Team:Oxford/P&P intellectual property1

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 9: Line 9:
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/0/08/Oxigemradcamcrop.jpg" style="position:absolute; width:100%;z-index:-1; border-radius:15px;"/>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/0/08/Oxigemradcamcrop.jpg" style="position:absolute; width:100%;z-index:-1; border-radius:15px;"/>
-
<div style="background-color:#D9D9D9; opacity:0.7; z-index:5; Height:75px; width:100%;font-size:65px;font-family:Helvetica;padding-top:5px;margin-top:10px; font-weight: 450;">
+
<div style="background-color:#D9D9D9; opacity:0.7; z-index:5; Height:75px; width:100%;font-size:65px;font-family:Helvetica;padding-top:5px;margin-top:15px; font-weight: 450;">
<div style="background-color:white; opacity:0.7; Height:75px; width:100%;margin-top:5px:margin-bottom:5px;font-size:65px;font-family:Helvetica;padding-top:5px; color:#00000; font-weight: 450;"><br><center><font style="opacity:0.7">Intellectual Property</font></center></div>
<div style="background-color:white; opacity:0.7; Height:75px; width:100%;margin-top:5px:margin-bottom:5px;font-size:65px;font-family:Helvetica;padding-top:5px; color:#00000; font-weight: 450;"><br><center><font style="opacity:0.7">Intellectual Property</font></center></div>
</div>
</div>

Revision as of 23:05, 10 October 2014


Intellectual Property




Intellectual Property is an increasingly important and controversial aspect of scientific advance, and synthetic biology is perhaps the paradigmatic area illustrating the effects of this growing legal influence. When thinking about how teams could turn their ideas from iGEM projects into viable real-world solutions, we realized that intellectual property is a crucial area to address.

Our team has produced a report exploring how teams can approach this task and how iGEM intellectual property policy can make the transition easier.

We begin with a brief overview of current intellectual property law (specifically relevant to the UK) before progressing to look at the challenges this poses for the iGEM competition. A number of different approaches which iGEM might choose to adopt towards intellectual property are discussed and the pros and cons of each are assessed. We then asked a range of interested groups, including iGEM students, professionals, and the public, for their views before concluding with recommendations for addressing intellectual property concerns in iGEM. We offer our conclusions in the form of advice to students, to the iGEM foundation, and briefly explore how a change in the law could have consequences for iGEM. This advice is purely based on our own views and our research which we hope will make interesting food for thought - it is not professional legal advice and should not be relied on as such!