Team:Austin Texas/human practices

Human Practices

ELLA/Someone else

• Add images of us
  • at SXSW
  • collecting samples
  • Specific data from poster

• Content - some data, some of the discussions/outreach we had with people.

• credit Ashley and Mike for assisting in sample collection.

Caffeinated Coli

Ella collecting coffee sample from Austin Java

Jordan discussing our project with Matt Bolick, co-owner of Flat Track Coffee

Jordan, a senior member of the group, took charge and assembled a map of about 40 local coffee shops in Austin. The team took a Saturday and split up to visit dozens of coffee shops, collecting samples of their house coffee. We were met with much enthusiasm by the coffee shop owners and employees, who's interest had been peaked when we described our experiment.

[http://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer?mid=zlUDhks6KHxI.ketDvlvg6zis Click here for an interactive map of coffee shops we visited!]

Back at the lab, the team members got to work. Senior members divided their attention to mentor the new members in the techniques necessary to start cultures, work with the lab equipment, and other general laboratory safety.

Measuring Caffeine Content

Cultures of knockout strain grown with collected coffee samples.

Standard growth curve of knockout strain grown with different amounts of caffeine.

The protocol was simple: We provided our Caffeinated coli with a diluted sample of coffee we had acquired from the various shops, and then compared the relative growth rates by taking an OD600 value at a time point. The simplicity of the project was the key its success. It provided a glimpse into the exciting new world of synthetic biology for the new members, and allowed them to learn vital skills that were used in day to day research during the summer. The results we found can be seen in Figure 1. below.

SXSW Create

A couple of weeks later, we presented this data set at the SXSW festival. As part of this outreach, we explained our project and synthetic biology to a wide range of people. Many people who came by had little to no background in science or technology, and even most of the ones who did had not heard about synthetic biology. By discussing our experiments with bacteria and coffee, an interesting and easy to understand application, we were able to explain what synthetic biology is and how it can be used in a beneficial way. Occasionally, these conversations would branch out into wider topics of science and technology.

People were particularly interested in the different types of coffee that yielded strange results. For example, it appeared that there was slightly more caffeine in the Epochs' Light Roast, than in the Dark roast, which seems to contradict the modern myth that dark roast coffee has more caffeine. There was much debate sparked when people started to make speculations on why that was so. Some people claimed that longer roasting destroyed the caffeine (and swore by cold-press coffee!), some people guessed that perhaps the dark roast sample had less coffee beans in it when it was brewed. Nevertheless, after much research by the team after the event, it was concluded that [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coffee_roasting coffee roasting] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coffee_preparation#Brewing coffee brewing] are largely variable processes, and caffeine content can hugely vary from batch to batch of beans. For more information about light roast vs. dark roast see this article at [http://www.scribblerscoffee.com/coffees_caffeine.htm Scribblers Coffee], which discusses the nuances between the two!

People also were extremely curious as to why the Wright Bros. Brew & Brew sample had a significantly more amount of caffeine. This data point compelled us to speak to one of the owners of Wright Bros. Brew & Brew, to determine how they had created such a highly caffeinated beverage. The owners concluded, after discussing our project and the coffee brewing process, that the specific pot of coffee was probably just not fully drained, i.e. there was less water in the batch than normal, resulting in a higher caffeine/volume content. However, similar conversations were had between the entire team and the various coffee shops and baristas during the collection and presentation processes.

To involve everyone attending the event and raise more awareness for the iGEM team, we held a contest in which patrons attending the event could enter to win an E. coli plush upon following us on Twitter.

Coffee bean counting contest