Team:TU Delft-Leiden/Project/Life science/curli/characterisation

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 33: Line 33:
<br>
<br>
-
<p>The different constructs made for this module are: BBa_K1316013: p[rham]-CsgB – p[const.]–CsgA, also referred here as CC50, BBa_K1316014: p[rham]-CsgB – p[const.]–CsgA:HIS, also referred here as CC51, BBa_K1316015: p[rham]-CsgB-CsgA, also referred here as CC52, BBa_K1316016: p[const.]-eGFP, also referred here as CC54. The strains used to characterize these constructs contain a combination of a curli-forming BioBrick (CC50, CC51 or CC52) plus the construct constitutively expressing eGFP (CC54). As negative controls, a strain containing the constitutively expressed eGFP alone (CC54) and an empty strain (containing no constructs) were used.   
+
<p>The different constructs made for this module are: BBa_K1316013: p[rham]-CsgB – p[const.]–CsgA, also referred here as CC50; BBa_K1316014: p[rham]-CsgB – p[const.]–CsgA:HIS, also referred here as CC51; BBa_K1316015: p[rham]-CsgB-CsgA, also referred here as CC52; BBa_K1316016: p[const.]-eGFP, also referred here as CC54. The strains used to characterize these constructs contain a combination of a curli-forming BioBrick (CC50, CC51 or CC52) plus the construct constitutively expressing eGFP (CC54). As negative controls, a strain containing the constitutively expressed eGFP alone (CC54) and an empty strain (containing no constructs) were used.   
</p>
</p>
<br>
<br>
Line 88: Line 88:
<p>
<p>
<figcaption>
<figcaption>
-
Figure 2: Fluorescent images taken using the Confocal Microscope of the cells carrying the CC constructs CC50 (P[RHAM]-CSGB P[CONST.]–CSGA) and CC54 (P[CONST.]-EGFP), induced (left) and non-induced (right).
+
Figure 2: Fluorescent images taken using the Confocal Microscope of the cells carrying the CC constructs CC50 (p[rham]-CsgB p[const.]–CsgA) and CC54 (p[const.]-eGFP), induced (left) and non-induced (right).
</figcaption>
</figcaption>
</figure>
</figure>
 +
<br>
<br>
Line 99: Line 100:
<p>
<p>
<figcaption>
<figcaption>
-
Figure 3: Fluorescent images taken using the Confocal Microscope of the cells carrying the CC constructs CC51 (P[RHAM]-CSGB P[CONST.]–CSGA:HIS) and CC54 (P[CONST.]-EGFP), induced (left) and non-induced (right).
+
Figure 3: Fluorescent images taken using the Confocal Microscope of the cells carrying the CC constructs CC51 (p[rham]-CsgB p[const.]–CsgA:HIS) and CC54 (p[const.]-eGFP), induced (left) and non-induced (right).
</figcaption>
</figcaption>
</figure>
</figure>
-
 
Line 112: Line 112:
<p>
<p>
<figcaption>
<figcaption>
-
Figure 4: Fluorescent images taken using the Confocal Microscope of the cells carrying the CC constructs CC52 (P[RHAM]-CSGB-CSGA) and CC54 (P[CONST.]-EGFP), induced (left) and non-induced (right).
+
Figure 4: Fluorescent images taken using the Confocal Microscope of the cells carrying the CC constructs CC52 (p[rham]-CsgB-CsgA) and CC54 (p[const.]-eGFP), induced (left) and non-induced (right).
</figcaption>
</figcaption>
</figure>
</figure>
-
 
