"
Team:Vanderbilt Software/Results
From 2014.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
expected darwin to run faster and show fewer changed lines | expected darwin to run faster and show fewer changed lines | ||
in the diff output than vanilla_git.</p> | in the diff output than vanilla_git.</p> | ||
| - | < | + | <table><tr> |
| + | <td><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/b/be/Diff_speed.png" style="width:500px;height:500px"></td> | ||
| + | <td><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/5/53/Diff_lines_changed.png" style="width:500px;height:500px></td> | ||
| + | </tr></table> | ||
<p>As expected, darwin's preprocessing produced a significantly | <p>As expected, darwin's preprocessing produced a significantly | ||
faster diff, with an average speed of 5.763 seconds per file, | faster diff, with an average speed of 5.763 seconds per file, | ||
Revision as of 18:03, 18 January 2015
|
||
ResultsWe produced software which implemented the algorithms described in our novel approach on specially cleaned input files and ran them through a typical version control system. We performed experimentation on transformations between iterations 3-6 of our wetware team's yeast plasmids. As a control, we compared darwin's output running through the git version control system to simple processing with git (vanilla_git). We expected darwin to run faster and show fewer changed lines in the diff output than vanilla_git.
| ||
Retrieved from "
