Team:Marburg:Project:Notebook:October
From 2014.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Line 3,319: | Line 3,319: | ||
<p>The control PCR for the plasmids piGEM002/007 + const and piGEM008 + Cu were positive. The clones containing these plasmids were used to inoculate 100 ml LB+ampicillin for a maxi prep.</p> | <p>The control PCR for the plasmids piGEM002/007 + const and piGEM008 + Cu were positive. The clones containing these plasmids were used to inoculate 100 ml LB+ampicillin for a maxi prep.</p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
+ | </fieldset> | ||
+ | <fieldset class="exp13"> | ||
+ | <legend><a name="exp13.114">13.114 control restriction of nose plasmids + lac and new colony PCR of picked clones</a></legend> | ||
+ | <div class="aim"> | ||
+ | <p>Aim: verify the absence of the lac promoter in the nose plasmids like indicated by the control PCR</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="exp-content"> | ||
+ | <p>The colony PCR for the clones containing the nose plasmids were positive but the control PCR with the prepped plasmids were negative. Since colony PCRs are a less reliable method than the control PCR on the isolated plasmid or a control restriction, the plasmids should be negative. To be sure a control restriction with BamHI and HindIII was carried out with these plasmids. The positive plasmids should result in fragments of 4194 bp and 2620 bp size, the negative plasmid should not be restricted by HindIII, because the only restriction site for HindIII is in the IPTG inducible promoter. As a control piGEM030 was cut with HindIII and NcoI (1172 bp, 5246 bp and 241 bp) and piGEM008 + const was cut with BamHI and NcoI (4189 bp + 2757 for a positive plasmid, 4189 bp and 2518 bp for a negative plasmid). | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <table width="100%" border="1"> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">Component</th> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">piGEM030 (µL)</th> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">lac plasmids (µL)</th> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">piGEM008 + const (µL)</th> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">piGEM030</th> | ||
+ | <td>5</td> | ||
+ | <td>5</td> | ||
+ | <td>5</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">nose plasmids + lac promoter</th> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>5</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">piGEM008 + const</th> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>5</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row"><i>Nco</i>I-HF</th> | ||
+ | <td>0,5</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>0,5</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row"><i>Hind</i>III</th> | ||
+ | <td>1</td> | ||
+ | <td>1</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row"><i>Bam</i>HI-HF</th> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>0,5</td> | ||
+ | <td>0,5</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">CutSmart 10x</th> | ||
+ | <td>2</td> | ||
+ | <td>2</td> | ||
+ | <td>2</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">Water</th> | ||
+ | <td>11,5</td> | ||
+ | <td>11,5</td> | ||
+ | <td>12</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">Total</th> | ||
+ | <td>20</th> | ||
+ | <td>20</th> | ||
+ | <td>20</th> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <p>The reactions were incubated at 37°C for over one hour.</p> | ||
+ | <p>Additionally a new colony PCR was done with new picked clones from the ligation plates of the plasmids with the lac promoter.</p> | ||
+ | <table width="100%" border="1"> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">Mix colony PCR</th> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">piGEM002 + lac (µL)</th> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">piGEM007 + lac (µL)</th> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">piGEM008 + lac (µL)</th> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">piGEM009 + lac (µL)</th> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">Positive control piGEM002 + Ag (µL)</th> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">Template</th> | ||
+ | <td>part of a colony</td> | ||
+ | <td>part of a colony</td> | ||
+ | <td>part of a colony</td> | ||
+ | <td>part of a colony</td> | ||
+ | <td>part of a colony</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">iGEM073 (1:50)</th> | ||
+ | <td>3,125</td> | ||
+ | <td>3,125</td> | ||
+ | <td>3,125</td> | ||
+ | <td>3,125</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">iGEM057 (1:50)</th> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>3,125</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">iGEM006 (1:50)</th> | ||
+ | <td>3,125</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>3,125</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">piGEM021 + const</th> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>3,125</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">piGEM022 + const</th> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>3,125</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">piGEM023 + const</th> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | <td>3,125</td> | ||
+ | <td>-</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">5x HF buffer</th> | ||
+ | <td>5</td> | ||
+ | <td>5</td> | ||
+ | <td>5</td> | ||
+ | <td>5</td> | ||
+ | <td>5</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">dNTP mix (10 mM each)</th> | ||
+ | <td>0,3</td> | ||
+ | <td>0,3</td> | ||
+ | <td>0,3</td> | ||
+ | <td>0,3</td> | ||
+ | <td>0,3</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">Phusion DNA polymerase 1:10</th> | ||
+ | <td>1</td> | ||
+ | <td>1</td> | ||
+ | <td>1</td> | ||
+ | <td>1</td> | ||
+ | <td>1</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">Water</th> | ||
+ | <td>12,45</td> | ||
+ | <td>12,45</td> | ||
+ | <td>12,45</td> | ||
+ | <td>12,45</td> | ||
+ | <td>12,45</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">Total</th> | ||
+ | <td>20</th> | ||
+ | <td>20</th> | ||
+ | <td>20</th> | ||
+ | <td>20</th> | ||
+ | <td>20</th> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <table width="100%" border="1"> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">PCR Step</th> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">Temperature °C</th> | ||
+ | <th scope="col">Time</th> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">1</th> | ||
+ | <td>98</td> | ||
+ | <td>10 min</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">2</th> | ||
+ | <td>98</td> | ||
+ | <td>30 sec</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">3</th> | ||
+ | <td>55</td> | ||
+ | <td>30 sec</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">4</th> | ||
+ | <td>72</td> | ||
+ | <td>60 sec</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">5</th> | ||
+ | <td>Go To 2</td> | ||
+ | <td>34x</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">6</th> | ||
+ | <td>72</td> | ||
+ | <td>5 min</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th scope="row">7</th> | ||
+ | <td>4</td> | ||
+ | <td>infinite</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/9/95/Kontroll_verdau_und_Colony_PCR_lac_plasmide_09.10.2014.png" width="50%" /> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <p>The control restriction of the nose plasmids was negative, the plasmid just seemed to be linearized and not cut into two fragments. That means that the <i>Hind</i>III could not cut since the IPTG inducible promoter was not contained in the plasmids. However, also the control piGEM030 did not show the expected bands. It could be possible that <i>Hind</i>III did not work correctly, since it was no HF enzyme and used in the CutSmart buffer of NEB, but according to the NEB Double Digest Finder <i>Hind</i>III was able to cut in CutSmart only with the half of its optimal activity. That was the reason, why the double amount of <I>Hind</i>III was chosen.</p> | ||
+ | <p>Some samples of the new colony PCR showed bands slightly higher than 750 bp, which would resemble the size of the expected fragment of ca 800 bp, but since the controls with the nose plasmids containing the Ag sensitive promoter (all confirmed positive by control PCR on isolated plasmids) were not all positive, it was uncertain, that the visible fragments really were the ones that indicate a positive clone. For the further cloning, the plasmids were isolated and digested directly.</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
</fieldset> | </fieldset> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
- | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
</html> | </html> | ||
{{Team:Marburg/Template:End}} | {{Team:Marburg/Template:End}} |
Revision as of 10:08, 15 October 2014
Notebook: October
04.10.2014