Team:StanfordBrownSpelman/Cellulose Cross Linker

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
(9 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 82: Line 82:
</div></div>
</div></div>
-
<div class="small-9 small-centered columns"><br><center><img src=""><br>
+
<div class="small-8 small-centered columns"><br><center><img src=""><br>
-
<h6><b></b>Our initial approach was to use the cellulose binding domains from <i>C. cellulovorans </i>  <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K863111">(part BBa_K863111)</a></a> on either side of the streptavidin domain <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K283010">(part BBa_K283010) under a T7 promoter in the PSB1A3 backbone.</a></a>We then express  the cross-linker protein in <i> E. coli </i>. We included a His-Tag to purify the protein. Once purified, the cross-linking protein is tested on bacterial cellulose we grew in our lab from the organism <i>G. hansenii</i>. By dotting the protein on the cellulose, the cellulose binding domains will bind to the cellulose fibers and leave the streptavidin domain unbound, but ready to bind biotin.</center></h6>
+
<h6><b></b>Our initial approach was to use the cellulose binding domains from <i>C. cellulovorans </i>  <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K863111">(part BBa_K863111)</a></a> on either side of the streptavidin domain <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K283010">(part BBa_K283010) under a T7 promoter in the PSB1A3 backbone.</a></a>We also included a His-Tag for protein purification. The protein is then expressed in <i> E. coli </i>. Once purified, the cross-linking protein is tested on bacterial cellulose we grew in our lab from the organism <i>G. hansenii</i>. By dotting the protein on the cellulose, the cellulose binding domains will bind to the cellulose fibers and leave the streptavidin domain unbound and ready to bind biotin.</center></h6>
   </div>
   </div>
<div class="row">
<div class="row">
Line 94: Line 94:
<h6>
<h6>
-
<div class="sub4"><a href="http://docs.google.com/document/d/1-BS2AXdxk_gbYPC2qc5T6e1L7qtnXg4DxsOF-aoxIQg/edit?usp=sharing" target="_blank"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/2/25/SBS_iGEM_2014_download.png"></a><a href="http://docs.google.com/document/d/1-BS2AXdxk_gbYPC2qc5T6e1L7qtnXg4DxsOF-aoxIQg/edit?usp=sharing">Click here to go to our project journal, which details our design and engineering process and included descriptions of the protocols we developed and used.</a></div>
+
<div class="sub4"><a href=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/2/2b/Cross-LinkingAdapter.pdf" target="_blank"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/2/25/SBS_iGEM_2014_download.png"></a><a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/2/2b/Cross-LinkingAdapter.pdf">Click here to go to our project journal, which details our design and engineering process and included descriptions of the protocols we developed and used.</a></div>
   </h6>
   </h6>
   </div>
   </div>
Line 112: Line 112:
   <h5><center>Results</h5>
   <h5><center>Results</h5>
   <h6>
   <h6>
-
   Our initial approach was to include two identical cellulose-binding domains on either side of the streptavidin domain. Due to the repetitive nature of the sequence and potential homologous recombination, we had many issues with molecular cloning. We changed our approach to using two different cellulose-binding domains with different sequences. This allowed us to successfully conduct the molecular cloning.  
+
   Using the same cellulose binding domain on either side of the streptavidin caused problems that lead us to revaluate our approach. Due to the repetitive nature of the sequence and potential homologous recombination, we had many issues with molecular cloning. We changed our approach to using two different cellulose-binding domains with different sequences. The first cellulose binding domain remained the same, but rather than repeating that same sequence on the other side of the streptavidin, we instead used the cellulose anchoring protein cohesin from the organism <i>C. cellulovorans </i>This allowed us to successfully conduct the molecular cloning.
   </h6>
   </h6>
   </div>
   </div>
Line 128: Line 128:
   </div>
   </div>
 +
<div class="row">
 +
  <div id="subheader" class="small-8 small-centered columns">
 +
  <h5><center></h5> <h6>
 +
  After obtaining a good sequence and inducing the protein with IPTG, we used a procedure similar to a western blot to test for functionality. After dotting the protein on bacterial cellulose and incubating with skim milk, unbound proteins were washed off with TBS buffer. The cellulose was then incubated with Biotin (5-fluorescein) conjugate which would  bind to the streptavidin domain. While our results are still inconclusive, if we can detect fluorescence on the cellulose sheet, we will know that the cellulose binding domains are functional. The biotin conjugate will only bind to the streptavidin domain which will only be present on the cellulose sheet if the binding domains are functional.
 +
  </h6>
 +
  </div>
 +
</div>
<!-- ====== Cell Spacer 4 ====== -->
<!-- ====== Cell Spacer 4 ====== -->
Line 142: Line 149:
   <h5><center>References</h5>
   <h5><center>References</h5>
   <h6>
   <h6>
-
1. M Linder and T T Teeri (1996) The cellulose-binding domain of the major cellobiohydrolase of Trichoderma reesei exhibits true reversibility and a high exchange rate on crystalline cellulose. <i>PNAS</i> 122251  PMID: <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC37976/?page=1">24136966</a>.<br><br>
+
1. Linder M <i>et al.</i> (1996) The cellulose-binding domain of the major cellobiohydrolase of Trichoderma reesei exhibits true reversibility and a high exchange rate on crystalline cellulose. <i>PNAS</i> 93: 12251-12255. PMID: <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC37976/?page=1" target="_blank">PMC37976</a>.<br><br>
-
2. Claire E. CHIVERS, Apurba L. KONER, Edward D. LOWE and Mark HOWARTH (2011) How the biotin–streptavidin interaction was made even stronger:
+
2. Chivers CE <i>et al.</i> (2011) How the biotin–streptavidin interaction was made even stronger: investigation via crystallography and a chimaeric tetramer. <i>Biochem.J.</i> 435: 55-63. PMID: <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21241253" target="_blank">21241253</a>.</div>
-
investigation via crystallography and a chimaeric tetramer<i>Biochem.J.</i> 55 PMID: <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21241253">2981802</a>.</a></div>
+
   </h6>
   </h6>
   </div>
   </div>
-
</div>
 
