Team:Goettingen/project overview/diganosis
From 2014.igem.org
Gwen Eleven (Talk | contribs) m |
m |
||
(26 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{:Team:Goettingen/header}} | {{:Team:Goettingen/header}} | ||
- | + | {{:Team:Goettingen/projectLP}} | |
<html> | <html> | ||
<body> | <body> | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
<!-- main part of the subpage --> | <!-- main part of the subpage --> | ||
<div id="subpage"> | <div id="subpage"> | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
<!-- right column--> | <!-- right column--> | ||
<div class="proRP" id="rpart1"> | <div class="proRP" id="rpart1"> | ||
- | <div id="goenext"><a | + | <div id="goenext"><a id="prev"><img id="pButton"></a> 13/15 <a id="next"><img id="nButton"></a></div> |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br /><br /><br /> | ||
+ | <h1>Applications in Diagnostics</h1> <br /> | ||
+ | <h2>Lowering costs and the burden</h2><br /> | ||
+ | <p>The attachment of a chemical moiety that emits a quantifiable signal (a | ||
+ | |||
+ | fluorescent, enzymatic or luminiscent moiety) to our peptides can lead to an | ||
+ | |||
+ | alternative diagnostic method to antibody and antibody fragments with the added | ||
+ | |||
+ | benefit of the relative low cost of production and modification of small peptides. This cost reduction may | ||
+ | |||
+ | help to spread this diagnostic tool to the markets of the developing world, where | ||
+ | |||
+ | fungal infections have the largest mortality rates and were health care is | ||
+ | |||
+ | largely affected by economic constraints. Moreover, if the peptides prove to have a high species-specificity, the diagnosis based on them may give more information for a proper therapy choice, potentially reducing the toxicity risks associated with the use of broad spectrum antimycotics.</p><br /> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <h2><i>In vivo</i> diagnosis and the potential of artificial selection</h2><br /> | ||
+ | <p>Short peptides are currently being used as diagnostic tools for certain kind | ||
+ | |||
+ | of cancers. These peptides are naturally produced by humans | ||
+ | |||
+ | and have their natural binding proteins in the surface of cells; however, they | ||
+ | |||
+ | have been optimized to increase their half-life and their affinity towards their | ||
+ | |||
+ | natural target, and they also have been modified with radionuclides that make it | ||
+ | |||
+ | possible to detect the location of tumors -cells were their binding proteins are | ||
+ | |||
+ | overrepresented- with PET or SECT imaging.</p><br /> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p>The most common isotopically labelled peptide used for diagnosisis a <sup>111</sup>In-labelled somatostatin analogue, known as OctreoScan<sup>TM</sup>, which is used to diagnose a variety of tumors. Other peptides under | ||
+ | |||
+ | develompent are cholecystokinin/gastrin analogues, glucagon-like peptide-1, | ||
+ | |||
+ | bombesin, chemokine receptor CXCR4 targeting peptides, RGD peptides, exendin, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Substance P, LHRH, neurotensin, α-M2, α-M2H and VIP.</p> <br /> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p>Following the same rationale, our artificially selected peptides can be modified and optimized to increase their binding affinity and their half-life. The peptides can then be tagged with radionuclides to enable the diagnosis by imaging techniques. The results of such a diagnostic method will give more information about the localization and spread of the fungal infection inside the patient's body than any of the currently available diagnostic methods.</p><br /><br /> | ||
+ | <hr> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <h2>References</h2><br /> | ||
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li>1. Fani, M., et al., (2012), Radiolabeled peptides: valuable tools for the detection and treatment of cancer, <i>Theranostics</i>, 2(5).</li><br /> | ||
+ | <li>2. Laverman, P., (2012), Radiolabelled peptides for oncological diagnosis, <i>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</i>, 39 (Suppl I).</li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
<script> | <script> | ||
window.fbAsyncInit = function() { | window.fbAsyncInit = function() { | ||
Line 65: | Line 92: | ||
}(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));</script> | }(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));</script> | ||
<br /><br /> | <br /><br /> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <div id="goenext"><a id="prev"><img id="pButton"></a> 13/15 <a id="next"><img id="nButton"></a></div> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
<div class="fb-like" data-layout="standard" data-action="like" data-show-faces="true" data-share="true"></div> | <div class="fb-like" data-layout="standard" data-action="like" data-show-faces="true" data-share="true"></div> | ||
<script> | <script> | ||
Line 76: | Line 107: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
<script>$(document).keydown(function(e) { | <script>$(document).keydown(function(e) { | ||
switch(e.which) { | switch(e.which) { | ||
case 37: // left | case 37: // left | ||
- | window.location = | + | window.location = url12; |
break; | break; | ||
Line 92: | Line 117: | ||
case 39: // right | case 39: // right | ||
console.log("right"); | console.log("right"); | ||
- | window.location = | + | window.location = url14; |
break; | break; | ||
Line 101: | Line 126: | ||
e.preventDefault(); // prevent the default action (scroll / move caret) | e.preventDefault(); // prevent the default action (scroll / move caret) | ||
});</script> | });</script> | ||
+ | <script> | ||
+ | $( "[id=next]" ).attr("href", url14); | ||
+ | $( "[id=prev]" ).attr("href", url12); | ||
+ | $( "[id=nButton]" ).attr("src", nextButton).attr("width", "40"); | ||
+ | $( "[id=pButton]" ).attr("src", prevButton).attr("width", "40"); | ||
+ | </script> | ||
</body> | </body> | ||
</html> | </html> |
Latest revision as of 11:20, 2 October 2014
Project
Applications in Diagnostics
Lowering costs and the burden
The attachment of a chemical moiety that emits a quantifiable signal (a fluorescent, enzymatic or luminiscent moiety) to our peptides can lead to an alternative diagnostic method to antibody and antibody fragments with the added benefit of the relative low cost of production and modification of small peptides. This cost reduction may help to spread this diagnostic tool to the markets of the developing world, where fungal infections have the largest mortality rates and were health care is largely affected by economic constraints. Moreover, if the peptides prove to have a high species-specificity, the diagnosis based on them may give more information for a proper therapy choice, potentially reducing the toxicity risks associated with the use of broad spectrum antimycotics.
In vivo diagnosis and the potential of artificial selection
Short peptides are currently being used as diagnostic tools for certain kind of cancers. These peptides are naturally produced by humans and have their natural binding proteins in the surface of cells; however, they have been optimized to increase their half-life and their affinity towards their natural target, and they also have been modified with radionuclides that make it possible to detect the location of tumors -cells were their binding proteins are overrepresented- with PET or SECT imaging.
The most common isotopically labelled peptide used for diagnosisis a 111In-labelled somatostatin analogue, known as OctreoScanTM, which is used to diagnose a variety of tumors. Other peptides under develompent are cholecystokinin/gastrin analogues, glucagon-like peptide-1, bombesin, chemokine receptor CXCR4 targeting peptides, RGD peptides, exendin, Substance P, LHRH, neurotensin, α-M2, α-M2H and VIP.
Following the same rationale, our artificially selected peptides can be modified and optimized to increase their binding affinity and their half-life. The peptides can then be tagged with radionuclides to enable the diagnosis by imaging techniques. The results of such a diagnostic method will give more information about the localization and spread of the fungal infection inside the patient's body than any of the currently available diagnostic methods.
References
- 1. Fani, M., et al., (2012), Radiolabeled peptides: valuable tools for the detection and treatment of cancer, Theranostics, 2(5).
- 2. Laverman, P., (2012), Radiolabelled peptides for oncological diagnosis, Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 39 (Suppl I).