vanderbilt MF/Project
From 2014.igem.org
Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
<table width="70%" align="center"> | <table width="70%" align="center"> | ||
<tr> <td><p> | <tr> <td><p> | ||
- | + | <span style="color:#ffffff"> | |
E. chrono<br> | E. chrono<br> | ||
Methods:<br> | Methods:<br> | ||
Our team utilized a unique microfluidic development process that emphasizes low cost and rapid prototyping. Through the use of open source design software and cheap manufacturing methods we were able to fabricate microfluidic devices in a cost and time efficient manner. It is our hope that these methods can be utilized by other iGEM teams who are interested in incorporating microfluidics into their projects without the hassle of complex design and fabrication techniques.<br> | Our team utilized a unique microfluidic development process that emphasizes low cost and rapid prototyping. Through the use of open source design software and cheap manufacturing methods we were able to fabricate microfluidic devices in a cost and time efficient manner. It is our hope that these methods can be utilized by other iGEM teams who are interested in incorporating microfluidics into their projects without the hassle of complex design and fabrication techniques.<br> | ||
- | + | <br> | |
Microfluidic Computer Aided Design<br> | Microfluidic Computer Aided Design<br> | ||
Several programs were used by members on the team to design and ultimately fabricate microfluidic devices. Initially, traditional computer aided design software packages were used such as AutoCAD and Solidworks. These packages provide advanced features which designers can wield to make complex devices with varying functions such as mixing and trapping cells. Alternative software packages were explored such as the open source vector graphics software Inkscape which proved to be easy to use in the design of a microfluidic device. Inkscape is an open source analogue to Adobe Illustrator, a common vector graphics editing software. Inkscape is easy to use and with a few online tutorials, ideas for microfluidic designs can be turned into realities.<br> | Several programs were used by members on the team to design and ultimately fabricate microfluidic devices. Initially, traditional computer aided design software packages were used such as AutoCAD and Solidworks. These packages provide advanced features which designers can wield to make complex devices with varying functions such as mixing and trapping cells. Alternative software packages were explored such as the open source vector graphics software Inkscape which proved to be easy to use in the design of a microfluidic device. Inkscape is an open source analogue to Adobe Illustrator, a common vector graphics editing software. Inkscape is easy to use and with a few online tutorials, ideas for microfluidic designs can be turned into realities.<br> | ||
Microfluidic Prototyping using a Vinyl Cutter<br> | Microfluidic Prototyping using a Vinyl Cutter<br> | ||
In order to rapidly prototype microfluidic devices of different geometries and designs, our team explored fabrication techniques that bypassed the complicated photolithography process that is standard for microfluidic devices in research laboratories. Photolithography has the benefit of achieving very fine resolution and fine details for pinpoint fluid manipulation, but it is detracted from its lengthy creation process. The time scale from device design to fabrication of a working device using photolithography is on the order of 2-3 days and uses a variety of expensive and highly technical equipment that is not readily accessible to many iGEM teams. <br> | In order to rapidly prototype microfluidic devices of different geometries and designs, our team explored fabrication techniques that bypassed the complicated photolithography process that is standard for microfluidic devices in research laboratories. Photolithography has the benefit of achieving very fine resolution and fine details for pinpoint fluid manipulation, but it is detracted from its lengthy creation process. The time scale from device design to fabrication of a working device using photolithography is on the order of 2-3 days and uses a variety of expensive and highly technical equipment that is not readily accessible to many iGEM teams. <br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
Our team focused on bypassing the entire photolithography process by using a commercially available arts and crafts vinyl cutter (Silhouette) to produce device masters. Arts and crafts vinyl cutters are typically used to craft complex shapes and figures for use in decorations. A vinyl cutter has a resolution on the order of 250 microns which means that the devices made using this technique are considerably larger than those made using standard photolithography techniques. While the devices obtained from vinyl cutting are larger, for many synthetic biology applications this is not an issue. For the purpose of E. chrono, the size of the channels simply affected the total amount of fluid needing to be pumped into the device. | Our team focused on bypassing the entire photolithography process by using a commercially available arts and crafts vinyl cutter (Silhouette) to produce device masters. Arts and crafts vinyl cutters are typically used to craft complex shapes and figures for use in decorations. A vinyl cutter has a resolution on the order of 250 microns which means that the devices made using this technique are considerably larger than those made using standard photolithography techniques. While the devices obtained from vinyl cutting are larger, for many synthetic biology applications this is not an issue. For the purpose of E. chrono, the size of the channels simply affected the total amount of fluid needing to be pumped into the device. | ||
As mentioned previously, the main benefit of using a vinyl cutter is the rapid production of microfluidic masters. A vinyl cutter is able to take a device design to a master and ultimately a device in roughly an hour. By simplifying and speeding up the design and fabrication process, vinyl cutting can allow iGEM teams with no microfluidic knowledge to rapidly develop their own devices for testing. Using an open source design software such as Inkscape allows a team to rapidly formulate and then test a microfluidic device within an afternoon. <br> | As mentioned previously, the main benefit of using a vinyl cutter is the rapid production of microfluidic masters. A vinyl cutter is able to take a device design to a master and ultimately a device in roughly an hour. By simplifying and speeding up the design and fabrication process, vinyl cutting can allow iGEM teams with no microfluidic knowledge to rapidly develop their own devices for testing. Using an open source design software such as Inkscape allows a team to rapidly formulate and then test a microfluidic device within an afternoon. <br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
The process for using a Silhouette vinyl cutter to fabricate a microfluidic device is outlined below.<br> | The process for using a Silhouette vinyl cutter to fabricate a microfluidic device is outlined below.<br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
Converting a Design to a Vinyl Master<br> | Converting a Design to a Vinyl Master<br> | ||
1) Import the design for microfluidic device into Silhouette Studio, the vinyl cutting software used to make designs. Note: for Design process, see Microfluidic Device Design instructions<br> | 1) Import the design for microfluidic device into Silhouette Studio, the vinyl cutting software used to make designs. Note: for Design process, see Microfluidic Device Design instructions<br> | ||
Line 105: | Line 108: | ||
15) Take a 1/16” OD syringe tip and use it to “punch” a hole inside the microfluidic inlet channel and inside the microfluidic outlet channel<br> | 15) Take a 1/16” OD syringe tip and use it to “punch” a hole inside the microfluidic inlet channel and inside the microfluidic outlet channel<br> | ||
16) Once the device holes have been punched, the device can be plasma bonded to a glass slide or coverslip by treating the bottom of the microfluidic device (where the channels are open) with a plasma wand or plasma oven for 45 seconds and then bonding to a plasma treated glass slide.<br> | 16) Once the device holes have been punched, the device can be plasma bonded to a glass slide or coverslip by treating the bottom of the microfluidic device (where the channels are open) with a plasma wand or plasma oven for 45 seconds and then bonding to a plasma treated glass slide.<br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
The final device will consist of a PDMS slab with microfluidic geometries embedded on the bottom of the slab. Fluids can be run through the device by either directly pipetting them through the inlet or by affixing microfluidic tubing with 1/16” OD to the inlet and pumping fluids in using a fluid pump such as a syringe pump or peristaltic pump.<br> | The final device will consist of a PDMS slab with microfluidic geometries embedded on the bottom of the slab. Fluids can be run through the device by either directly pipetting them through the inlet or by affixing microfluidic tubing with 1/16” OD to the inlet and pumping fluids in using a fluid pump such as a syringe pump or peristaltic pump.<br> | ||
Line 110: | Line 114: | ||
- | + | </span> | |
</p></td> | </p></td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> |
Revision as of 20:27, 16 October 2014
|
E. chrono |