-
<!-- ====== Cell Spacer 5 ====== -->
 
-
 
-
    <div class="row">
 
-
  <div class="small-3 small-centered columns cells6">
 
-
      </div>
 
</div>
</div>
-
<!-- ====== Additional Information ====== -->
 
Line 192: Line 191:
   <div id="closing" class="small-8 small-centered columns">
   <div id="closing" class="small-8 small-centered columns">
   <h6>
   <h6>
-
Built atop Foundation. Content &amp Development &copy; Stanford–Brown–Spelman iGEM 2014.
+
Built atop Foundation. Content &amp; Development &copy; Stanford–Brown–Spelman iGEM 2014.
</h6>
</h6>
       </div>
       </div>

Latest revision as of 00:31, 18 October 2014

Stanford–Brown–Spelman iGEM 2014 — Cellulose Acetate

Approach & Methods


Figure 1. An illustration of cellulose binding domains cross-linking cellulose fibers with a streptavidin domain in the middle. The biosensing cell is expressing a biotinylated AviTag which will bind to the streptavidin .


Our initial approach was to use the cellulose binding domains from C. cellulovorans (part BBa_K863111) on either side of the streptavidin domain (part BBa_K283010) under a T7 promoter in the PSB1A3 backbone.We also included a His-Tag for protein purification. The protein is then expressed in E. coli . Once purified, the cross-linking protein is tested on bacterial cellulose we grew in our lab from the organism G. hansenii. By dotting the protein on the cellulose, the cellulose binding domains will bind to the cellulose fibers and leave the streptavidin domain unbound and ready to bind biotin.
Results
Using the same cellulose binding domain on either side of the streptavidin caused problems that lead us to revaluate our approach. Due to the repetitive nature of the sequence and potential homologous recombination, we had many issues with molecular cloning. We changed our approach to using two different cellulose-binding domains with different sequences. The first cellulose binding domain remained the same, but rather than repeating that same sequence on the other side of the streptavidin, we instead used the cellulose anchoring protein cohesin from the organism C. cellulovorans This allowed us to successfully conduct the molecular cloning.


Figure 2. Sequencing data for the cross-linking protein. The solid green bar indicates a perfect match between our sequence and the expected sequence.The first 1000 base pairs are sequenced in this forward sequence.


Figure 3. Sequencing data for the cross-linking protein. The solid green bar indicates a perfect match between our sequence and the expected sequence.The last 1000 base pairs are sequenced in this reverse sequence. This in combination with the perfect sequencing of the first 1000 base pairs shows our construct matches the CBD-Streptavidin-CBD protein exactly.
After obtaining a good sequence and inducing the protein with IPTG, we used a procedure similar to a western blot to test for functionality. After dotting the protein on bacterial cellulose and incubating with skim milk, unbound proteins were washed off with TBS buffer. The cellulose was then incubated with Biotin (5-fluorescein) conjugate which would bind to the streptavidin domain. While our results are still inconclusive, if we can detect fluorescence on the cellulose sheet, we will know that the cellulose binding domains are functional. The biotin conjugate will only bind to the streptavidin domain which will only be present on the cellulose sheet if the binding domains are functional.
References
1. Linder M et al. (1996) The cellulose-binding domain of the major cellobiohydrolase of Trichoderma reesei exhibits true reversibility and a high exchange rate on crystalline cellulose. PNAS 93: 12251-12255. PMID: PMC37976.

2. Chivers CE et al. (2011) How the biotin–streptavidin interaction was made even stronger: investigation via crystallography and a chimaeric tetramer. Biochem.J. 435: 55-63. PMID: 21241253.
Built atop Foundation. Content & Development © Stanford–Brown–Spelman iGEM 2014.