Line 124: Line 123:
<figcaption>
<figcaption>
-
Figure 5: Fluorescent images taken using the Confocal Microscope of the cells only carrying the CC construct CC54 (P[CONST.]-EGFP), induced (left) and non-induced (right).
+
Figure 5: Fluorescent images taken using the Confocal Microscope of the cells only carrying the CC construct CC54 (p[const.]-eGFP), induced (left) and non-induced (right).
</figcaption>
</figcaption>
</figure>
</figure>
Line 143: Line 142:
<a name="CC congo red"></a>  
<a name="CC congo red"></a>  
<h3> Congo Red Assay </h3>
<h3> Congo Red Assay </h3>
-
<p>We did a Congo Red assay on the following cell cultures: CC54 (P[CONST.]-EGFP) + CC52 (P[RHAM]-CSGB-CSGA), CC54 (P[CONST.]-EGFP) + CC50 (P[RHAM]-CSGB – P[CONST.]–CSGA),  
+
<p>We did a Congo Red assay on the following cell cultures: CC54 + CC52, CC54 + CC50, CC54 + CC51 and the used strain without plasmid. The protocol that was used for the assay can be found  
-
CC54 (P[CONST.]-EGFP) + CC51 (P[RHAM]-CSGB – P[CONST.]–CSGA:HIS) and the used strain without plasmid. The protocol that was used for the assay can be found  
+
<a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/7/7a/Delft2014_ProtocolCongoRed.pdf">here</a>. We took samples spread over two days and did the following for each sample:  
<a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/7/7a/Delft2014_ProtocolCongoRed.pdf">here</a>. We took samples spread over two days and did the following for each sample:  
first measured the OD<sub>600</sub> to be able to correct for growth. Then added Congo Red, waited for five minutes and measured the OD<sub>480</sub>.  
first measured the OD<sub>600</sub> to be able to correct for growth. Then added Congo Red, waited for five minutes and measured the OD<sub>480</sub>.  
Line 155: Line 153:
<p><figcaption>
<p><figcaption>
Figure 7: Results of the Congo Red assay 19 hours after induction with rhamnose. On the y-axis: minus the measured OD<sub>480</sub> divided by the OD<sub>600</sub>,  
Figure 7: Results of the Congo Red assay 19 hours after induction with rhamnose. On the y-axis: minus the measured OD<sub>480</sub> divided by the OD<sub>600</sub>,  
-
correcting for culture growth. Induced (+) with 0.5 % rhamnose and non-induced (-). </figcaption></p>
+
correcting for culture growth. Induced (+) with 0.5 % rhamnose and non-induced (-). CC50 contains p[rham]-CsgB – p[const.]–CsgA. CC51 contains p[rham]-CsgB – p[const.]–CsgA:HIS. CC52 contains p[rham]-CsgB-CsgA. CC54 contains p[const.]-eGFP.</figcaption></p>
</figure>
</figure>
<br>   
<br>   
-
<p>In figure 7 we can see that the samples with induced CC50 (P[RHAM]-CSGB – P[CONST.]–CSGA), CC51 (P[RHAM]-CSGB – P[CONST.]–CSGA:HIS) and  
+
<p>In figure 7 we can see that the samples with induced CC50, CC51 and CC52 result in a higher value than the non-induced samples, meaning that the OD<sub>480</sub> values are more negative  
-
CC52 (P[RHAM]-CSGB-CSGA) result in a higher value than the non-induced samples, meaning that the OD<sub>480</sub> values are more negative  
+
(as we measured these in negative values). From this we can deduct that more Congo Red dye got stuck in the pellet (also see figure 8 and 9) in the  
(as we measured these in negative values). From this we can deduct that more Congo Red dye got stuck in the pellet (also see figure 8 and 9) in the  
-
CC50 (P[RHAM]-CSGB – P[CONST.]–CSGA) induced, CC51 (P[RHAM]-CSGB – P[CONST.]–CSGA:HIS) induced and CC52 (P[RHAM]-CSGB-CSGA) induced cultures and  
+
CC50 induced, CC51 induced and CC52 induced cultures and therefore more biofilm was formed. The negative control of empty cells gives roughly the same value for induced as for non-induced cells, which points to  
-
therefore more biofilm was formed. The negative control of empty cells gives roughly the same value for induced as for non-induced cells, which points to  
+
the same amount of curli produced. Together with the results that the empty cells have around the same value for the -OD<sub>480</sub> divided by  
the same amount of curli produced. Together with the results that the empty cells have around the same value for the -OD<sub>480</sub> divided by  
the OD<sub>600</sub> as the non-induced CC50, CC51 and CC52, this results in the conclusion that the empty cells do not produce curli.</p>
the OD<sub>600</sub> as the non-induced CC50, CC51 and CC52, this results in the conclusion that the empty cells do not produce curli.</p>

Revision as of 16:06, 17 October 2014

Module Conductive Curli – Characterization

In the wet lab, we made constructs containing csgA and csgB, two of the genes involved in curli formation. Here you can find information with respect to the characterization of the BioBricks for the Conductive Curli pathway.


