Team:StanfordBrownSpelman/Human Practices

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 60: Line 60:
   </div>
   </div>
   <div id="header" class="small-8 small-centered columns">
   <div id="header" class="small-8 small-centered columns">
-
   <h3><center><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:StanfordBrownSpelman/Human_Practices">Uses of UAVs &amp; Orthogonal systems in Nature</a></h3>
+
   <h3><center><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:StanfordBrownSpelman/Human_Practices">Uses of UAVs &amp; Orthogonal <br> Systems in Nature</a></h3>
   <h6><center><a href="#images" id="pics">Images</a> ● <a href="#results" id="data">EPA Partnership</a> ● <a href="#references" id="links">Publications</a> ● <a href="#process" id="methods">Methods</a> ● <a href="#references" id="links">References</a></h6>
   <h6><center><a href="#images" id="pics">Images</a> ● <a href="#results" id="data">EPA Partnership</a> ● <a href="#references" id="links">Publications</a> ● <a href="#process" id="methods">Methods</a> ● <a href="#references" id="links">References</a></h6>
   <h6>
   <h6>

Revision as of 00:57, 4 October 2014

Stanford–Brown–Spelman iGEM 2014 — Human Practices

  • Image description goes here.

  • Image description goes here.

  • Image description goes here.


  • Image description goes here.

  • Image description goes here.

  • Image description goes here.
Our Work with the EPA: Synthetic biology in the air: Biological UAVs and environmental safety concerns

We are currently working on a series of projects towards the construction of a fully biological unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) for use in scientific and humanitarian missions. The prospect of a biologically-produced UAV presents numerous advantages over the current manufacturing paradigm. First, a foundational architecture built by cells allows for construction or repair in locations where it would be difficult to bring traditional tools of production. Second, a major limitation of current research with UAVs is the size and high power consumption of analytical instruments, which require bulky electrical components and large fuselages to support their weight. By moving these functions into cells with biosensing capabilities – for example, a series of cells engineered to report GFP, green fluorescent protein, when conditions exceed a certain threshold concentration of a compound of interest, enabling their detection post-flight – these problems of scale can be avoided.

However, housing live cells on an aerial system presents a new set of problems, chief amongst which is the concern of horizontal gene transfer. Bacterial cells can perform conjugation, a process which allows for plasmids (small, circular strands of DNA) to be copied from one organism to another. In our case, we must take steps to protect the environment from our cells and avoid the possibility that our engineered genes proliferate throughout ecosystems. In addition, not dissimilar to the problem of mechanical UAVs getting lost or crashing and leaching toxins into the environment, we must address what might happen if our biological UAV were to crash and allow the cells on its biofilm to act as an invasive species.

We are harnessing the power of genetic engineering to mitigate both of these scenarios. To address horizontal gene transfer, we are recoding the cells on our UAV to use the UAG stop codon, which usually signals the truncation of a protein during translation, as leucine, an amino acid, instead. When we engineer the genes we wish to transform into our cells (an “amberless” strain, as UAG stop is called “amber”), all instances of UAG will be replaced with different stop codons, and all leucine residues will be coded for by UAG. Thus, any engineered genes which are passed from an amberless cell to a normal cell in the environment will not be read correctly, as each leucine residue will be instead be interpreted as “stop” and will result in the production of a non-functional protein fragment. We hope that our amberless strain can be adopted as a model for any engineered organisms one might wish to send into the environment. Finally, to address the invasion of our cells into the environment, we are engineering a pressure-sensitive “kill switch.” Upon crash, the cells will activate quorum sensing (a method of intercellular communication), which will act as a signal to begin producing a set of proteins which can degrade the cellulose acetate base material. The UAV itself will degrade into glucose, which can be taken up by organisms in the crash environment, while the engineered cells will be killed by the free acetate, which, hopefully, will be in high enough concentration to harm the biofilm but not the crash environment.

Links & References
Suspendisse volutpat sem eu ornare tincidunt. Mauris pharetra sed justo vitae sodales. Nulla in sodales tortor, placerat tempor dui.
Additional Information
Try to avoid having any additional information here. We're trying to keep our site organized, clean, and compelling!
Built atop Foundation. Content &amp Development © Stanford–Brown–Spelman iGEM 2014.