Team:Oxford/P&P intellectual property1

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 65: Line 65:
</div>
</div>
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
<html>
 +
<!-- Timeline script adapted from http://www.csslab.cl/2011/08/18/jquery-timelinr/.  Thanks!! -->
 +
 +
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
 +
 +
<link rel="stylesheet" href="
 +
http://www.hcs.harvard.edu/~stahr/javascript/style.css" type="text/css" media="screen" />
 +
 +
<!-- Extra custom css -->
 +
<style type="text/css">
 +
.issuedate
 +
{
 +
color: #021E6B;
 +
background: none;
 +
font-weight: normal;
 +
margin-right: 50px;
 +
padding-top: .5em;
 +
padding-bottom: .17em;
 +
border-bottom: none;
 +
font-size:150%;
 +
line-height:130%;
 +
}
 +
 +
#dates .iGEM14 {
 +
        font-size: 20px;
 +
}
 +
 +
</style>
 +
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.6.2/jquery.min.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
 +
 +
<script src="http://www.hcs.harvard.edu/~stahr/javascript/jquery.timelinr-0.9.3.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
 +
 +
<script type="text/javascript">
 +
 +
$(function(){
 +
 +
$().timelinr({
 +
 +
datesSpeed: 800,
 +
issuesSpeed: 800,
 +
                                issuesTransparency: 1.0,
 +
arrowKeys: 'true',
 +
 +
})
 +
 +
});
 +
 +
</script>
 +
 +
<!-- End timeline -->

Revision as of 23:23, 10 October 2014


Intellectual Property




Intellectual Property is an increasingly important and controversial aspect of scientific advance, and synthetic biology is perhaps the paradigmatic area illustrating the effects of this growing legal influence. When thinking about how teams could turn their ideas from iGEM projects into viable real-world solutions, we realized that intellectual property is a crucial area to address.

Our team has produced a report exploring how teams can approach this task and how iGEM intellectual property policy can make the transition easier.

We begin with a brief overview of current intellectual property law (specifically relevant to the UK) before progressing to look at the challenges this poses for the iGEM competition. A number of different approaches which iGEM might choose to adopt towards intellectual property are discussed and the pros and cons of each are assessed. We then asked a range of interested groups, including iGEM students, professionals, and the public, for their views before concluding with recommendations for addressing intellectual property concerns in iGEM. We offer our conclusions in the form of advice to students, to the iGEM foundation, and briefly explore how a change in the law could have consequences for iGEM. This advice is purely based on our own views and our research which we hope will make interesting food for thought - it is not professional legal advice and should not be relied on as such!

Team Policy

Dealing with intellectual property is not only necessary on a competition-wide level - each team must also make decisions as to how they wish to deal with the intellectual property they will acquire during the course of their project. Deciding whether to file a patent application can be a tricky decision - below are just some of the factors you might want to take into consideration…
Attitudes Survey

We conducted a survey of attitudes within iGEM teams to intellectual property. The results, illustrated below, are analysed in detail in our report. Broadly, we found a noticeable lack of understanding of IP issues, confirming in many ways the findings and excellent foundation work done by British Columbia iGEM team in 2012, and a great deal of social mindedness in the responses.

Retrieved from "http://2014.igem.org/Team:Oxford/P%26P_intellectual_property1"