The Project

---

Background

Lanthanides are a group of fifteen elements from lanthanide to luthetium. Their open f suborbtials grant them their unique properties.
They are usen in a variety of modern technologies, such as electronics, aviation (eg. jet engines) and superconductors, thanks to their magnetic properties.
According to their name 'rare earths metals' their deposits on Earth are scarce at best and dispersed. Most of their ores lay in China and with China being very cautious with their recources situation on lanthanides market is not getting any better.
Other problems with lanthanides avaibility are problems with extraction of pure metals from minerals. Most of lanthanides appear together in ores and similar properties of their ions in aquous solutions makes extraction and purification difficult. Lanthanides are often purified by ion-exchange chromatography, despite it's cost.

---

Proof of concept

In 2013 group of prof. He from the University of Chicago published paper in Journal of American Chemical Society in which they described devised by themselves lanthanide detecting system.
To accomplish this, they engineered two-component system from Salmonella enterica.

---

Detailed explanation

In initial plans, our project would consist of two parts, first being lanthanide detecting system in BioBrick standard, much like the one constructed by group of prof. He and the second being lanthanide binding system, which would bind lanthanides much more effectively than the detecting system.
Both of these systems would be based on PmrA-PmrB two-component system, native to Salmonella enterica. This system consists of two proteins, PmrA and PmrB. PmrB is a transmembrane kinase with iron (III) binding tag on it's extracellular loop. When iron (III) is bound to this tag, PmrB gains kinase activity and phosphorylates PmrA. PmrA is a transctriptoral factor and, upon activation, binds to pmr^C promoter and induces expression of CheZ, a chemotaxis protein.
So much for native systems.

Design

Detecting system
Our detecting system was planned as follows:
Iron binding tag would be replaced with lanthanide binding tag (of which a various collection can be find in literature) and a reporter protein would be inserted downstream of pmr^C. Thus, in the presence of lanthanides, fluorescence of GFP should be observed.
Binding system
Binding system would be more tricky. PmrA-PmrB would stay the same, with LBT (lanthanide binding tag) instead of iron binding tag. The difference would be downstream the pmrC promoter. First of all, we must have some sort of binding agent. We were planning to use some sort of small protein (like ubiquitin) or structurised peptide as a structural basis and fuse it with LBT.
Another problem would be with pmr^C. pmr^C, even induced by PmrA, is a very weak promoter. So, even in the presence of lanthanides, expression of binding agent would be poor. To overcome that, we planned to use some genetic device to boost the expression from upon the pmr^C. Our first idea was to put two subsequent inverters (based on different proteins, eg. tetR and lacI), which should fix the problem. Expression of binding agent would be high in the presence of lanthanides and low in absence.

	Binding agent expression
Lanthanide presence	pmrC	pmrC-inverter1	pmrC-inverter1-inverter2
none	zero (very low)	high	low
present	low	low	high

This may seem like an excessive mean, but we could not have invented anything subtler.

Project goals

1. Construction of lanthanide sensor in BioBrick standard
2. Cloning of PmrA/PmrB parts into pSB1C3 in BioBrick standard
3. Construction of lanthanide sensoring system with other LBT described in literature with their deposition in the Registry
4. Construction of lanthanide binding system

---

Modelling

---

Wastewater study

---

System analysis

---

Safety

---

Possibilities of development

We can see two clear paths in which our project could be enhanced. One is to use more LBTs described in literature in detection and the other is to plan and construct more effective binding systems.
Overmore, we had ideas about utilising some sulphur bacterias instead of E. coli. Their sulphur metabolism and ability to survive in low pH (in which metal leaching is more efficient) makes them excellent candidates for industrial utilisation of our project.
Another thing that could produce glitches; our system should not be present in bacterias as plasmids. It would be much better idea to integrate it with bacterias' genome, so it would not 'mutate away' so quickly.

---

/*tu JEST KONIEC STRONY*/