Team:SJTU-Software/Database/AssessmentModel
From 2014.igem.org
Line 495: | Line 495: | ||
<tr><th>Part Status<td>The status of a part based on the completeness of its documentation and characterization. | <tr><th>Part Status<td>The status of a part based on the completeness of its documentation and characterization. | ||
- | <tr><th> | + | <tr><th>DNA Status<td>States the DNA status of your part: Deleted, Planning, Sent, Available, etc. These statuses are generated by the Registry, so the user cannot edit them. |
- | + | ||
- | <tr><th> | + | <tr><th>Whether or not Deleted<td>Whether the part is deleted or not. |
- | + | ||
- | <tr><th> | + | <tr><th>Confirmed Times<td>Times of the sequence of the part being confirmed. Part samples are sequenced using the VF2 and VR primer sites on their plasmid backbones. Sequence results are then uploaded and compared to their target sequence (part's documented sequence) through Registry software. |
- | + | ||
+ | <tr><th>Length of Documentation<td>Length of documentation for the part on Registry | ||
</table> | </table> |
Revision as of 08:51, 15 October 2014
3. Assessment Model
An assessment model is optimized to judge the quality of biobricks. With a default score given to each biobrick respectively, biobricks that are related to the input keyword in the “Easy BBK” search engine can be listed in descending order of scores although users can define their own sorting order. If sorted by default scores, users can always get biobricks with high quality. Our assessment model considered 4 general properties, namely status, reliability, feedback and publication, based on 12 attributes of a biobrick. Weights of the attributes in the general properties are already optimized and fixed; weights of the 4 general properties can be adjusted by users although default weights of the properties are optimized already and recommended to users.
3.1. 1 Evaluation criteria
Based on the description on the website of Registry of Standard Biological Parts and advice collected from our instructor, 13 attributes of biobricks are picked out as evaluation criteria in the assessment model.
Considering different aspects users frequently takes into account when choosing a biobrick, we deliberately divided these attributes into 4 properties, which are listed in Table 3.2.1.
Property | Description |
---|---|
Status | Will I get this official part? This property measures the availability of the part. |
Reliability | Will this part work? This property measures the working quality of the part. |
Feedback | What is the review of previous teams or experimenters for this part? This property collects the feedbacks of previous workers on the part. |
Publication | How many publications are related to this part? This property contains the related results on Google Scholar. |
Table 3.2.1 The four properties in the assessment model
More detailed description of the attributes in the properties are demonstrated in Table 3.2.2.
Property | Attribute | Description |
---|---|
hi | |
Part Status | The status of a part based on the completeness of its documentation and characterization. |
DNA Status | States the DNA status of your part: Deleted, Planning, Sent, Available, etc. These statuses are generated by the Registry, so the user cannot edit them. |
Whether or not Deleted | Whether the part is deleted or not. |
Confirmed Times | Times of the sequence of the part being confirmed. Part samples are sequenced using the VF2 and VR primer sites on their plasmid backbones. Sequence results are then uploaded and compared to their target sequence (part's documented sequence) through Registry software. |
Length of Documentation | Length of documentation for the part on Registry |
3.1. 2 Database Structure
The structure of the database is presented in Figure 3.1. The primary key in table “Main” is “part name”, with all the other tables linked to it by identical “part name”. There is no primary key in the tables except “Main” because biobricks could belong to more than one category or have more than one twins. Thus, the part name in the rest tables could be repeated for several times, depending on different biobricks.
Figure 3.1 The structure of the reconstructed biobrick database
SJTU-Software
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
800, Dongchuan Road
200240 Shanghai, China