Team:Dundee/medals
From 2014.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Line 126: | Line 126: | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
- | <h3>Bronze</h3> | + | <h3 style="color:#CD7F32">Bronze</h3> |
<br/> | <br/> | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
Line 147: | Line 147: | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
- | <h3>Silver</h3> | + | <h3 style="color:#C0C0C0">Silver</h3> |
<br/> | <br/> | ||
<br/> | <br/> |
Revision as of 23:20, 12 October 2014
Medal Fulfillment
ooh shiny
Bronze
Team Registration
Complete and Submit Judging Form
Create and share a description of the teams project using the iGEM wiki and the team’s parts using the Registry of Standard Biological Parts
Poster and Presentation prepared and ready for the iGEM Jamboree
The description of each project must clearly attribute work done
Document at least one new standard BioBrick Part or Device used in your project/central to your project and submit this part to the iGEM Registry.
Silver
Experimentally validated that at least one new Biobrick Part or Device of your own design and construction works as expected
Document the characterization of this part in the Main page section of that
Part’s/Device’s Registry entry.
Submit this new part to the iGEM Parts Registry iGEM projects involve important questions beyond the bench, for example relating to (but not limited to) ethics, sustainability, social justice, safety, security, or intellectual property rights. Articulate at least question encountered by your team, and describe how your team considered the question within your project. Include attributions to all experts and stakeholders consulted.
Gold
Improve the function OR characterization of an existing BioBrick Part or Device (created by another team or your own institution in a previous year), enter this information in the Registry. Please see the Registry help page on how to document a contribution to an existing part.
Help any registered iGEM team from another school or institution, by example, characterizing a part, debugging a construct, or modeling or stimulating their system.
iGEM projects involve important questions beyond the bench, for example relating to (but not limited to) ethics, sustainability, social justice, safety, security, or intellectual property rights. Describe an approach that your team used to address at least one of these questions. Evaluate your approach, including whether it allowed you to answer your question(s), how it influenced the team’s scientific project, and how it might be adapted for others to use (within and beyond iGEM). We encourage thoughtful and creative approaches, and those that draw on past Policy and Practice.