The different constructs made for this module are: BBa_K1316013: p[rham]-CsgB – p[const.]–CsgA, also referred here as CC50; BBa_K1316014: p[rham]-CsgB – p[const.]–CsgA:HIS, also referred here as CC51; BBa_K1316015: p[rham]-CsgB-CsgA, also referred here as CC52; BBa_K1316016: p[const.]-eGFP, also referred here as CC54. The strains used to characterize these constructs contain a combination of a curli-forming BioBrick (CC50, CC51 or CC52) plus the construct constitutively expressing eGFP (CC54). As negative controls, a strain containing the constitutively expressed eGFP alone (CC54) and an empty strain (containing no constructs) were used.


Plate Reader

A plate reader is a machine designed to handle samples on 6-1536 well format microtiter plates for the measuring of physical properties such as absorbance, fluorescence intensity, luminescence, time-resolved fluorescence, and fluorescence polarisation.


In this module, the cells carrying the curli-forming BioBricks (CC50, CC51 or CC52) also carried a plasmid constitutively expressing eGFP (CC54). Hence, an assay to detect biofilm formation (due to the curli) can be performed. The cells can be grown on a 96-well plate, where curli formation will be induced with Rhamnose. The cells carrying CC50, CC51 or CC52 together with CC54 will generate curli under these conditions, whereas the cells carrying CC54 alone will not. Under the Plate reader, the wells can be analysed for green fluorescence. Before washing out the cells all wells carrying cells with CC54 should present green fluorescence. After washing out the cells, however, only the wells carrying cells with CC54 together with one of the curli-forming BioBricks should still generate green fluorescence, because of cell attachment to the walls. The final protocol developed for Plate reader analysis for this module can be found by clicking on this link .


Results - Plate Reader

Figure 1: OD after washing out the cells twice as a fraction of initial OD observed on 96-well plates, with (+) and without (-) induction of the curli-formation genes. Induced cells are induced with 1% rhamnose solution. CC50 contains p[rham]-CsgB – p[const.]–CsgA. CC51 contains p[rham]-CsgB – p[const.]–CsgA:HIS. CC52 contains p[rham]-CsgB-CsgA. CC54 contains p[const.]-eGFP.

Figure 1 shows the OD of the cells after two rounds of washing them out of the 96-well plate. On the image it can be appreciated that the cells carrying the curli-forming BioBricks (CC50 + CC54, CC51 + CC54 and CC52 + CC54) retain many more cells when they are induced with Rhamnose, whereas no noticeable increase of the OD is oserved under induction for the cells that do not carry curli-forming constructs (CC54 alone and empty cells). This suggests that cell retention happens when the curli genes are expressed.


Confocal Microscopy

Confocal microscopy is an imaging technique that allows for the visualisation of fluorescent bodies with higher resolution and improved contrast compared to Bright-field microscopy. Whereas fluorescent Bright-field microscopes excite all the sample analysed, confocal microscopes can highly reduce the excited field, thus eliminating the background noise produced by species neighbouring the body of interest.


We used confocal microscpoy technology to observe the deposition of cells at the bottom of the microscope slide. Figures 2-6 intend to represent how, after induction with Rhamnose, the cells forming curli are attached faster to the surface (bottom) of the microscope slide than when they are not induced.


The fact that more cells are observed at the bottom of the microscope slide for the strains carrying the CC54 plasmid alone, or the empty cells could be attributed to the fact that these cells grow faster because they do not have the burden of carrying an extra plasmid, or even two in the case of the empy cells. This idea is supported by the fact that the strains carrying curli-forming constructs (CC50, CC51 or CC52) seem to be deposited faster onto the surface of the microscope slide when they are induced than when they are not.


Figure 2: Fluorescent images taken using the Confocal Microscope of the cells carrying the CC constructs CC50 (p[rham]-CsgB – p[const.]–CsgA) and CC54 (p[const.]-eGFP), induced (left) and non-induced (right).

Figure 3: Fluorescent images taken using the Confocal Microscope of the cells carrying the CC constructs CC51 (p[rham]-CsgB – p[const.]–CsgA:HIS) and CC54 (p[const.]-eGFP), induced (left) and non-induced (right).

Figure 4: Fluorescent images taken using the Confocal Microscope of the cells carrying the CC constructs CC52 (p[rham]-CsgB-CsgA) and CC54 (p[const.]-eGFP), induced (left) and non-induced (right).

Figure 5: Fluorescent images taken using the Confocal Microscope of the cells only carrying the CC construct CC54 (p[const.]-eGFP), induced (left) and non-induced (right).

