Team:StanfordBrownSpelman/Cellulose Cross Linker

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 78: Line 78:
<h6>More methods here.
<h6>More methods here.
 +
 +
 +
</div></div>
 +
<div class="small-7 small-centered columns"><br><center><img src="https://2014.igem.org/File:Cellulose_cross_linker.png"><br>
 +
<h6><center>Image description goes here.</center></h6>
 +
  </div>
 +
<div class="row">
 +
  <div id="subheader" class="small-8 small-centered columns"> 
  
  
-
<div class="sub4"><a href="work/PUT-PDF-REFERENCE-HEREpdf" target="_blank"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/2/25/SBS_iGEM_2014_download.png"></a><a href="work/PUT-PDF-REFERENCE-HEREpdf">Click here to go to our project journal, which details our design and engineering process and included descriptions of the protocols we developed and used.</a></div>
+
<div class="sub4"><a href="work/PUT-PDF-REFERENCE-HEREpdf" target="_blank"><img src=""></a><a href="work/PUT-PDF-REFERENCE-HEREpdf">Click here to go to our project journal, which details our design and engineering process and included descriptions of the protocols we developed and used.</a></div>
   </h6>
   </h6>
   </div>
   </div>
Line 98: Line 106:
   <h5><center>Results</h5>
   <h5><center>Results</h5>
   <h6>
   <h6>
-
   Our initial approach was to include two identical cellulose-binding domains on either side of the streptavidin domain. However, this led to numerous problems with molecular cloning due to the repetitive nature of the sequence. We changed our approach to using two cellulose-binding domains with different sequences. This allowed us to successfully conduct the molecular cloning.  
+
   Our initial approach was to include two identical cellulose-binding domains on either side of the streptavidin domain. Due to the repetitive nature of the sequence and potential homologous recombination, we had many issues with molecular cloning. We changed our approach to using two different cellulose-binding domains with different sequences. This allowed us to successfully conduct the molecular cloning.  
   </h6>
   </h6>
   </div>
   </div>

Revision as of 19:44, 16 October 2014

Stanford–Brown–Spelman iGEM 2014 — Cellulose Acetate

Methods
Methods here.


Figure 1. Figure caption here.
More methods here.


Image description goes here.
Results
Our initial approach was to include two identical cellulose-binding domains on either side of the streptavidin domain. Due to the repetitive nature of the sequence and potential homologous recombination, we had many issues with molecular cloning. We changed our approach to using two different cellulose-binding domains with different sequences. This allowed us to successfully conduct the molecular cloning.
References
1. M Linder and T T Teeri (1996) The cellulose-binding domain of the major cellobiohydrolase of Trichoderma reesei exhibits true reversibility and a high exchange rate on crystalline cellulose. PNAS 122251 PMID: 24136966.

2. Claire E. CHIVERS, Apurba L. KONER, Edward D. LOWE and Mark HOWARTH (2011) How the biotin–streptavidin interaction was made even stronger: investigation via crystallography and a chimaeric tetramerBiochem.J. 55 PMID: 2981802.
Additional Information
Try to avoid having any additional information here. We're trying to keep our site organized, clean, and compelling!
Built atop Foundation. Content &amp Development © Stanford–Brown–Spelman iGEM 2014.