Figure 6: Fluorescent images taken using the Confocal Microscope of the empty cells carrying no CC construct fluorescence mode(left) and Bright-field mode (right).

Congo Red Assay

We did a Congo Red assay on the following cell cultures: CC54 + CC52, CC54 + CC50, CC54 + CC51 and the used strain without plasmid. The protocol that was used for the assay can be found here. We took samples spread over two days and did the following for each sample: first measured the OD600 to be able to correct for growth. Then added Congo Red, waited for five minutes and measured the OD480. If curli (biofilm) is formed, the Congo Red dye will get stuck in the curli biofilm and therefore will be stuck in the pellet after centrifugation. Of course the difference between the non-induced cultures and the induced cultures are the most important, therefore the comparison between the induced and non-induced samples. The results of our assay can be found in figure 7.


Figure 7: Results of the Congo Red assay 19 hours after induction with rhamnose. On the y-axis: minus the measured OD480 divided by the OD600, correcting for culture growth. Induced (+) with 0.5 % rhamnose and non-induced (-). CC50 contains p[rham]-CsgB – p[const.]–CsgA. CC51 contains p[rham]-CsgB – p[const.]–CsgA:HIS. CC52 contains p[rham]-CsgB-CsgA. CC54 contains p[const.]-eGFP.


In figure 7 we can see that the samples with induced CC50, CC51 and CC52 result in a higher value than the non-induced samples, meaning that the OD480 values are more negative (as we measured these in negative values). From this we can deduct that more Congo Red dye got stuck in the pellet (also see figure 8 and 9) in the CC50 induced, CC51 induced and CC52 induced cultures and therefore more biofilm was formed. The negative control of empty cells gives roughly the same value for induced as for non-induced cells, which points to the same amount of curli produced. Together with the results that the empty cells have around the same value for the -OD480 divided by the OD600 as the non-induced CC50, CC51 and CC52, this results in the conclusion that the empty cells do not produce curli.


It should be noted that we only took two measurements the first day and left the cultures overnight before conducting the last measurement. As part of the collaboration, Wageningen repeated the Congo Red assay and these results can be found in the following paragraph.


Figure 10: Results of the Congo Red assay that Wageningen conducted for us, 21.5 hours after induction with rhamnose. On the y-axis: minus the measured OD480 divided by the OD600, correcting for culture growth. Induced (+) with 0.8 % rhamnose and non-induced (-).


In figure 10 we can see the results of the Congo Red assay Wageningen performed for us as part of the collaboration. They used the same protocol as we did, it can be found here. The results are partially the same, except for the large negative value for CC51 (P[RHAM]-CSGB – P[CONST.]–CSGA:HIS). (Explanation!) Wageningen also measured over two days, just as we did. But because they had more measurements, we could also make a OD480 versus time plot (figure 11).


Figure 10: Results of the Congo Red assay that Wageningen conducted for us, 21.5 hours after induction with rhamnose. On the y-axis: minus the measured OD480 divided by the OD600, correcting for culture growth. Induced (+) with 0.8 % rhamnose and non-induced (-).


From this timeplot we can see that the OD480 increases over time... (Do we actually want this plot in the text or is it not an addition to the information?)

Crystal Violet assay and conductance measurements

Crystal Violet assay

The Congo red experiments prove that after induction with rhamnose the curli-proteins CsgA and CsgB were produced. This does however not prove that bio-film is formed; to prove bio-film formation a crystal violet assay was performed together with the experiment for conductance. Crystal violet (or Methyl violet) is an organic dye that is used in Gram-staining to colour the cell-wall of bacteria [1] The protocol for the assay can be found here[LINK!!!!!!!!!!]. E.coli ΔCsgB bearing the BBa_K1316014 (CsgB + pRha, CsgA-His+ pConst) are grown in petri-dishes with liquid medium without shaking. When induced this allows them to create a layer of biofilm on the surface of the plastic. After incubation the petri-dishes were emptied and submerged in MQ to wash away any non-bound cells. Bacteria were now incubated with Crystal violet dye, which colours them purple. The biofilm was then resuspended in acetic acid and the absorbance at 590nm, the absorption peak of crystal violet, was measured. Figure 1 shows a picture of stained biofilm in dishes containing BBa_K1316014 (CsgB + pRha, CsgA-His+ pConst) that were induced. The results of the absorbance measurements can be seen in table 1.

Figure 11: Picture of crystal violet stained biofilm of E.coli with deleted CsgB transformed with BBa_K1316014 (pRha CsgB + pConst CsgA-His) induced with 0.5% (w/w) rhamnose incubated for 36h at 37oC without shaking.
Table 1: Absorbance measurements at 590nm performed on E.coli ΔCsgB with BBa_K1316014 (CsgB + pRha, CsgA-His+ pConst) and a negative control with untransformed cells after the crystal violet assay.
Exp. # Strain Biobrick Induced A590
1. E.coli ΔCsgB BBa_K1316014 (CsgB + pRha, CsgA-His+ pConst) Yes 1.256
2. E.coli ΔCsgB BBa_K1316014 (CsgB + pRha, CsgA-His+ pConst) Yes 1.066
3. E.coli ΔCsgB BBa_K1316014 (CsgB + pRha, CsgA-His+ pConst) No 0.310
4. E.coli ΔCsgB - No 0.082

Table 1 quantitatively shows that when BBa_K1316014 was induced with rhamnose that biofilm was formed, whereas the negative control which was untransformed E.coli ΔCsgB showed marginal biofilm formation. Experiment 1 and 2 seem duplicate of one and other, however this is not the case since Gold nanoparticles were added to experiment 4 as will be elaborated on in the conductivity measurement part further down. These gold nano-particles might also absorb at 590nm therefore yielding a higher absorbance in exp.# 4. It is peculiar the uninduced strain bearing the biobrick also shows some biofilm formation. This might be due to the fact that the rhamnose-promoter is leaky or alternatively that it is induced by other carbon-sources in the medium like glucose.


Conductance measurements


Proteins containing a His-tag can bind Cu and Ni in a coordinance bond. Our BBa_K1316014 (CsgB + pRha, CsgA-His+ pConst) biobrick has a His-tag, and can therefore bind Gold nanoparticles that are attached to a Ni atom via a NitriloTriacetic Acid (NTA) chain. CsgA is a proteins that is abundant in the extracellular matrix in biofilm. Because this protein can now bind gold-nanoparticles it facilitates conductance of electricity through this biofilm.


Figure 9: Interaction between the Ni-atom that is attached to a 5nm Gold NanoParticle (GNP) via a NitriloTriacetic Acid (NTA) with a His-tag attached to a proten; in our case the His-tag is attached to the CsgA.
Figure 10: Dropsens integrated electrodes at 10micron distance for one and other for measurement of the conductance of biofilm.

Mother Machine - Widefield Fluorescence Microscopy

A Widefield Fluorescence Microscope was used to characterise the the eGFP reporter BBa_k1316016 in the Mother Machine (MM), which was used as a positive control Curli module. For more information about the Mother Machine, please visit our Microfluidics section.

MM Devices were flushed with Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) to render the PDMS out of which the MM is made inert after plasma activation. Then cells grown in M4 minimal medium supplemented with 40mM glucose were flowed through. The M4 medium is used as a growth medium because it does not exert autofluoresence and the diameter of the cells are smaller as compared to those grown in rich media; a small diameter is required for the cells to fit in the side-channels of the MM.

The devices were then centrifuged at 3000rpm for 10 minutes, with side channels of the MM in the direction of the centripetal force. In order to coax the cells into the small channels on one side.

Unfortunately, individual cells were not found in the side channels. Reasons for this are unclear, possible causes are faulty or damaged moulds, or human error in the fabrication process. However, cells could still be imaged in the main channel, and characterised for flouresence.

BBa_k1316016 construct imaged with Brightfield (left) and eGFP filter (excitation 488nm, emission 508nm) (right) As can be seen in the images, flourescence was clearly observed.

Conclusions

From the assays performed it can be concluded that:
  • The constructs made are capable of generating curli-forming proteins
  • Curli formation happens in response to induction of the used promoter (induced with the presence of Rhamnose)
  • BioBricks CC50 (P[RHAM]-CSGB – P[CONST.]–CSGA) and CC51 (P[RHAM]-CSGB – P[CONST.]–CSGA:HIS) do not show a clear improvement compared to CC52 (P[RHAM]-CSGB-CSGA). Consequently, contrary to what we expected, constitutively express CsgA protein does not seem to speed up the nucleation process of curli formation with the constructs used.

  • Top
    facebook twitter